BradburyH. (2022). How to do action research at a time of eco social crisis. Elgar.
3.
BradburyH.WaddellS.O’ BrienK.ApgarM.TeehankeeB.FazeyI. (2019). A call to action research for transformations: The times demand it. Action Research, 17(1), 3–10. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750319829633
DivechaS.BradburyH. (2024). ARJ special issue: The inner journey and mindset shifts of transformation. Action Research, 21(4), 476–478. https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503231215405.
6.
FaireyT.FirchowP.DixonP. (2022). Images and indicators: Mixing participatory methods to build inclusive rigour. Action Research, 22(2), Article 147675032211378. https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503221137851
7.
FreinachtH. (2017). The listening society: A metamodern guide to politics, book one. Metamoderna.
8.
FriedmanV.SykesI.StrauchM. (2018). Expanding the realm of the possible: Field theory and a relational framing of social entrepreneurship. In DeyP.SteyaertC. (Eds.), Social entrepreneurship: An affirmative critique (pp. 239–263). Edward Elgar Publishing.
9.
FriedmanV. J.TardieuB.AlmeydaG.BroxtonM.FriedmanD. H.KyomuhendoG. B.LifvergrenS. (2024). Action research for transforming the poverty field. Action Research, 22(1), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503231221078
10.
JacobsG.CubaS. de. (2023). A clear center but no clear boundaries.’ the construction of professional identities in spiritual care through boundary work in participatory action research within health care. Action Research, 22(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/14767503231195418.
11.
KortenD. C. (2007). The great turning: From empire to earth community (1st ed.). Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
12.
LewinK. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers (Republished, 1997, Washington, DC: American Psychological Association, pp. 1–152). Harper and Row.