The recent process of criminalization of stalking in various European countries has proved to be complex, due to the diffuse nature of the phenomenon. One tool for helping to identify the most appropriate legal response to this issue is social perception studies. This article presents the findings of one such study conducted with a sample of 1010 university students, one of the population segments most victimized by stalking, based on two case scenarios. The aim was to determine, first, this population segment’s perceptions of the incidence and seriousness of the stalking phenomenon and, second, their attitude regarding the proportionate legal response in cases of stalking, depending on both certain personal characteristics of the sample members and other variables related to the case scenario itself. The results show that the sample population’s attitude with regard to the appropriate legal response in such cases is relatively nonpunitive. They also reveal distortions in the sample population’s view of the incidence and seriousness of these behaviours: in contrast to the findings of stalking victimization studies, the respondents considered cases of stalking by strangers to be more serious.
AucoinK (2005) Family Violence in Canada: A Statistical Profile 2005. Stalking – Criminal Harassment. Ottawa: Canadian Centre for Justice Statistics.
2.
BaldryAC (2005) From domestic violence to stalking: The infinite cycle of violence. In: BoonJSheridanL (eds) Stalking and Psychosexual Obsession: Psychological Perspectives from Prevention, Policing and Treatment. London: John Wiley & Sons, 83–104.
3.
BaumKCatalanoSRandMRoseK (2009) Stalking Victimization in the United States. Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
4.
BjerregaardB (2000) An empirical study of stalking victimization. Violence and Victims15(4): 389–406.
5.
BuddTMattinsonJ (2000) The Extent and Nature of Stalking: Findings from the 1998 British Crime Survey. London: Home Office Research Study 210, Home Office Research, Development and Statistics Directorate.
6.
BurgessAWBakerTGreeninDHartmanCRBurgessAGDouglasJEHalloranR (1997) Stalking behaviors within domestic violence. Journal of Family Violence12(4): 389–403.
7.
CassAI (2011) Defining stalking: The influence of legal factors, extralegal factors, and particular actions on judgements of college students. Western Criminology Review12(1): 1–14.
8.
CassAIMallicoatSL (2015) College students’ perceptions of Victim Action: Will targets of stalking report to police?American Journal of Criminal Justice40(2): 250–269.
9.
CassAIRosayAB (2012) College students’ perceptions of criminal justice system responses to stalking. Sex Roles66: 392–404.
10.
De FazioLSgarbiCMooreJSpitzbergBH (2015) The impact of criminalization of stalking on Italian students: Adherence to stalking myths. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment and Trauma, Papers in Communication Studies 59: 1–17.
11.
DennisonSM (2007) Interpersonal relationships and stalking: Identifying when to intervene. Law and Human Behavior31: 353–367.
12.
DennisonSMThomsonDM (2000) Community perceptions of stalking: What are the fundamental concerns?Psychiatry, Psychology, and Law7: 159–169.
13.
DennisonSMThomsonDM (2002) Identifying stalking: The relevance of intent in commonsense reasoning. Law and Human Behavior26: 543–561.
14.
DiamondSSStalansLJ (1989) The myth of judicial leniency in sentencing. Behavioral Sciences and Law7(1): 73–89.
15.
DouglasKSDuttonDD (2001) Assessing the link between stalking and domestic violence. Aggression and violent behavior6(6): 519–546.
16.
DoveliusAMÖbergJHolmbergS (2006) Stalking in Sweden – Prevalence and Prevention. Estocolm, Sweden: Edita Norsteds.
17.
DuffSCScottAJ (2013) Understanding perceptions of stalking: The impact of additional contextual information regarding the breakdown of relationships. Journal of Criminal Psychology3(2): 136–144.
18.
DunnJL (2002) Courting Disaster: Intimate Stalking, Culture, and Criminal Justice. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.
19.
European Commission Directorate-General X ‘Information, Communication, Culture and Audiovisual Media’ (1999) Eurobarometer 51.0: Europeans and Their Views on Domestic Violence against Women. Brussels: INRA (Europe) - European Coordination Office.
20.
FeltesTBalloniACsapskaJBodelónEStenningP (2012) Gender-based Violence, Stalking and Fear of Crime. Research Project 2009–2011. Research Report Publication. Bochum, Germany: Ruhr-Universität Bochum.
21.
FinkelhorD (2009) The prevention of childhood sexual abuse. The Future of Children19(2): 169–194.
22.
FRA [European Union for Fundamental Rights] (2014) Violence against Women: An EU-wide Survey. Main Results. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
23.
GavinJScottAJ (2016) The influence of the sex of and prior relationship between the perpetrator and victim on perceptions of stalking: A qualitative analysis. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law25(5): 716–732.
24.
HillsAMTaplinJJ (1998) Anticipated responses to stalking: Effect of threat and target-stalker relationship. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law5: 139–146.
25.
HuttonN (2005) Beyond populist punitivism?Punishment and Society7: 243–258.
26.
JordanCEWilcoxPPritchardAJ (2007) Stalking acknowledgement and reporting among college women experiencing intrusive behaviors: Implications for the emergence of a ‘classic stalking case’. Journal of Criminal Justice35: 556–569.
27.
KamphuisJHGaleazziGMDe FazioLEmmelkampPMGFarnhamFGroenenAJamesDVervaekeG (2005) Stalking – Perceptions and attitudes amongst helping professions. An EU cross-national comparison. Clinical Psychology and Psychotherapy12: 215–225.
28.
KingAMarunaS (2009) Is a conservative just a liberal who has been mugged? Exploring the origins of punitive views. Punishment and Society11(2): 147–169.
29.
LambertEGSmithBWGestmanJCluse-TolarTJiangS (2013) Do men and women differ in their perceptions of stalking: An exploratory study among college students. Violence and Victims28(2): 195–209.
30.
MarunaSKingA (2009) Once a criminal, always a criminal? ‘Redeemability’ and the psychology of punitive public attitudes. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research15: 7–24.
31.
MatosMSheridanL (2015) Perceptions and personal experiences of unwanted attention among Portuguese male students. Psychology, Crime and Law21: 398–411.
32.
MigliettaAAcquadro MaranD (2017) Gender, sexism and the social representation of stalking: What makes the difference?Psychology of Violence7(4): 563–573.
33.
Modena Group on Stalking (2005) Recognition and perceptions of stalking by police officers and general practitioners: A multi-centre European study. Female Victims of Stalking: Recognition and Intervention Models: A European Study. Milan: Franco Angeli.
34.
National Union of Students (2011) A Study of Women Students’ Experiences of Harassment, Stalking, Violence and Sexual Assault. London: NUS.
35.
PhillipsLQuirkRRosenfeldBO’ConnorM (2004) Is it stalking? Perceptions of stalking among college undergraduates. Criminal Justice and Behavior31(1): 73–96.
36.
RobertsJV (2008) Punishing Persistent Offenders. Exploring Community and Offender Perspectives. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
37.
RobertsJVHoughM (2002) Changing Attitudes to Punishment: Public Opinion, Crime and Justice. London: Willan.
38.
ScottAJSheridanL (2011) ‘Reasonable’ perceptions of stalking: The influence of conduct severity and the perpetrator–target relationship. Psychology, Crime & Law17: 331–343.
39.
ScottAJLloydRGavinJ (2010) The influence of prior relationship on perceptions of stalking in the United Kingdom and Australia. Criminal Justice and Behavior37(11): 1185–1194.
40.
ScottAJDuffSCSheridanLRajakarunaN (2018) The influence of contextual information regarding the breakdown of relationships and perpetrator–target sex composition on perceptions of relational stalking. Psychology, Crime and Law24(11): 1–36.
41.
ScottAJRajakarunaNSheridanLSleathE (2014) International perceptions of stalking and responsibility: The influence of prior relationship and severity of behavior. Criminal Justice and Behavior41(2): 220–236.
42.
SheridanLGillettRDaviesGMBlaauwEPatelD (2003) ‘There’s no smoke without fire’: Are male ex-partners perceived as more ‘entitled’ to stalk than acquaintance or stranger stalkers?British Journal of Psychology94: 87–98.
43.
SheridanLScottAJArcherJRobertsK (2017) Female undergraduates’ perceptions of intrusive behavior in 12 countries. Aggressive Behavior43: 531–543.
44.
TjadenPThoennesN (1998) Stalking in America: Findings from the National Violence Against Women Survey. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice.
45.
TNS Opinion & Social (2010) Special Eurobarometer 344 – Eurobarometer 73.2: Domestic Violence against Women. Brussels: Directorate-General for Justice, Freedom and Security.
46.
UhlCARhynerKJTerranceCAPlummKM (2017) Perceptions of stalking: The impact of threat level and victim response. Violence and Victims32(2): 326–341.
47.
Van der AaS (2012) Stalking as a form of (domestic) violence against women: Two of a kind?Rassegna Italiana di Criminologia3: 174–187.
48.
Van der AaS (2017) New trends in the criminalization of stalking in the EU member states. European Journal on Criminal Policy and Research23: 1–19.
49.
VillacampaC (2009) Stalking y derecho penal. Relevancia jurídico-penal de una nueva forma de acoso. Madrid: Iustel.
50.
VillacampaCPujolsA (2017a) Stalking victimisation: Prevalence and dynamics amongst Spanish university students. European Journal of Crime, Criminal Law and Criminal Justice25: 1–24.
51.
VillacampaCPujolsA (2017b) Stalking: efectos en las víctimas, estrategias de afrontamiento y consideraciones legales derivadas. Indret: Revista para el Análisis del Derecho2/2017: 1–33.
52.
YungCR (2010) The emerging war on sex offenders. Harvard Civil Rights–Civil Liberties Law Review45: 435–483.
