Scholars have become increasingly interested in CEO sociopolitical activism, or instances where CEOs take public stands on heated societal debates. So far, though, researchers have largely overlooked an extraordinary imbalance in this phenomenon: In nearly all cases, CEOs have expressed support for liberal positions, and only very rarely for conservative positions. In this analytic essay, we propose four explanations for this puzzling asymmetry. First, there are fewer opportunities for conservative activism than for liberal activism. Second, CEOs may anticipate that conservative activism would agitate key liberal-leaning stakeholder groups. Third, CEOs may anticipate that supporting conservative positions would be inconsistent with conveying images of their firms as future-oriented. Fourth, CEOs tend to believe in staying out of society’s “non-business” debates. We discuss the practical and scholarly implications of our conclusions.
AltemeyerB (1981) Right-wing Authoritarianism. Winnipeg, MB, Canada: University of Manitoba Press.
2.
BermissYSMcDonaldR (2018) Ideological misfit? Political affiliation and employee departure in the private-equity industry. Academy of Management Journal61(6): 2182–2209.
BundyJVogelRMZacharyMA (2018) Organization–stakeholder fit: A dynamic theory of cooperation, compromise, and conflict between an organization and its stakeholders. Strategic Management Journal39(2): 476–501.
ChatterjiAKToffelMW (2018) The new CEO activists. Harvard Business Review96: 78–89.
9.
ChatterjiAKToffelMW (2019) Assessing the impact of CEO activism. Organization & Environment32(2): 159–185.
10.
ChinMKHambrickDCTreviñoLK (2013) Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly58(2): 197–232.
11.
ChinMKZhangSXJahanshahiAA, et al. (2021) Unpacking political ideology: CEO social and economic ideologies, strategic decision-making processes, and corporate entrepreneurship. Academy of Management Journal64(4): 1213–1235.
12.
CohenAHazanMTallaritaR, et al. (2019) The politics of CEOs. Journal of Legal Analysis11: 1–45.
13.
DavenportTH (2013) Thinking for a Living: How to Get Better Performances and Results from Knowledge Workers. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
14.
DruckerPF (1999) Knowledge-worker productivity: The biggest challenge. California Management Review41(2): 79–94.
FreemanRE (1984) Strategic Management: A Stakeholder Approach. Boston, MA: Pitman.
18.
FriedmanM (1970) The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. New York Times Magazine32–33: 122–126.
19.
GethinAMartínez-ToledanoCPikettyT (2021) Brahmin left versus merchant right: Changing political cleavages in 21 Western democracies, 1948–2020. Quarterly Journal of Economics137(1): 1–48.
GrahamJHaidtJNosekBA (2009) Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology96(5): 1029–1046.
22.
GrosecloseTMilyoJ (2005) A measure of media bias. Quarterly Journal of Economics120(4): 1191–1237.
23.
GuptaABriscoeFHambrickDC (2017) Red, blue, and purple firms: Organizational political ideology and corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal38(5): 1018–1040.
24.
HaidtJGrahamJ (2007) When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research20(1): 98–116.
25.
HambrickDCFinkelsteinS (1987) Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. In: CummingsLLStawBM (eds) Research in Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, pp. 369–406.
26.
HambrickDCMasonPA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review9(2): 193–206.
27.
HambrickDCWowakAJ (2021) CEO sociopolitical activism: A stakeholder alignment model. Academy of Management Review46(1): 33–59.
HillmanAJKeimGDSchulerD (2004) Corporate political activity: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management30(6): 837–857.
30.
HmielowskiJDHutchensMJBeamMA (2020) Asymmetry of partisan media effects?: Examining the reinforcing process of conservative and liberal media with political beliefs. Political Communication37(6): 852–868.
HouYPoliquinCW (2023) The effects of CEO activism: Partisan consumer behavior and its duration. Strategic Management Journal44(3): 672–703.
33.
HuselidMABeattyRWBeckerBE (2005) “A players” or “a positions”?Harvard Business Review2005: 110–117.
34.
JostJTBanajiMRNosekBA (2004) A decade of system justification theory: Accumulated evidence of conscious and unconscious bolstering of the status quo. Political Psychology25(6): 881–919.
35.
JostJTFedericoCMNapierJL (2009) Political ideology: Its structure, functions, and elective affinities. Annual Review of Psychology60(1): 307–337.
36.
JostJTNosekBAGoslingSD (2008) Ideology: Its resurgence in social, personality, and political psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science3(2): 126–136.
37.
JungKGarbarinoEBrileyDA, et al. (2017) Blue and red voices: Effects of political ideology on consumers’ complaining and disputing behavior. Journal of Consumer Research44(3): 477–499.
McWilliamsASiegelD (2001) Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review26(1): 117–127.
40.
Maks-SolomonCDrewryJM (2021) Why do corporations engage in LGBT rights activism? LGBT employee groups as internal pressure groups. Business and Politics23(1): 124–152.
MayerD (2017) The law and ethics of CEO social activism. Journal of Law, Business, & Ethics23: 21–44.
43.
MelloniGPatacconiAVikanderN (2023) Cashing in on the culture wars? CEO activism, wokewashing, and firm value. Strategic Management Journal44(13): 3098–3121.
44.
MkrtchyanASandvikJZhuVZ (2024) CEO activism and firm value. Management Science70(10): 6519–6549.
SimonE (2022) Demystifying the link between higher education and liberal values: A within-sibship analysis of British individuals’ attitudes from 1994–2020. British Journal of Sociology73(5): 967–984.
51.
TetlockPE (2000) Cognitive biases and organizational correctives: Do both disease and cure depend on the politics of the beholder?Administrative Science Quarterly45(2): 293–326.
WowakAJBusenbarkJR (2024) Why do some conservative CEOs publicly support liberal causes? Organizational ideology, managerial discretion, and CEO sociopolitical activism. Organization Science35(4): 1388–1408.
54.
WowakAJBusenbarkJRHambrickDC (2022) How do employees react when their CEO speaks out? Intra- and extra-firm implications of CEO sociopolitical activism. Administrative Science Quarterly67(2): 553–593.
