BartelsK. P. R. (2017). The double bind of social innovation: Relational dynamics of change and resistance in neighbourhood governance. Urban Studies, 54(16), 3789–3805. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098016682935
2.
BartelsK. P. R. (2020). Transforming the relational dynamics of urban governance: How social innovation research can create a trajectory for learning and change. Urban Studies, 57(14), 2868–2884. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098019889290
3.
BartelsK. P. R. (2023). Experiential learning: Sustaining community-led social innovation by transforming relational dynamics. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 36(3), 434–452. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2022.2121268
4.
BartelsK. P. R. (2024). Relational ecosystems: Sustaining prefigurative change by creating conditions for mutual learning and change. International Journal of the Commons, 18(1), 231–245. https://doi.org/10.5334/ijc.1228
5.
BollierD.HelfrichS. (2019). Free, fair and alive. The insurgent power of the commons: New Society Publishers.
6.
BradburyH. (2022). How to do action research for transformations: At a time of eco-social crisis: Edward Elgar.
7.
BradburyH.DivechaS.BartelsK.FriedmanV.ApgarM.WheelerJ.BivensF.HirasawaT.HoD.WittmayerJ.PizzolatiM. (2025). Seven quality choicepoints for ARJ: Ambition is welcome. Action Research, 23(1), 3–7. https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503241306927
8.
BradburyH.WaddellS.O’ BrienK.ApgarM.TeehankeeB.FazeyI. (2019). A call to Action Research for Transformations: The times demand it. Action Research, 17(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750319829633
9.
BuaA.BussuS. (Eds.), (2023). Reclaiming participatory governance: Social movements and the reinvention of democratic innovation. Routledge.
10.
Bureau of European Policy Advisers. (2011). Empowering people, driving change social innovation in the European union. Publications Office of the European Union.
11.
Cajaiba-SantanaG. (2014). Social innovation: Moving the field forward. A conceptual framework. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 82(1), 42–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.05.008
12.
GreenwoodD. J.RavnJ. E.BartelsK. P. R. (2025). A call to action research. Confronting the sustainability crises. Edward Elgar. in press.
13.
HendriksC. M.ErcanS. A.BoswellJ. (2020). Mending democracy: Democratic repair in disconnected times. Oxford University Press.
14.
HowaldtJ.KaletkaC.SchröderA. (2021). A research agenda for social innovation. The emergence of a research field. Edward Elgar.
15.
MoulaertF.MacCallumD. (2019). Advanced introduction to social innovation: Edward Elgar.
16.
MoulaertF.MacCallumD.MehmoodA., et al. (Eds.), (2013). The international handbook on social innovation. Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research. Edward Elgar.
17.
PelB.WittmayerJ. M.AvelinoF.BaulerT. (2023). Paradoxes of transformative social innovation: From critical awareness towards strategies of inquiry. NOvation - Critical Studies of Innovation, 4(1), 35–62. https://doi.org/10.5380/nocsi.v0i4.91113
18.
PelB.WittmayerJ. M.DorlandJ.Søgaard JørgensenM. (2020). Unpacking the social innovation ecosystem: An empirically grounded typology of empowering network constellations. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 33(3), 311–336. https://doi.org/10.1080/13511610.2019.1705147
19.
SpethJ. G.CourrierK. (2020). The new systems reader: Routledge.
WagenaarH.PrainsackB. (2021). The pandemic within: Policy making for a better world: The Policy Press.
22.
WittmayerJ.PelB.BaulerT.AvelinoF. (2017). Editorial synthesis: Methodological challenges in social innovation research. European Public & Social Innovation Review, 2(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.31637/epsir.17-1.1