In this paper, we investigate attitude—behaviour inconsistency as well as the effect of social norms and other peer-related factors on the translation of attitudes into behaviour. We draw upon social psychological perspectives, in particular from the social identity approach. Data were used from two waves of 1385 secondary school students in the School Study of the Netherlands Institute for the Study of Crime and Law Enforcement (NSCR). The results show that almost half of the respondents did not act in accordance with their previously measured attitudes on delinquency. Respondents who were exposed to an attitude-congruent social norm supportive of their own attitude reported significantly more attitude-consistent behaviour than respondents who were exposed to an incongruent norm. The effect of normative support was significantly moderated by attachment to peers but not by time spent with peers.
Acock AC and DeFleur ML ( 1972). A configurational approach to contingent consistency in the attitude-behaviour relationship. American Sociological Review37, 714-26.
2.
Ajzen I. ( 1985). From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behaviour . In J Kuhl and J Beckmann (eds), Action-control: from cognition to behaviour , 11-39. Heidelberg: Springer.
3.
Ajzen I. ( 1988). Attitudes, personality, and behaviour. Buckingham: Open University Press.
4.
Ajzen I. ( 1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes50, 179-211.
5.
Ajzen I. and Fishbein M. ( 1977). Attitude-behavior relations: a theoretical analysis and review of empirical research. Psychological Bulletin84, 888-918.
6.
Andrews KH and Kandel DB ( 1979). Attitude and behavior: a specification of the contingent consistency hypothesis. American Sociological Review44, 298-310.
7.
Bendixen M., Endresen IM and Olweus D. ( 2003). Variety and frequency scales of antisocial involvement: Which one is better? Legal and Criminological Psychology8, 135-50.
8.
Bem DJ ( 1972) Self-perception theory. In L Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology , vol. 6, 2-62. New York : Academic Press Inc.
9.
Bishop DM ( 1984). Legal and extralegal barriers to delinquency. A panel analysis. Criminology22, 403-19.
10.
Cialdini RB, Petty RE and Cacioppo JT ( 1981). Attitude and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology32, 357-404.
11.
Cohen LE and Felson M. ( 1979). Social change and crime rate trends: a routine activity approach. American Sociological Review44, 588-608.
12.
Eagly AH and Chaiken S. ( 1998). Attitude structure and function. In DT Gilbert, ST Fiske and G Lindzey (ed.), The handbook of social psychology, 4th edn, vol. 1, 269-322. Boston: Oxford University Press.
13.
Engels Rcme, Luijpers E., Landsheer J. and Meeus W. ( 2004). A longitudinal study of relations between attitudes and delinquent behaviour in adolescents. Criminal Justice and Behaviour31, 244-60.
14.
Festinger L. ( 1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row, Peterson.
15.
Fishbein M. and Ajzen I. ( 1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behaviour: an introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
16.
Grasmick HG and Bursik RJ ( 1990). Conscience, significant others and rational choice: Extending the deterrence model. Law & Society Review24, 837-61.
17.
Heider F. ( 1944) Social perception and phenomenal causality. Psychological Review51, 358-74.
18.
Hirschi T. ( 1969). The causes of delinquency. Berkeley : University of California Press.
19.
Liska AE ( 1974). Emergent issues in the attitude-behaviour consistency controversy. American Sociological Review39, 261-72.
20.
Matsueda RL ( 1989). The dynamics of moral beliefs and minor deviance . Social Forces68, 428-57.
21.
Menard S. and Elliott DS ( 1994). Delinquent bonding, moral beliefs and illegal behaviour: a three-wave panel model. Justice Quarterly11, 173-88.
22.
Menard S. and Huizinga D. ( 1994). Changes in conventional attitudes and delinquent behaviour in adolescence. Youth and Society26, 23-53.
23.
Miller DT, Monin B. and Prentice DA ( 2000), Pluralistic ignorance and inconsistency between private attitudes and public behaviour. In DJ Terry and MA Hogg (eds) Attitudes, behaviour, and social context: the role of norms and group membership , 95-113. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
24.
Paternoster R. and Simpson S. ( 1996). Sanction threats and appeals to morality: Testing a rational choice model of corporate crime. Law and Society Review30, 549-83.
25.
Piquero A. and Tibbetts S. ( 1996). Specifying the direct and indirect effects of low self-control and situational factors in offenders’ decision making: Toward a more complete model of ration offending. Justice Quarterly13, 481-510.
26.
Pryor A., Dalenberg D., McCorkle D., Reardon J. and Wicks J. ( 2008). Buy or burn? Empirical test of models of crime using data from a general population. Social Science Journal45, 95-106.
27.
Schuman H. and Johnson MP ( 1976). Attitudes and behaviour. Annual Review of Sociology2, 151-207.
28.
Skinner WF and Cattarello AM ( 1989). Understanding the relationship among attitudes, group norms, and behaviour using behavioural commitment: a structural equation analysis of marijuana use. Journal of Applied Psychology19, 1268-91.
29.
Smith JR and Terry DJ ( 2003). Attitude-behaviour consistency: the role of group norms, attitude accessibility, and mode of behavioural decision-making. European Journal of Social Psychology33, 591-608.
30.
Smith JR and Louis WR ( 2008). Do as we say and as we do: the interplay of descriptive and injunctive group norms in the attitude-behaviour relationship. British Journal of Social Psychology47, 647-66.
31.
Sutherland EH ( 1947). Principles of criminology. Philadelphia : Lippincott.
32.
Sykes GM and Matza D. ( 1957). Techniques of neutralization: a theory of delinquency . American Sociological Review22, 664-70.
33.
Tajfel H. and Turner JC ( 1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In WG Austin and S Worchel (eds), The social psychology of intergroup relations , 33-47. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.
34.
Terry DJ and Hogg MA ( 1996) Group norms and the attitude-behaviour relationship: a role for group identification. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin22, 776-93.
35.
Terry DJ, Hogg MA and McKimmie BM ( 2000). Attitude-behaviour relations: the role of in-group norms and mode of behavioural decision-making. British Journal of Social Psychology39, 337-61.
36.
Terry DJ, Hogg MA and White KM ( 1999). Attitude-behaviour relations: Social identity and group membership. In DJ Terry and MA Hogg (eds), Attitudes, behaviour and the social context: the role of norms and group membership, 67-93. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
37.
Thornberry TP, Lizotte AJ, Krohn M., Farnworth M. and Jang SJ ( 1994). Delinquent peers, beliefs, and delinquent behaviour: a longitudinal test of interactional theory. Criminology32, 47-84.
38.
Warr M. ( 2002). Companions in crime. The social aspects of criminal conduct . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39.
Warr M. and Stafford M. ( 1991). The influence of delinquent peers: What they think or what they do? Criminology29, 851-66.
40.
Weerman FM and Bijleveld C. ( 2007). Birds of different feathers: School networks of serious delinquent, minor delinquent and non-delinquent boys and girls. European Journal of Criminology4, 357-83.
41.
Weerman FM, Harland P. and Van der Laan PH ( 2007). Misbehaviour at school and delinquency elsewhere: a complex relationship. Criminal Justice Review32 (special issue on School Crime and Disorder), 358-79.
42.
Weerman FM and Smeenk W. ( 2005). Peer similarity in delinquency for different types of friends: a comparison using two measurement methods. Criminology43, 499-524.
43.
Wellen JM, Hogg MA and Terry DJ ( 1998). Group norms and attitude-behaviour consistency: the role of group salience and mood. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice2, 48-56.
44.
Wenzel M. ( 2004). The social side of sanctions: Personal and social norms as moderators of deterrence. Law and Human Behavior28, 547-67.
45.
Wicker AW ( 1969). Attitudes versus actions: the relationship of verbal and overt behavioural responses to attitude objects. Journal of Social Issues25, 41-78.
46.
Wikström, P-OH ( 2004). Crime as an alternative. Towards a cross-level situational action theory of crime causation. In J McCord (ed.), Beyond empiricism: Institutions and intentions in the study of crime. Advances in criminological theory13, 1-37. New Brunswick: Transaction .
47.
Zhang Q., Loeber R. and Stouthamer-Loeber M. ( 1997). Developmental trends of delinquent attitudes and behaviours: Replications and synthesis across domains, time, and samples. Journal of Quantitative Criminology13, 181-215.
