The heterogeneous repercussions of killing Osama bin Laden on global terrorism patterns

Abstract

The United States has adopted the targeted killing of high-ranking members of terrorist organizations to disrupt terrorist networks and exert general deterrence. The most salient of these killings occurred on 2 May 2011, when US Navy Seals killed Osama bin Laden in Pakistan. Although general deterrence suggests this should result in decreased subsequent terrorism, high-profile targeted killings can also result in increased terrorist violence through backlash. This study uses dual trajectory analysis to examine the divergent influence that the killing of bin Laden had on global terrorism trends between November 2007 and May 2014. These analyses reveal that killing bin Laden did not have the desired deterrent impact on global terrorism or on terrorism committed by Al Qaeda.

Keywords

Dual trajectory models general deterrence Osama bin Laden targeted killing terrorism

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Anker

(2005) Villains, victims and heroes: Melodrama, media and September 11. Journal of Communication 55: 22–37.

Argomaniz

Vidal-Diez

(2015) Examining deterrence and backlash effects in counter-terrorism: The case of ETA. Terrorism and Political Violence 27: 160–181.

Beccaria

(1764) On Crimes and Punishments. Indianapolis: Hackett.

Bejan

Parkin

(2015) Examining the effect of repressive and conciliatory government actions on terrorism activity in Israel. Economics Letters 133: 55–58.

Blum

Heymann

(2010) Law and policy of targeted killing. Harvard National Security Journal 1: 145–170.

Buchanan

Daniel

Pearce

(2016) Does more security at airports make us safer or just move the targets? The New York Times, 1 July.

Burke

(2004) Al Qaeda. Foreign Policy 142: 18–26.

Bush

(2001) Remarks in a meeting with the National Security Team and an exchange with reporters at Camp David, Maryland. 15 September.

Bush

(2006) President Bush delivers remarks on terrorism. The Washington Post, 6 September.

10.

Byman

(2006) Do targeted killings work? Foreign Affairs 85: 95–112.

11.

Byman

(2013) Why drones work: The case for Washington’s weapon of choice. Foreign Affairs 92: 32–43.

12.

Cahill

(2017) London attack followed ‘soft target’ terror trend. NBC News, 23 May. URL (accessed 26 April 2019): http://www.nbcnews.com/storyline/london-bridge-attack/manchester-concert-bomb-followed-soft-target-terror-trend-n763501.

13.

Carson

(2017) Assessing the effectiveness of high-profile targeted killings in the ‘War on Terror’. Criminology & Public Policy 16: 191–220.

14.

Carvin

(2012) The trouble with targeted killing. Security Studies 21: 529–555.

15.

Clarke

RVG

Newman

(2006) Outsmarting the Terrorists. London: Greenwood Publishing Group.

16.

Cronin

(2009) How Terrorism Ends: Understanding the Decline and Demise of Terrorist Campaigns. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

17.

Daschle

(2001) Text - S.J.Res.23 – 107th Congress (2001-2002): Authorization for Use of Military Force. URL (accessed 26 April 2019): https://www.congress.gov/bill/107th-congress/senate-joint-resolution/23/text.

18.

Daskal

Vladeck

(2014) After the AUMF. Harvard National Security Journal 5: 115–146.

19.

Daxecker

Hess

(2013). Repression hurts: Coercive government responses and the demise of terrorist campaigns. British Journal of Political Science 43(3): 559–577.

20.

Dear

(2013) Beheading the hydra? Does killing terrorist or insurgent leaders work? Defence Studies 13(3): 293–337.

21.

Dugan

Chenoweth

(2012) Moving beyond deterrence: The effectiveness of raising the expected utility of abstaining from terrorism in Israel. American Sociological Review 77: 597–624.

22.

Dugan

LaFree

Piquero

(2005) Testing a rational choice model of airline hijackings. Criminology 43: 513–529.

23.

Dugan

Yang

S-M

(2012) Introducing group-based trajectory analysis and series hazard modeling: Two innovative methods to systematically examine terrorism over time. In: Lum

Kennedy

(eds) Evidence-Based Counterterrorism Policy. Springer Series on Evidence-Based Crime Policy, Vol. 3. New York: Springer, 113–149.

24.

Dulin

Patiño

(2018) Countering Boko Haram’s violence: A deterrence–backlash perspective. Armed Forces & Society. DOI: 0095327X18756284.

25.

Durlauf

Nagin

(2011) Imprisonment and crime. Criminology & Public Policy 10: 13–54.

26.

Enders

Sandler

(2004) What do we know about the substitution effect in transnational terrorism? In: Silke

(ed.) Research on Terrorism: Trends, Achievements and Failures. New York: Frank Cass, 119–137.

27.

Fisher

Dugan

(2019) Sociological and criminological explanations of terrorism. In: Chenoweth

Gofas

English

Kalyvas

(eds) The Oxford Handbook on Terrorism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

28.

Fisher

Dugan

Chenoweth

(2018) Does US presidential rhetoric affect asymmetric political violence? Critical Studies on Terrorism. Epub ahead of print 12 October 2018. https://doi.org/10.1080/17539153.2018.1494120.

29.

Fisher

Meitus

(2017) Uprooting or sowing violence? Coca eradication and guerrilla violence in Colombia. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 9: 790–807.

30.

Forst

(2017) Targeted killings. Criminology & Public Policy 16: 221–224.

31.

Gill

Piazza

Horgan

(2016) Counterterrorism killings and provisional IRA bombings, 1970–1998. Terrorism and Political Violence 28(3): 473-496.

32.

Gruenewald

(2017) Do targeted killings increase or decrease terrorism? Criminology & Public Policy 16: 187–190.

33.

Hafez

Hatfield

(2006) Do targeted assassinations work? A multivariate analysis of Israel’s controversial tactic during Al-Aqsa uprising. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 29: 359–382.

34.

Haviland

Jones

Nagin

(2011) Group-based trajectory modeling extended to account for nonrandom participant attrition. Sociological Methods & Research 40: 367–390.

35.

Hepworth

(2014) Terrorist retaliation? An analysis of terrorist attacks following the targeted killing of top-tier al Qaeda leadership. Journal of Policing, Intelligence and Counter Terrorism 9: 1–18.

36.

Hoffman

(2009) A counterterrorism strategy for the Obama administration. Terrorism and Political Violence 21: 359–377.

37.

Hsu

Apel

(2015) A situational model of displacement and diffusion following the introduction of airport metal detectors. Terrorism and Political Violence 27: 29–52.

38.

Hsu

Vásquez

McDowall

(2018) A time-series analysis of terrorism: Intervention, displacement, and diffusion of benefits. Justice Quarterly 35: 557–583.

39.

Jenkins

(1987) Should our arsenal against terrorism include assassination? No. P-7303. RAND Corporation.

40.

Jiao

Luo

(2018) A model of terrorism and counterterrorism with location choices. Public Choice. DOI: 10.1007/s11127-018-0559-8.

41.

Johnston

(2004) Terrorism and transportation policy and administration: Balancing the model and equations for optimal security. Review of Policy Research 21: 263–274.

42.

Jones

Nagin

(2007) Advances in group-based trajectory modeling and an SAS procedure for estimating them. Sociological Methods & Research 35: 542–571.

43.

Jordan

(2009) When heads roll: Assessing the effectiveness of leadership decapitation. Security Studies 18: 719–755.

44.

LaFree

Bersani

(2014) County-level correlates of terrorist attacks in the United States. Criminology & Public Policy 13: 455–481.

45.

LaFree

Dugan

(2007) Introducing the Global Terrorism Database. Terrorism and Political Violence 19: 181–204.

46.

LaFree

Dugan

Korte

(2009a) The impact of British counterterrorist strategies on political violence in Northern Ireland: Comparing deterrence and backlash models. Criminology 47: 17–45.

47.

LaFree

Dugan

Miller

(2014) Putting Terrorism in Context: Lessons from the Global Terrorism Database. New York: Routledge.

48.

LaFree

Morris

Dugan

(2010) Cross-national patterns of terrorism: Comparing trajectories for total, attributed and fatal attacks, 1970–2006. British Journal of Criminology 50: 622–649.

49.

LaFree

Yang

S-M

Crenshaw

(2009b) Trajectories of terrorism. Criminology & Public Policy 8: 445–473.

50.

Luft

(2003) The logic of Israel’s targeted killing. Middle East Quarterly 10(1): 3–13.

51.

Lynch

(2011) Implications of opportunity theory for combating terrorism. In: Forst

Greene

Lynch

(eds) Criminologists on Terrorism and Homeland Security. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 151–182.

52.

Mannes

(2008) Testing the snake head strategy: Does killing or capturing its leaders reduce a terrorist group’s activity? Journal of International Policy Solutions 9: 40–49.

53.

Mitchell

WJT

(2012) Preface to ‘Occupy: Three Inquiries in Disobedience’. Critical Inquiry 39: 1–7.

54.

Nagin

(2005) Group-based Modeling of Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

55.

Obama

(2011) Osama Bin Laden dead. 2 May. URL (accessed 26 April 2019): https://obamawhitehouse.archives.gov/blog/2011/05/02/osama-bin-laden-dead (accessed 6.2.17).

56.

Orr

(2011) Unmanned, unprecedented, and unresolved: The status of American drone strikes in Pakistan under international law. Cornell International Law Journal 44: 729–752.

57.

Perry

Apel

Newman

Clarke

(2016) The situational prevention of terrorism: An evaluation of the Israeli West Bank barrier. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 1–25.

58.

Piazza

Choi

S-W

(2018) International military interventions and transnational terrorist backlash. International Studies Quarterly 62: 686–695.

59.

Ross

Gurr

(1989) Why terrorism subsides: A comparative study of Canada and the United States. Comparative Politics 21: 405–426.

60.

Sandler

Siqueira

(2006) Global terrorism: Deterrence versus pre-emption. Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d’Economique 39(4): 1370–1387.

61.

Schmitt

Shanker

(2011) Counterstrike: The Untold Story of America’s Secret Campaign Against Al Qaeda. New York: Times Books.

62.

Schuster

Stein

Jaycox

Collins

Marshall

Elliott

Zhou

Kanouse

Morrison

Berry

(2001) A national survey of stress reactions after the September 11, 2001, terrorist attacks. New England Journal of Medicine 345: 1507–1512.

63.

Stafford

Warr

(1993) A reconceptualization of general and specific deterrence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 30: 123–135.

64.

START (National Consortium for the Study of Terrorism and Responses to Terrorism) (2016) Global Terrorism Database. URL (accessed 26 April 2019): https://www.start.umd.edu/gtd/.

65.

Victoroff

(2005) The mind of the terrorist: A review and critique of psychological approaches. Journal of Conflict Resolution 49: 3–42.

66.

Wilner

(2010) Targeted killings in Afghanistan: Measuring coercion and deterrence in counterterrorism and counterinsurgency. Studies in Conflict & Terrorism 33: 307–329.