Recent scholarship on women’s substantive representation has expanded from its initial focus on gender inequalities in parliaments and now studies (1) various group interests, (2) in different venues, (3) across different contexts and (4) using different methods and approaches. Building on these advances, we present a new comparative measure of women’s substantive representation. This ‘Substantive Representation Index’ combines eight indicators, linked to two key dimensions of women’s substantive representation, in one composite quantitative index. As such, we offer a consistent modality that allows scholars to measure women’s substantive representation systematically and comparatively across and within democratic countries and over time.
AlexanderABolzendahlCJalalzaiF (eds) (2018) Measuring Women’s Political Empowerment across the Globe. Cham: Palgrave.
2.
AnnesleyC (2010) Gender, Politics and Policy Change: The Case of Welfare Reform under New Labour. Government and Opposition45 (1): 50–72.
3.
BolzendahlCBrooksC (2007) Women’s Political Representation and Welfare State Spending in 12 Capitalist Democracies. Social Forces85 (4): 1509–1534.
4.
CelisKChildsS (2014) Introduction: The ‘Puzzle’ of Gender, Conservatism and Representation In: CelisKChildsS (eds) Gender, Conservatism and Political Representation. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp.1–20.
5.
CelisKChildsS (2020) Feminist Democratic Representation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
ChaneyP (2006) Critical Mass, Deliberation and the Substantive Representation of Women. Political Studies54 (4): 691–714.
8.
ChildsSKrookML (2009) Analysing Women’s Substantive Representation: From Critical Mass to Critical Actors. Government & Opposition44 (2): 125–145.
9.
ChildsSLovenduskiJ (2013) Political Representation. In: WaylenGCelisKKantolaJ, et al. (eds) The Oxford Handbook of Gender and Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.489–513.
10.
ClaytonAJosefssonCMattesR, et al. (2019) In Whose Interest? Gender and Mass-Elite Priority Congruence in Sub-Saharan Africa. Comparative Political Studies52 (1): 69–101.
11.
DahlerupD (2014) Representing Women: Defining Substantive Representation of Women In: Escobar-LemmonMCTaylor-RobinsonM (eds) Representation. The Case of Women. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.58–78.
12.
DassonnevilleRMcAllisterI (2021) Are they different?A comparative study of European populist party members. Party Politics29 (1). https://doi.org/10.1177/13540688211060652
13.
DinglerSKroeberCFortin-RittbergerJ (2019) Do Parliaments Underrepresent Women’s Preferences?Journal of European Public Policy26 (2): 302–321.
EsareyJSchwindt-BayerL (2018) Women’s Representation, Accountability and Corruption in Democracies. Brazilian Journal of Pharmaceutical Sciences48 (3): 659–690.
16.
Escobar-LemmonMSchwindt-BayerLATaylor-RobinsonMM (2014) Representing Women: Empirical Insights from Legislatures and Cabinets in Latin America. In: Escobar-LemmonMCTaylor-RobinsonM (eds) Representation. The Case of Women. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.205–224.
FranceschetSKrookMLTanN (eds) (2019) The Palgrave Handbook of Women’s Political Rights. London: Palgrave.
19.
GolderMStramskiJ (2010) Ideological Congruence and Electoral Institutions. American Journal of Political Science54 (1): 90–106.
20.
GreeneZO’BrienDZ (2016) Diverse Parties, Diverse Agendas?European Journal of Political Research55 (3): 435–453.
21.
HöhmannDNugentM (2022) Male MPs, Electoral Vulnerability and the Substantive Representation of Women’s Interests. European Journal of Political Research61 (3): 762–782.
22.
HtunMWeldonSL (2012) The Civic Origins of Progressive Policy Change: Combating Violence Against Women in Global Perspective, 1975–2005. American Political Science Review106 (3): 548–569.
23.
KuyperJW (2016) Systemic Representation: Democracy, Deliberation, and Nonelectoral Representatives. American Political Science Review110 (2): 308–324.
24.
McBrideDMazurA (2010) The Politics of State Feminism. Philadelphia, PA: Temple.
25.
MurrayR (2008) Is the Mere Presence of a Strong Female Candidate Enough to Increase the Substantive Representation of Women?Parliamentary Affairs61 (3): 476–489.
26.
O’BrienDPiscopoJ (2019) The Impact of Women in Parliament. In: FranceschetSKrookMLTanN (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Women’s Political Rights. London: Palgrave, pp.53–72.
PhillipsA (1995) The Politics of Presence. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
PiscopoJ (2014) Feminist Proposals and Conservative Voices: The Substantive Representation of Women in Argentina In: CelisKChildsS (eds) Gender, Conservatism and Political Representation. Colchester: ECPR Press, pp.209–230.
30.
PitkinH (1967) The Concept of Representation. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
31.
ReherS (2018) Gender and Opinion-Policy Congruence in Europe. European Political Science Review10 (4): 613–635.
32.
ReingoldB (2000) Representing Women: Sex, Gender and Legislative Behavior in Arizona and California. Chapel Hill, NC: The University of North Carolina Press.
33.
SawardM (2010) The Representative Claim. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34.
SeversE (2010) Representation as Claims-Making: Quid Responsiveness?Representation46 (4): 411–423.
35.
SorokaSWlezienC (2009) Degrees of Democracy: Politics, Public Opinion, and Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI:10.1017/CBO9780511804908.
36.
ThomsonJ (2018) Restricted Gendered Change: Feminist Institutionalism and Critical Actors. International Political Science Review39 (2): 178–191.
37.
WängnerudL (2009) Women in Parliaments: Descriptive and Substantive Representation. Annual Review of Political Science12: 51–69.
38.
WaylenG (2008) Enhancing the Substantive Representation of Women: Lessons from Transitions to Democracy. Parliamentary Affairs61 (3): 518–534.
39.
WeldonL (2002) Beyond Bodies: Institutional Sources of Representation for Democratic Policymaking. The Journal of Politics64 (4): 1153–1174.
40.
YoungIM (2002) Lived Body vs Gender: Reflections on Social Structure and Subjectivity. Ratio15: 410–428. DOI:10.1111/1467-9329.00200
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
