Prior research demonstrates a clear association between deviant peers and delinquent behavior, but it is unclear whether stable relationships provide stronger sources of influence than ephemeral ties. The current study addresses this gap by testing whether individuals are more likely to adjust their delinquent behaviors to be similar to their stable friends compared to their transient affiliations. Drawing from network data in the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent to Adult Health, we use Stochastic Actor Oriented Models to estimate whether stable friendships condition the peer-delinquency link. Our results suggest the stability of friendships does not impact whether an individual will adopt the delinquency of their friends; adolescents were not more or less likely to conform to their stable and enduring friends compared to their transient and short-lived ties. We discuss the study's implications for understanding peer effects and status-seeking behaviors during adolescence.
AgnewR (1991) The interactive effects of peer variables on delinquency. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal29(1): 47–72.
2.
AkersR (2011) Social Learning And Social Structure: A General Theory Of Crime And Deviance. New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.
3.
BerndtTJHawkinsJAJiaoZ (1999) Influences of friends and friendships on adjustment to junior high school. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly45: 13–41.
4.
BranjeSJTFrijnsTFinkenauerC, et al. (2007) You are my best friend: Commitment and stability in adolescents’ same-sex friendships. Personal Relationships14(4): 587–603.
5.
BrownBB (1990) Peer groups and peer culture. In: FeldmanSSElliottGR (eds) At the Threshold: The Developing Adolescent. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp.171–196.
6.
BurgessRLAkersRL (1966) A differential association-reinforcement theory of criminal behavior. Social Problems14: 128–147.
7.
CharetteYPapachristosAV (2017) The network dynamics of co-offending careers. Social Networks51: 3–13.
8.
ChrysoulakisAP (2020) Morality, delinquent peer association, and criminogenic exposure: (how) does change predict change?European Journal of Criminology: 1–22. Online first
9.
DeğirmencioğluSMUrbergKATolsonJM, et al. (1998) Adolescent friendship networks: Continuity and change over the school year. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly44: 313–337.
10.
DeLayDHaTVan RyzinM, et al. (2016) Changing friend selection in middle school: A social network analysis of randomized intervention study designed to prevent adolescent problem behavior. Prevention Science17: 285–294.
11.
FarisFFelmleeD (2018) Best friends for now: Friendship network stability and adolescents’ life course goals. In: AlwinDFFelmleeDHKreagerDA (eds) Social Networks and the Life Course: Integrating the Development of Human Lives and Social Relational Networks. Cham, Switzerland: Springer, pp.185–203.
12.
FarisRFelmleeD (2011) Status struggles: Network centrality and gender segregation in same- and cross-gender aggression. American Sociological Review76(1): 48–73.
GallupeOMcLeveyJBrownS (2019) Selection and influence: A meta-analysis of the association between peer and personal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology35: 313–335.
15.
GerstnerDOberwittlerD (2018) Who’s hanging out and what’s happening? A look at the interplay between unstructured socializing, crime propensity and delinquent peers using social network data. European Journal of Criminology15(1): 111–129.
16.
GiordanoPCCernkovichSAPughMD (1986) Friendships and delinquency. American Journal of Sociology91(5): 1170–1202.
17.
HaasSASchaeferD (2014) With a little help from my friends? Asymmetrical social influence on adolescent smoking initiation and cessation. Journal of Health and Social Behavior55(2): 126–143.
18.
HayCEvansMM (2006) Violent victimization and involvement in delinquency: Examining predictions from general strain theory. Journal of Criminal Justice34(3): 261–274.
19.
HaynieDL (2002) Friendship networks and delinquency: The relative nature of peer delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology18: 99–134.
20.
HaynieDLDooganNJSollerB (2014) Gender, friendship networks, and delinquency: A dynamic network approach. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal52(4): 688–722.
21.
HaynieDLGiordanoPCManningWD, et al. (2005) Adolescent romantic relationships and delinquency involvement. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal43(1): 177–210.
22.
HaynieDLOsgoodDW (2005) Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter?Social Forces84: 1109–1130.
23.
HirschiT(1969) Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
24.
HoebenEMThomasKJ (2019) Peers and offender decision-making. Criminology & Public Policy18(4): 759–784.
25.
JacquithSM (1981) Adolescent marijuana and alcohol use: An empirical test of differential association theory. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal19(2): 271–280.
26.
JanssenHJWeermanFMEichelsheimVI (2017) Parenting as a protective factor against criminogenic settings? Interaction effects between three aspects of parenting and unstructured socializing in disordered areas. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency54(2): 181–207.
27.
KrohnMDSkinnerWFMasseyJL, et al. (1985) Social learning theory and adolescent cigarette smoking: A longitudinal study. Social Problems32(5): 455–473.
28.
LospinosoJSnijdersTAB (2019) Goodness of fit for stochastic actor-oriented models. Methodological Innovations12(3): 1–18.
McGloinJMShermerLO (2009) Self-control and deviant peer network structure. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency46(1): 35–72.
31.
McGloinJMSullivanCJPiqueroAR, et al. (2008) Investigating the stability of co-offending and co-offenders among a sample of youthful offenders. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal46(1): 155–188.
32.
McGloinJMThomasKJ (2016) Incentives for collective deviance: Group size and changes in perceived risk, cost, and reward. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal54(3): 459–486.
33.
MeldeCEsbensenFA (2014) The relative impact of gang status transitions: Identifying the mechanisms of change in delinquency. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency51(3): 349–376.
34.
MeldrumRCPiqueroAR (2018) Maternal knowledge of adolescent activity moderates the longitudinal association between autonomy and unstructured socializing with peers. Journal of Developmental and Life-Course Criminology4: 50–72.
35.
MoodyJ (2001) Race, school integration, and friendship segregation in America. American Journal of Sociology107(3): 679–716.
36.
MoodyJBrynildsenWDOsgoodDW, et al. (2011) Popularity trajectories and substance use in early adolescence. Social Networks33(2): 101–112.
37.
OsgoodDWWilsonJKO’MallyP, et al. (1996) Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review61(4): 635–655.
38.
PyroozDCSweetenGPiqueroAR (2013) Continuity and change in gang membership and gang embeddedness. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency50(2): 239–271.
39.
R Core Team(2021) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org/.
RogersE (1995) The Diffusion of Innovations, 4th edition. New York, NY: The Free Press.
42.
SchaeferDR (2018) A network analysis of factors leading adolescents to befriend substance-using peers. Journal of Quantitative Criminology34: 275–312.
43.
SchreckCJFisherBSMillerJM (2004) The social context of violent victimization: A study of the delinquent peer effect. Justice Quarterly21(1): 23–47.
44.
ShortJF (1958) Differential association with delinquent friends and delinquent behavior. The Pacific Sociological Review1: 20–25.
45.
ShortJFStrodtbeckFL (1965) Group Process And Gang Delinquency. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
46.
SimpkinsSDSchaeferDRPriceCD, et al. (2013) Adolescent friendships, BMI, and physical activity: Untangling selection and influence through longitudinal social network analysis. Journal of Research on Adolescence23(3): 537–549.
47.
SnijdersTABvan de BuntGGSteglichCEG (2010) Introduction to stochastic actor-based models for network dynamics. Social Networks32: 44–60.
48.
SteglichCEGSnijdersTABPearsonM (2010) Dynamic networks and behavior: Separating selection from influence. Sociological Methodology40: 329–393.
49.
SutherlandEH (1947) Principles of Criminology, 4th edition. Philadelphia, PA: J. B. Lippincott.
50.
SweetenG (2012) Scaling criminal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology28: 533–557.
51.
ThomasKJMcGloinJM (2013) A dual-systems approach for understanding differential susceptibility to processes of peer influence. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal51(2): 435–474.
52.
ThomasKJNguyenH (2020) Status gains versus status losses: Loss aversion and deviance. Justice Quarterly. Online First
53.
ThornberryTPKrohnMDLizotteAJ, et al. (1993) The role of juvenile gangs in facilitating delinquent behavior. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency30(1): 55–87.
54.
TuranovicJJYoungJTN (2016) Violent offending and victimization in adolescence: Social network mechanisms and homophily. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal54(3): 487–519.
55.
VazsonyiATMikuškaJKelleyEL (2017) It’s time: A meta-analysis on the self-control-deviance link. Journal of Criminal Justice48: 48–63.
56.
VossHL (1964) Differential association and reported delinquent behavior: A replication. Social Problems12: 78–85.
57.
WarrM (1993) Age, peers, and delinquency. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal31(1): 17–40.
58.
WarrM(2002) Companions in Crime: The Social Aspects of Criminal Conduct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
59.
WeermanFM (2011) Delinquent peers in context: A longitudinal network analysis of selection and influence effects. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal49(1): 253–286.
60.
WeermanFMSmeenkWH (2005) Peer similarity in delinquency for different types of friends: A comparison using two measurement methods. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal43(2): 499–524.
61.
WeermanFMWilcoxPSullivanCJ (2018) The short-term dynamics of peers and delinquent behavior: An analysis of bi-weekly changes within a high school student network. Journal of Quantitative Criminology34: 431–463.
62.
WellmanBWongRYLTindallD, et al. (1997) A decade of network change: Turnover, persistence and stability in personal communities. Social Networks19: 27–50.
63.
YoungTNRebellonCJBarnesJC, et al. (2014) Unpacking the black box of peer similarity in deviance: Understanding the mechanisms linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions. Criminology; An Interdisciplinary Journal52(1): 60–86.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
