The potential influence of perceived popularity of political parties or candidates on individual vote choice is most commonly studied in terms of a ‘bandwagon effect’. However, there is confusion over exactly what the bandwagon effect is. In this article, I seek to remedy this confusion by providing a clear definition and typology of bandwagon effects, grounded in a review which reappraises existing scholarship. I argue that the bandwagon effect is a distinct social phenomenon involving an individual-level change in vote choice or turnout decision towards a more or increasingly popular candidate or party, motivated initially by this popularity. I then break this down employing a typology which draws on distinctions made in the literature between static and dynamic, and conversion and mobilisation effects. This conception of the bandwagon effect leaves it open to the operation of a variety of possible underlying processes. Scholars should apply such clear concepts as are proposed here in bandwagon research, to situate and clarify their contributions theoretically and offer a more nuanced understanding of whether, how and why bandwagon effects occur across different political contexts.
AbramowitzAI (1987) Candidate Choice before the Convention: The Democrats in 1984. Political Behavior9 (1): 49–61.
2.
AbramowitzAI (1989) Viability, Electability, and Candidate Choice in a Presidential Primary Election: A Test of Competing Models. The Journal of Politics51 (4): 977–992.
3.
AcharyaABlackwellMSenM (2018) Analyzing Causal Mechanisms in Survey Experiments. Political Analysis26 (4): 357–378.
4.
AgranovMGoereeJKRomeroJ, et al. (2018) What Makes Voters Turn Out: The Effects of Polls and Beliefs. Journal of the European Economic Association16 (3): 825–856.
5.
AllardW (1941) A Test of Propaganda Values in Public Opinion Surveys. Social Forces20 (2): 206–213.
6.
AlvarezRMBoehmkeFJNaglerJ (2006) Strategic Voting in British Elections. Electoral Studies25 (1): 1–19.
7.
AnsolabehereSIyengarS (1994) Of Horseshoes and Horse Races: Experimental Studies of the Impact of Poll Results on Electoral Behavior. Political Communication11 (4): 413–430.
8.
AreniCSFerrellMEWilcoxJB (1998) The Influence of Poll Results on Public Opinion: Examining the Personal Consequences of the Poll Topic. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing3 (4): 293–311.
9.
AreniCSFerrellMEWilcoxJB (2000) The Persuasive Impact of Reported Group Opinions on Individuals Low Vs. High in Need for Cognition: Rationalization Vs. Biased Elaboration)?Psychology & Marketing17 (10): 855–875.
10.
ArnesenSJohannessonMPLindeJ, et al. (2017) Do Polls Influence Opinions? Investigating Poll Feedback Loops Using the Novel Dynamic Response Feedback Experimental Procedure. Social Science Computer Review36 (6): 735–743.
11.
AschSE (1952) Group Forces in the Modification and Distortion of Judgments. In: AschSE (ed.) Social Psychology. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, pp.450–501.
12.
AtkinCK (1969) The Impact of Political Poll Reports on Candidate and Issue Preferences. Journalism Quarterly46 (3): 515–521.
13.
BartelsL (1985) Expectations and Preferences in Presidential Nominating Campaigns. The American Political Science Review79: 804–815.
14.
BartelsL (1987) Candidate Choice and the Dynamics of the Presidential Nominating Process. American Journal of Political Science31: 1–30.
15.
BaumolWJ (1957) Interactions between Successive Polling Results and Voting Intentions. The Public Opinion Quarterly21 (2): 318–323.
16.
BenigerJR (1976) Winning the Presidential Nomination: National Polls and State Primary Elections, 1936-1972. The Public Opinion Quarterly40 (1): 22–38.
17.
BischoffIEgbertH (2013) Social Information and Bandwagon Behavior in Voting: An Economic Experiment. Journal of Economic Psychology34: 270–284.
18.
BlaisA (2000) To Vote or Not to Vote: The Merits and Limits of Rational Choice Theory. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
BlaisAGidengilENevitteN (2006) Do Polls Influence the Vote? In: BradyHEJohnstonJ (eds) Capturing Campaign Effects. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press, pp.263–279.
21.
CallanderS (2007) Bandwagons and Momentum in Sequential Voting. The Review of Economic Studies74 (3): 653–684.
22.
CeciSJKainEL (1982) Jumping on the Bandwagon with the Underdog: The Impact of Attitude Polls on Polling Behavior. The Public Opinion Quarterly46 (2): 228–242.
23.
ChaikenS (1987) The Heuristic Model of Persuasion. In: ZannaPOlsonJM (eds) Social Influence: The Ontario Symposium, vol. 5. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, pp.3–39.
24.
ChungSHeoY-JMoonJ-H (2018) Perceived Versus Actual Polling Effects: Biases in Perceptions of Election Poll Effects on Candidate Evaluations. International Journal of Public Opinion Research30 (3): 420–442.
25.
CloutierENadeauRGuayJ (1989) Bandwagoning and Underdoging on North-American Free Trade: A Quasi-Experimental Panel Study of Opinion Movement. International Journal of Public Opinion Research1 (3): 206–220.
26.
CookSAWelchAC (1940) Methods of Measuring the Practical Effects of Polls of Public Opinion. Journal of Applied Psychology24 (4): 441–454.
27.
DahlgaardJOHansenJHHansenKM, et al. (2017) How Election Polls Shape Voting Behaviour. Scandinavian Political Studies40 (3): 330–343.
28.
DaltonRJ (2013) The Apartisan American: Dealignment and Changing Electoral Politics. Washington, DC: CQ Press.
29.
DassonnevilleR (2016) Volatile Voters, Short-Term Choices? An Analysis of the Vote Choice Determinants of Stable and Volatile Voters in Great Britain. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties26 (3): 273–292.
30.
De BockH (1976) Influence of In-State Election Poll Reports on Candidate Preference in 1972. Journalism Quarterly53 (3): 457–462.
31.
DilliplaneS (2011) All the News You Want to Hear: The Impact of Partisan News Exposure on Political Participation. The Public Opinion Quarterly75 (2): 287–316.
32.
DilliplaneS (2013) Activation, Conversion, or Reinforcement? The Impact of Partisan News Exposure on Vote Choice. American Journal of Political Science58 (1): 79–94.
33.
DizneyHFRoskensRW (1962) An Investigation of the ‘Bandwagon Effect’ in a College Straw Election. The Journal of Educational Sociology36 (3): 108–114.
34.
DonsbachWHartungU (2008) The Legal Status of Public Opinion Research in the World. In: DonsbachWTraugottMW (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Public Opinion Research. London: SAGE Publishing, pp.431–440.
35.
EvrenkHSherC-Y (2015) Social Interactions in Voting Behavior: Distinguishing Between Strategic Voting and the Bandwagon Effect. Public Choice162 (3): 405–423.
36.
FaasTMackenrodtCSchmitt-BeckR (2008) Polls That Mattered: Effects of Media Polls on Voters’ Coalition Expectations and Party Preferences in the 2005 German Parliamentary Election. International Journal of Public Opinion Research20 (3): 299–325.
37.
FisherSD (2004) Definition and Measurement of Tactical Voting: The Role of Rational Choice. British Journal of Political Science34 (1): 152–166.
38.
FisherSD (2014) One Party Can Be the Biggest Winner and the Biggest Loser: Tactical Voting. In: CowleyPFordRA (eds) Sex, Lies & the Ballot Box. London: Biteback Publishing, pp.73–77.
39.
FleitasDW (1971) Bandwagon and Underdog Effects in Minimal-Information Elections. The American Political Science Review65 (2): 434–438.
40.
FrankovicKJohnsonTStavrakantonakiM (2018) The Freedom to Publish Opinion Poll Results: A Worldwide Update of 2012. European Society for Opinion and Market Research and World Association for Public Opinion Research. Available at: https://wapor.org/wp-content/uploads/WAPOR_FTP_2012.pdf
41.
GallupGRaeSF (1940) Is There a Bandwagon Vote?The Public Opinion Quarterly4 (2): 244–249.
42.
GartnerM (1976) Endogenous Bandwagon and Underdog Effects in a Rational Choice Model. Public Choice25: 83–89.
43.
GherghinaSChiruM (2012) Voting after Watching: The Strategic Role of Election Polls. European Review20 (2): 210–221.
44.
GimpelJGHarveyDH (1997) Forecasts and Preferences in the 1992 General Election. Political Behavior19 (2): 157–175.
45.
GlynnCJMcLeodJM (1982) Public Opinion, Communication Processes, and Voting Decisions. Annals of the International Communication Association6 (1): 759–774.
46.
GlynnCJMcLeodJM (1985) Implications of the Spiral of Silence Theory for Communication and Public Opinion Research. In: SandersKRKaidLLNimmoD (eds) Political Communication Yearbook 1984. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, pp.43–65.
47.
GoidelRKShieldsTG (1994) The Vanishing Marginals, the Bandwagon, and the Mass Media. The Journal of Politics56 (3): 802–810.
48.
GranbergDBrentE (1983) When Prophecy Bends: The Preference–Expectation Link in U.S. Presidential Elections, 1952–1980. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology45 (3): 477–491.
49.
GrilloA (2017) Risk Aversion and Bandwagon Effect in the Pivotal Voter Model. Public Choice172 (3): 465–482.
50.
GroßerJSchramA (2010) Public Opinion Polls, Voter Turnout, and Welfare: An Experimental Study. American Journal of Political Science54 (3): 700–717.
51.
HainmuellerJHopkinsDJYamamotoT (2014) Causal Inference in Conjoint Analysis: Understanding Multidimensional Choices via Stated Preference Experiments. Political Analysis22 (1): 1–30.
52.
HardmeierS (2008) The Effects of Published Polls on Citizens. In: DonsbachWTraugottMW (eds) The SAGE Handbook of Public Opinion Research. London: SAGE Publishing, pp.504–513.
53.
HenshelRLJohnstonW (1987) The Emergence of Bandwagon Effects: A Theory. The Sociological Quarterly28 (4): 493–511.
54.
HodgsonRMaloneyJ (2013) Bandwagon Effects in British Elections, 1885-1910. Public Choice157 (1): 73–90.
55.
HongCSKonradK (1998) Bandwagon Effects and Two-Party Majority Voting. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty16 (2): 165–172.
56.
IrwinGAVan HolsteynJJM (2000) Bandwagons, Underdogs, the Titanic, and the Red Cross: The Influence of Public Opinion Polls on Voters. Communication Presented at the 18th congress of the International Political Science Association, Montreal, QC, Canada, 1–5 August.
57.
JenningsWWlezienC (2018) Election Polling Errors across Time and Space. Nature Human Behaviour2 (4): 276–283.
58.
JoslynMR (1997) The Public Nature of Personal Opinion: The Impact of Collective Sentiment on Individual Appraisal. Political Behavior19 (4): 337–363.
59.
KaplanNParkDKGelmanA (2012) Polls and Elections Understanding Persuasion and Activation in Presidential Campaigns: The Random Walk and Mean Reversion Models. Presidential Studies Quarterly42 (4): 843–866.
60.
KenneyPJRiceTW (1994) The Psychology of Political Momentum. Political Research Quarterly47 (4): 923–938.
61.
KissASimonovitsG (2014) Identifying the Bandwagon Effect in Two-Round Elections. Public Choice160 (3): 327–344.
62.
LangKLangGE (1984) The Impact of Polls on Public Opinion. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science472 (1): 129–142.
63.
LanoueDJBowlerS (1998) Picking the Winners: Perceptions of Party Viability and Their Impact on Voting Behavior. Social Science Quarterly79 (2): 361–377.
64.
LaponceJA (1966) An Experimental Method to Measure the Tendency to Equibalance in a Political System. The American Political Science Review60 (4): 982–993.
65.
LazarsfeldPFBerelsonBGaudetH (1948) The People’s Choice – How the Voter Makes Up His Mind in a Presidential Campaign, 2nd edn.New York: Columbia University Press.
66.
LeeW (2011) Bandwagon, Underdog, and Political Competition: The Uni-Dimensional Case. Social Choice and Welfare36 (3–4): 423–449.
67.
McAllisterIStudlarDT (1991) Bandwagon, Underdog, or Projection? Opinion Polls and Electoral Choice in Britain, 1979–1987. The Journal of Politics53 (3): 720–741.
68.
McDermottR (2011) Internal and External Validity. In: DruckmanJNGreenDPKuklinskiJH, et al. (eds) Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.27–40.
69.
MarcusGNeumanWMacKuenM (2000) Affective Intelligence and Political Judgement. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
70.
MarshC (1985) Back on the Bandwagon: The Effect of Opinion Polls on Public Opinion. British Journal of Political Science15 (1): 51–74.
71.
MeffertMFGschwendT (2011) Polls, Coalition Signals and Strategic Voting: An Experimental Investigation of Perceptions and Effects. European Journal of Political Research50 (5): 636–667.
72.
MeffertMFHuberSGschwendT, et al. (2011) More Than Wishful Thinking: Causes and Consequences of Voters’ Electoral Expectations about Parties and Coalitions. Electoral Studies30 (4): 804–815.
73.
MehrabianL (1998) Effects of Poll Reports on Voter Preferences. Journal of Applied Social Psychology28 (23): 2119–2130.
74.
MendelsohnHCrespiI (1970) Polls, Television, and the New Politics. Scranton, PA: Chandler Publishing Company.
75.
MortonRBOuK (2015) What Motivates Bandwagon Voting Behavior: Altruism or a Desire to Win?European Journal of Political Economy40: 224–241.
76.
MortonRBWilliamsK (2011) Electoral Systems and Strategic Voting (Laboratory Election Experiments). In: DruckmanJNGreenDPKuklinskiJH, et al. (eds) Cambridge Handbook of Experimental Political Science. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp.369–383.
77.
MortonRBMullerDPageL, et al. (2015) Exit Polls, Turnout, and Bandwagon Voting: Evidence from a Natural Experiment. European Economic Review77 (Suppl. C): 65–81.
78.
MorwitzVGPluzinskiC (1996) Do Polls Reflect Opinions or Do Opinions Reflect Polls? The Impact of Political Polling on Voter’s Expectations, Preferences, and Behavior. Journal of Consumer Research23 (1): 53–67.
79.
MoyPRinkeEM (2012) Attitudinal and Behavioral Consequences of Published Opinion Polls. In: Holtz-BachaCStrömbäckJ (eds) Opinion Polls and the Media: Reflecting and Shaping Public Opinion. London: Palgrave Macmillan, pp.225–245.
80.
MutzDC (1992) Impersonal Influence: Effects of Representations of Public Opinion on Political Attitudes. Political Behavior14 (2): 89–122.
81.
MutzDC (1997) Mechanisms of Momentum: Does Thinking Make It So?The Journal of Politics59 (1): 104–125.
82.
MutzDC (1998) Impersonal Influence: How Perceptions of Mass Collectives Affect Political Attitudes. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
83.
MyersDGWojcickiSBAardemaBS (1977) Attitude Comparison: Is There Ever a Bandwagon Effect?Journal of Applied Social Psychology7 (4): 341–347.
84.
NadeauRCloutierEGuayJ-H (1993) New Evidence about the Existence of a Bandwagon Effect in the Opinion Formation Process. International Political Science Review14 (2): 203–213.
85.
NadeauRNiemiRGAmatoT (1994) Expectations and Preferences in British General Elections. The American Political Science Review88 (2): 371–383.
86.
NavazioR (1977) An Experimental Approach to Bandwagon Research. The Public Opinion Quarterly41 (2): 217–225.
87.
Noelle-NeumannE (1977) Turbulences in the Climate of Opinion: Methodological Applications of the Spiral of Silence Theory. The Public Opinion Quarterly41 (2): 143–158.
88.
ObermaierMKochTBadenC (2015) Everybody Follows the Crowd?Journal of Media Psychology29 (2): 1–12.
89.
PanovaE (2015) A Passion for Voting. Games and Economic Behavior90: 44–65.
90.
PettyRECacioppoJT (1986) The Elaboration Likelihood Model of Persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology19: 123–205.
91.
PlesciaC (2019) On the Subjectivity of the Experience of Victory: Who Are the Election Winners?Political Psychology: Early View40: 797–814.
92.
ProsserCMellonJ (2018) The Twilight of the Polls? A Review of Trends in Polling Accuracy and the Causes of Polling Misses. Government and Opposition53 (4): 757–790.
93.
RiambauG (2015) Bandwagon or Strategic Voting in Israel? Note on Bargsted and Kedar 2009. Electoral Studies37: 63–72.
94.
RiambauG (2016) Do Citizens Vote for Parties, Policies or the Expected Winner in Proportional Representation Systems? Evidence from Four Different Countries Using a Multiple-Type Model. Party Politics24 (5): 549–562.
95.
RothschildDMalhotraN (2014) Are Public Opinion Polls Self-Fulfilling Prophecies?Research & Politics1 (2): 1–10.
96.
RoyJSinghSPFournierP, et al. (2015) An Experimental Analysis of the Impact of Campaign Polls on Electoral Information Seeking. Electoral Studies40 (Suppl. C): 146–157.
97.
Schmitt-BeckR (1996) Mass Media, the Electorate, and the Bandwagon: A Study of Communication Effects on Vote Choice in Germany. International Journal of Public Opinion Research8 (3): 266–291.
98.
SimonHA (1954) Bandwagon and Underdog Effects and the Possibility of Election Predictions. The Public Opinion Quarterly18 (3): 245–253.
99.
SkalabanA (1988) Do the Polls Affect Elections? Some 1980 Evidence. Political Behavior10 (2): 136–150.
100.
StiersDDaoustJ-FBlaisA (2018) What Makes People Believe That Their Party Won the Election?Electoral Studies55: 21–29.
101.
StolwijkSBSchuckARTde VreeseCH (2017) How Anxiety and Enthusiasm Help Explain the Bandwagon Effect. International Journal of Public Opinion Research29 (4): 554–574.
102.
StraffinPD (1977) The Bandwagon Curve. American Journal of Political Science21 (4): 695–709.
103.
SupadhilokeB (2015) How Opinion Polls Affect Voting in Bangkok’s Gubernatorial Election. Asian Journal of Communication25 (2): 135–161.
104.
ToffB (2018) Exploring the Effects of Polls on Public Opinion: How and When Media Reports of Policy Preferences Can Become Self-Fulfilling Prophesies. Research & Politics5 (4): 1–9.
105.
Van der MeerTWGHakhverdianAAalderingL (2016) Off the Fence, onto the Bandwagon? A Large-Scale Survey Experiment on Effect of Real-Life Poll Outcomes on Subsequent Vote Intentions. International Journal of Public Opinion Research28 (1): 46–72.
106.
Van der MeerTWGLubbeRvan ElsasE, et al. (2012) Bounded Volatility in the Dutch Electoral Battlefield: A Panel Study on the Structure of Changing Vote Intentions in the Netherlands during 2006-2010. Acta Politica47 (4): 333–355.
107.
WaddellTF (2017) What Does the Crowd Think? How Online Comments and Popularity Metrics Affect News Credibility and Issue Importance. New Media & Society20 (8): 3068–3083.
108.
WestDM (1991) Polling Effects in Election Campaigns. Political Behavior13 (2): 151–163.
109.
ZechCE (1975) Leibenstein’s Bandwagon Effect as Applied to Voting. Public Choice21: 117–122.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
