The influence of curriculum and policy documents on the decision-making of educators is of particular interest in the field of early childhood. Reports of competing pedagogical approaches with a ‘push-down’ of curriculum alongside advocacy for play-based pedagogies raise questions as to the potential of curriculum and policy documents to create tension through multiple discourses. This is significant in light of politically driven discourses in education and their potential to influence the decision-making of educators. This research draws on an interpretivist epistemology framed by a post-structural approach to induce and examine discourses that exist across curriculum and policy documents relevant to the first year of compulsory school in Western Australia. A discourse analysis revealed three powerful discourses: inclusivity, achievement and ‘PED’ – a discourse encapsulating the interrelationships between play, engagement and development. The power embedded within these discourses provided evidence of how persuasive and prescriptive language is used to engender distinct ethical responsibilities. The findings illuminate the potent influence of powerful discourses on the negotiation of priorities in pedagogical decision-making in the early years.
Australian Government (2020) Closing the gap: Report 2020. Available at: https://ctgreport.niaa.gov.au (accessed 17 April 2020).
4.
BaglieriSLalvaniP (2019) Undoing Ableism: Teaching about Disability in K–12 Classrooms. New York: Routledge.
5.
BarblettLKnausMBarratt-PughC (2016) The pushes and pulls of pedagogy in the early years: Competing knowledges and the erosion of play-based learning. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood41(4): 36–43.
6.
BlaiseMRyanS (2019) Engaging with critical theories and early childhood curriculum. In: MuellerJFileN (eds) Curriculum in Early Childhood Education: Re-Examined, Reclaimed, Renewed. New York: Routledge, pp. 80–95.
7.
BradburyA (2019) Datafied at four: The role of data in the ‘schoolification’ of early childhood education in England. Learning, Media and Technology44(1): 7–21.
8.
BrymanA (2015) Social Research Methods. Oxford: Oxford Univerity Press.
9.
CoppleCBredekampS (eds) (2009) Developmentally Appropriate Practice in Early Childhood Programs: Serving Children from Birth through Age 8. Washington, DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children.
FenechMGiugniMBrownK (2012) A critical analysis of the National Quality Framework: Mobilising for a vision for children beyond minimum standards. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood37(4): 5–14.
17.
FenechMWilkinsDP (2017) Representations of childcare in the Australian media print: An exploraitory corpus-assisted discourse analysis. The Australian Educational Researcher44(2): 161–190.
18.
FoucaultM (1972) The discourse on language. In: WoodDMedinaJ (eds) Truth: Engagements across Philosophical Traditions. New York: Wiley, pp. 315–335.
19.
FoucaultM (1977) Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Sheridan A. New York: Vintage Books.
20.
GibsonEJ (1982) The concept of affordances in development: The renascence of functionalism. In: CollinsWA (ed.) The Concept of Development. New York: Psychology Press, pp. 55–81.
21.
GibsonMMcArdleFHatcherC (2015) Governing child care in neoliberal times: Discursive constructions of children as economic units and early childhood educators as investment brokers. Global Studies of Childhood5(3): 322–332.
22.
Government of Western Australia (2011) The early years of schooling: An initiative of the Director General’s Classroom First strategy. Report, Department of Education, Perth, WA, Australia, September.
23.
Government of Western Australia (2014) Early childhood (K–2) operational handbook. Report, Office of Early Development and Learning, Perth, WA, Australia, July.
24.
Government of Western Australia (2016b) Policy standards for Pre-primary to Year 10: Teaching, assessing and reporting. Report, School Curriculum and Standards Authority, Perth, WA, Australia, June.
25.
Government of Western Australia (2016b) Western Australian Curriculum mandated materials (background information). School Curriculum and Standards Authority, Perth, WA, Australia.
JohnR (2019) Unsettling the colonial places and spaces of early childhood education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood20(2): 213–215.
30.
Keesing-StylesLHedgesH (2007) Emerging Dialogues. Castle Hill, NSW, Australia: Pademelon Press.
31.
LalvaniPBaconJK (2019) Rethinking ‘We are all special’: Anti-ableism curricula in early childhood classrooms. Young Exceptional Children22(2): 87–100.
32.
MacNaughtonG (2003) Eclipsing voice in research with young children. Australian Journal of Early Childhood28(1): 36–42.
33.
MillerMG (2017) Reconceptualist work in a colonising context: Challenges for Australian early childhood education. In: LiMFoxJGrieshaberS (eds) Contemporary Issues and Challenge in Early Childhood Education in the Asia-Pacific Region. Singapore: Springer, pp. 33–50.
34.
Ministerial Council on Education, Employment, Training and Youth Affairs (2008) Melbourne Declaration on Educational Goals for Young Australians. Report, Australian Federal Government, Canberra, ACT, Australia, December.
35.
MossP (2017) Power and resistance in early childhood education: From dominant discourse to democratic experimentalism. Journal of Pedagogy8(1): 11–32.
36.
NolanARabanB (2015) Theories into Practice: Understanding and Rethinking Our Work with Young Children and the EYLF. Blairgowrie, VIC, Australia: Teaching Solutions.
37.
O’ConnellMFoxSHinzB, et al. (2016) Quality early education for all: Fostering, entrepreneurial, resilient and capable leaders. Mitchell Report no. 01/2016, Mitchell Institute, Melbourne, VIC, Australia, January.
38.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2008) Education at a Glance 2008: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
39.
OrmstonRSpencerLBarnardM, et al. (2014) The foundations of qualitative research. In: RitchieJLewisJMcNaughton NichollsC, et al. (eds) Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Science Students and Researchers. 2nd ed.London: SAGE, pp. 52–55.
40.
PedersenSBangJ (2016) Historicizing affordance theory: A rendezvous between ecological psychology and cultural-historical activity theory. Theory and Psychology26(6): 731–750.
41.
PuccioniJ (2018) Parental beliefs about school readiness, home and school-based involvement, and children’s academic achievement. Journal of Research in Childhood Education32(4): 435–454.
42.
Roberts-HolmesG (2019) School readiness, governance and early years ability grouping. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood. Epub ahead of print 22 July 2019. DOI: 10.1177/1463949119863128.
43.
RuddKMacklinJ (2007) New directions for early childhood education: Universal access to early learning for 4 year olds. Report, Australian Labor Party, Canberra, ACT, Australia, January.
WallJStahlBCSalamAF (2015) Critical discourse analysis as a review methodology: An empirical example. Communications of the Association for Information Systems37(1): 257–285.
50.
WangSP (2005) Corpus-based approaches and discourse analysis in relation to reduplication and repetition. Journal of Pragmatics37(4): 505–540.
51.
WestonKTaylerC (2016) A policy frame on early learning and teaching. In: PageJTaylerC (eds) Learning and Teaching in the Early Years. Port Melbourne, VIC, Australia: Cambridge University Press, pp. 26–40.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
