In this article we analyse the structure, composition and relational resources of young offenders’ personal networks in order to identify how they are related to desistance. We present a mixed-methods analysis of a sample of young offenders, either in juvenile custody or on probation in Catalonia’s juvenile justice system. We first construct a typology of personal networks according to their composition and structure. In each of the profiles we conduct a qualitative analysis in order to identify the role of relational resources in desistance processes and the meaning that desisters give to these resources. Results show the different relevance of strong and weak ties according to the characteristics of the network and explain how these ties may contribute to the process of desistance.
AgnewR (2006) Pressure into Crime: An Overview of General Strain Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
2.
BarryM (2010) Youth transitions: from offending to desistance. Journal of Youth Studies13(1): 121–136.
3.
BesemerS (2014) The impact of timing and frequency of parental criminal behaviour and risk factors on offspring offending. Psychology, Crime & Law20(1): 78–99.
4.
BomanJHMowenTJ (2017) Building the ties that bind, breaking the ties that don’t. Criminology & Public Policy16(3): 753–774.
5.
BottomsAShaplandJ (2011) Steps towards desistance among male young adult recidivists. In: FarrallSSparksRMarunaSHoughM (eds) Escape Routes. Contemporary Perspectives on Life after Punishment. London: Routledge, 41–79.
CalverleyA (2011) All in the family: The importance of support, tolerance and forgiveness in the desistance of male Bangladeshi offenders. In: FarrallSSparksRMarunaSHoughM (eds) Escape Routes: Contemporary Perspectives on Life after Punishment. London: Routledge, 182–201.
8.
CidJMartíJ (2017) Imprisonment, social support, and desistance: A theoretical approach to pathways of desistance and persistence for imprisoned men. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology61(13): 1433–1454.
9.
DuweGClarkV (2013) Blessed be the social tie that binds: The effect of prison visitation on offender recidivism. Criminal Justice Policy Review24: 271–296.
10.
FarrallS (2002) Rethinking What Works with Offenders. Probation, Social Context and Desistance from Crime. Cullompton, UK: Willan Publishing.
11.
FarrallSHunterBSharpeGHCalverleyA (2014) Criminal Careers in Transition: The Social Context of Desistance from Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12.
FarringtonDWelshB (2007) Saving Children from a Life of Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
13.
FarringtonDPPiqueroARJenningWG (2013) Offending from Childhood to Late Middle Age: Recent Results from the Cambridge Study in Delinquent Development. New York: Springer.
14.
GiordanoPCCernkovichSAHollandDD (2003) Changes in friendship relations over the life course: Implications for desistance from crime. Criminology41: 293–327.
15.
GiordanoPCCernkovichSARudolphL (2002) Gender, crime, and desistance: Toward a theory of cognitive transformation. American Journal of Sociology17: 990–1064.
16.
GranovetterM (1983) The strength of weak ties: A network theory revisited. Sociological Theory1: 201–233.
17.
HaganJ (1993) The social embeddedness of crime and unemployment. Criminology31: 465–491.
18.
HaynieDL (2001) Delinquent peers revisited: Does network structure matter?American Journal of Sociology106(4): 1013–1057.
19.
HaynieDL (2002) Friendship networks and delinquency: The relative nature of peer delinquency. Journal of Quantitative Criminology18(2): 99–134.
20.
HaynieDLGiordanoPCManningWDLongmoreMA (2005) Adolescent romantic relationships and delinquency involvement. Criminology43(1): 177–210.
21.
HirschiT (1969) Causes of Delinquency. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
22.
LaubJSampsonR (2003) Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives: Delinquents Boys to Age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
23.
LonardoRGiordanoPCLongmoreMManningW (2009) Parents, friends, and romantic partners: Enmeshment in deviant networks and adolescent delinquency involvement. Journal of Youth Adolescence38: 367–383.
McCartyCKillworthPDRennellJ (2007) Impact of methods for reducing respondent burden on personal network structural measures. Social Networks29(2): 300–315.
McGloinJMShelmerL (2009) Self-control and deviant peer network structure. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency46: 35–72.
28.
MartíJCidJ (2015) Encarcelamiento, lazos familiares y reincidencia: Explorando los límites del familismo. Revista Internacional de Sociología73(1): e002.
29.
MarunaS (1999) Desistance and development: The psychosocial process of ‘going straight’. British Society of Criminology Conferences: Selected Proceedings, Volume 2: 1–25.
30.
MarunaS (2001) Making Good: How Ex-convicts Reform and Rebuild Their Lives. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
31.
MatsuedaRSAndersonKA (1998) The dynamics of delinquent peers and delinquent behaviour. Criminology36: 269–308.
32.
MegensKICMWeermanFM (2012) The social transmission of delinquency: Effects of peer attitudes and behavior revisited. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency49: 420–443.
33.
MoffitT (1993) Adolescence-limited and life-course persistent antisocial behavior: A developmental taxonomy. Psychological Review100: 674–701.
34.
MorselliCBoivinR (2017) Introduction to the special issue on Crime and Networks. Social Networks51: 1–2.
35.
MulveyEPSteinbergLFaganJCauffmanEPiqueroARChassinL… LosoyaSH (2004) Theory and research on desistance from antisocial activity among serious adolescent offenders. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice2(3): 213–236.
36.
RomanCCahillMLachmanPLowrySOroscoCMcCartyC (2012) Social Networks, Delinquency, and Gang Membership: Using a Neighborhood Framework to Examine the Influence of Network Composition and Structure in a Latino Community. URL (accessed 28 March 2019): https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/ojjdp/grants/238538.pdf.
37.
SampsonR (2004) Neighbourhood and community. New Economy11: 106–113.
38.
SampsonRJLaubJH (1993) Crime in the Making: Pathways and Turning Points through Life. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
SampsonRJLaubJH (1997) A life-course theory of cumulative disadvantage and the stability of delinquency. In: ThornberryTP (ed.) Developmental Theories of Crime and Delinquency. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers, 133–161.
40.
SavolainenJ (2008) Work, family and criminal desistance. British Journal of Criminology49(3): 285–304.
41.
SchroederRDGiordanoPCCernkovichSA (2010) Adult child–parent bonds and life course criminality. Journal of Criminal Justice38: 562–571.
42.
SimonsRStewartEGordonLCongerRElderG (2002) A test of life-course explanations for stability and change in antisocial behaviour from adolescence to young adulthood. Criminology40(2): 401–433.
43.
SivertssonFCarlssonC (2015) Continuity, change and contradictions. Risk and agency in criminal careers to age 59. Criminal Justice and Behavior42(4): 382–411.
44.
SmithEPFaulkMSizerMA (2016) Exploring the meso-system: The roles of community, family, and peers in adolescent delinquency and positive youth development. Youth & Society48(3): 318–343.
45.
SutherlandECresseyDRLuckenbillDF ([1947] 1992) Principles of Criminology (11th edn). Boston: General Hall.
46.
ThornberryTPKrohnMD (1997) Peers, drug use, and delinquency. In: StoffDMBreilingJMaserJD (eds) Handbook of Antisocial Behavior. New York: Wiley, 218–233.
47.
ThornberryTPLizotteAJKrohnMDFarnworthMJangSJ (1994) Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behavior: A longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology32: 47–83.
48.
VisherCA (2017) Social networks and desistance. Criminology & Public Policy16(3): 749–752.
49.
VolkerBDe CuyperRMollenhorstGDirkzwagerAVan der LaanPNieuwbeertaP (2016) Changes in the social networks of prisoners: A comparison of their networks before and after imprisonment. Social Networks47: 47–58.
50.
WarrM (1998) Life-course transitions and desistance from crime. Criminology36: 183–216.
51.
WarrM (2002) Companions in Crime. The Social Aspects of Criminal Conduct. New York: Cambridge University Press.
52.
WarrMStaffordM (1991) The influence of delinquent peers: What they think or what they do?Criminology29: 851–866.
53.
WeaverB (2015) Offending and Desistance: The Importance of Social Relations. London: Routledge.
54.
WeermanFM (2003) Co-offending as social exchange: Explaining characteristics of co-offending. British Journal of Criminology43: 398–416.
55.
WeermanFMSmeenkWH (2005) Peer similarity in delinquency for different types of friends: A comparison using two measurement methods. Criminology43(2): 499–524.
56.
WrightJPCullenFTMillerJT (2001) Family social capital and delinquent involvement. Journal of Criminal Justice29: 1–9.
57.
WrightKKimBChassinLLosoyaSPiqueroA (2014) Ecological context, concentrated disadvantage, and youth reoffending: Identifying the social mechanisms in a sample of serious adolescent offenders. Journal of Youth Adolescence43: 1781–1799.
58.
YoungJTN (2011) How do they ‘end up together’? A social network analysis of self-control, homophily, and adolescent relationships. Journal of Quantitative Criminology27(3): 251–273.
