Doctoral students’ well-being and motivation are important factors that are both shaped by, and shape students’ academic experiences in their programs. Existing literature consistently highlights the concerning well-being and maladaptive motivational patterns in doctoral students, but no research to date attempted to explore some of the structural features associated with these wellness and achievement factors in a large-scale study. The present study examined whether doctoral program phase (i.e. coursework, comprehensive examination, or dissertation phase had an effect on 3004 doctoral students’ well-being levels (stress, depression, program satisfaction, and illness symptoms) and motivation (self-determined motivation and self-efficacy). Results revealed doctoral students to report the highest well-being and internal motivation during the coursework phase, while the comprehensive examination phase was found to be the most challenging for most students as indicated by the lowest wellness and motivation scores. A discussion of the present results and their theoretical and practical implications ensues.
AliA.KohunF. (2006).
Dealing with isolation feelings at IS doctoral programs. International Journal of Doctoral Studies,
1, 21–33. Retrieved from http://ijds.org/Volume1/IJDSv1p021-033Ali13.pdf
2.
AmpawF.D., & JaegerA.J. (2012).
Completing the three stages of doctoral education: an event history analysis, Res. High. Educ,
53(6), 640–660.
3.
Ali, A., & Kohun, F. (2006). Dealing with isolation feelings at IS doctoral programs. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 1, 21–33. Retrieved from http://ijds.org/Volume1/IJDSv1p021-033Ali13.pdf
BishopR. M.BieschkeK. J. (1998).
Applying social cognitive theory to interest in research among counseling psychology doctoral students: A path analysis. Journal of Counseling Psychology,
45, 182. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.45.2.182
6.
BrailsfordI. (2010).
Motives and aspirations for doctoral study: Career, personal, and inter-personal factors in the decision to embark on a history PhD. International Journal of Doctoral Studies,
5, 15–27. doi:10.28945/710
7.
BrownL.WatsonP. (2010).
Understanding the experiences of female doctoral students. Journal of Further and Higher Education,
34, 385–404. doi:10.1080/0309877X.2010.484056
8.
BrusC. P. (2006).
Seeking balance in graduate school: A realistic expectation or a dangerous dilemma?New Directions for Student Services,
115, 31–45. doi:10.1002/ss.214
9.
CastroV.GarciaE. E.CavazosJ.CastroA. Y. (2011).
The road to doctoral success and beyond. International Journal of Doctoral Studies,
6, 51–77.
CohenS.HobermanH. M. (1983).
Positive events and social supports as buffers of life change stress. Journal of Applied Social Psychology,
13, 99–125.
12.
CohenS.WilliamsonG. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In SpacapanS.OskampS. (Eds.), The social psychology of health (pp. 31–67).
Newbury Park, CA:
SAGE.
13.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed.).
Thousand Oaks, CA:
SAGE.
14.
CotterallS. (2013).
More than just a brain: Emotions and the doctoral experience. Higher Education Research and Development,
32, 174–187. doi:10.1080/07294360.2012.680017
15.
DabneyK. P.TaiR. H. (2013).
Female physicist doctoral experiences. Physical Review Special Topics – Physics Education Research,
9(1), 010115. doi:10.1103/PhysRevSTPER.9.010115
16.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior.
New York:
Plenum Press.
17.
DeciE. L.RyanR. M. (2012). Motivation, personality, and development within embedded social contexts: An overview of self-determination theory. In RyanR. M. (Ed.), The oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 85–107).
New York:
Oxford University Press.
18.
De WeldeK.LaursenS. L. (2008).
The ‘ideal type’ advisor: How advisors help STEM graduate students find their ‘scientific feet’. The Open Education Journal,
1, 49–61. doi:10.2174/1874920800801010049
19.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum Press.
20.
DienerE.EmmonsR. A.LarsenR. J.GriffinS. (1985).
The satisfaction with life scale. Journal of Personality Assessment,
49(1), 71–75. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa4901_13
21.
DustT. J. (2006).
Motivational influences to pursue graduate studies in secondary music education. Alberta Journal of Educational Research,
52, 158–166.
22.
El-GhorouryN. H.GalperD. I.SawaqdehA.BufkaL. F. (2012).
Stress, coping, and barriers to wellness among psychology graduate students. Training and Education in Professional Psychology,
6(2), 122–134. doi:10.1037/a0028768
23.
EllisE. M. (2001).
The impact of race and gender on graduate school socialization, satisfaction with doctoral study, and commitment to degree completion. The Western Journal of Black Studies,
25, 30–45.
24.
FergusonT. (2009).
The “write” skills and more: A thesis writing group for doctoral students. Journal of Geography in Higher Education,
33, 285–297. doi:10.1080/03098260902734968
25.
FishL. A.FishL. A. (2010).
Career expectations and perceptions of part-time MBA students. College Student Journal,
44, 706–719.
26.
FlynnS. V.ChasekC. L.HarperI. F.MurphyK. M.JorgensenM. F. (2012).
A qualitative inquiry of the counseling dissertation process. Counselor Education and Supervision,
51, 242–255. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2012.00018.x
27.
ForesterM.KahnJ. H.Hesson-McInnisM. S. (2004).
Factor structures of three measures of research self-efficacy. Journal of Career Assessment,
12, 3–16. doi:10.1177/1069072703257719
28.
GardnerS. K. (2007). “
I heard it through the grapevine”: Doctoral student socialization in chemistry and history. Higher Education,
54, 723–740. doi:10.1007/s10734-006-9020-x
29.
GardnerS. K. (2008). “
What’s too much and what’s too little?”: The process of becoming an independent researcher in doctoral education. The Journal of Higher Education,
79, 326–350. doi:10.1353/jhe.0.000
30.
GardnerS. K. (2009).
Student and faculty attributions of attrition in high and low-completing doctoral programs in the United States. Higher Education,
58, 97–112. doi:10.1007/s10734-008-9184-7
31.
GardnerS. K. (2010).
Contrasting the socialization experiences of doctoral students in high- and low-completing departments: A qualitative analysis of disciplinary contexts at one institution. The Journal of Higher Education,
81, 61–81. doi:10.1353/jhe.0.0081
32.
GearityB. T.MertzN. (2012).
From “bitch” to “mentor”: A doctoral student’s story of self-change and mentoring. The Qualitative Report,
17, 1–27. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol17/iss30/1
33.
GeraniouE. (2010).
The transitional stages in the PhD degree in mathematics in terms of students’ motivation. Educational Studies in Mathematics,
73, 281–296. doi:10.1007/s10649-009-9205-1
34.
GoldeC. M. (1998).
Beginning graduate school: Explaining first-year doctoral attrition. New Directions for Higher Education,
1998, 55–64. doi:10.1002/he.10105
35.
GoldeC. M. (2005).
The role of the department and discipline in doctoral student attrition: Lessons from four departments. The Journal of Higher Education,
76, 669–700. doi:10.1353/jhe.2005.0039
36.
HallN. C.ChipperfieldJ. G.PerryR. P.RuthigJ. C.GoetzT. (2006).
Primary and secondary control in academic development: Gender-specific implications for stress and health in college students. Anxiety, Stress & Coping,
19, 189–210.
37.
Gordon, P. J. (2003).
Advising to avoid or to cope with dissertation hang-ups, AMLE2(2), 181–187.
38.
HegartyN. (2011).
Adult learners as graduate students: Underlying motivation in completing graduate programs. Journal of Continuing Higher Education,
59(3), 146–151. doi:10.1080/07377363.2011.614883
39.
HerzigA. H. (2002).
Where have all the students gone? Participation of doctoral students in authentic mathematical activity as a necessary condition for persistence toward the Ph.D. Educational Studies in Mathematics,
50, 177–212. doi:10.1023/A:1021126424414
40.
HoskinsC. M.GoldbergA. D. (2005).
Doctoral student persistence in counselor education programs: Student–program match. Counselor Education and Supervision,
44, 175–188. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2005.tb01745.x
41.
HyunJ. K.QuinnB. C.MadonT.LustigS. (2006).
Graduate student mental health: Needs assessment and utilization of counseling services. Journal of College Student Development,
47, 247–226. doi:10.1353/csd.2006.0030
42.
IvankovaN. V.StickS. L. (2007).
Students’ persistence in a distributed doctoral program in educational leadership in higher education: A mixed methods study. Research in Higher Education,
48, 93–135. doi:10.1007/s11162-006-9025-4
43.
IvesG.RowleyG. (2005).
Supervisor selection or allocation and continuity of supervision: Ph.D. students’ progress and outcomes. Studies in Higher Education,
30, 535–555. doi:10.1080/03075070500249161
JuniperB.WalshE.RichardsonA.MorleyB. (2012).
A new approach to evaluating the well-being of PhD research students. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,
37, 563–576. doi:10.1080/02602938.2011.555816
46.
KernanW.BogartJ.WheatM. E. (2011).
Health-related barriers to learning among graduate students. Health Education,
111(5), 425–445. doi:10.1108/09654281111161248
47.
KinmanG.JonesF. (2003). “
Running up the down escalator”: Stressors and strains in UK academics. Quality in Higher Education,
9, 22–37. doi:10.1080/13538320308162
48.
KohlerH.BehrmanJ. R.SkyttheA. (2005).
Partner + children = happiness? The effects of partnerships and fertility on well‐being. Population and Development Review,
31, 407–445. doi:10.1111/j.1728-4457.2005.00078.x
49.
LambieG. W.VaccaroN. (2011).
Doctoral counselor education students’ levels of research self-efficacy, perceptions of the research training environment, and interest in research. Counselor Education and Supervision,
50, 243–258. doi:10.1002/j.1556-6978.2011.tb00122.x
50.
LeonardD.BeckerR.CoateK. (2005).
To prove myself at the highest level: The benefits of doctoral study. Higher Education Research & Development,
24(2), 135–149. doi:10.1080/07294360500062904
51.
LevecqueK.AnseelF.DeB. A.VanH. J.GisleL. (2017).
Work organization and mental health problems in PhD students. Research Policy,
46(4), 868–879. doi:10.1016/j.respol.2017.02.008
LitalienD.GuayF. (2015).
Dropout intentions in PhD studies: A comprehensive model based on interpersonal relationships and motivational resources. Contemporary Educational Psychology,
41, 218–231. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2015.03.004
54.
LitalienD.GuayF.MorinA. J. (2015).
Motivation for PhD studies: Scale development and validation. Learning and Individual Differences,
41, 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.05.006
LovittsB. E. (2001). Leaving the ivory tower: The causes and consequences of departure from doctoral study.
Lanham, MD:
Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
57.
LovittsB. E. (2008).
The transition to independent research: Who makes it, who doesn’t, and why. The Journal of Higher Education,
79, 296–325. doi:10.1353/jhe.0.0006
MurphyN.BainJ. D.ConradL. (2007).
Orientations to research higher degree supervision. Higher Education,
53, 209–234. doi:10.1007/s10734-005-5608-9
60.
O’MearaK.KnudsenK.JonesJ. (2013).
The role of emotional competencies in faculty-doctoral student relationships. The Review of Higher Education,
36, 315–347. doi:10.1353/rhe.2013.0021
61.
OnwuegbuzieA. J.RosliR.IngramJ. M.FrelsR. K. (2014).
A critical dialectical pluralistic examination of the lived experience of select women doctoral students. Qualitative Report,
19, 1–35. Retrieved from https://nsuworks.nova.edu/tqr/vol19/iss3/1
62.
Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013).
Students enrolled by type of institution [Statistics tables]. Retrieved from http://stats.oecd.org
63.
PallosH.YamadaN.OkawaM. (2005).
Graduate student blues: The situation in Japan. Journal of College Student Psychotherapy,
20(2), 5–15. doi:10.1300/J035v20n02_02
64.
PatchnerM. A. (1982).
A decade of social work doctoral graduates: Their characteristics and educational programs. Journal of Education for Social Work,
18(2), 35–41.
65.
PauleyR.CunninghamM.TothP. (1999).
Doctoral student attrition and retention: A study of a non-traditional Ed.D. program. Journal of College Student Retention,
1, 225–238. doi:10.2190/RAWM-HXTB-M72D-1FFH
66.
PyhäitöK.VekkailaJ.KeskinenJ. (2012).
Exploring the fit between doctoral students’ and supervisors’ perceptions of resources and challenges vis-à-vis the doctoral journey. International Journal of Doctoral Studies,
7, 395–414.
67.
SchunkD. H.PajaresF. (2009). Self-efficacy theory. In WentzelK. R.WigfieldA. (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 35–53).
New York:
Routledge.
68.
SolemM.HopwoodN.SchlemperM. B. (2011).
Experiencing graduate school: A comparative analysis of students in geography programs. The Professional Geographer,
63, 1–17. doi:10.1080/00330124.2010.533547
StubbJ.PyhaltoK.LonkaK. (2011).
Balancing between inspiration and exhaustion: PhD students’ experienced socio-psychological well-being. Studies in Continuing Education,
33, 33–50. doi:10.1080/0158037X.2010.515572
71.
StubbJ.PyhaltoK.LonkaK. (2012).
The experienced meaning of working with a PhD thesis. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,
56, 439–456. doi:10.1080/00313831.2011.599422
72.
SverdlikA.HallN. C.McAlpineL.HubbardK. (2018).
The PhD experience: A review of the factors influencing doctoral students’ completion, achievement, and well-being. International Journal of Doctoral Studies,
13, 361–388. doi:10.28945/4113
73.
TanakaM.WatanabeaY. (2012).
Academic and family conditions associated with intrinsic academic motivation in Japanese medical students: A pilot study. Health Education Journal,
71, 358–364. doi:10.1177/0017896911401004
74.
TrenberthL. (2005).
The role, nature and purpose of leisure and its contribution to individual development and well-being. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling,
33(1), 1–6. doi:10.1080/03069880412331335849
VekkailaJ.VirtanenV.TainaJ.PyhältöK. (2018).
The function of social support in engaging and disengaging experiences among post PhD researchers in STEM disciplines. Studies in Higher Education,
43(8), 1439–1453. doi:10.1080/03075079.2016.1259307
77.
WalfordG. (2006).
Why physics students start doctorates. Studies in Higher Education,
5, 77–80. doi:10.1080/03075078012331377336
WalshE. (2010).
A model of research group microclimate: Environmental and cultural factors affecting the experiences of overseas research students in the UK. Studies in Higher Education,
35, 545–560. doi:10.1080/03075070903243092
80.
WeidmanJ. C.SteinE. L. (2003).
Socialization of doctoral students to academic norms. Research in Higher Education,
44, 641–656. doi:10.1023/A:1026123508335
81.
WeidmanJ. C.TwaleD. J.SteinE. L. (2001).
Socialization of graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage?ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report,
28(3), 2–137. Retrieved from https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED457710.pdf
82.
WellingtonJ.SikesP. (2007).
A doctorate in a tight compartment”: Why do students choose a professional doctorate and what impact does it have on their personal and professional lives?Studies in Higher Education,
31, 723–734. doi:10.1080/03075070601004358
WyattT.OswaltS. B. (2013).
Comparing mental health issues among undergraduate and graduate students. American Journal of Health Education,
44(2), 96–107. doi:10.1080/19325037.2013.764248
86.
ZhaoC. M.GoldeC. M.McCormickA. C. (2007).
More than a signature: How advisor choice and advisor behaviour affect doctoral student satisfaction. Journal of Further and Higher Education,
31, 263–281. doi:10.1080/03098770701424983
