Despite acknowledgment of ‘hybrid’ street gangs in the literature, there is little systematic research into ethnic heterogeneity within gangs. This research aims at moving beyond the broad categorization of the Black street gang. For this purpose, we examine an all-Black London-based gang in detail, using fieldwork and police arrest data, and investigate the role of ethnic heterogeneity for the workings of the gang. Our findings suggest that ethnic heterogeneity within this gang is crucial for its criminal operation. Although there is no evidence for ethnicity-related specialization of crime, the structural co-offending pattern of the gang’s activities is dominated by ethnicity. Ethnicity matters for who offends with whom.
AdamsonC (2000) Defensive localism in white and black: A comparative history of European-American and African-American youth gangs. Ethnic and Racial Studies23: 272–298.
AlonsoA (2004) Racialized identities and the formation of black gangs in Los Angeles. Urban Geography25: 658–674.
4.
AsburyH (1927) Gangs of New York: An Informal History of the Underworld. New York: Putnam.
5.
BanksDCarleyK (1996) Models for network evolution. Journal of Mathematical Sociology21: 173–196.
6.
BankstonC (1998) Youth gangs and the new second generation: A review essay. Aggression and Violent Behavior3: 35–45.
7.
BaurMBrandesULernerJWagnerD (2009) Group level analysis and visualization in social networks. In: LernerJWagnerDZweigK (eds) Algorithmics of Large and Complex Networks: Design, Analysis, and Simulation. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
8.
BiernackiPWaldorfD (1981) Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling. Sociological Methodology10: 141–163.
9.
BlauP (1977) Inequality and Heterogeneity: A Primitive Theory of Social Structure. New York: Free Press.
10.
ChinK (1996) Chinatown Gangs: Extortion, Enterprise and Ethnicity. New York: Oxford University Press.
11.
CuretonS (2009) Something wicked this way comes: A historical account of Black gangsterism offers wisdom and warning for African American leadership. Journal of Black Studies40: 347–361.
12.
CurryGD (2000) Self-reported gang involvement and officially recorded delinquency. Criminology38: 1253–1274.
13.
DalyR (2005) Delinquent networks in Philadelphia: The structure of co-offending among juveniles. Unpublished PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania.
14.
DavisM (2006) City of Quartz: Excavating the Future of Los Angeles. New York: Verso.
15.
DeckerSVan WinkleB (1996) Life in the Gang: Family, Friends, and Violence. New York: Cambridge University Press.
16.
DeckerSKatzCWebbV (2008) Understanding the black box of gang organisation: Implications for involvement in violent crime, drug sales, and violent victimization. Crime & Delinquency54: 153–172.
17.
DeckerSVan GemertFPyroozD (2009) Gangs, migration, and crime: The changing landscape in Europe and the United States. Journal of International Migration and Integration10: 393–408.
18.
DensleyJ (2012a) The organisation of London’s street gangs. Global Crime13: 42–64.
EsbensenF-AHuizingaDWeiherAW (1993) Gang and nongang youth: ‘Differences in explanatory variables’. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice9: 94–116.
21.
EsbensenF-ALynskeyDP (2001) Youth gang members in a school survey. In: KleinMWKernerH-JMaxsonCLWeitekampEGM (eds) The Eurogang Paradox: Street Gangs and Youth Groups in the U.S. and Europe. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 93–113.
22.
EsbensenF-AWinfreeLT (1998) Race and gender differences between gang and non-gang youth: Results from a multisite survey. Justice Quarterly15: 505–526.
23.
EsbensenF-ABrickBTMeldeCTusinskiKTaylorTJ (2008) The role of race and ethnicity in gang membership. In: Van GemertFPetersonDInger-LiseL (eds) Street Gangs, Migration, and Ethnicity. Devon: Willan, 117–139.
24.
FeldS (1982) Structural determinants of similarity among associates. American Sociological Review47: 797–801.
25.
FestingerL (1957) A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
26.
FleisherM (2005) Fieldwork research and social network analysis: Different methods creating complementary perspectives. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice21: 120–134.
FrengAEsbensenF (2007). Race and gang affiliation: An examination of multiple marginality. Justice Quarterly24: 600–628.
29.
GambettaD (2009) Codes of the Underworld: How Criminals Communicate. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
30.
GilroyP (1987). There Ain’t No Black in the Union Jack. London: Hutchinson.
31.
GunterA (2008) Growing up bad: Black youth, ‘road’ culture and badness in an East London neighbourhood. Crime Media Culture4: 349–366.
32.
HagedornJ (1988) People and Folks: Gangs, Crime, and the Underclass in a Rustbelt City. Chicago, IL: Lake View Press.
33.
HagedornJ (1996) The emperor’s new clothes: Theory and method in gang field research. Free Inquiry in Creative Sociology24: 111–122.
34.
HagedornJ (2008) A World of Gangs: Armed Young Men and Gangsta Culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
35.
HallSCriticherCJeffersonTClarkeJRobertB (1978) Policing the Crisis: Mugging, the State, and Law and Order. London: Macmillan.
36.
HallsworthSYoungT (2008) Gang talk and gang talkers: A critique. Crime, Media, Culture4: 175–195.
37.
HammJ (2000) Do birds of a feather flock together? Individual, contextual, and relationship bases for African American, Asian American, and European American adolescents’ selection of similar friends. Developmental Psychology36: 209–219.
38.
HeckathornD (1997) Respondent-driven sampling: A new approach to the study of hidden populations. Social Problems44: 174–199.
39.
HeckathornD (2002) Respondent-driven sampling II: Deriving valid population estimates from chain-referral samples of hidden populations. Social Problems49: 11–34.
40.
HowellJMooreJEgleyA (2002) The changing boundaries of youth gangs. In: HuffCR (ed.) Gangs in America III. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 3–18.
41.
HubertL (1987) Assignment Methods in Combinatorial Data Analysis. New York and Basel: Marcel Dekker, Inc.
42.
HughesL (2005) Studying youth gangs: Alternative methods and conclusions. Journal of Contemporary Criminal Justice21: 98–119.
43.
JosephIGunterA (2011) Gangs Revisited: What’s a Gang and What’s Race Got to Do with It?London: Runnymede Trust.
44.
KatzC (2003) Issues in the production and dissemination of gang statistics: An ethnographic study of a large Midwestern police gang unit. Crime and Delinquency49: 485–516.
45.
KatzCWebbVSchaeferD (2000) The validity of police gang intelligence lists: Examining differences in delinquency between documented gang members and non-documented delinquent youth. Police Quarterly3: 413–437.
46.
KeithM (1993) Race, Riots and Policing. London: UCL Press.
47.
KleinM (1995) The American Street Gang: Its Nature, Prevalence, and Control. New York: Oxford University Press.
48.
KleinMCrawfordL (1967) Groups, gangs, and cohesiveness. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency30: 63–75.
49.
KleinMMaxsonC (2006) Street Gang Patterns and Policies. New York: Oxford University Press.
50.
McGloinJ (2007) The organisational structure of street gangs in Newark, New Jersey: A network analysis of methodology. Journal of Gang Research15: 1–34.
51.
McGloinJDeckerS (2010). Theories of gang behavior and public policy. In: BarlowHDeckerS (eds) Criminology and Public Policy: Putting Theory to Work. Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 150–165.
52.
McGloinJKirkD (2010) Social network analysis. In: PiqueroAWeisburdD (eds) Handbook of Quantitative Criminology. New York: Springer, 209–224.
53.
McIllwainJ (1999) Organized crime: A social network approach. Crime, Law and Social Change32: 301–323.
54.
McPhersonJSmith-LovinLCookJ (2001) Birds of a feather: Homophily in social networks. Annual Review of Sociology27: 415–444.
55.
MollicaKGaryBTrevinoL (2003) Racial homophily and its persistence in newcomers’ social networks. Organisation Science14: 123–136.
56.
MooreJ (1991) Going Down to the Barrio: Homeboys and Homegirls in Change. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
57.
MorselliC (2009) Inside Criminal Networks. New York: Springer.
PaoliL (2002) The paradoxes of organized crime. Crime, Law and Social Change37: 51–97.
60.
PapachristosA (2006) Social network analysis and gang research. In: ShortJHughesL (eds) Studying Youth Gangs. Oxford: AltaMira Press, 99–116.
61.
PapachristosA (2009) Murder by structure: Dominance relations and the social structure of gang homicide. American Journal of Sociology115: 74–128.
62.
PerkinsU (1987) Explosion of Chicago’s Black Street Gangs: 1900 to the Present. Chicago, IL: Third World Press.
63.
PetterssonT (2003) Ethnicity and violent crime: The ethnic structure of networks of youths suspected of violent offences in Stockholm. Journal of Scandinavian Studies in Criminology and Crime Prevention4: 143–161.
64.
PittsJ (2007) Americanization, the third way, and the racialization of youth crime and disorder. In: HagedornJ (ed.) Gangs in the Global City: Alternatives to Traditional Criminology. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 273–292.
65.
PittsJ (2008) Reluctant Gangsters: The Changing Face of Youth Crime. Devon: Willan Publishers.
66.
PortesASensenbrennerJ (1993) Embeddedness and immigration: Notes on the social determinants of economic action. American Journal of Sociology98: 1320–1350.
67.
PyroozDFoxADeckerS (2010) Racial and ethnic heterogeneity, economic disadvantage, and gangs: A macro-level study of gang membership in urban America. Justice Quarterly27: 867–892.
68.
PyroozDFoxAKatzCDeckerS (2012) Gang organization, offending, and victimization: A cross-national analysis. In EsbensenFMaxsonC (eds) Youth Gangs in International Perspective: Results from the Eurogang Program of Research. New York: Springer, 85–105.
69.
ReissAFarringtonD (1991) Advancing knowledge about co-offending: Results from a prospective longitudinal survey of London males. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology82: 360–395.
70.
RobinsGPattisonPKalishYLusherD (2007) An introduction to exponential random graph (p*) models for social networks. Social Networks29(2): 173–191.
71.
Russell-BrownK (2008) The Color of Crime. New York: New York University Press.
72.
SampsonRGrovesW (1989) Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. American Journal of Sociology94: 774–802.
73.
Sánchez-JankowskiM (1991) Islands in the Street: Gangs and American Urban Society. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
74.
SandbergS (2010) What can ‘lies’ tell us about life? Notes towards a framework of narrative criminology. Journal of Criminal Justice Education21: 447–465.
75.
SarneckiJ (2001) Delinquent Networks: Youth Co-offending in Stockholm. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
76.
ShawCMcKayD (1942) Juvenile Delinquency and Urban Areas. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
77.
ShortJStrodtbeckF (1965) Group Processes and Gang Delinquency. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
78.
SmithAD (1987) The Ethnic Origins of Nations. Oxford: Blackwell.
79.
SpergelI (1995) The Youth Gang Problem: A Community Approach. New York: Oxford University Press.
80.
StarbuckDHowellJLindquistD (2001) Hybrid and other modern gangs. Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention Bulletin. Washington DC: US Department of Justice.
81.
StevensARadcliffePWilliamsLGladstoneB (2010) Offender Management Community Scoping of London Gang Demographics. London: London Probation Trust.
82.
SuttlesG (1968) The Social Order of the Slum: Ethnicity and Territory in the Inner City. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
83.
SveinssonK (2008) A Tale of Two Englands: Race and Violent Crime in the Press. London: Runnymede Trust.
84.
ThrasherF (1927) The Gang: A Study of 1,313 Gangs in Chicago. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
85.
TitaGCohenJEngbergJ (2005) An ecological study of the location of gang ‘set space’. Social Problems52: 272–299.
86.
ValdezA (2007) Gangs: A Guide to Understanding Street Gangs, 5th edn.San Clemente, CA: LawTech Publishing Co.
87.
Van GemertF (2005) Youth groups and gangs in Amsterdam: A pretest of the Eurogang expert survey. In: DeckerSWeermanF (eds) European Street Gangs and Troublesome Youth Groups. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 147–168.
88.
Van GemertFPetersonDInger-LiseL (2008) Street Gangs, Migration, and Ethnicity. Devon: Willan Publishing.
89.
VigilJ (1988) Barrio Gangs: Street Life and Identity in Southern California. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
90.
VigilJ (2002) A Rainbow of Gangs: Street Life and Identity in the Mega-City. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.
91.
WarrM (2002) Companions in Crime: The Social Aspects of Criminal Conduct. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
92.
WassermanSFaustK (1994) Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
93.
WatersM (1999) Black Identities: West Indian Immigrant Dreams and American Realities. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
94.
WeermanF (2003) Co-offending as social exchange: Explaining characteristics of co-offending. British Journal of Criminology43: 398–416.
95.
WeitekampEKernerHReichK (2005) Why do young male Russians of German descent tend to join or form violent gangs? In: DeckerSWeermanF (eds) European Street Gangs and Troublesome Youth Groups. Lanham, MD: AltaMira Press, 81–104.
96.
WernerCParmeleeP (1979) Similarity of activity preferences among friends: Those who play together stay together. Social Psychology Quarterly42: 62–66.
97.
WhiteR (2008) Disputed definitions and fluid identities: The limitations of social profiling in relation to ethnic youth gangs. Youth Justice8: 149–161.
98.
YoungTFitzgeraldMHallsworthSJosephI (2007) Groups, Gangs and Weapons. London: Youth Justice Board.
99.
ZaitchD (2002) Trafficking Cocaine: Columbian Drug Entrepreneurs in the Netherlands. The Hague: Kluwer.
