Research has shown that punitive attitudes are influenced by denominational affiliation, religious participation and images of God. However, most of the research so far has been conducted in the United States, which is very different compared with most European states with respect to the importance of religion. The paper analyses the relationship between religion and punitiveness outside the United States in a European context based on a German-wide representative survey (N = 2265). Respondents who perceive God as loving are less punitive and support the death penalty less. The same holds for the frequency of praying and church attendance. Protestants and Catholics are also less supportive of the death penalty compared with non-affiliated individuals.
ApplegateBK (1997) Specifying Public Support for Rehabilation: A Factorial Survey Approach. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati.
2.
ApplegateBKCullenFTLinkBG. (1996) Determinants of public punitiveness toward drunk driving: A factorial survey approach. Justice Quarterly13(1): 57–79.
3.
ApplegateBKCullenFTFisherBS. (2000) Forgiveness and fundamentalism: Reconsidering the relationship between correctional attitudes and religion. Criminology38(3): 719–754.
4.
BaderCDDesmondSAMenckenCF. (2010) Divine justice: The relationship between images of God and attitudes toward criminal punishment. Criminal Justice Review35(1): 90–106.
5.
BaierDKemmeSHanslmaierM. (2011) Kriminalitätsfurcht, Strafbedürfnisse und wahrgenommene Kriminalitätsentwicklung. Ergebnisse von bevölkerungsrepräsentativen Befragungen aus den Jahren 2004, 2006 und 2010 [Fear of crime, longing for sanctions and subjective crime trends. Results from a representative survey from the years 2004, 2006 and 2010]. KFN Research Report No. 117, Criminological Research Institute of Lower Saxony, Hannover.
6.
BaumerEPMessnerSFRosenfeldR (2003) Explaining spatial variation in support for capital punishment: A multilevel analysis. American Journal of Sociology108(4): 844–875.
7.
BlumsteinACohenJ (1980) Sentencing of convicted offenders: An analysis of the public’s view. Law & Society Review14(2): 223.
8.
BorgMJ (1997) The Southern subculture of punitiveness? Regional variation in support for capital punishment. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency34(1): 25–45.
9.
BrittCL (1998) Race, religion, and support for the death penalty: A research note. Justice Quarterly15(1): 175–191.
10.
CochranJCPiqueroAR (2011) Exploring sources of punitiveness among German citizens. Crime & Delinquency57(4): 544–571.
11.
DenkKM (2012) Jurisprudence that necessarily embodies moral judgment : The Eighth Amendment, Catholic teaching, and death penalty discourse. Notre Dame Law Review2012(1): 323–394.
12.
DoobANRobertsJV (1984) Social psychology, social attitudes, and attitudes toward sentencing. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science16(4): 269–280.
13.
DowlerK (2003) Media consumption and public attitudes toward crime and justice: The relationship between fear of crime, punitive attitudes, and perceived police effectiveness. Journal of Criminal Justice and Popular Culture10(2): 109–126.
14.
DurkheimE (1988) Über soziale Arbeitsteilung [The Division of Labour in Society], 2nd edn.Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp.
15.
EllisonCGGeorgeLK (1994) Religious involvement, social ties, and social support in a southeastern community. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion33(1): 46–61.
16.
EickenJSchmitz-VeltinA (2010) Die Entwicklung der Kirchemitglieder in Deutschland [The development of church membership in Germany]. Wirtschaft und Statistik6/2010: 576–589.
17.
EvansTDAdamsM (2003) Salvation or damnation? Religion and correctional ideology. American Journal of Criminal Justice28(1): 15–35.
18.
FrejkaTWestoffCF (2008) Religion, religiousness and fertility in the US and in Europe. European Journal of Population24(1): 5–31.
19.
GarlandD (1990) Punishment and Modern Society. A Study in Social Theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
GrasmickHGCochranJKBursikRJ. (1993) Religion, punitive justice, and support for the death penalty. Justice Quarterly10: 289–314.
21.
GreenDA (2009) Feeding wolves: Punitiveness and culture. European Journal of Criminology6(6): 517–536.
22.
HartnagelTFTempletonL (2008) Perceptions, emotions and experiences of crime: Effects on attitudes toward punishment in a Canadian sample. In: KuryH (ed.) Fear of Crime - Punitivity. New Developments in Theory and Research. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer, 349–370.
23.
HirtenlehnerH (2011) The origins of punitive mentalities in late modern societies. Testing an expressive explanatory model. In: KuryHSheaE (eds) Punitivity. International Developments. Vol. 1: Punitiveness – A Global Phenomenon?Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer, 27–52.
24.
HübnerMSchmidtPSchürhoffR. (2014) Allgemeine Autoritarismus-Kurzform [General authoritarianism short form]. In: DannerDGlöckner-RistA (eds) Zusammenstellung sozialwissenschaftlicher Items und Skalen. doi: 10.6102/zis119.
25.
IannacconeLR (1991) The consequences of religious market structure: Adam Smith and the economics of religion. Rationality and Society3(2): 156–177.
26.
IannacconeLR (1998) Introduction to the economics of religion. Journal of Economic Literature36(3): 1465–1495.
27.
IannacconeLRFinkeRStarkR (1997) Deregulating religion: The economics of church and state. Economic Inquiry35: 350.
28.
JohnsonMKRowattWCBarnard-BrakLM. (2011) A mediational analysis of the role of right-wing authoritarianism and religious fundamentalism in the religiosity–prejudice link. Personality and Individual Differences50(6): 851–856.
29.
KemmeSHanslmaierMPfeifferC (2014) Experience of parental corporal punishment in childhood and adolescence and its effect on punitiveness. Journal of Family Violence29(2): 129–142.
30.
KingAMarunaS (2009) Is a conservative just a liberal who has been mugged? Exploring the origins of punitive views. Punishment & Society11(2): 147–169.
31.
KuryHFerdinandT (1999) Public opinion and punitivity. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry22(3–4): 373–392.
32.
KuryHKaniaHObergfell-FuchsJ (2004) Worüber sprechen wir, wenn wir über Punitivität sprechen? Versuch einer konzeptionellen und empirischen Begriffsbestimmung [What are we talking about when we speak about punitivity? Attempt at a conceptional and empirical determination of the term]. In: LautmannRKlimkeDSackF (eds) Punitivität. 8. Beiheft des Kriminologischen Journals. Weinheim: Juventa, 51–88.
33.
LautmannRKlimkeD (2004) Punitivität als Schlüsselbegriff für eine kritische Kriminologie [Punitivity as key term for a critical criminology]. In: LautmannRKlimkeDSackF (eds) Punitivität. 8. Beiheft des Kriminologischen Journals. Weinheim: Juventa, 9–29.
34.
MessnerSFBaumerEPRosenfeldR (2006) Distrust of government, the vigilante tradition, and support for capital punishment. Law & Society Review40(3): 559–590.
35.
MüllerDPollackO (2013) Religionsmonitor verstehen was verbindet. Religiosität und Zusammenhalt in Deutschland [Monitor on Religion – Understanding What Connects. Religiosity and Cohesion in Germany]. Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.
36.
NorrisPInglehartR (2004) Sacred and Secular. Religion and Politics Worldwide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37.
Pew Research Center (2011) The American–Western European Values Gap. Pew Global Attitudes Project.
38.
PfeifferCWindzioMKleimannM (2005) Media use and its impacts on crime perception, sentencing attitudes and crime policy. European Journal of Criminology2(3): 259–285.
39.
ReubandK-H (2011) Changing punitiveness in the German population? A review of the empirical evidence based on nationwide surveys. In: KuryHSheaE (eds) Punitivity. International Developments. Vol. 2: Insecurity and Punitiveness. Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer, 131–163.
40.
RobertsLDIndermaurD (2007) Predicting punitive attitudes in Australia. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law14(1): 56–65.
41.
SimonsonJ (2011) Problems in measuring punitiveness. Results from a German study. In: KuryHSheaE (eds) Punitivity. International Developments. Vol. 1: Punitiveness – A Global Phenomenon?Bochum: Universitätsverlag Dr. N. Brockmeyer, 73–96.
42.
SmithTW (2006) Altruism and Empathy in America: Trends and Correlates. Chicago: National Opinion Research Center.
43.
SöötM-L (2013) Trust and punitive attitudes. Crime, Law and Social Change59(5): 537–554.
44.
SossJLangbeinLMetelkoA (2003) Why do white Americans support the death penalty?Journal of Politics65(2): 397–421.
45.
SpiranovicCARobertsLDIndermaurD (2012) What predicts punitiveness? An examination of predictors of punitive attitudes towards offenders in Australia. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law19(2): 249–261.
46.
StackS (2003) Authoritarianism and support for the death penalty: A multivariate analysis. Sociological Focus36(4): 333–352.
47.
StalansLJ (2002) Measuring attitudes to sentencing. In: RobertsJVHoughM (eds) Changing Attitudes to Punishment. Public Opinion, Crime and Justice. Cullompton: Willan Publishing, 15–32.
48.
TylerTRBoeckmanRJ (1997) Three strikes and you are out, but why?Law & Society Review31: 237–266.
49.
TylerTRWeberR (1982) Support for the death penalty: Instrumental response to crime or symbolic attitude?Law & Society Review17(1): 21–45.
50.
UnneverJDCullenFT (2006) Christian fundamentalism and support for capital punishment. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency43: 169–197.
51.
UnneverJDCullenFT (2010) The social sources of Americans’ punitiveness: A test of three competing models. Criminology48(1): 99–129.
52.
UnneverJDCullenFTApplegateBK (2005) Turning the other cheek: Reassessing the impact of religion on punitive ideology. Justice Quarterly22(3): 304–339.
53.
UnneverJDCullenFTBartkowskiJP (2006) Images of God and public support for capital punishment: Does a close relationship with a loving God matter?Criminology44(4): 835–866.
54.
UnneverJDCullenFTFisherBS (2005) Empathy and public support for capital punishment. Journal of Crime and Justice28: 1–34.
55.
UnneverJDCullenFTFisherBS (2007) ‘A liberal is someone who has not been mugged’: Criminal victimization and political beliefs. Justice Quarterly24(2): 309–334.
56.
WozniakKHLewisAR (2010) Reexamining the effect of Christian denominational affiliation on death penalty support. Journal of Criminal Justice38(5): 1082–1089.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
