Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Background

Noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) is recommended as the initial mode of ventilation to treat acute respiratory failure in patients with AECOPD. The Noninvasive Ventilation Outcomes (NIVO) score has been proposed to evaluate the prognosis in patients with AECOPD requiring assisted NIV. However, it is not validated in Chinese patients.

Methods

We used data from the MAGNET AECOPD Registry study, which is a prospective, noninterventional, multicenter, real-world study conducted between September 2017 and July 2021 in China. Data for the potential risk factors of mortality were collected and the NIVO score was calculated, and the in-hospital mortality was evaluated using the NIVO risk score.

Results

A total of 1164 patients were included in the study, and 57 patients (4.9%) died during their hospital stay. Multiple logistic regression analysis revealed that age ≥75 years, DBP <60 mmHg, Glasgow Coma Scale ≤14, anemia and BUN >7 mmol/L were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. The in-hospital mortality was associated with an increase in the risk level of NIVO score and the difference was statistically significant (p < .001). The NIVO risk score showed an acceptable accuracy for predicting the in-hospital mortality in AECOPD requiring assisted NIV (AUC: 0.657, 95% CI: 0.584-0.729, p < .001).

Conclusion

Our findings identified predictors of mortality in patients with AECOPD receiving NIV, providing useful information to identify severe patients and guide the management of AECOPD. The NIVO score showed an acceptable predictive value for AECOPD receiving NIV in Chinese patients, and additional studies are needed to develop and validate predictive scores based on specific populations.

Keywords

Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease noninvasive mechanical ventilation in-hospital mortality noninvasive ventilation outcomes score chronic obstructive pulmonary disease

Introduction

Acute exacerbations of COPD (AECOPD) is the third leading cause of death worldwide and brings significant economic and social burden.¹ Given that patients with AECOPD may experience hypoxia and hypercapnic respiratory failure, there is a strong need to provide respiratory support to improve oxygenation and acute respiratory acidosis.² Noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) can decrease work of breathing and improve breathing co‐ordination, which is recommended as the initial mode of ventilation to treat acute respiratory failure in patients with AECOPD.^3,4 Evidence clearly demonstrates that NIV is associated with lower risk of mortality, decreased risk of intubation, prolonged the time to readmission, and fewer complications.^5–7

Several risk factors independently associated with in-hospital mortality have been identified in patients with AECOPD, including older age, comorbidities, cardiac dysfunction, blood eosinophils and blood urea nitrogen (BUN).^8–12 However, few studies have specifically aimed at exploring the independent prognostic factors among inpatients with AECOPD requiring assisted NIV. In a multicenter study, extended Medical Research Council Dyspnoea (eMRCD) score, time from admission to acidaemia, pH, presence of atrial fibrillation, Glasgow coma scale and chest radiograph consolidation were found to be associated with in-hospital mortality, and a simple scoring system- Noninvasive Ventilation Outcomes (NIVO) score had been proposed to evaluate the poor prognosis in AECOPD requiring assisted NIV.¹³ Although NIVO score allows for accurate risk stratification of patients admitted to hospital with AECOPD who required assisted NIV, it was conducted in non-Asian populations. Given the regional and ethnic differences, validation of the NIVO score in Chinese patients is warranted for clinical practice in China.

The specific objectives of the present study are to: (1) determine the risk factors affecting all cause in-hospital mortality in patients with AECOPD requiring assisted NIV, and (2) preliminarily assess the discriminate capacity of NIVO score in a prospective multicenter cohort study in China.

Methods

Study design and subjects

The MAGNET AECOPD (MAnaGement aNd advErse ouTcomes in inpatients with acute exacerbation of COPD) Registry study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: ChiCTR2100044625) was a prospective, noninterventional, multicenter cohort study enrolling consecutive inpatients with AECOPD among 10 tertiary hospitals in China between September 2017 and July 2021. The major aims of this registry study were to investigate the management and adverse outcomes of inpatients with AECOPD, and to establish and validate the early warning models of these adverse outcomes. The research results of the MAGNET AECOPD Registry study have been published previously.^14–17 In the present study, inclusion criteria: (1) AECOPD as primary diagnosis; (2) pre-admission spirometry evidence of airflow obstruction (forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) < 0.7); (3) acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (pH < 7.35 or partial pressure of carbon dioxide (PaCO2) > 45 mmHg) treated with assisted NIV. Exclusion criteria were patients without acute hypercapnic respiratory failure and data missed. No additional direct intervention was performed. The study protocol was approved by the institutional review boards of West China Hospital of Sichuan University (20191056). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.

Data collection and NIVO score

A standardized case report form was completed for every enrolled patient, including demographic characteristics, comorbidities, vital signs, routine blood tests, biochemical tests, arterial blood gases and radiographic findings. Demographic characteristic included age, gender, body mass index (BMI) and smoking status. Comorbidities recorded were: hypertension, coronary heart disease (CHD) and chronic heart failure (CHF), atrial fibrillation, diabetes, chronic kidney disease, interstitial lung disease, pulmonary heart disease, and cancer. Details of comorbidities were obtained from the clinical records. Vital signs were recorded on admission: systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, heart rate, and Glasgow Coma Scale. We assessed the Medical Research Council dyspnoea scale (MRCD) instead of eMRCD for the COPD patients in stable condition, patients with MRCD 5 who require long-term bed rest were defined as eMRCD 5b and the rest were defined as eMRCD 5a. Blood tests included hemoglobin and white cell count, platelet count, eosinophil ratio (EOSR%), C reactive protein, albumin, D-dimers, N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-pro BNP), BUN and uric acid. Arterial blood gas data and time to acidaemia were also recorded. Radiologic findings included consolidation and pleural effusion detected by chest radiograph or computed tomography (CT).

Six risk factors used to calculate the NIVO score were captured from the date of admission, and the individual scores of each risk factor were summed to generate a cumulative risk score that defined the patient’s risk level: low risk (score 0-2), medium risk (score 3–4), high risk (score 5–6), and very high risk (score 7-9). The NIVO score and risk category were calculated by two study operators who received in-depth training to ensure data reliability. The disagreements were resolved by consensus or by consultation with a third assessor.

Study outcomes

The primary outcome was all cause in-hospital mortality after receiving NIV. The secondary outcomes included invasive mechanical ventilation and ICU admission during hospital stay. All clinical outcomes were adjudicated by the independent clinical event committee composed of three experienced physicians.

Statistical analysis

Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages, and continuous variables are expressed as mean ± standard deviation or median and interquartile range. The independent Student’s t test was used to assess differences between continuous variables and the Mann–Whitney U test was used for data that were not normally distributed. The chi-squared test was used to analyze categorical variables.

Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify the predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with AECOPD requiring assisted NIV, and odds ratio (OR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI) was calculated to assess the discriminatory power of these parameters. The in-hospital mortality in inpatients enrolled in the study with different risk levels by the NIVO score was compared using the chi-square test. We estimated the discriminative power of NIVO score in predicting the in-hospital overall mortality by calculating the area under the ROC curve (AUC) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All data were analyzed by using SPSS 25.0 (IBM, NY, USA), and p-values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.

Results

Study population

Between September 2017 and July 2021, a total of 14007 patients admitted for AECOPD were enrolled in the MAGNET AECOPD Registry study registration study. 2811 patients requiring assisted NIV were initially screened for inclusion in this study, of which 1647 patients were excluded because of the following reasons: (1) patients without acute hypercapnic respiratory failure (n = 1578); (2) data missed (n = 69). Ultimately, 1164 patients were enrolled in the final analysis, 57 patients (4.9%) died during their hospital stay, 23 patients (2.0%) discharged against medical advice, and 1084 patients (93.1%) were discharged after showing improvement (Figure 1).

Figure 1.

Flow chart of the study (Abbreviations: AECOPD = Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease).

Clinical characteristics of the study population

Patients were divided into survivors and non-survivors based on in-hospital mortality. Clinical characteristics of patients in the survival and non-survival groups are shown in Table 1. The average patient age was 71.79 ± 10.35 years, and 74.5% of the patients were male. Patients who died in the hospital tended to be older and have a higher median eMRCD score. No significant differences were witnessed in gender, BMI and smoking status. Additionally, there were significant differences in the prevalence of comorbidities, including hypertension, chronic heart failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney diseases between the two groups, which were more frequently observed in non-survivors than in survivors (all p < .05). Regarding vital signs on admission, non-survivors tended to have lower diastolic blood pressure (DBP) as well as higher rate of altered mental status (all p < .05). Anemia was more common in non-survivors than in survivors. Non-survivors had higher level of BUN as well as lower albumin level. Compared with patients who survived, those died in the hospital had a higher proportion of acidaemia and pleural effusion. No observable difference was identified in consolidation between the two groups.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the AECOPD patients requiring assisted noninvasive ventilation.

Variables	Total (N = 1164)	Survivors (n = 1107)	Non-survivors (n = 57)	p value
Age, years	71.79 ± 10.35	71.35 ± 10.28	80.24 ± 7.90	<0.001
Age ≥75 years	491 (42.2)	447 (40.4)	44 (77.2)	<0.001
Gender				0.887
Male	867 (74.5)	825 (74.5)	42 (73.7)
Female	297 (25.5)	282 (25.5)	15 (26.3)
BMI, kg/m2	21.25 ± 4.49	21.28 ± 4.52	20.67 ± 3.63	0.471
Smoking status				0.437
Never smoker	396 (34.5)	379 (34.7)	17 (30.4)
Former smoker	542 (47.2)	511 (46.8)	31 (55.4)
Current smoker	211 (18.4)	203 (18.6)	8 (14.3)
eMRCD score	4 (4-5a)	4 (4-5a)	5a (4-5a)	0.045
Comorbidities
Hypertension	433 (37.2)	399 (36.0)	34 (59.6)	<0.001
Coronary heart disease	103 (8.8)	95 (8.6)	8 (14.0)	0.157
Chronic heart failure	204 (17.5)	185 (16.7)	19 (33.3)	0.001
Atrial fibrillation	84 (7.2)	73 (6.6)	11 (19.3)	<0.001
Diabetes	217 (18.6)	206 (18.6)	11 (19.3)	0.896
Chronic kidney diseases	71 (6.1)	59 (5.3)	12 (21.1)	<0.001
Interstitial lung disease	26 (2.2)	23 (2.1)	3 (5.3)	0.130
Pulmonary heart disease	521 (44.8)	492 (44.4)	29 (50.9)	0.341
Cancer	39 (3.4)	35 (3.2)	4 (7.0)	0.119
SBP, mmHg	131.96 ± 21.23	132.12 ± 21.14	128.89 ± 22.76	0.263
SBP <100 mmHg	65 (5.6)	61 (5.5)	4 (7.0)	0.554
DBP, mmHg	76.92 ± 13.57	77.39 ± 13.30	67.75 ± 15.62	<0.001
DBP <60 mmHg	106 (9.1)	89 (8.0)	17 (29.8)	<0.001
Glasgow coma scale score ≤14	124 (10.7)	103 (9.3)	21 (36.8)	<0.001
HR, beats/min	93.64 ± 17.02	93.58 ± 16.83	94.93 ± 20.39	0.624
HR ≥100 beats/min	414 (35.6)	392 (35.4)	22 (38.6)	0.624
Hb, g/L	131.25 ± 26.41	132.41 ± 25.80	109.05 ± 28.17	<0.001
Anemia	299 (26.0)	264 (24.2)	35 (61.4)	<0.001
WBC, ×10⁹/L	7.9 (6.0-10.8)	7.9 (6.0-10.8)	9.2 (6.4-13.7)	0.021
WBC >10 × 10⁹/L	341 (29.7)	320 (29.3)	21 (36.8)	0.225
Platelet, ×10⁹/L	165.0 (124.0-225.0)	165.0 (124.0-225.0)	151.0 (112.0-229.5)	0.730
Platelet <100 × 10⁹/L	163 (14.2)	152 (14.0)	11 (19.3)	0.263
EOSR, %	0.4 (0.0-1.7)	0.4 (0.0-1.7)	0.3 (0.0-1.0)	0.120
EOSR <2%	889 (78.3)	841 (77.9)	48 (84.2)	0.264
CRP, mg/L	13.3 (5.3-46.3)	12.5 (5.0-44.1)	29.1 (9.2-76.4)	0.054
Albumin, g/L	36.34 ± 5.52	36.44 ± 5.50	34.34 ± 5.43	0.005
Albumin<30 g/L	124 (10.8)	111 (10.2)	13 (22.8)	0.003
D-dimers, mg/L	1.0 (0.5-2.2)	1.0 (0.5-2.1)	2.1 (1.2-4.2)	0.158
NT-proBNP, pg/ml	824.0 (214.7-2576.8)	780.0 (194.9-2524.8)	1620.5 (668.8-4577.8)	0.837
BUN, mmol/L	6.3 (4.5-8.9)	6.2 (4.5-8.7)	8.7 (6.9-13.9)	0.001
BUN >7 mmol/L	449 (40.2)	408 (38.3)	41 (75.9)	<0.001
PH	7.37 (7.33-7.41)	7.37 (7.33-7.41)	7.36 (7.30-7.41)	0.181
PH<7.25	42 (3.6)	36 (3.3)	6 (10.5)	0.004
PaO2, mmHg	83.0 (66.5-110.4)	82.7 (66.2-110.0)	89.9 (71.4-121.2)	0.143
PaCO2, mmHg	60.9 (51.8-72.2)	61.0 (52.0-72.1)	59.7 (50.4-74.1)	0.755
Chest radiograph consolidation	119 (10.2)	112 (10.1)	7 (12.3)	0.599
Pleural effusion	395 (33.9)	365 (33.0)	30 (52.6)	0.002
Invasive mechanical ventilation	129 (11.1)	109 (9.8)	20 (35.1)	<0.001
ICU Admission	196 (16.8)	174 (15.7)	22 (38.6)	<0.001
LOS	12 (8-17)	11 (8-16)	20 (11-31)	0.013

Data are presented as the number of patients (%); mean ± standard deviation; median (interquartile range).

Abbreviations: AECOPD = acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; BMI = body mass index; eMRCD = extended Medical Research Council Dyspnoea; SBP = systolic blood pressure; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; HR = heart rate; Hb = hemoglobin; WBC = white blood cell; EOSR = eosinophil ratio; CRP = C-reactive protein; NT-pro BNP = N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide; BUN = blood urea nitrogen; ICU = intensive care unit; LOS = length of stay.

Note: Anemia: hemoglobin is less than 12 g/L in females and hemoglobin is less than 13 g/L in males.

Independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality

To identify factors that could potentially be associated with the all cause in-hospital mortality in AECOPD requiring assisted NIV, we performed a multivariate logistic regression analysis with age, eMRCD score, hypertension, chronic heart failure, atrial fibrillation, chronic kidney diseases, DBP, Glasgow Coma Scale, anemia, albumin, BUN, PH and pleural effusion as candidate predictive factors based on the results of the univariate analysis (all p < .05). We found that age ≥75 years (OR = 2.634; 95% CI: 1.295–5.355, p = .007), DBP <60 mmHg (OR = 2.459; 95% CI: 1.167–5.183, p = .018), Glasgow Coma Scale ≤14 (OR = 3.122; 95% CI: 1.597–6.104, p = .001), anemia (OR = 3.543; 95% CI: 1.849–6.792, p < .001), and BUN >7 mmol/L (OR = 2.538; 95% CI: 1.254–5.135, p = .010) were independent predictors of in-hospital mortality (Table 2).

Table 2.

Multivariate analysis for predictors of in-hospital mortality in AECOPD requiring assisted noninvasive ventilation.

Variable	OR	95%CI	p
Age ≥75 years	2.634	1.295-5.355	0.007
DBP <60 mmHg	2.459	1.167-5.183	0.018
Glasgow coma scale score ≤14	3.122	1.597-6.104	0.001
Anemia	3.543	1.849-6.792	<0.001
BUN >7 mmol/L	2.538	1.254-5.135	0.010

Abbreviations: AECOPD = acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; DBP = diastolic blood pressure; BUN = blood urea nitrogen.

Note: Anemia: hemoglobin is less than 12 g/L in females and hemoglobin is less than 13 g/L in males.

Validation of the NIVO risk score

Table 3 shows the characteristics of the AECOPD patients with each variable in NIVO score. The odds ratios for patients with a Glasgow Coma Scale ≤14 and a history of atrial fibrillation in the cohort were 5.686 (95% CI 3.199–10.106) and 3.387 (95% CI 1.683–6.816), respectively. Of the 1164 AECOPD patients, 42 (3.6%) patients had a pH< 7.25 with an odds ratio of 3.50, and 120 (10.3%) had a score of eMRCD 5b with an odds ratio of 2.467. The relationship between other variables (chest radiograph consolidation, time to acidaemia >12 h and eMRCD 5a) with in-hospital mortality in the cohort were not significant.

Table 3.

Risk factors of NIVO score in AECOPD patients.

Risk score	Variable	Point	Events/n (%)	OR (95%CI)	p
NIVO score	Chest radiograph consolidation	1	119 (10.2)	1.244 (0.551-2.809)	0.600
	Glasgow coma scale ≤14	1	124 (10.7)	5.686 (3.199-10.106)	<0.001
	Atrial fibrillation	1	84 (7.2)	3.387 (1.683-6.816)	0.001
	pH < 7.25	1	42 (3.6)	3.500 (1.411-8.684)	0.007
	Time to acidaemia >12 h	2	333 (28.6)	1.486 (0.854-2.586)	0.161
	eMRCD 5a	2	436 (37.5)	0.973 (0.560-1.689)	0.922
	eMRCD 5b	3	120 (10.3)	2.467 (1.266-4.806)	0.008

Abbreviations: NIVO score = noninvasive ventilation outcomes score; eMRCD = extended Medical Research Council Dyspnoea.

The patients were divided into four groups according to the NIVO risk score: 778 patients (66.8%) were rated as low-risk, 288 patients (24.7%) as medium-risk, 92 (7.9%) as high-risk, and 6 (0.5%) as very high-risk. The all cause in-hospital mortality was associated with an increase in the risk level: of the patients in the low-risk level, 3.2% died in hospital; among the medium-risk patients, 7.3% died in hospital; among the high-risk patients, 10.9% died in hospital; and among the very high-risk patients, 16.7% died in hospital (Table 4 and Figure 2). The difference among the risk groups was statistically significant (p < .001). Based on the ROC curve analysis, the NIVO risk score showed an acceptable accuracy for predicting the in-hospital mortality in AECOPD requiring assisted NIV (AUC: 0.657, 95% CI: 0.584–0.729, p < .001) (Figure 3).

Table 4.

Association between in-hospital mortality of AECOPD and risk levels of NIVO score.

	Risk level	n, %	In-hospital mortality	p-value
NIVO score	Low (0–2)	778 (66.8)	25 (3.2%)	0.001
	Medium (3–4)	288 (24.7)	21 (7.3%)
	High (5–6)	92 (7.9)	10 (10.9%)
	Very high (7–9)	6 (0.5)	1 (16.7%)

Abbreviations: AECOPD = acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; NIVO score = noninvasive ventilation outcomes score.

Figure 2.

The in-hospital mortality by risk levels of NIVO score (Abbreviations: NIVO score = noninvasive ventilation outcomes score).

Figure 3.

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve of the NIVO score. (Abbreviations: NIVO score = noninvasive ventilation outcomes score).

Discussion

Acute hypercapnic respiratory failure is recognized as a very severe condition, with associated mortality as high as 20%–25% in AECOPD patients.¹³ The use of NIV is preferred as the initial mode of ventilation to treat acute respiratory failure in patients hospitalized for AECOPD and showed a success rate of 80%–85%,^18–20 However, which variables could predict poor outcomes in AECOPD patients after receiving NIV remained to be elucidated. In this study, we explored factors contributed to a higher in-hospital mortality in a prospective multicenter cohort of 1164 AECOPD patients requiring assisted NIV. The results showed age ≥75 years, DBP <60 mmHg, Glasgow Coma Scale ≤14, anemia and BUN >7 mmol/L were associated with higher odds of all cause in-hospital mortality.

Our findings suggest that five different factors can affect outcome in patients with AECOPD after requiring assisted NIV. The first factor is advanced age, possibly reflecting diminished functional reserve or immune system senescence, supporting the findings of a previous study in patients with AECOPD in Spain.⁸ A meta-analysis including 189,772 study subjects also found that advanced age weas significantly associated with increased short-term mortality in patients with AECOPD.²¹ The second factor, lower DBP, is an explicit and independent risk factor for the development of cardiovascular diseases.^22,23 Myocardial hypoperfusion and damage could be caused by a lower DBP because of the fact that 85% of left ventricular perfusion occurs during diastole.¹⁶ James et al. found that a ‘U-shaped’ relationship between DBP and all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events exists in patients with COPD and heightened cardiovascular risk, in which in reference to DBP within 80∼90 mmHg, lower or higher DBP were both significantly associated with a higher risk of death in the follow-up period.²⁴ The third factor, Glasgow Coma Scale ≤14, reflect physiological derangement and are frequently included in ICU-specific severity scores.²⁵ A low Glasgow Coma Scale score could exacerbate CO2 retention and oxygen deficiency, which has been associated with increased mortality in ICU-admitted AECOPD patients.²⁶ The fourth possible factor is anemia. Anemic COPD patients could increase hypoxic changes, and prolong systemic inflammatory response.²⁷ In a study by Martinez-Rivera et al, the prevalence of anemia was 33%, multivariate analysis showed that anemia was an independent predictor of mortality in patients hospitalized for AECOPD.²⁸ Putcha et al. showed that AECOPD with anemia had a significantly higher burden of cardiac and metabolic comorbidities, worse exercise capacity, greater dyspnea, and greater disease severity compared with those without anemia.²⁹ The results of the present study were consistent with previous studies. This finding is not surprising: typically, anemia should be used as an important variable in future scoring systems for AECOPD. BUN >7 mmol/L is the fifth risk factor for in-hospital mortality in patients AECOPD requiring assisted NIV. An association between BUN and increased mortality in AECOPD has been reported in several studies.^17,30 The probable reasons for this association were activation of the sympathetic nerve systems and renal dysfunction.¹⁷

In 2021, Hartley et al proposed a noninvasive ventilation outcomes risk score by incorporating a combination of eMRCD scale, atrial fibrillation, PH, time to acidaemia, Glasgow Coma Scale and chest radiograph consolidation, and verified its predictive value in a 10-centre western population of AECOPD patients requiring assisted ventilation.¹³ However, it is not validated in an Asian cohort. In this study, we validate this risk score in a Chinese cohort of patients with AECOPD receiving NIV and confirmed its value in predicting adverse outcomes. In this very large cohort of prospectively enrolled patients with AECOPD having relatively high NIV occurrence, the increases in the risk level were accompanied by increases in the in-hospital mortality for NIVO score, which suggested that NIVO score can stratify the mortality risk in inpatients with AECOPD receiving NIV effectively. However, the NIVO Score in our study showed moderate discrimination (AUC 0.657, 95% CI: 0.584–0.729), comparable to that observed in the western multiple-center validation cohort (AUC 0.79, 95% CI 0.75–0.83). Male bias may be one of the reasons for the differences, the percentage of males in our study was 74.5%, much higher than that of Hartley et al. There are sex differences in clinical characteristics, treatments and outcomes of COPD, which may affect the predictive accuracy of NIVO score. In addition, we noted that the NIVO score, unlike our study, used the treating clinicians’ interpretation of the radiology findings, not the report of a radiologist. The treating clinician was the one who defined the treatment plan (not the radiologist), so their actions changed the outcome of the patient. Radiology reports were often time delayed and therefore not always available contemporaneously. Considering the only moderate performance of NIVO score, its clinical implementation may be of limited usefulness for the clinician. Further improvement is necessary, possibly by adding additional biomarkers such as diastolic blood pressure, anemia and blood urea nitrogen.

To our knowledge this is the first large-scale multicenter study that assessed risk factors for in-hospital mortality in patients with AECOPD receiving NIV and discriminated capacity of NIVO score in patients with AECOPD in China. The prospective and consecutive inclusion of unselected inpatients with AECOPD in our study ensured high data quality, and comprehensive information, including baseline demographics, comorbidities and laboratory tests, were probed into prognostic analysis. These results, therefore, reflect true associations in the real-world setting. Nevertheless, our study has several limitations. First, because patients with AECOPD generally have poor breathing status and cannot afford the pulmonary function test, and related data from stable stage were missing for many patients, thus, parameters of pulmonary function were not included into our analysis. Second, this is a post-hoc secondary analysis of data from the MAGNET AECOPD Registry study, the differences in the definition of eMRCD may affect the accuracy of NIVO score. So the results should be interpreted with caution and deserve to be verified in future prospective studies. Third, the lack of follow-up data prevented us from further evaluating the risk factors with long-term outcome of AECOPD patients receiving NIV. Fourth, we did not analyze the impact of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on excess mortality in patients with AECOPD. COVID-19 has no large-scale epidemic in China under strict epidemic prevention and control measures during the study period. Additionally, COVID-19 patients were admitted to designated hospitals rather than research centers involved in this study. Therefore, the outbreak of COVID-19 has little impact on the outcomes of this study.

Conclusion

In this large cohort study, our findings identified predictors of in-hospital mortality in patients with AECOPD receiving NIV, providing useful information to improve understanding of disease severity and support the decision-making process. The NIVO score showed an acceptable predictive value for AECOPD receiving NIV in Chinese patients, additional studies aiming to develop and validate predictive scores based on specific populations is needed.

Footnotes

Author contributions

Jiarui Zhang: Data curation; Formal analysis; Writing – original draft; Writing – review & editing.

Qun Yi: Conceptualization; Funding acquisition; Supervision; Writing – review & editing

Chen Zhou: Data curation; Methodology; Writing – review & editing.

Yuanming Luo: Data curation; Methodology; Writing – review & editing.

Hailong Wei: Investigation; Resources; Writing – original draft.

Huiqing Ge: Investigation; Resources; Writing – original draft.

Huiguo Liu: Investigation; Software; Writing – original draft.

Jianchu Zhang: Resources; Writing – original draft.

Xianhua Li: Resources; Writing – original draft.

Pinhua Pan: Investigation; Writing – original draft.

Mengqiu Yi: Investigation; Writing – original draft.

Lina Cheng: Investigation; Writing – original draft.

Liang Liu: Investigation; Writing – original raft.

Adila Aili: Investigation; Writing – original draft.

Yu Liu: Investigation; Data curation; Writing – original draft.

Lige Peng: Investigation; Writing – original draft.

Jiaqi Pu: Investigation; Writing – original draft.

Haixia Zhou: Conceptualization; Funding acquisition; Supervision; Writing – original draft; Writing – review & editing.

Declaration of conflicting interests

The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (82170013), the Sichuan Science and Technology Program (2022YFS0262) and the National Key Research Program of China (2016YFC1304202).

Ethical statement

Clinical trial registration

Chinese Clinical Trail Registry NO.: ChiCTR2100044625; URL:

ORCID iD

Haixia Zhou

Data availability statement

The data will be shared on reasonable request to the corresponding author.*

References

World Health Organisation . The top 10 causes of death. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/the-top-10-causes-of-death.

Daher

Dreher

. Oxygen therapy and noninvasive ventilation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Clin Chest Med 2020; 41(3): 529–545.

Davidson

Banham

Elliott

, et al. BTS/ICS guideline for the ventilatory management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure in adults. Thorax 2016; 71(Suppl 2): ii1–35.

Rochwerg

Brochard

Elliott

, et al. Official ERS/ATS clinical practice guidelines: noninvasive ventilation for acute respiratory failure. Eur Respir J 2017; 50(2).

Wilson

Dobler

Morrow

, et al. Association of home noninvasive positive pressure ventilation with clinical outcomes in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA 2020; 323(5): 455–465.

Murphy

Rehal

Arbane

, et al. Effect of home noninvasive ventilation with oxygen therapy vs oxygen therapy alone on hospital readmission or death after an acute COPD exacerbation: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2017; 317(21): 2177–2186.

Ram

Picot

Lightowler

, et al. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation for treatment of respiratory failure due to exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2004; 1: Cd004104.

Crisafulli

Manco

Guerrero

, et al. Age is a determinant of short-term mortality in patients hospitalized for an acute exacerbation of COPD. Intern Emerg Med 2021; 16(2): 401–408.

Roche

Chavaillon

Maurer

, et al. A clinical in-hospital prognostic score for acute exacerbations of COPD. Respir Res 2014; 15(1): 99.

10.

Spannella

Giulietti

Cocci

, et al. Acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in oldest adults: predictors of in-hospital mortality and need for post-acute care. J Am Med Dir Assoc 2019; 20(7): 893–898.

11.

Cui

Zhang

, et al. Stability of blood eosinophils in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and its relationship to clinical outcomes: a prospective cohort study. Respir Res 2021; 22(1): 301.

12.

Giri

, et al. Blood urea nitrogen is associated with in-hospital mortality in critically ill patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a propensity score matching analysis. J Clin Med 2022; 11(22): 6709.

13.

Hartley

Lane

Steer

, et al. The Noninvasive Ventilation Outcomes (NIVO) score: prediction of in-hospital mortality in exacerbations of COPD requiring assisted ventilation. Eur Respir J 2021; 58(2): 2004042.

14.

Zhou

, et al. Validation of risk assessment models predicting venous thromboembolism in inpatients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multicenter cohort study in China. Thromb Haemostasis 2022; 122(7): 1177–1185.

15.

Luo

, et al. Blood eosinophils and clinical outcomes in inpatients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a prospective cohort study. Int J Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis 2023; 18: 169–179.

16.

Zhou

Luo

, et al. Low diastolic blood pressure and adverse outcomes in inpatients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a multicenter cohort study. Chin Med J (Engl) 2023; 136(8): 941–950.

17.

Zhang

Qin

Zhou

, et al. Elevated BUN upon admission as a predictor of in-hospital mortality among patients with acute exacerbation of COPD: a secondary analysis of multicenter cohort study. Int J Chronic Obstr Pulm Dis 2023; 18: 1445–1455.

18.

Osadnik

Tee

Carson-Chahhoud

, et al. Non-invasive ventilation for the management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure due to exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2017; 7(7): Cd004104.

19.

Brochard

Mancebo

Wysocki

, et al. Noninvasive ventilation for acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med 1995; 333(13): 817–822.

20.

Meyer

Hill

. Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation to treat respiratory failure. Ann Intern Med 1994; 120(9): 760–770.

21.

Singanayagam

Schembri

Chalmers

. Predictors of mortality in hospitalized adults with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2013; 10(2): 81–89.

22.

Böhm

Schumacher

Teo

, et al. Achieved diastolic blood pressure and pulse pressure at target systolic blood pressure (120-140 mmHg) and cardiovascular outcomes in high-risk patients: results from ONTARGET and TRANSCEND trials. Eur Heart J 2018; 39(33): 3105–3114.

23.

Choi

Kim

Kang

, et al. Reconsidering the cut-off diastolic blood pressure for predicting cardiovascular events: a nationwide population-based study from Korea. Eur Heart J 2019; 40(9): 724–731.

24.

Byrd

Newby

Anderson

, et al. Blood pressure, heart rate, and mortality in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the SUMMIT trial. Eur Heart J 2018; 39(33): 3128–3134.

25.

Knaus

Draper

Wagner

, et al. Apache II: a severity of disease classification system. Crit Care Med 1985; 13(10): 818–829.

26.

Tabak

Sun

Johannes

, et al. Development and validation of a mortality risk-adjustment model for patients hospitalized for exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Med Care 2013; 51(7): 597–605.

27.

Ding

, et al. Effects of anemia on the survival of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Expet Rev Respir Med 2020; 14(12): 1267–1277.

28.

Martinez-Rivera

Portillo

Muñoz-Ferrer

, et al. Anemia is a mortality predictor in hospitalized patients for COPD exacerbation. COPD 2012; 9(3): 243–250.

29.

Putcha

Fawzy

Paul

, et al. Anemia and adverse outcomes in a chronic obstructive pulmonary disease population with a high burden of comorbidities. An analysis from SPIROMICS. Ann Am Thorac Soc 2018; 15(6): 710–717.

30.

Chen

Zheng

, et al. The association of blood urea nitrogen levels upon emergency admission with mortality in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Chron Respir Dis 2021; 18: 14799731211060051.

Risk factors of in-hospital mortality and discriminating capacity of NIVO score in exacerbations of COPD requiring noninvasive ventilation

Abstract

Background

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Keywords

Introduction

Methods

Study design and subjects

Data collection and NIVO score

Study outcomes

Statistical analysis

Results

Study population

Clinical characteristics of the study population

Independent risk factors for in-hospital mortality

Validation of the NIVO risk score

Discussion

Conclusion

Footnotes

Author contributions

Declaration of conflicting interests

Funding

Ethical statement

Clinical trial registration

ORCID iD

Data availability statement

References