How is parenting related to adolescent delinquency? A between- and within-person analysis of the mediating role of self-control,delinquent attitudes,peer delinquency,and time spent in criminogenic settings

Abstract

We examined how parenting is directly and indirectly associated with adolescent delinquency. We derived four possible mechanisms from major criminological theories and examined their relative contribution to explaining the relationship between parenting and delinquency: self-control theory (that is, self-control), differential association theory (that is, delinquent attitudes and peer delinquency), and routine activity theory (that is, time spent in criminogenic settings). In addition, we examined how changes in different aspects of parenting during adolescence were directly and indirectly related to changes in delinquency. Results of multilevel structural equation modeling on two waves of panel data on 603 adolescents indicated that parenting was indirectly related to delinquency through self-control, delinquent attitudes, peer delinquency, and time spent in criminogenic settings. However, only when examined together these variables, derived from major criminological theories, almost fully mediate the effects of parenting. Furthermore, changes in parenting during adolescence were indirectly related to changes in delinquency through changes in delinquent attitudes and in peer delinquency.

Keywords

Delinquency delinquent attitudes parenting peer delinquency self-control time spent in criminogenic settings

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abar

Jackson

Colby

. (2014) Parent–child discrepancies in reports of parental monitoring and their relationship to adolescent alcohol-related behaviors. Journal of Youth and Adolescence Advance online publication.

Bacon

(2004) The contributions of reliability and pretests to effective assessment. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation 9.

Bernasco

Ruiter

Bruinsma

GJN

. (2013) Situational causes of offending: A fixed-effects analysis of space–time budget data. Criminology 51: 895–926.

Bernburg

Thorlindsson

(2001) Routine activities in social context: A closer look at the role of opportunity in deviant behavior. Justice Quarterly 18: 543–567.

Bivand

(2008) Interpolation and geostatistics. In: Bivand

(ed.) Applied Spatial Data Analysis with R. New York: Springer, 191–235.

Bollen

(1987) Total, direct, and indirect effects in structural equation models. Sociologicl Methodology 17: 37–69.

Burt

Simons

(2006) A longitudinal test of the effects of parenting and the stability of self-control: Negative evidence for the general theory of crime. Criminology 44: 353–396.

Burt

Sweeten

Simons

(2014) Self-control through emerging adulthood: Instability, multidimensionality, and criminological significance. Criminology 52: 450–487.

Cohen

Felson

(1979) Social change and crime rate trends: A routine activity approach. American Sociological Review 44: 588–608.

10.

Duckworth

Kern

(2011) A meta-analysis of the convergent validity of self-control measures. Journal of Research in Personality 45: 259–268.

11.

Felson

Boba

(2010) Crime and Everyday Life. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications Inc.

12.

Galambos

Barker

Almeida

(2003) Parents do matter: Trajectories of change in externalizing and internalizing problems in early adolescence. Child Development 74: 578–594.

13.

Gottfredson

Hirschi

(1990) A General Theory of Crime. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

14.

Grasmick

Tittle

Bursik

RJJ

. (1993) Testing the core empirical implications of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 30: 5–29.

15.

Halgunseth

Perkins

Lippold

. (2013) Delinquent-oriented attitudes mediate the relation between parental inconsistent discipline and early adolescent behavior. Journal of Family Psychology 27: 293–302.

16.

Hay

(2001) Parenting, self-control, and delinquency: A test of self-control theory. Criminology 39: 707–736.

17.

Hayes

(2009) Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs 76: 408–420.

18.

Haynie

Osgood

(2005) Reconsidering peers and delinquency: How do peers matter? Social Forces 84: 1109–1130.

19.

Hoeve

Dubas

Eichelsheim

. (2009) The relationship between parenting and delinquency: A meta-analysis. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 37: 749–775.

20.

Hoffman

Stawski

(2009) Persons as contexts: Evaluating between-person and within-person effects in longitudinal analysis. Research in Human Development 6: 97–120.

21.

Hox

Maas

CJM

Brinkhuis

MJS

(2010) The effect of estimation method and sample size in multilevel structural equation modeling. Statistica Nederlandica 64: 157–170.

22.

Janssen

Deković

Bruinsma

GJN

(2014) Parenting and time adolescents spend in criminogenic settings: A between- and within-person analysis. British Journal of Criminology 54: 551–567.

23.

Keijsers

Branje

SJT

Hawk

. (2012) Forbidden friends as forbidden fruit: Parental supervision of friendships, contact with deviant peers, and adolescent delinquency. Child Development 83: 651–666.

24.

Keizer

Lindenberg

Steg

(2008) The spreading of disorder. Science 322: 1681–1685.

25.

Kerr

Stattin

(2000) What parents know, how they know it, and several forms of adolescent adjustment: Further support for a reinterpretation of monitoring. Developmental Psychology 36: 366–380.

26.

Knoester

Haynie

Stephens

(2006) Parenting practices and adolescents’ friendship networks. Journal of Marriage and Family 68: 1247–1260.

27.

Lahey

Van Hulle

D’Onofrio

. (2008) Is parental knowledge of their adolescent offspring’s whereabouts and peer associations spuriously associated with offspring delinquency. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology 36: 807–823.

28.

Loeber

Farrington

Stouthamer-Loeber

. (1998) Antisocial Behavior and Mental Health Problems: Explanatory Factors in Childhood and Adolescence. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

29.

Luthar

Sexton

(2007) Maternal drug abuse versus maternal depression: Vulnerability and resilience among school-age and adolescent offspring. Development and Psychopathology 19: 205–225.

30.

Mulvey

(2014) Using developmental science to reorient our thinking about criminal offending in adolescence. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency. First published online February 13, 2014.

31.

Muthén

(1998–2012) Mplus User’s Guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.

32.

Oberwittler

Wikström

P-OH

(2009) Why small is better: Advancing the study of the role of behavioral contexts in crime causation. In: Weisburd

Bernasco

Bruinsma

GJN

(eds) Putting Crime in Its Place: Units of Analysis in Geographic Criminology. New York: Springer, 35–59.

33.

Osgood

Anderson

(2004) Unstructured socializing and rates of delinquency. Criminology 42: 519–549.

34.

Osgood

Anderson

Shaffer

(2005) Unstructured leisure in the after-school hours. In: Mahoney

Larson

(eds) Organized Activities as Contexts of Development: Extracurricular Activities, Afterschool and Community Programs. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 45–64.

35.

Osgood

Wilson

O’Mally

. (1996) Routine activities and individual deviant behavior. American Sociological Review 61: 635–655.

36.

Pardini

Loeber

Stouthamer-Loeber

(2005) Developmental shifts in parent and peer influences on boys’ beliefs about delinquent behavior. Journal of Research on Adolescence 15: 299–323.

37.

Perrone

Sullivan

Pratt

. (2004) Parental efficacy, self-control, and delinquency: A test of a General Theory of Crime on a nationally representative sample of youth. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 48: 298–312.

38.

Pratt

Cullen

(2000) The empirical status of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s General Theory of Crime: A meta-analysis. Criminology 38: 931–964.

39.

Preacher

Hayes

(2008) Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods 40: 879–891.

40.

Ragan

Osgood

Feinberg

(2014) Friends as a bridge to parental influence: Implications for adolescent alcohol use. Social Forces 92: 1061–1085.

41.

Raudenbush

Sampson

(1999) Ecometrics: Toward a science of assessing ecological settings, with application to the systematic social observation of neighborhoods. Sociological Methodology 29: 1–41.

42.

Sampson

Raudenbush

(1999) Systematic social observation of public spaces: A new look at disorder in urban neighborhoods. American Journal of Sociology 105: 603–651.

43.

Sampson

Raudenbush

(2004) Seeing disorder: Neighborhood stigma and the social construction of ‘broken windows’. Social Psychology Quarterly 67: 319–342.

44.

Shakya

Christakis

Fowler

(2012) Parental influence on substance use in adolescent networks. Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine 166: 1132–1139.

45.

Siennick

Osgood

(2012) Hanging out with which friends? Friendship-level predictors of unstructured and unsupervised socializing in adolescence. Journal of Research on Adolescence 22: 646–661.

46.

Simons

Chen

Y-F

. (2007) Identifying the psychological factors that mediate the association between parenting practices and delinquency. Criminology 45: 481–517.

47.

Smetana

Campione-Barr

Metzger

(2006) Adolescent development in interpersonal and societal contexts. Annual Review of Psychology 57: 255–284.

48.

Snijders

Bosker

(1999) Multilevel Analysis: An Introduction to Basic and Advanced Multilevel Modeling, London: Sage Publications Ltd.

49.

Statistics Netherlands (2014) Definitions: Origin. URL (accessed 14 September 2015): http://www.cbs.nl/en-GB/menu/methoden/begrippen/default.htm?ConceptID=315.

50.

Stattin

Kerr

(2000) Parental monitoring: A reinterpretation. Child Development 71: 1072–1085.

51.

Steinberg

Silk

(2002) Parenting adolescents. In: Bornstein

(ed.) Handbook of Parenting: Children and Parenting. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 103–133.

52.

Sullivan

(2014) Individual, social, and neighborhood influences on the launch of adolescent antisocial behavior. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 12: 103–120.

53.

Sutherland

(1947) Principles of Criminology. Philadelphia: Lippincott.

54.

Sweeten

(2012) Scaling criminal offending. Journal of Quantitative Criminology 28: 533–557.

55.

Thornberry

Krohn

(2000) The self-report method for measuring delinquency and crime. Criminal Justice 4: 33–83.

56.

Unnever

Cullen

Agnew

(2006) Why is ‘bad’ parenting criminogenic. Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice 4: 3–33.

57.

Vazsonyi

Belliston

(2007) The family → low self-control → deviance: A cross-cultural and cross-national test of self-control theory. Criminal Justice and Behavior 34: 505–530.

58.

Warr

(1993) Age, peers, and delinquency. Criminology 31: 17–40.

59.

Warr

(2005) Making delinquent friends: Adult supervision and children’s affiliations. Criminology 43: 77–106.

60.

Wikström

P-OH

Butterworth

(2006) Adolescent Crime: Individual Differences & Lifestyles. Cullompton, Devon: Willan Publishing.

61.

Wikström

P-OH

Oberwittler

Treiber

. (2012) Breaking Rules: The Social and Situational Dynamics of Young People’s Urban Crime. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

62.

Wright

Beaver

(2005) Do parents matter in creating self-control in their children? A genetically informed test of Gottfredson and Hirschi’s theory of low self-control. Criminology 43: 1169–1202.

63.

Wright

Cullen

(2001) Parental efficacy and delinquent behavior: Do control and support matter? Criminology 39: 677–706.

64.

Young

JTN

Weerman

(2013) Delinquency as a consequence of misperception: Overestimation of friends’ delinquent behavior and mechanisms of social influence. Social Problems 60: 334–356.

65.

Young

JTN

Rebellion

Barnes

. (2014) Unpacking the black box of peer similarity in deviance: Understanding the mechanisms linking personal behavior, peer behavior, and perceptions. Criminology 52: 60–86.