Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online 2026-2
From Marginalized to Mainstream? An International Comparative Analysis of Gender Differences in Social Media Adoption and Activity by Politicians in Non-Election Times
Traditional media and party gatekeepers are found to restrict women's visibility and influence in politics. Social media, however, is seen as a potential means for women to overcome these obstacles, potentially leveling the playing field in politics. This study introduces two novel elements to the ongoing discussion by focusing on non-electoral periods and taking into account the contextual factor of political power for women. We analyze Twitter/X usage among 1246 MPs in four countries (Finland, Belgium, Germany, and Ireland) with varying political power scores for women throughout 2022. Contrary to our expectations, logistic and negative binomial regression models show no significant differences in Twitter/X adoption or activity between male and female politicians, or across countries. These results suggest that while social media does not significantly increase female politicians’ visibility, it also does not worsen existing communication disparities, indicating a potential stabilizing effect on gender inequalities in political communication.
AalderingLvan der PasDJ (2020) Political Leadership in the Media: Gender Bias in Leader Stereotypes during Campaign and Routine Times. British Journal of Political Science50 (3): 911–931.
2.
AltheideDSnowR (1979) Media Logic. Beverly Hills8: 1094–1096.
3.
BäckHDebusM (2019) When Do Women Speak? A Comparative Analysis of the Role of Gender in Legislative Debates. Political Studies67 (3): 576–596.
4.
BaekgaardMKjaerU (2012) The Gendered Division of Labor in Assignments to Political Committees: Discrimination or Self-Selection in Danish Local Politics?Politics & Gender8 (4): 465–482.
5.
BeltranJGallegoAHuidobroA, et al. (2021) Male and Female Politicians on Twitter: A Machine Learning Approach. European Journal of Political Research60 (1): 239–251.
6.
BosALGreenleeJSHolmanMR, et al. (2022) This One’s for the Boys: How Gendered Political Socialization Limits Girls’ Political Ambition and Interest. American Political Science Review116 (2): 484–501.
7.
BrunsAHighfieldT (2015) Is Habermas on Twitter?: Social Media and the Public Sphere. In: The Routledge Companion to Social Media and Politics. Routledge, pp.56–73.
8.
Castanho SilvaBProkschS-O (2022) Politicians Unleashed? Political Communication on Twitter and in Parliament in Western Europe. Political Science Research and Methods10 (4): 776–792.
9.
CeccobelliD (2018) Not Every Day Is Election Day: a Comparative Analysis of Eighteen Election Campaigns on Facebook. Journal of Information Technology & Politics15 (2): 122–141.
10.
CeccobelliDQuarantaMValerianiA (2020) Citizens’ Engagement with Popularization and with Populist Actors on Facebook: A Study on 52 Leaders in 18 Western Democracies. European Journal of Communication35 (5): 435–452.
11.
ChadwickA (2017) The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford University Press.
12.
de VetBDevroeR (2023a) Gender and Strategic Opposition Behavior: Patterns of Parliamentary Oversight in Belgium. Politics and Governance11 (1): NP97–107.
13.
de VetBDevroeR (2023b) Party Control Intraparty Competition, and the Substantive Focus of Women's Parliamentary Questions: Evidence from Belgium. Politics & Gender19 (1): 1–25.
14.
DolezalM (2015) Online Campaigning by Austrian Political Candidates: Determinants of Using Personal Websites Facebook, and Twitter. Policy & Internet7 (1): 103–119.
15.
ErnstNBlassnigSEngesserS, et al. (2019) Populists Prefer Social Media Over Talk Shows: An Analysis of Populist Messages and Stylistic Elements across Six Countries. Social Media+ Society5 (1): 2056305118823358.
EvansHKClarkJH (2016) “You Tweet Like a Girl!” How Female Candidates Campaign on Twitter. American Politics Research44 (2): 326–352.
18.
EvansHKOvalleJGreenS (2016) Rockin'robins: Do Congresswomen Rule the Roost in the Twittersphere?Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology67 (2): 268–275.
19.
GainousJWagnerKM (2013) Tweeting to Power: The Social Media Revolution in American Politics. Oxford University Press.
20.
GalaisCCardenalAS (2020) When David and Goliath Campaign Online: The Effects of Digital Media Use during Electoral Campaigns on Vote for Small Parties. In: Social Media Campaigning in Europe. Routledge, pp. 80–94.
21.
GibsonRKMcAllisterI (2015) Normalising or Equalising Party Competition? Assessing the Impact of the Web on Election Campaigning. Political Studies63 (3): 529–547.
22.
Guerrero-SoléFPerales-GarcíaC (2021) Bridging the Gap: How Gender Influences Spanish Politicians’ Activity on Twitter. Journalism and Media2 (3): 469–483.
23.
HackerKL (1996) Missing Links in the Evolution of Electronic Democratization. Media Culture & Society18 (2): 213–232.
24.
HeldmanCCarrollSJOlsonS (2005) “She Brought Only a Skirt”: Print Media Coverage of Elizabeth Dole's Bid for the Republican Presidential Nomination. Political Communication22 (3): 315–335.
25.
HolmMSkhiriYZetterbergP (2024) Political Institutions and the Gendered Use of Social Media among Political Candidates: Evidence from Tunisia. Journal of Information Technology & Politics21 (2): 1–14.
26.
JacksonNLillekerD (2011) Microblogging, Constituency Service and Impression Management: UK MPs and the Use of Twitter. The Journal of Legislative Studies17 (1): 86–105.
27.
JacobsKSpieringsN (2016) Social Media, Parties, and Political Inequalities. Springer.
28.
JacobsKSpieringsN (2019) A Populist Paradise? Examining Populists’ Twitter Adoption and Use. Information Communication & Society22 (12): 1681–1696.
29.
JanuszABarreiroS-NCintronE (2022) Political Parties and Campaign Resource Allocation: Gender Gaps in Brazilian Elections. Party Politics28 (5): 854–864.
30.
JenningsWWlezienC (2016) The Timeline of Elections: A Comparative Perspective. American Journal of Political Science60 (1): 219–233.
31.
JollySBakkerRHoogheL, et al. (2022) Chapel Hill Expert Survey. Electoral Studies75: 102420.
32.
JustMRCriglerAN (2014) Gender and Self-Presentation in Social Media: An Analysis of the 10 Most Competitive 2012 US Senate Races. APSA 2014 Annual Meeting Paper.
33.
KahnKF (1994) The Distorted Mirror: Press Coverage of Women Candidates for Statewide Office. The Journal of Politics56 (1): 154–173.
34.
KittilsonMCFridkinK (2008) Gender, Candidate Portrayals and Election Campaigns: A Comparative Perspective. Politics & Gender4 (3): 371–392.
35.
KlingerUSvenssonJ (2015) The Emergence of Network Media Logic in Political Communication: A Theoretical Approach. new media & society17 (8): 1241–1257.
36.
KlingerUSvenssonJ (2018) The End of Media Logics? On Algorithms and Agency. new media & society20 (12): 4653–4670.
37.
KroeberCHüffelmannJ (2022) It's a Long Way to the Top: Women's Ministerial Career Paths. Politics & Gender18 (3): 741–767.
38.
KrookML (2020) Violence against Women in Politics. Springer.
39.
KruikemeierSvan NoortGVliegenthartR, et al. (2015) Nederlandse Politici Op Twitter: Wie, Waarover, Wanneer En Met Welk Effect?Tijdschrift Voor Communicatiewetenschap43 (1).
40.
LarssonA (2015) The EU Parliament on Twitter—Assessing the Permanent Online Practices of Parliamentarians. Journal of Information Technology & Politics12 (2): 149–166.
41.
MachariaS (2020) Who Makes the News?: 6th Global Media Monitoring Project.
42.
MargolisMResnickD (2000) Politics as Usual, Vol. 6. Sage.
43.
MetagJMarcinkowskiF (2012) Strategic, Structural, and Individual Determinants of Online Campaigning in German Elections. Policy & Internet4 (3-4): 136–158.
44.
NorrisP (2003) Digital Divide: Civic Engagement, Information Poverty, and the Internet Worldwide. University of Toronto Press.
45.
NultyPTheocharisYPopaSA, et al. (2016) Social Media and Political Communication in the 2014 Elections to the European Parliament. Electoral Studies44: 429–444.
46.
RauchfleischAMetagJ (2016) The Special Case of Switzerland: Swiss Politicians on Twitter. new media & society18 (10): 2413–2431.
47.
RauchfleischAMetagJ (2020) Beyond Normalization and Equalization on Twitter: Politicians’ Twitter Use during Non-election Times and Influences of Media Attention. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies9 (2): 169–189.
48.
RossKFountaineSComrieM (2015) Facing Up to Facebook: Politicians, Publics and the Social Media (ted) Turn in New Zealand. Media Culture & Society37 (2): 251–269.
49.
SandbergLACÖhbergP (2017) The Role of Gender in Online Campaigning: Swedish Candidates’ Motives and Use of Social Media during the European Election 2014. Journal of Information Technology & Politics14 (4): 314–333.
StrandbergK (2013) A Social Media Revolution or Just a Case of History Repeating Itself? The Use of Social Media in the 2011 Finnish Parliamentary Elections. new media & society15 (8): 1329–1347.
52.
Stromer-GalleyJ (2000) On-Line Interaction and Why Candidates Avoid It. Journal of Communication50 (4): 111–132.
53.
TrillòTStaritaGD (2025). The middle region populism of Giorgia Meloni and Matteo Renzi on Instagram. The International Journal of Press/Politics30 (1): 122–144. https://doi.org/10.1177/19401612231186938
54.
ThomeczekJP (2024) Political Communication on Facebook: Do Populist Parties Send Out More Posts?Party Politics30 (6): 1143–1151.
55.
TrombleRKooleK (2020) She Belongs in the Kitchen, Not in Congress? Political Engagement and Sexism on Twitter. Journal of Applied Journalism & Media Studies9 (2): 191–214.
56.
Van der MeerTWVan ElsasELubbeR, et al. (2015) Are Volatile Voters Erratic, Whimsical or Seriously Picky? A Panel Study of 58 Waves into the Nature of Electoral Volatility (The Netherlands 2006–2010). Party Politics21 (1): 100–114.
57.
van der PasDJ (2022) Do European Media Ignore Female Politicians? A Comparative Analysis of MP Visibility. West European Politics45 (7): 1481–1492.
58.
VergeerMHermansL (2012) Personalization in E-Campaigning: a Cross-National Comparison of Personalization Strategies Used on Candidates Websites of 17 Countries in EP Elections 2009. New Media Soc15 (1): 72–92.
59.
VergeerMHermansLCunhaC (2013) Web Campaigning in the 2009 European Parliament Elections: A Cross-National Comparative Analysis. new media & society15 (1): 128–148.
60.
WagnerKMGainousJHolmanMR (2017) I Am Woman, Hear Me Tweet! Gender Differences in Twitter Use among Congressional Candidates. Journal of Women Politics & Policy38 (4): 430–455.
61.
YarchiMSamuel-AzranT (2018) Women Politicians Are More Engaging: Male Versus Female Politicians’ Ability to Generate Users’ Engagement on Social Media during an Election Campaign. Information Communication & Society21 (7): 978–995.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
