This article proposes that targum studies is in the midst of a significant transition away from the traditional philological disciplines and toward methodologies more informed by contemporary literary and linguistic theory. This article traces the broad contours of this transition, surveying philological scholarship on the targums and outlining some of the ongoing issues with this scholarship. The article then moves to examine some of the emerging modes of study, ending with a brief discussion of some of the finished projects in the field.
AlexanderP.2003The Targum of Canticles (Collegeville, MN: Michael Glazier).
2.
AlexanderP.2008The Targum of Lamentations (Collegeville, MN: Michael Glazier).
3.
BeattieD.R.G2002 ‘The Targum of Ruth: A Preliminary Edition’, in FlesherP.V.M. (ed.), Targum and Scripture: Studies in Aramaic Translation and Interpretation in Memory of Ernest G. Clarke (Leiden: Brill): 231-90.
4.
CookE.M.1994 ‘A New Perspective on the Language of Onqelos and Jonathan’, in BeattieD.R.G.McNamaraM.J. (eds.), The Aramaic Bible: Targums in their Historical Context (Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press): 142-56.
5.
de MoorJ.1995A Bilingual Concordance to the Targum of the Prophets. I. Joshua (Leiden: Brill)
6.
FlesherP.V.M.1999 ‘Is Targum Onqelos a Palestinian Targum? The Evidence of Genesis 28–50’, JSP19: 35-79.
7.
FlesherP.V.M.2001 ‘The Translations of Proto-Onqelos and the Palestinian Targums’, JAB3: 75-100.
8.
FlesherP.V.M.2003 ‘The Literary Legacy of Priests? The Pentateuchal Targums of Israel in their Social and Linguistic Context’, in OlssonB.ZetterholmeM. (eds.), The Ancient Synagogue from its Origins until 200 C.E.: Papers Presented at an International Conferenceat Lund UniversityOctober 14-17, 2001 (Stockholm: Almquist and Wiksell International): 467-508.
9.
FlesherP.V.M.ChiltonB.2011The Targums: A Critical Introduction (Waco, TX: Baylor University Press).
10.
GreenfieldJ.C1974 ‘Standard Literary Aramaic’, in Actes du priemeir Congres International de Linguistique Semantique et Chamito-Semitique Paris, Juliet 1969 (The Hague: Mouton): 280-89.
11.
HaywardR.1994 ‘Major Aspects of Targumic Studies 1983–1993: A Survey’, CR:BS2: 107-112.
12.
HaywardR.2011 ‘Targum a Misnomer for Midrash? Towards a Typology for Targum Sheni of Esther’, AS9.1: 47-63.
13.
HoutmanA.2005 ‘The Role of Abraham in Targum Isaiah’, AS3.1: 3-14.
14.
KaufmanS.A.SokoloffM.1993A Key-Word-in-Context Concordance to Targum Neofiti: A Guide to the Complete Palestinian Aramaic Text of the Torah (Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).
15.
LaclauE.2005On Populist Reason (London and New York: Verso).
16.
LasairS.G.D.A.2008A Narratological Approach to the Pentateuch Targums (PhD dissertation, University of Manchester).
17.
LasairS.G.D.A.2009 ‘Review of Beverly P. Mortensen, The Priesthood in Targum Pseudo-Jonathan: Renewing the Profession’, Journal of Semitic Studies54.1: 287-89.
18.
LasairS.G.D.A.2010a ‘Targum and Translation: A New Approach to a Classic Problem’, Association for Jewish Studies Review34.2: 265-87.
19.
LasairS.G.D.A.2010b ‘What are the Contours of Torah? Targumic Roles in Defining and Delimiting the Nature of Torah Observance’, JSP20.2: 135-50.
20.
McNamaraM.2011Targum and New Testament: Collected Essays (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck).
21.
MortensenB.P.2002 ‘Pseudo-Jonathan’s Temple, Symbol of Judaism’, in FlesherP.V.M. (ed.), Targum and Scripture: Studies in Aramaic Translation and Interpretation in Memory of Ernest G. Clarke (Leiden: Brill): 129-37.
22.
MortensenB.P.2006The Priesthood in Targum Pseudo-Jonathan: Renewing the Profession (2 vols.; Leiden: Brill)
23.
Müller-KesslerC.2001 ‘The Earliest Evidence for Targum Onqelos from Babylonia and the Question of its Dialect and Origin’, JAB3: 181-98.
24.
NeusnerJ.1989Judaism and its Social Metaphors: Israel in the History of Jewish Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
25.
SamelyA.2011 ‘The Targums within a New Description of Jewish Text Structures in Antiquity’, AS9.1: 5-38.
26.
SmelikW.F.1996A Bilingual Concordance to the Targum of the Prophets. II. Judges (Leiden: Brill).
27.
SmelikW.F.1998a ‘Translation and Commentary in One: The Interplay of Pluses and Substitutions in the Targum of the Prophets’, JSJ29.3: 245-60.
28.
SmelikW.F.1998b ‘Concordance and Consistency: Translation Studies and Targum Jonathan’, JJS49.2: 286-305.
29.
SmelikW.F.1999 ‘The Rabbinic Reception of Early Bible Translations as Holy Writings and Oral Torah’, JAB1: 249-72.
30.
SmelikW.F.2001 ‘Language, Locus, and Translation between the Talmudim’, JAB3: 199-224.
31.
SokoloffM.2002aA Dictionary of Jewish Palestinian Aramaic (Ramat-Gan: Bar Ilan University Press; Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press, 2nd edn).
32.
SokoloffM.2002bA Dictionary of Jewish Babylonian Aramaic of the Talmudic and Geonic Periods (Ramat-Gan: Bar Ilan University Press; Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press).
33.
SperberA.1992aThe Bible in Aramaic. I. The Pentateuch according to Targum Onqelos (Leiden: Brill).
34.
SperberA.1992bThe Bible in Aramaic. II. The Prophets according to Targum Jonathan (Leiden: Brill).
35.
SyslingH.1999 ‘The Use of Dramatic and Erotic Elements as a Literary Technique in Targum Pseudo-Jonathan’, JAB1: 147-61.
36.
Van Staalduine-SulmanE.1996aA Bilingual Concordance to the Targum of the Prophets. III. Samuel(I) (Leiden: Brill).
37.
Van Staalduine-SulmanE.1996bA Bilingual Concordance to the Targum of the Prophets. IV. Samuel(II) (Leiden: Brill).
