Effects of academic and non-academic instructional approaches on preschool English language learners’ classroom engagement and English language development

Abstract

This research compared the relative impact of different preschool activities on the development of bilingual students’ English-language skills. The study investigated whether bilingual preschool children would engage more, and use more of their second language (English), during free-play (non-academic) versus teacher-structured (academic) activities. The researcher utilized both quantitative and qualitative research approaches; data sources included 285 preschool observations made in three classrooms in Northern California. Data analysis consisted of descriptive statistics (e.g. frequencies/percentages, mean values, and standard deviations). In addition, children’s observed scores were also analyzed by normative scales using standardized z-scores. The findings of this study indicated that bilingual children engaged and interacted significantly more during free-play (non-academic) preschool classroom activities than during teacher-structured (academic) activities. Specific free-play activities enabling optimal engagement and second language acquisition were pretend play, free play, and monkey bars. The study’s major implication is that free-play (non-academic) activities may be much more helpful in developing bilingual preschoolers’ English-language skills than teacher-structured (academic) activities. Free-play activities are an affordance for making language available, which helps with building academic skills and cultural capital. This study proves that free-play activities are an affordance for language learning because bilingual children have shown dramatically greater engagement in non-academic activities (vs academic activities). The importance of free-play activities may extend beyond preschool classrooms (e.g. greater English-language development in early preschool may subsequently positively impact student performance in kindergarten). Thus, unstructured, social-based activities should be implemented for bilingual students in K-12 classrooms. Free-play (i.e. non-academic) activities should be implemented in preschool.

Keywords

child development early childhood curriculum language acquisition linguistic minorities policies for early education

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ballantyne

Sanderman

McLaughin

(2008) Dual Language Learners in the Early Years: Getting Ready to Succeed in School. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for English language learners. Available at: http://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED512635 (accessed 29 September 2015).

Barnett

Jung

Yarosz

et al . (2008) Educational effects of the tools of the mind curriculum: a randomized trial. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 23: 299–313.

Beauchat

Blamey

Walpole

(2009) Building preschool children’s language and literacy one storybook at a time. Reading Teacher 63(1): 26–39.

Bodrova

Leong

(1996) The Vygotskian approach to early childhood. Columbus, OH: Imprint of Prentice Hall.

Bodrova

Leong

(2003) Chopsticks and counting chips: do play and foundational skills need to compete for the teacher’s attention in an early childhood classroom? Young Children 58: 10–17.

Bodrova

Leong

(2007) Tools of the mind. Available at: http://www.bostonchildrensmuseum.org/sites/default/files/pdfs/5-Tools-of-the-Mind-Curriculum.pdf (accessed 29 September 2015).

Brown

(2007) Principles of Language Learning and Teaching. White Plains, NY: Pearson Education.

Brown

(2006) Rhymes, stories and songs in the ESL classroom. The Internet TESL Journal 12(4). Available at: http://iteslj.org/Articles/Brown-Rhymes.html

Burchinal

Vandergrift

Pianta

et al . (2010) Threshold analysis of association between child care quality and child outcomes for low-income children in pre-kindergarten programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 25(2): 166–176.

10.

Burts

Hart

Charlesworth

et al . (1990) A comparison of frequencies of stress behaviors observed in kindergarten children in classrooms with developmentally appropriate versus developmentally inappropriate instructional practices. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 5: 407–423.

11.

Burts

Hart

Charlesworth

et al . (1992) Observed activities and stress behaviors of children in developmentally appropriate and inappropriate kindergarten classrooms. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 7: 297–318.

12.

California Department of Education (2013) Facts about English language learners. Available at: http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/sd/cb/cefelfacts.asp (accessed 3 June 2012).

13.

Cardiff

Stringham

(2006) Is universal preschool beneficial? An assessment of Rand corporation’s analysis (Reason Foundation Policy No. 345). Available at: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1676268

14.

Castro

(2014) The development and early care and education of dual language learners: examining the state of knowledge. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 29: 693–698.

15.

Chien

Howes

Pianta

et al . (2010) Children’s classroom engagement and school readiness gains in prekindergarten. Child Development 81(5): 1534–1549.

16.

Collins

(2010) ELL preschoolers’ English vocabulary acquisition from storybook reading. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 25: 84–97.

17.

Creswell

(2008) Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research. 3rd ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson, Merrill Prentice Hall.

18.

DeBaryshe

Gorecki

(2007) An experimental validation of a preschool emergent literacy curriculum. Early Education and Development 18(1): 93–110.

19.

Dickinson

Smith

(1994) Long-term effects of preschool teachers’ book readings on low-income children’s vocabulary and story comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly 29(2): 104–122.

20.

Doidge

(2007) The Brain that Changes Itself: Stories of Personal Triumph from the Frontiers of Brain Science. New York: Penguin Group.

21.

Elkind

(2001) Young Einsteins: much too early. Education Matters 1(2): 9–15.

22.

Farver

JAM

Lonigan

Eppe

(2009) Effective early literacy skill development for young Spanish-speaking English language learners: an experimental study of two methods. Child Development 80(3): 703–719.

23.

Fromberg

(2002) Play and Meaning in Early Childhood Education. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.

24.

Fuligni

Howes

Huang

et al . (2012) Activity settings and daily routines in preschool classrooms: diverse experiences in early learning settings for low-income children. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 27: 198–209.

25.

Gormley

Gayer

Philips

et al . (2005) The effects of universal Pre-K on cognitive development. Developmental Psychology 41(6): 872–884.

26.

Hamers

(2004) A sociocognitive model of bilingual development. Journal of Language and Social Psychology 23(1): 70–98.

27.

Hammer

Hoff

Uchikoshi

et al . (2014) The language and literacy development of young dual language learners: a critical review. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 29: 715–733.

28.

Howes

Burchinal

Pianta

et al . (2008) Ready to learn? Children’s pre-academic achievement in pre-kindergarten programs. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 23: 27–50.

29.

Justice

Chow

Capellini

et al . (2003) Emergent literacy intervention for vulnerable preschoolers: relative effects of two approaches. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology 12: 320–332.

30.

Justice

Mashburn

Pence

et al . (2008) Experimental evaluation of a comprehensive language-rich curriculum in at-risk preschools. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research 51: 1–19.

31.

Kindler

(2002) Survey of the States’ Limited English Proficient Students and Available Educational Programs and Services, 2000-2001 Summary Report. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for English Language Acquisition and Language Instruction Educational Programs.

32.

Loeb

Bridges

Bassok

et al . (2007) How much is too much? The influence of preschool centers on children’s social and cognitive development. Economics of Educational Review 26: 52–66.

33.

Magnuson

Meyers

Ruhm

et al . (2004) Inequality in preschool education and school readiness. American Educational Research Journal 41(1): 115–157.

34.

Ohman-Rodriguez

(2004) Music from inside out: promoting emergent composition with young children. Young Children 59(4): 50–55.

35.

Paquette

Rieg

(2008) Using music to support the literacy development of young English language learners. Early Childhood Education Journal 36: 227–232.

36.

Raver

Zigler

(2004) Public policy viewpoint. Another step back? Assessing readiness in Head Start. Young Children 59: 58–63.

37.

Reese

Garnier

Gallimore

et al . (2000) Longitudinal analysis of the antecedents of emergent Spanish literacy and middle-school English reading achievement of Spanish-speaking students. American Educational Research Journal 37(3): 633–662.

38.

Saricoban

Metin

(2000) Songs, verse, and games for teaching grammar. The Internet TESL Journal 6(10): 1–7.

39.

Saunders

O’Brien

(2006) Oral language. In: Genesee

Lindholm-Leary

Saunders

et al . (eds) Educating English Language Learners: A Synthesis of Research Evidence. New York: Cambridge University Press, pp. 15–44.

40.

Scarborough

(2005) Developmental relationship between language and reading: Reconciling a beautiful hypothesis with some ugly facts. In: Catts

Kamhi

(eds) The connections between language and reading disabilities. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

41.

Scribner

Cole

(1978) Literacy without schooling: testing for intellectual effects. Harvard Educational Review 48(4): 448–464.

42.

Senechal

(1997) The differential effect of storybook reading on preschoolers’ acquisition of expressive and receptive vocabulary. Journal of Child Language 24: 123–138.

43.

Shonkoff

Philips

(2000) From Neurons to Neighbourhoods: The Science of Early Childhood Development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.

44.

Singer

Plaskon

(2003) The role of play in the preschool curriculum. In: Olfman

(ed.) All work and no play: How educational reforms are harming our preschoolers. Westport, CT: Greenwood Publishing Group.

45.

Stipek

(2004) Teaching practices in kindergarten and first grade: Different strokes for different folks. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 19(4): 548–568.

46.

Stipek

Byler

(1997) Early childhood education teachers: do they practice what they preach? Early Childhood Research Quarterly 12: 305–325.

47.

Stipek

Byler

(2004) The early childhood classroom observation measure. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 19: 375–397.

48.

Stipek

Feiler

Daniels

et al . (1995) Effects of different instructional approaches on young children’s achievement and motivation. Child Development 66: 209–223.

49.

US Census Bureau (2010) New census bureau report analyzes nation’s linguistic diversity (American community survey: (ACS) of 2010). Available at: http://www.census.gov/newsroom/releases/archives/american_community_survey_acs (accessed 5 July 2012).

50.

Vail

(2003) Ready to learn. What the Head Start debate about early academics means for your schools. American School Board Journal 190: 14–18.

51.

Vygotsky

(1978) Interaction between learning and development. In: Cole

John-Steiner

Souberman

(eds) Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, pp. 79–91.

52.

Whitehurst

(2001) Young Einsteins: much too late. Education Matters 1(2): 9, 16–19.

53.

Whitehurst

Arnold

Epstein

et al . (1994) A picture book reading intervention in day care and home for children from low-income families. Developmental Psychology 30(5): 679–689.

54.

Woodall

Ziembroski

(n.d.) Promoting literacy through music. Available at: http://www.songsforteaching.com/lb/literacymusic.htm (accessed 29 September 2015).

55.

Yamamoto

(2012) What makes a high-quality preschool? Similarities and differences between Chinese immigrant and European American parents’ view. Early Childhood Research Quarterly 27: 306–315.

56.

Yin

(2009) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. 4th ed. London: SAGE.

57.

Zigler

Singer

Bishop-Joseph

(eds) (2004) Children’s Play: The Roots of Reading. Washington, DC: Zero to Three Press.