Social network analysis can be a powerful tool to better understand the social context of terrorist activities, and it may also offer potential leads for agencies to intervene. Our access to Dutch police information allows us to analyse the relational features of two networks that include actors who planned acts of terrorism and were active in the dissemination of a Salafi-Jihadi interpretation of Islam (n = 57; n = 26). Based on a mixed-method approach that combines qualitative and more formal statistical analysis (exponential random graph models), we analyse the structural characteristics of these networks, individual positions and the extent to which radical leaders, pre-existing family and friendship ties and radicalizing settings affect actors to form ties. We find that both networks resemble a core–periphery structure, with cores formed by a densely interconnected group of actors who frequently meet in radicalizing settings. Based on our findings, we discuss the potential effects of preventive and repressive measures developed within the Dutch counterterrorism framework.
AIVD (2002) Recruitment for the Jihad in the Netherlands; from incident to trend..
2.
ArgomanizABermejoR (2019) Jihadism and crime in Spain: A convergence settings approach. European Journal of Criminology16(3): 351–353.
3.
ArquillaJRonfeldtD (2001) Networks and Netwars: The Future of Terror, Crime, and Militancy. Santa Monica: RAND Corporation.
4.
BakkerE (2011) Characteristics of jihadi terrorists in Europe (2001–2009). In: CoolsaetR (ed) Jihadi Terrorism and the Radicalisation Challenge. European and American Experiences. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 131–144.
BorgattiSPEverettMG (1999) Models of core/periphery structures. Social Networks21(4): 375–395.
7.
BorgattiSPEverettMGFreemanLC (1999) UCINET 6.0 Version 1.00. Natick: Analytic Technologies.
8.
BorgattiSPEverettMGJohnsonJC (2013) Analyzing Social Networks. Sage publication ltd. London: Sage.
9.
BotteroWCrossleyN (2011) Worlds, fields and networks: Becker, Bourdieu and the structures of social relations. Cultural Sociology5(1): 99–119.
10.
BouhanaNWikströmP-OH (2011) Al Qa’ida-influenced radicalization: A rapid evidence assessment guided by situational action theory. Report, Occasional Paper 97, Home Office, London.
11.
BouhanaNWikströmP-OH (2017) Analyzing radicalization and terrorism: A situational action theory. In: LaFreeGFreilichJD (eds) The Handbook of the Criminology of Terrorism. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 175–186.
ColemanJ (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology94: S95–S120.
14.
CrossleyNEdwardsG (2016) Cases, mechanisms and the real: The theory and methodology of mixed-method social network analysis. Sociological Research Online21(2). https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.3920.
15.
CrossleyNEdwardsGHarriesE, et al. (2012) Covert social movement networks and the secrecy-efficiency trade off: The case of the UK suffragettes (1906–1914). Social Networks34(4): 634–644.
16.
CsárdiGNepuszT (2006) The igraph software package for complex network research. InterJournal, Complex Systems, 1695.http://igraph.org
17.
DawsonL (2019) Clarifying the explanatory context for developing theories of radicalization: Five basic considerations. Journal for Deradicalization18(Spring 2019): 146–184.
18.
DawsonLL (1996) Who joins new religious movements and why: Twenty years of research and what have we learned?. Studies in Religion25(2): 141–161.
19.
De BieJLDe PootCJ (2016) Studying police files with grounded theory methods to understand jihadist networks. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism39(7–8): 580–601.
20.
De BieJLDe PootCJFreilichJD, et al. (2017) Changing organizational structures of jihadist networks in the Netherlands. Social Networks48: 270–283.
21.
De KoningM (2013) ‘We Reject You’ – ‘Counter-Conduct’ and radicalisation of the Dutch Hofstad network. In: HerdingM (ed) Radikaler Islam im Jugendalter; Erscheinungsformen, Ursachen und Kontexte. Halle: Deutsches Jugendinstitut e.V, pp. 92–106.
22.
Della PorteD (1988) Recruitment processes in clandestine organizations: Italian left-wing terrorism. International Social Movement Research1: 155–169.
23.
Della PostaD (2017) Network closure and integration in the mid-20th century American mafia. Social Networks51: 148–157.
24.
De PootCJSonnenscheinA (2011) Jihadi terrorism in the Netherlands; A description based on closed investigations. Report O&B 291. WODC, the Netherlands.
25.
DiviákTVan NassauCSDijkstraJK, et al. (2022) Dynamics and disruption: Structural and individual changes in two Dutch Jihadi networks after police interventions. Social Networks70: 364–374.
26.
DoosjeBMoghaddamFMKruglanskiAW, et al. (2016) Terrorism, radicalization and de-radicalization. Current Opinion in Psychology11: 79–84.
27.
EvertonSF (2016) Social networks and religious violence. Review of Religious Research58: 191–217.
28.
FelsonM (2003) The process of co-offending. In: SmithMJCornishDB (eds) Theory for Practice in Situational Crime Prevention. Monsey, NY: Criminal Justice Press, 16, pp. 149–168.
29.
GrundTUDensleyJA (2014) Ethnic homophily and triad closure: Mapping internal gang structure using exponential random graph models. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice31(3): 354–370.
30.
HafezMMullinsC (2015) The radicalization puzzle: A theoretical synthesis of empirical approaches to homegrown extremism. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism38(11): 958–975.
31.
HelfsteinSWrightD (2011) Covert or convenient? Evolution of terror attack networks. Journal of Conflict Resolution55(5): 785–813.
32.
KellyMMcCarthy-JonesA (2019) Mapping connections: A dark network analysis of neojihadism in Australia. Terrorism and Political Violence33(4): 743–765. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2019.1586675.
33.
KenneyMCoulthartSWrightD (2017) Structure and performance in a violent extremist network: The small-world solution. Journal of Conflict Resolution61(10): 2208–2234.
34.
KoschadeS (2006) A social network analysis of Jemaah Islamiyah: The applications to counter-terrorism and intelligence. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism29(6): 559–575.
KruglanskiABélangerJGunaratnaR (2019) The Three Pillars of Radicalization: Needs, Narratives, and Networks. New York: Oxford University Press.
37.
LoflandJStarkR (1965) Becoming a world-saver: A theory of conversion to a deviant perspective. American Sociological Review30(6): 862–875.
38.
LusherDKoskinenJRobinsG (2013) Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks. New York: Cambridge University Press.
39.
MaherS (2017) Salafi-Jihadism: The History of an Idea. London: Penguin Books Ltd.
40.
MalthanerS (2017) Radicalization: The evolution of an analytical paradigm. European Journal of Sociology58(3): 369–401.
41.
McMillanCFelmleeDBrainesD (2020) Dynamic patterns of terrorist networks: Efficiency and security in the evolution of eleven Islamic extremist. Journal of Quantitative Criminology (36): 559–581. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10940-019-09426-9.
42.
McPhersonMSmith-LovinLCookJM (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology27: 415–444.
43.
MorrisonJF (2020) Talking stagnation: Thematic analysis of terrorism experts’ perception of the health of terrorism research. Terrorism and Political Violence34(8): 1509–1529.
44.
MorselliC (2009) Inside criminal networks. Studies of Organized Crime 8. New York: Springer.
45.
NCTV (2022) Dreigingsbeeld Terrorisme Nederland 56.
46.
NeumannPRRogersB (2007) Recruitment and Mobilisation for the Islamist Militant Movement in Europe. Report for the European Commission (Directorate General Justice, Freedom and Security), King’s College, London.
47.
NewmanMEJ (2006) Modularity and community structure in networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences103(23): 8577–8582.
48.
NewmanMEJGirvanM (2004) Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. Physical Review E69(2): 1-16.
49.
OuelletMBouchardMMackenzieH (2017) Criminal collaboration and risk: The drivers of Al Qaeda’s network structure before and after 9/11. Social Networks51: 171–177.
50.
PerligerAPedahzurA (2011) Social network analysis in the study of terrorism and political violence. Political Science and Politics44(1): 45–50.
51.
PetersR (2008) Dutch extremist Islamism: Van Gogh’s murderer and his ideas. In: CoolsaetR (eds) Jihadi Terrorism and the Radicalisation Challenge in Europe. Aldershot: Ashgate, pp. 115-127.
52.
RagazziFJonghDe (2019Countering radicalization: Hijacking trust? Dilemma's of street-level bureaucrats in the NetherlandsFadilNDe KoningM (eds) Radicalization in Belgium and the Netherlands: Critical perspectives on Violence and Security. London: I.B.Tauris, pp. 147–168.
53.
RobertsNEvertonSF (2011) Strategies for Combating Dark Networks. Journal of Social Structure12.
54.
RobinsG (2009) Understanding individual behaviors within covert networks: The interplay of individual qualities, psychological predispositions, and network effects. Trends in Organized Crime (12): 166–187. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-008-9059-4.
55.
SagemanM (2004) Understanding Terror Networks. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press.
SchuurmanB (2018) Becoming a European Homegrown Jihadist. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
58.
SheridanPOnoderaT (2017) A preferential attachment paradox: How preferential attachment combines with growth to produce networks with lognormal in-degree distributions. Scientific Reports (8): 2811.
59.
SnijdersTABKoskinenJ (2013) Simulation, estimation, and goodness of fit. In: LusherDKoskinenJRobinsG (eds) Exponential Random Graph Models for Social Networks: Theory, Methods, and Applications. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 141–166.
60.
SnijdersTABPattisonPERobinsGL, et al. (2006) New specifications for exponential random graph models. Sociological Methodology36(1): 99–153.
61.
StarkRBainbridgeWS (1980) Networks of faith: Interpersonal bonds and recruitment to cults and sects. American Journal of Sociology85(6): 1376–1395.
62.
Van der HulstRC (2009a) Introduction to social network analysis (SNA) as an investigative tool. Trends in Organized Crime (12): 101–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12117-008-9057-6.
63.
Van der HulstRC (2009b) Terroristische netwerken en intelligence: Een sociale netwerkanalyse van de Hofstadgroep. Tijdschrift voor Veiligheid2009(8): 2.
64.
Van der WoudeM (2012) Dutch counterterrorism: An exceptional body of legislation or just an inevitable product of the culture of control? In: EllianAMolierG (eds) The State of Exception and Militant Democracy in a Time of Terror. Dordrecht: Republic of Letters Publishing, pp. 69–95.
65.
Van GestelB (2020) Evaluatie Tijdelijke wet bestuurlijke maatregelen terrorismebestrijding. Cahier 2020-2 WODC, the Netherlands.
66.
Van GestelBDe PootCJBokhorstRJ, et al. (2009) Signalen van terrorisme en de opsporingspraktijk: De Wet opsporing terroristische misdrijven twee jaar in werking. Cahier 2009-10 WODC, the Netherlands.
67.
Van NassauCSDe PootCJ (2023) The relational dimension of radicalization: Context and tie formation in Dutch Salafi-Jihadi networks. Terrorism and Political Violence. https://doi.org/10.1080/09546553.2022.2158083.
68.
WebberDKruglanskiAW (2017) Psychological factors in radicalization: A “3 N” approach. In: LaFreeGFreilichJD (eds) The Handbook of the Criminology of Terrorism. John Chichester: Wiley & Sons, pp. 34-46.
69.
WiktorowiczQ (2005) A genealogy of radical Islam. Studies in Conflict and Terrorism28(2): 75–97.
