As part of society’s motivation to address racial and ethnic disparities, scholars have examined racial/ethnic minorities’ underrepresentation in organizations’ upper echelons. However, prior research on minority executive dismissal has yielded equivocal findings. We draw on leadership categorization theory and token status theory to hypothesize that, under conditions of greater ambiguity and uncertainty, the likelihood of dismissal differs for White and non-White executives. Using a sample of NCAA Division 1 college basketball coaches over an 18-year period, we find overall support for our theorizing—lower financial support, low prestige power, and greater strategic change increase the chances of non-White executives being dismissed. Our findings have important implications for minority executive dismissal research and point to potential remedies that organizations can implement to reduce stereotyping and bias against non-White executives.
AllenWDSchepkerDJChadwickC (2022) Firms’ responses to changes in frictions in related human capital factor markets. Strategic Management Journal43(7): 1347–1373.
2.
AllisonPD (1984) Event History Analysis: Regression for Longitudinal Event Data. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
AusterERPrasadA (2016) Why do women still not make it to the top? Dominant organizational ideologies and biases by promotion committees limit opportunities to destination positions. Sex Roles75(5): 177–196.
5.
BascleG (2008) Controlling for endogeneity with instrumental variables in strategic management research. Strategic Organization6(3): 285–327.
6.
BennerMJTripsasM (2012) The influence of prior industry affiliation on framing in nascent industries: The evolution of digital cameras. Strategic Management Journal33(3): 277–302.
7.
BliesePDSchepkerDJEssmanSM, et al. (2020) Bridging methodological divides between macro- and microresearch: Endogeneity and methods for panel data. Journal of Management46(1): 70–99.
8.
BlossfeldHGolschKRohwerG (2007) Event History Analysis with STATA. New York: Taylor & Francis.
9.
BoustanifarHZajacEJZiljaF (2021) Taking chances? The effect of CEO risk propensity on firms’ risky internationalization decisions. Journal of International Business Studies53: 302–325.
10.
Box-SteffensmeierJMJonesBS (2004) Event History Modeling: A Guide for Social Scientists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11.
BromileyPHarrisJD (2014) A comparison of alternative measures of organizational aspirations. Strategic Management Journal35(3): 338–357.
12.
CampbellJTSirmonDGSchijvenM (2016) Fuzzy logic and the market: A configurational approach to investor perceptions of acquisition announcements. Academy of Management Journal59(1): 163–187.
13.
ChinMKHambrickDCTreviñoLK (2013) Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly58(2): 197–232.
14.
CookAGlassCM (2014) Above the glass ceiling: When are women and racial/ethnic minorities promoted to CEO?Strategic Management Journal35(7): 1080–1089.
15.
CortinaLM (2008) Unseen injustice: Incivility as modern discrimination in organizations. Academy of Management Review33(1): 55–75.
16.
CoxDR (1972) Regression models and life-tables. J Roy Stat Soc B Met34(2): 187–202.
17.
CyertRMMarchJG (1963) A Behavioral Theory of the Firm. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
DovidioJFGaertnerSL (2010) Intergroup bias. In: FiskeSTGilbertDTLindzeyG (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, pp. 1084–1121.
20.
EaglyAHChinJL (2010) Diversity and leadership in a changing world. American Psychologist65(3): 216–224.
21.
EaglyAHKarauSJ (2002) Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review109(3): 573–598.
22.
EnsariNMurphySE (2003) Cross-cultural variations in leadership perceptions and attribution of charisma to the leader. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes92(1–2): 52–66.
23.
EpitropakiOMartinR (2005) From ideal to real: A longitudinal study of the role of implicit leadership theories on leader-member exchanges and employee outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology90(4): 659–676.
24.
ErtugrulMKrishnanK (2011) Can CEO dismissals be proactive?Journal of Corporate Finance17(1): 134–151.
25.
EvansBPittsJD (2017) The determinants of NCAA basketball recruiting outcomes. Applied Economics Letters24(5): 351–354.
26.
FainshmidtSSmithAGuldikenO (2017) Orchestrating the flow of human resources: Insights from Spanish soccer clubs. Strategic Organization15(4): 441–460.
27.
FinkelsteinS (1992) Power in top management teams: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal35(3): 505–538.
28.
FinkelsteinSHambrickDC (1990) Top-management-team tenure and organizational outcomes: The moderating role of managerial discretion. Administrative Science Quarterly35(3): 484–503.
29.
FralichRPapadopoulosA (2018) The financial crisis, acquisition premiums and the moderating effect of CEO power. Long Range Planning51(2): 204–218.
30.
GiambatistaRC (2004) Jumping through hoops: A longitudinal study of leader life cycles in the NBA. The Leadership Quarterly15(5): 607–624.
31.
GlassCMCookA (2020) Pathways to the glass cliff: A risk tax for women and minority leaders?Social Problems67(4): 637–653.
32.
GligorDM (2020) Birds of a feather: The impact of race on the supplier selection and evaluation process. International Journal of Production Economics230: 107802.
33.
GligorDMNovicevicMFeizabadiJ, et al. (2021) Examining investor reactions to appointments of Black top management executives and CEOs. Strategic Management Journal42(10): 1939–1959.
34.
GraffinSDBoivieSCarpenterMA (2013) Examining CEO succession and the role of heuristics in early-stage CEO evaluation. Strategic Management Journal34(4): 383–403.
35.
GreenhausJHParasuramanS (1993) Job performance attributions and career advancement prospects: An examination of gender and race effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes55(2): 273–297.
36.
GuptaVKMortalSCSilveriS, et al. (2020) You’re fired! Gender disparities in CEO dismissal. Journal of Management46(4): 560–582.
37.
HeilmanME (1997) Sex discrimination and the affirmative action remedy: The role of sex stereotypes. In: BurkeRJ (ed.) Women in Corporate Management. Dordrecht: Springer, pp. 5–17.
38.
HeilmanMEHaynesMC (2008) Subjectivity in the appraisal process: A facilitator of gender bias in work settings. In: BorgidaEFiskeST (eds) Beyond Common Sense: Psychological Science in the Courtroom. Malden, MA: Blackwell, pp. 127–155.
39.
HeilmanMEOkimotoTG (2007) Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology92(1): 81–92.
40.
HillADJohnsonSGGrecoLM, et al. (2021) Endogeneity: A review and agenda for the methodology-practice divide affecting micro and macro research. Journal of Management47(1): 105–143.
41.
HillADUpadhyayADBeekunRI (2015) Do female and ethnically diverse executives endure inequity in the CEO position or do they benefit from their minority status? An empirical examination. Strategic Management Journal36(8): 1115–1134.
42.
HolmesP (2011) Win or go home: Why college football coaches get fired. Journal of Sports Economics12(2): 157–178.
43.
HomPWRobersonLEllisAD (2008) Challenging conventional wisdom about who quits: Revelations from corporate America. Journal of Applied Psychology93(1): 1–34.
44.
HowardMDWithersMCCarnesCM, et al. (2016) Friends or strangers? It all depends on context: A replication and extension of Beckman, Haunschild, and Phillips (2004). Strategic Management Journal37(11): 2222–2234.
HubbardTDChristensenDMGraffinSD (2017) Higher highs and lower lows: The role of corporate social responsibility in CEO dismissal. Strategic Management Journal38(11): 2255–2265.
47.
KanterRM (1977) Men and Women of the Corporation. New York: Basic Books.
48.
KaraevliAZajacEJ (2013) When do outsider CEOs generate strategic change? The enabling role of corporate stability. Journal of Management Studies50(7): 1267–1294.
49.
KoenigAMEaglyAHMitchellAA, et al. (2011) Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin137(4): 616–642.
50.
KolevKDMcNamaraG (2020) Board demography and divestitures: The impact of gender and racial diversity on divestiture rate and divestiture returns. Long Range Planning53(2): 101881.
51.
KolevKDMcNamaraG (2022) The role of top management teams in firm responses to performance shortfalls. Strategic Organization20(3): 541–564.
52.
KulichCTrojanowskiGRyanMK, et al. (2011) Who gets the carrot and who gets the stick? Evidence of gender disparities in executive remuneration. Strategic Management Journal32(3): 301–321.
53.
LaminaCSturmGKolleritsB, et al. (2012) Visualizing interaction effects: A proposal for presentation and interpretation. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology65(8): 855–862.
54.
LauDCMurnighanJK (1998) Demographic diversity and faultlines: The compositional dynamics of organizational groups. Academy of Management Review23(2): 325–340.
55.
LeePMJamesEH (2007) She’-e-os: Gender effects and investor reactions to the announcements of top executive appointments. Strategic Management Journal28(3): 227–241.
56.
LittleTDBovairdJAWidamanKF (2006) On the merits of orthogonalizing powered and product terms: Implications for modeling interactions among latent variables. Structural Equation Modeling13(4): 497–519.
57.
LordRGEmrichCG (2000) Thinking outside the box by looking inside the box: Extending the cognitive revolution in leadership research. The Leadership Quarterly11(4): 551–579.
58.
LordRGMaherKJ (1990) Leadership perceptions and leadership performance: Two distinct but interdependent processes. In: CarrollJ (ed.) Applied Social Psychology and Organizational Settings. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 129–154.
59.
LordRGMaherKJ (1991) Cognitive theory in industrial and organizational psychology. In: DunnetteMDHoughLM (eds) Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 2nd edn.Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press, pp. 1–62.
60.
LordRGMaherKJ (1993) Leadership and Information Processing: Linking Perceptions and Performance. New York: Routledge.
61.
LordRGEpitropakiOFotiRJ, et al. (2020) Implicit leadership theories, implicit followership theories, and dynamic processing of leadership information. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior7: 49–74.
62.
LordRGFotiRJDe VaderCL (1984) A test of leadership categorization theory: Internal structure, information processing, and leadership perceptions. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance34(3): 343–378.
63.
LordRGFotiRJPhillipsJS (1982) A theory of leadership categorization. In: HuntJGSekaranUSchriesheimCA (eds) Leadership: Beyond Establishment Views. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press, pp. 104–121.
64.
McDonaldMLKeevesGDWestphalJD (2018) One step forward, one step back: White male top manager organizational identification and helping behavior toward other executives following the appointment of a female or racial minority CEO. Academy of Management Journal61(2): 405–439.
65.
McHughML (2012) Interrater reliability: The kappa statistic. Biochemia Medica22(3): 276–282.
66.
MaddenJFRutherM (2009) Reply to: Differences in the success of NFL coaches by race: A different perspective. Journal of Sports Economics10(5): 543–550.
67.
MahJKolevKMcNamaraG, et al. (2022) Women in the C-Suite: A review of predictors, experiences, and outcomes. Academy of Management Annals. Available at: https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2021.0042
MisangyiVFAcharyaAG (2014) Substitutes or complements? A configurational examination of corporate governance mechanisms. Academy of Management Journal57(6): 1681–1705.
70.
MixonFGTrevinoLJ (2004) How race affects dismissals of college football coaches. Journal of Labor Research25(4): 645–656.
71.
ObenauerWGLangerN (2019) Inclusion is not a slam dunk: A study of differential leadership outcomes in the absence of a glass cliff. The Leadership Quarterly30(6): 101334.
72.
OffermannLRCoatsMR (2018) Implicit theories of leadership: Stability and change over two decades. The Leadership Quarterly29(4): 513–522.
73.
PalmerTBWisemanRM (1999) Decoupling risk taking from income stream uncertainty: A holistic model of risk. Strategic Management Journal20(11): 1037–1062.
74.
ParkSHWestphalJD (2013) Social discrimination in the corporate elite: How status affects the propensity for minority CEOs to receive blame for low firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly58(4): 542–586.
75.
PelledLH (1996) Demographic diversity, conflict, and work group outcomes: An intervening process theory. Organization Science7(6): 615–631.
76.
PorterME (1983) Cases in Competitive Strategy. New York: Simon & Schuster.
77.
RindovaVPWilliamsonIOPetkovaAP, et al. (2005) Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Journal48(6): 1033–1049.
78.
RosetteASLeonardelliGJPhillipsKW (2008) The White standard: Racial bias in leader categorization. Journal of Applied Psychology93(4): 758–777.
79.
RyanMKHaslamSA (2007) The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions. Academy of Management Review32(2): 549–572.
80.
RyanMKHaslamSAHersbyMD, et al. (2011) Think crisis–Think female: The glass cliff and contextual variation in the think manager–Think male stereotype. Journal of Applied Psychology96(3): 470–484.
81.
SalagaSJuravichM (2020) National Football League head coach race, performance, retention, and dismissal. Sport Management Review23(5): 978–991.
82.
SchepkerDJBarkerVLIII (2018) How stigmatized are dismissed chief executives? The role of character questioning causal accounts and executive capital in dismissed CEO reemployment. Strategic Management Journal39(9): 2566–2586.
83.
SchumacherCKeckSTangW (2020) Biased interpretation of performance feedback: The role of CEO overconfidence. Strategic Management Journal41(6): 1139–1165.
84.
ScottKABrownDJ (2006) Female first, leader second? Gender bias in the encoding of leadership behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes101(2): 230–242.
85.
ShenWCannellaAA (2002) Power dynamics within top management and their impacts on CEO dismissal followed by inside succession. Academy of Management Journal45(6): 1195–1206.
86.
ShiWWajdaDAguileraRV (2022) Interorganizational spillover: A review and a proposal for future research. Journal of Management48(1): 185–210.
87.
SirmonDGHittMAIrelandRD, et al. (2011) Resource orchestration to create competitive advantage: Breadth, depth, and life cycle effects. Journal of Management37(5): 1390–1412.
88.
ThompsonMSekaquaptewaD (2002) When being different is detrimental: Solo status and the performance of women and racial minorities. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy2(1): 183–203.
89.
TushmanMLRomanelliE (1983) Uncertainty, social location and influence in decision making: A sociometric analysis. Management Science29(1): 12–23.
90.
UbakaALuXGutierrezL (2022) Testing the generalizability of the white leadership standard in the post-Obama era. The Leadership Quarterly. Epub ahead of print 5 January. DOI: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2021.101591.
91.
WangRWareJH (2013) Detecting moderator effects using subgroup analyses. Prevention Science14(2): 111–120.
92.
WangrowDBSchepkerDJBarkerVLIII (2018) Power, performance, and expectations in the dismissal of NBA coaches: A survival analysis study. Sport Management Review21(4): 333–346.
93.
WangrowDBSchwartzEHughes-MorganM (2021) Executive dismissal or retention? A study of performance, power, and survival for college basketball coaches. Journal of General Management47(1): 56–68.
94.
WashingtonMZajacEJ (2005) Status evolution and competition: Theory and evidence. Academy of Management Journal48(2): 282–296.
95.
WatkinsMBSimmonsAUmphressE (2019) It’s not black and white: Toward a contingency perspective on the consequences of being a token. Academy of Management Perspectives33(3): 334–365.
96.
WilliamsJC (2014) Double jeopardy? An empirical study with implications for the debates over implicit bias and intersectionality. Harvard Journal of Law & Gender37: 185–241.
97.
WingfieldAH (2014) Crossing the color line: Black professional men’s development of interracial social networks. Societies4(2): 240–255.
98.
ZhuDHShenWHillmanAJ (2014) Recategorization into the in-group: The appointment of demographically different new directors and their subsequent positions on corporate boards. Administrative Science Quarterly59(2): 240–270.
