Wikström’s Situational Action Theory of Crime Causation (SAT) aims at providing a comprehensive account of the action-generating mechanisms that underlie rule-breaking. Paying tribute to the longstanding criminological interest in self-control, SAT also entails a new view of this concept and its role in crime causation. SAT claims that morality is the more fundamental determinant of rule-breaking and that self-control should become relevant only when actors enter a process of deliberation on whether or not to break a rule. Our contribution is twofold: theoretically, we discuss the role of self-control in SAT and derive previously untested implications; empirically, we evaluate these implications based on data from a large German panel study and thereby advance our understanding of when and how self-control matters for crime and delinquency.
AgnewRBrezinaTWrightJPCullenFT (2002) Strain, personality traits and delinquency: Extending general strain theory. Criminology40: 43–71.
2.
AntonaccioOTittleCR (2008) Morality, self-control, and crime. Criminology46: 479–510.
3.
BendixenMEndresenIMOlweusD (2003) Variety and frequency scales of antisocial involvement: Which one is better?Legal and Criminological Psychology8: 135–150.
4.
BouhanaNWikströmP-O (2011) Theorizing terrorism: Terrorism as moral action. Contemporary Readings in Law & Social Justice2(1): 9–79.
5.
BruinsmaGJNPauwelsLJRWeermanFMBernascoW (2015) Situational action theory: Cross-sectional and cross-lagged tests of its core propositions. Canadian Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice57(3): 363–398.
6.
BurtCHSimonsRL (2013) Self-control, thrill seeking, and crime: Motivation matters. Criminal Justice and Behavior40(11): 1326–1348.
7.
CochranJKAleksaVSandersBA (2008) Are persons low in self-control rational and deterrable?Deviant Behavior29: 461–483.
8.
FelsonRBOsgoodDW (2008) Violent crime. In: GoodeE (ed.) Out of Control: Assessing the General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 160–172.
9.
GallupeOBaronSW (2014) Morality, self-control, deterrence, and drug use. Street youths and situational action theory. Crime & Delinquency60: 284–305.
10.
GerstnerDOberwittlerD (2015) Wer kennt wen und was geht ab? Ein netzwerkanalytischer Blick auf die Rolle delinquenter Peers im Rahmen der Situational Action Theory. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform98(3): 204–226.
11.
GottfredsonMRHirschiT (1990) A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
12.
GrasmickHGTittleCRBursikJRet al. (1993) Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency30: 5–29.
13.
HayCHMeldrumRC (2016) Self-Control and Crime over the Life Course. Los Angeles: SAGE.
14.
HirtenlehnerH (2015) ‘Gelegenheit macht Diebe!’ oder ‘Wer raucht, der stiehlt!’. Der Beitrag der Situational Action Theory zur Erklärung der Ladendiebstahlskriminalität junger Menschen. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform98(3): 257–279.
15.
HirtenlehnerHKunzF (2016) The interaction between self-control and morality in crime causation among older adults. European Journal of Criminology13(3): 393–409.
16.
HirtenlehnerHPauwelsLJRMeskoG (2014) Is the effect of perceived deterrence on juvenile offending contingent on the level of self-control? Results from three countries. British Journal of Criminology54(1): 128–150.
17.
KronebergCErnstAGerthM (2016) Das Projekt ‘Freundschaft und Gewalt im Jugendalter’. In: NeubacherFBögeleinN (eds) Krise-Kriminalität-Kriminologie. Mönchengladbach: Forum Verlag Godesberg, 353–364.
18.
KronebergCHeintzeIMehlkopG (2010) The interplay of moral norms and instrumental incentives in crime causation. Criminology48: 259–294.
19.
LaubJHSampsonRJ (2003) Shared Beginnings, Divergent Lives. Delinquent Boys to Age 70. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
20.
OsgoodDWFinkenLLMcMorrisBJ (2002) Analyzing multiple-item measures of crime and deviance II: Tobit regression analysis of transformed scores. Journal of Quantitative Criminology18(4): 319–347.
21.
PaternosterRPogarskyG (2009) Rational choice, agency and thoughtfully reflective decision making: The short and long-term consequences of making good choices. Journal of Quantitative Criminology25(2): 103–127.
22.
PauwelsL (2012) How similar is the interaction between low self-control and deviant moral beliefs in the explanation of adolescent offending? An inquiry in subgroups by gender and immigrant background. Psychology Research Progress: Ethical Issues in the 21st Century: 1–12.
23.
PauwelsL (2015) Über die Haltbarkeit in der Situational Action Theory beschriebenen Interaktionseffekte in verschiedenen Bevölkerungsgruppen: Eine belgische Studie unter Jungen und Mädchen mit und ohne Migrationshintergrund. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform98(3): 280–296.
24.
PauwelsLSvenssonR (2017) How robust is the moderating effect of extremist beliefs on the relationship between self-control and violent extremism?Crime & Delinquency63(8): 1000–1016.
25.
PauwelsLSvenssonRHirtenlehnerH (2018) Testing situational action theory: A narrative of published studies between 2006–2015. European Journal of Criminology15(1): 32–55.
26.
PogarskyG (2007) Deterrence and individual differences among convicted offenders. Journal of Quantitative Criminology23(1): 59–74.
27.
SchulzS (2014) Individual differences in the deterrence process: Which individuals learn (most) from their offending experiences?Journal of Quantitative Criminology30(2): 215–236.
28.
SchulzS (2016) ‘Don’t blow your cool’: Provocation, violent coping, and the conditioning effects of self-control. Journal of Quantitative Criminology32(4): 561–587.
29.
SeddigD (2014) Peer group association, the acceptance of norms and violent behaviour: A longitudinal analysis of reciprocal effects. European Journal of Criminology11: 319–339.
30.
StewartEASimonsRL (2010) Race, code of the street, and violent delinquency: A multilevel investigation of neighborhood street culture and individual norms of violence. Criminology48: 569–605.
31.
SvenssonRPauwelsL (2010) Is a risky lifestyle always ‘risky’? The interaction between individual propensity and lifestyle risk in adolescent offending: A test in two urban samples. Crime & Delinquency56(4): 608–626.
32.
SvenssonRPauwelsLWeermanFM (2010) Does the effect of self-control on adolescent offending vary by level of morality? A test in three countries. Criminal Justice and Behavior37: 732–743.
33.
SweetenG (2012) Scaling criminal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology28(3): 533–557.
34.
WikströmP-O (2004) Crime as alternative: Towards a cross-level situational action theory of crime causation. In: McCordJ (ed.) Beyond Empiricism: Institutions and Intentions in the Study of Crime. Advances in Criminological Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 1–38.
35.
WikströmP-O (2005) The social origins of pathways in crime: Towards a developmental ecological action theory of crime involvement and its changes. In: FarringtonD (ed.) Integrated Developmental and Life-course Theories of Offending. Advances in Criminological Theory. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction, 211–246.
36.
WikströmP-O (2006) Individuals, settings, and acts of crime: Situational mechanisms and the explanation of crime. In: WikströmP-OHSampsonRJ (eds) The Explanation of Crime. Context, Mechanisms and Development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 61–108.
37.
WikströmP-O (2009) Crime propensity, criminogenic exposure and crime involvement in early to mid adolescence. Monatsschrift für Kriminologie und Strafrechtsreform92(2): 253–266.
38.
WikströmP-O (2011) Does everything matter?Addressing the problem of causation and explanation in the study of crime. In: McGloinJMSullivanCJKennedyLW (eds) When Crime Appears: The Role of Emergence. London. Routledge, 53–72.
39.
WikströmP-OSvenssonR (2010) When does self-control matter? The interaction between morality and self-control in crime causation. European Journal of Criminology7(5): 395–410.
40.
WikströmP-OTreiberK (2007) The role of self-control in crime causation: Beyond Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime. European Journal of Criminology4(2): 237–264.
41.
WikströmP-OTreiberK (2009) Violence as situational action. International Journal of Conflict and Violence3(1): 75–96.
42.
WikströmP-OOberwittlerDTreiberKet al. (2012) Breaking Rules: The Social and Situational Dynamics of Young People’s Urban Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
