Early learning assessment is a necessary mechanism for understanding skills children possess and to inform their instruction. Assessing early learners is different in many aspects than assessing older students. Considerations such as mode of assessment, supports necessary to obtain instructionally relevant data, and the impact of feedback for engaging students in assessment must be afforded. This study focused on the use of a tablet-based app as a digital means of assessment that lent itself well to the necessary considerations when assessing early learners. Based on the data collected in this study through the assessment app, observations and student and teacher interviews, students as young as 44 months demonstrated the ability to self-administer and remain engaged in the assessment activities incorporated within the app. Teachers described use of the reporting interface as instructionally informative and easy to use. The paper concludes with a discussion of supportive attributes of digital platforms in the assessment of early learners and areas for future research in the field.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
3.
CouseLJChenDW (2010) A tablet computer for young children? Exploring its viability for early childhood education. Journal of Research on Technology in Education43(1): 75–96.
4.
FalloonG (2013) Young students using iPads: App design and content influences on their learning pathways. Computers & Education68: 505–521.
5.
GoodRHIKaminskiRADeweyEN, et al. Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills DIBELS Next Technical Manual. Eugene, OR: Dynamic Measurement Group, Inc.
6.
HildrethG (1936) Developmental sequences in name writing. Child Development7(4): 291–303.
7.
IsabweGMNReichertFCarlsenM, et al. (2014) Using assessment for learning mathematics with mobile tablet-based solutions. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning9(2): 29–36.
8.
JonesJLSinclairB (2011) Assessment on the go: Surveying students with an iPad. Journal of Library Innovation2(2): 22–35.
9.
KucirkovaNMesserDSheehyK, et al. (2014) Children’s engagement with educational iPad apps: Insights from a Spanish classroom. Computers and Education71: 175–184.
10.
LoniganCJAllanNPLernerMD (2011) Assessment of preschool early literacy skills: Linking children’s educational needs with empirically supported instructional activities. Psychology in the Schools48(5): 488–501.
11.
MasciaMLFastameMCAgusM, et al. (2016) Numerical acuity enhancement in kindergarten: How much does material presentation form mean? In: Proceedings of the 13th international conference on cognition and exploratory learning in the digital age, Mannheim, Germany. Available at: http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?eid=2-s2.0-85009151997&partnerID=MN8TOARS (accessed 12 April 2018).
12.
McConnellSBradfieldTWackerle-HollmanA, et al. (2012) Technical Information Summary Sheet: Individual Growth and Development Indicators of Early Literacy. Saint Paul, MN: Early Learning Labs, Inc.
13.
McManisLGunnewigS (2012) Finding the education in educational technology with early learners. YC Young Children67(3): 14–24.
14.
MicleaMMihalcaL (2007) A computerized platform for the assessment of school readiness. Cognition, Brain & Behavior11(1): 83–90.
15.
MurciaKCampbellCArandaG (2018) Trends in early childhood education practice and professional learning with digital technologies. Pedagogika68(3): 249–264.
Northwest Evaluation Association (2011) Technical Manual for Measures of Academic Progress (MAP) and Measures of Academic Progress for Primary Grades (MPG). Portland, OR: Author.
19.
PanterJEBrackenBA (2009) Validity of the Bracken School Readiness assessment for predicting first grade readiness. Psychology in the Schools46(5): 397–409.
20.
PyleADeLucaC (2013) Assessment in the kindergarten classroom: An empirical study of teachers’ assessment approaches. Early Childhood Education Journal41(5): 373–380.
21.
RuffHARothbartMK (1996) Attention in Early Development: Themes and Variations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
SteeleB (1998) Draw Me a Story: An Illustrated Exploration of Drawing-as-Language. Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada: Peguis Publishers.
24.
StrakerLZabatieroJDanbyS, et al. (2018) Conflicting guidelines on young children’s screen time and use of digital technology create policy and practice dilemmas. The Journal of Pediatrics202: 300–303.
25.
The Aspen Institute National Commission for Social, Emotional, and Academic Learning (2018) A nation at risk to a nation at hope: Recommendations from the national commission on social, emotional, and academic development. Available at: http://nationathope.org/wpcontent/uploads/2018_aspen_final-report_full_webversion.pdf (accessed 18 January 2019).
26.
U.S. Department of Education (2016) Future ready learning: Reimagining the role of technology in education. Available at: https://tech.ed.gov/files/2015/12/NETP16.pdf (accessed 12 April 2018).
27.
VerenikinaIKervinL (2011) iPads, digital play and pre-schoolers. He Kupu: The Word2(5): 4–19.
28.
WangFKinzieMBMcGuireP, et al. (2010) Applying technology to inquiry-based learning in early childhood education. Early Childhood Education Journal37: 381–389.
29.
WhitehurstGJ (2008) The NCLD Get Ready to Read! Screening tool: Technical report. Applied Research Partners Inc and The State University of New York at Stony Brook.
30.
WilsonA (2015) An examination of the Oregon kindergarten assessment. Doctoral dissertation, University of Oregon. University of Oregon Libraries Scholar’s Bank. Available at: http://hdl.handle.net/1794/19243 (accessed 18 January 2019).
