We examine the impact of CEOs’ moral foundations—innate source of moral intuitions—on firms’ environmental, social, and governance performance. Using a linguistic technique on unscripted texts spoken by 1860 CEOs of S&P 1500 firms over 5 years, we found that CEOs with higher binding moral foundations (i.e., focus on expectations of key stakeholder groups) are associated with lower environmental, social, and governance performance. In contrast, we found that CEOs with higher individualizing moral foundations (i.e., focus on well-being of individuals in general) are associated with higher environmental, social, and governance performance. Our study contributes to the upper echelons theory by providing evidence that CEO morality matters for environmental, social, and governance outcomes. We add to moral foundations theory by showing that a bi-dimensional lens on CEO’s morality (i.e., binding vs individualizing) reveals nuances on environmental, social, and governance outcomes.
AguileraRVRuppDEWilliamsCA, et al. (2007) Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review32(3): 836–863.
2.
Al-ShammariMRasheedAAl-ShammariHA (2019) CEO narcissism and corporate social responsibility: Does CEO narcissism affect CSR focus?Journal of Business Research104: 106–117.
3.
AmisJBarneyJMahoneyJT, et al. (2020) From the editors—Why we need a theory of stakeholder governance—And why this is a hard problem. Academy of Management Review45(3): 499–503.
4.
BencherkiNSergiVCoorenF, et al. (2021) How strategy comes to matter: Strategizing as the communicative materialization of matters of concern. Strategic Organization19(4): 608–635.
5.
BergFFabisikKSautnerZ (2020) Is history repeating itself? The (un)predictable past of ESG ratings. Finance working paper 708. Brussels: European Corporate Governance Institute.
6.
BernardJBoiralOGuillaumieL, et al. (2023) Does proxy voting really promote corporate sustainability?Corporate Governance: An International Review31(3): 445–463.
7.
BerronePGomez-MejiaLR (2009) Environmental performance and executive compensation: An integrated agency-institutional perspective. Academy of Management Journal52(1): 103–126.
8.
BiemannTColeMSVoelpelS (2012) Within-group agreement: On the use (and misuse) of rWG and rWG (J) in leadership research and some best practice guidelines. The Leadership Quarterly23(1): 66–80.
9.
BliesePD (2000) Within-group agreement, non-independence, and reliability: Implications for data aggregation and analysis. In: KleinKJKozlowskiSWJ (eds) Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, pp. 349–381.
10.
BridouxFStoelhorstJ (2022) Stakeholder theory, strategy, and organization: Past, present, and future. Strategic Organization20(4): 797–809.
11.
BromileyP (1991) Testing a causal model of corporate risk taking and performance. Academy of Management Journal34(1): 37–59.
12.
BrowerJMahajanV (2012) Driven to be good: A stakeholder theory perspective on the drivers of corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics117(2): 313–331.
13.
BusenbarkJRYoonHGamacheDL, et al. (2022) Omitted variable bias: Examining management research with the impact threshold of a confounding variable (ITCV). Journal of Management48(1): 17–48.
14.
CarrollABShabanaKM (2010) The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews12(1): 85–105.
15.
CertoSTBusenbarkJRWooHS, et al. (2016) Sample selection bias and Heckman models in strategic management research. Strategic Management Journal37(13): 2639–2657.
16.
ChatterjeeAHambrickDC (2007) It’s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly52(3): 351–386.
17.
ChaudhuriSGanjamKGantiV, et al. (2003) Robust and efficient fuzzy match for online data cleaning. In: Proceedings of the 2003 ACM SIGMOD international conference on management of data, San Diego, California, USA, 9–12 June 2003, pp. 313–324.
18.
ChenJZhangZJiaM (2021) How CEO narcissism affects corporate social responsibility choice?Asia Pacific Journal of Management38(3): 897–924.
19.
ChenTDongHLinC (2020) Institutional shareholders and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Financial Economics135(2): 483–504.
20.
ChinMKHambrickDCTreviñoLK (2013) Political ideologies of CEOs: The influence of executives’ values on corporate social responsibility. Administrative Science Quarterly58(2): 197–232.
21.
ChiuSCSharfmanM (2011) Legitimacy, visibility, and the antecedents of corporate social performance: An investigation of the instrumental perspective. Journal of Management37(6): 1558–1585.
22.
ClarkCBSwailsJAPontinenHM, et al. (2017) A behavioral economic assessment of individualizing versus binding moral foundations. Personality and Individual Differences112: 49–54.
23.
DasGuptaR (2022) Financial performance shortfall, ESG controversies, and ESG performance: Evidence from firms around the world. Finance Research Letters46: 102487.
24.
DavidsonRHDeyASmithAJ (2019) CEO materialism and corporate social responsibility. The Accounting Review94(1): 101–126.
25.
DawsonSLTysonGA (2012) Will morality or political ideology determine attitudes to climate change. Australian Community Psychologist24(2): 8–25.
26.
DayMVFiskeSTDowningEL, et al. (2014) Shifting liberal and conservative attitudes using moral foundations theory. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin40(12): 1559–1573.
27.
DesJardineMRZhangMShiW (2023) How shareholders impact stakeholder interests: A review and map for future research. Journal of Management49(1): 400–429.
28.
Di SantoDGelfandMJBaldnerC, et al. (2022) The moral foundations of desired cultural tightness. Frontiers in Psychology13: 739579.
29.
DickinsonJLMcLeodPBloomfieldR, et al. (2016) Which moral foundations predict willingness to make lifestyle changes to avert climate change in the USA?PLoS ONE11(10): e0163852.
30.
DittoPHPizarroDATannenbaumD (2009) Motivated moral reasoning. In: BartelsDMBaumanCWSkitkaLJ, et al. (eds) Psychology of Learning and Motivation. Burlington: Academic Press, pp. 307–338.
31.
DobrickJKleinCZwergelB (2023) Size bias in Refinitiv ESG data. Finance Research Letters55: 104014.
32.
DoğruyolBAlperSYilmazO (2019) The five-factor model of the moral foundations theory is stable across WEIRD and non-WEIRD cultures. Personality and Individual Differences151: 109547.
33.
DrempeticSKleinCZwergelB (2020) The influence of firm size on the ESG score: Corporate sustainability ratings under review. Journal of Business Ethics167: 333–360.
34.
EllemersNVan Der ToornJPaunovY, et al. (2019) The psychology of morality: A review and analysis of empirical studies published from 1940 through 2017. Personality and Social Psychology Review23(4): 332–366.
35.
FeinbergMWillerR (2013) The moral roots of environmental attitudes. Psychological Science24(1): 56–62.
36.
FrankKA (2000) Impact of a confounding variable on a regression coefficient. Sociological Methods & Research29(2): 147–194.
37.
FrankKAMaroulisSJDuongMQ, et al. (2013) What would it take to change an inference? Using Rubin’s causal model to interpret the robustness of causal inferences. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis35(4): 437–460.
FreemanREWicksACParmarB (2004) Stakeholder theory and “the corporate objective revisited.”Organization Science15(3): 364–369.
40.
FrimerJA (2020) Do liberals and conservatives use different moral languages? Two replications and six extensions of Graham, Haidt, and Nosek’s (2009) moral text analysis. Journal of Research in Personality84: 103906.
41.
FuRTangYChenG (2020) Chief sustainability officers and corporate social (Ir)responsibility. Strategic Management Journal41(4): 656–680.
42.
GalassoASimcoeTS (2011) CEO overconfidence and innovation. Management Science57(8): 1469–1484.
43.
GamacheDLMcNamaraG (2019) Responding to bad press: How CEO temporal focus influences the sensitivity to negative media coverage of acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal62(3): 918–943.
44.
GamacheDLMcNamaraGMannorMJ, et al. (2015) Motivated to acquire? The impact of CEO regulatory focus on firm acquisitions. Academy of Management Journal58(4): 1261–1282.
45.
GamacheDLNevilleFBundyJ, et al. (2020) Serving differently: CEO regulatory focus and firm stakeholder strategy. Strategic Management Journal41(7): 1305–1335.
46.
GilliganC (1982) In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women’s Development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
47.
GondJ-PCabantousLKrikorianF (2018) How do things become strategic? “Strategifying” corporate social responsibility. Strategic Organization16(3): 241–272.
48.
GrahamJHaidtJNosekBA (2009) Liberals and conservatives rely on different sets of moral foundations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology96(5): 1029–1046.
49.
GrahamJHaidtJKolevaS, et al. (2013) Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology47: 55–130.
50.
GrahamJNosekBAHaidtJ, et al. (2011) Mapping the moral domain. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology101(2): 366–385.
51.
GrahamJWaytzAMeindlP, et al. (2017) Centripetal and centrifugal forces in the moral circle: Competing constraints on moral learning. Cognition167: 58–65.
52.
HadaricsMKendeA (2018) Moral foundations of positive and negative intergroup behavior: Moral exclusion fills the gap. International Journal of Intercultural Relations64: 67–76.
53.
HaidtJ (2001) The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review108(4): 814–834.
54.
HaidtJ (2007) The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science316: 998–1002.
55.
HaidtJ (2008) Morality. Perspectives on Psychological Science3(1): 65–72.
56.
HaidtJ (2012) The Righteous Mind: Why Good People Are Divided by Politics and Religion. New York: Pantheon Books.
57.
HaidtJGrahamJ (2007) When morality opposes justice: Conservatives have moral intuitions that liberals may not recognize. Social Justice Research20(1): 98–116.
HaidtJKesebirS (2010) Morality. In: FiskeSGilbertDLindzeyG (eds) Handbook of Social Psychology, 5th edn.Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, pp. 797–832.
60.
HaidtJGrahamJJosephC (2009) Above and below left–right: Ideological narratives and moral foundations. Psychological Inquiry 20(2-3): 110–119.
61.
HambrickDC (2007) Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review32(2): 334–343.
62.
HambrickDCFinkelsteinS (1987) Managerial discretion: A bridge between polar views of organizational outcomes. Research in Organizational Behavior9: 369–406.
63.
HambrickDCMasonPA (1984) Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review9(2): 193–206.
64.
HarperCARhodesD (2021) Reanalysing the factor structure of the moral foundations questionnaire. British Journal of Social Psychology60(4): 1303–1329.
65.
HarrisonJSThurgoodGRBoivieS, et al. (2019) Measuring CEO personality: Developing, validating, and testing a linguistic tool. Strategic Management Journal40(8): 1316–1330.
66.
HarrisonJSThurgoodGRBoivieS, et al. (2020) Perception is reality: How CEOs’ observed personality influences market perceptions of firm risk and shareholder returns. Academy of Management Journal63(4): 1166–1195.
67.
HarrisonJSYuXZhangZ (2023) Consistency among common measures of corporate social and sustainability performance. Journal of Cleaner Production391: 136232.
68.
HeckmanJJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica41(1): 153–161.
69.
HillADJohnsonSGGrecoLM, et al. (2021) Endogeneity: A review and agenda for the methodology-practice divide affecting micro and macro research. Journal of Management47(1): 105–143.
70.
HillADRecendesTRidgeJW (2019) Second-order effects of CEO characteristics: How rivals’ perceptions of CEOs as submissive and provocative precipitate competitive attacks. Strategic Management Journal40(5): 809–835.
71.
HillADWhiteMAWallaceJC (2014) Unobtrusive measurement of psychological constructs in organizational research. Organizational Psychology Review4(2): 148–174.
72.
HoeweJPanekEPeacockC, et al. (2022) Using moral foundations to assess stereotypes: Americans’ perceptions of immigrants and refugees. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies20(4): 501–518.
73.
HoffmanAJ (2011) Talking past each other? Cultural framing of skeptical and convinced logics in the climate change debate. Organization & Environment24(1): 3–33.
74.
HoffmanAJ (2015) How Culture Shapes the Climate Change Debate. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
75.
HuangSK (2013) The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate sustainable development. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management20: 234–244.
76.
HwangCYTitmanSWangY (2022) Investor tastes, corporate behavior, and stock returns: An analysis of corporate social responsibility. Management Science68(10): 7131–7152.
77.
IoannouISerafeimG (2012) What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies43(9): 834–864.
78.
IurinoKSaucierG (2020) Testing measurement invariance of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire across 27 countries. Assessment27(2): 365–372.
79.
JamaliD (2008) A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: A fresh perspective into theory and practice. Journal of Business Ethics82(1): 213–231.
80.
JanssonJDorrepaalE (2015) Personal norms for dealing with climate change: Results from a survey using moral foundations theory. Sustainable Development23(6): 381–395.
81.
JeongNKimNArthursJD (2021) The CEO’s tenure life cycle, corporate social responsibility and the moderating role of the CEO’s political orientation. Journal of Business Research137: 464–474.
82.
KalninsA (2018) Multicollinearity: How common factors cause Type 1 errors in multivariate regression. Strategic Management Journal39(8): 2362–2385.
83.
KangJ (2013) The relationship between corporate diversification and corporate social performance. Strategic Management Journal34: 94–109.
84.
KangJ (2017) Unobservable CEO characteristics and CEO compensation as correlated determinants of CSP. Business & Society56(3): 419–453.
85.
KavadisNThomsenS (2023) Sustainable corporate governance: A review of research on long-term corporate ownership and sustainability. Corporate Governance: An International Review31(1): 198–226.
86.
KimHJMunSHanSH (2023) Corporate social responsibility and the alignment of CEO and shareholders wealth: Does a strong alignment induce or restrain CSR?Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management30(2): 720–741.
87.
KivikangasJMFernández-CastillaBJärveläS, et al. (2021) Moral foundations and political orientation: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin147(1): 55–94.
88.
KohlbergL (1969) Stages in the Development of Moral Thought and Action. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
89.
KongDTChiuScChristopoulosGI (2024) The face of morality: Powerful Chief Executive Officers’ (CEOs’) facial characteristics and moral foundations. Evolutionary Behavioral Sciences18(1): 26–40.
90.
LaplumeAOSonparKLitzRA (2008) Stakeholder theory: Reviewing a theory that moves us. Journal of Management34(6): 1152–1189.
91.
LeBretonJMSenterJL (2008) Answers to 20 questions about interrater reliability and interrater agreement. Organizational Research Methods11: 815–852.
92.
LemoineGJHartnellCALeroyH (2019) Taking stock of moral approaches to leadership: An integrative review of ethical, authentic, and servant leadership. Academy of Management Annals13(1): 148–187.
93.
LennickDKielF (2005) Moral Competence: Enhancing Business Performance and Leadership Success. New Jersey: Wharton School Publishing.
94.
LennoxCSFrancisJRWangZ (2012) Selection models in accounting research. The Accounting Review87(2): 589–616.
95.
LotzSFixAR (2014) Financial returns versus moral concerns: Laypeople’s willingness to engage in fair investments. Social Justice Research27: 487–503.
96.
MalhotraSReusTHZhuP, et al. (2018) The acquisitive nature of extraverted CEOs. Administrative Science Quarterly63(2): 370–408.
97.
MatsumotoDPronkMRoelofsenE (2011) What makes conference calls useful? The information content of managers’ presentations and analysts’ discussion sessions. The Accounting Review86(4): 1383–1414.
98.
McClellandPLLiangXBarkerVL (2010) CEO commitment to the status quo: Replication and extension using content analysis. Journal of Management36(5): 1251–1277.
99.
McGuireJDowSArgheydK (2003) CEO incentives and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics45: 341–359.
100.
McWilliamsASiegelDS (2000) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: Correlation or misspecification?Strategic Management Journal21(5): 603–609.
101.
McWilliamsASiegelDS (2001) Corporate social responsibility: A theory of the firm perspective. Academy of Management Review26(1): 117–127.
102.
MilesS (2017) Stakeholder theory classification: A theoretical and empirical evaluation of definitions. Journal of Business Ethics142: 437–459.
103.
MilfontTLDaviesCLWilsonMS (2019) The moral foundations of environmentalism. Social Psychological Bulletin14(2): 1–25.
104.
MintzbergHWatersJA (1985) Of strategies, deliberate and emergent. Strategic Management Journal6(3): 257–272.
105.
MontañaRA (2017) Corporate sustainability and responsibility 2.0: Moral foundations and implications. KRITIKE: An Online Journal of Philosophy11(1): 108–128.
106.
MorganBGullifordLKristjánssonK (2017) A new approach to measuring moral virtues: The multi-component gratitude measure. Personality and Individual Differences107: 179–189.
107.
NadkarniSChenJ (2014) Bridging yesterday, today, and tomorrow: CEO temporal focus, environmental dynamism, and rate of new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal57(6): 1810–1833.
108.
NapierJLLuguriJB (2013) Moral mind-sets: Abstract thinking increases a preference for “individualizing” over “binding” moral foundations. Social Psychological and Personality Science4(6): 754–759.
109.
NasonRSBacqSCGrasD (2018) A behavioral theory of social performance: Social identity and stakeholder expectations. Academy of Management Review43(2): 259–283.
110.
NeubaumDOZahraSA (2006) Institutional ownership and corporate social performance: The moderating effects of investment horizon, activism, and coordination. Journal of Management32(1): 108–131.
111.
NickersonDLoweMPattabhiramaiahA, et al. (2022) The impact of corporate social responsibility on brand sales: An accountability perspective. Journal of Marketing86(2): 5–28.
112.
NilssonAErlandssonAVästfjällD (2016) The congruency between moral foundations and intentions to donate, self-reported donations, and actual donations to charity. Journal of Research in Personality65: 22–29.
113.
NilssonAErlandssonAVästfjällD (2020) Moral foundations theory and the psychology of charitable giving. European Journal of Personality34: 431–447.
114.
OcasioWLaamanenTVaaraE (2018) Communication and attention dynamics: An attention-based view of strategic change. Strategic Management Journal39(1): 155–167.
115.
O’GradyTVandegriftDWolekM, et al. (2019) On the determinants of other-regarding behavior: Field tests of the moral foundations questionnaire. Journal of Research in Personality81: 224–237.
116.
OhW-YChaJChangYK (2017) Does ownership structure matter? The effects of insider and institutional ownership on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics146: 111–124.
117.
OhW-YChangYKKimT-Y (2018) Complementary or substitutive effects? Corporate governance mechanisms and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management44(7): 2716–2739.
118.
OstromE (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
119.
PandeyNAndresCKumarS (2023) Mapping the corporate governance scholarship: Current state and future directions. Corporate Governance: An International Review31(1): 127–160.
120.
PattersonDM (2001) Causal effects of regulatory, organizational and personal factors on ethical sensitivity. Journal of Business Ethics30(2): 123–159.
121.
PennebakerJWBoothRJBoydRL, et al. (2015) Linguistic Inquiry Word Count: LIWC2015. Austin, TX: Pennebaker Conglomerates.
122.
PetersGFRomiAMSanchezJM (2018) The influence of corporate sustainability officers on performance. Journal of Business Ethics159(4): 1065–1087.
123.
PetrenkoOVAimeFRidgeJ, et al. (2016) Corporate social responsibility or CEO narcissism? CSR motivations and organizational performance. Strategic Management Journal37(2): 262–279.
124.
PittelSMMendelsohnGA (1966) Measurement of moral values: A review and critique. Psychological Bulletin66(1): 22–35.
125.
QuigleyTJGraffinSD (2017) Reaffirming the CEO effect is significant and much larger than chance: A comment on Fitza (2014). Strategic Management Journal38(3): 793–801.
126.
ReesWRodionovaT (2015) The influence of family ownership on corporate social responsibility: An international analysis of publicly listed companies. Corporate Governance: An International Review23(3): 184–202.
RestJ (1983) Morality. In: MussenP (ed.) Manual of Child Psychology. New York: Wiley, pp. 556–629.
129.
RodrigueMMagnanMChoCH (2013) Is environmental governance substantive or symbolic? An empirical investigation. Journal of Business Ethics114: 107–129.
130.
SacchiSRivaPAcetoA (2016) Myopic about climate change: Cognitive style, psychological distance, and environmentalism. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology65: 68–73.
131.
SahinÖBaxKPaterliniS, et al. (2023) The pitfalls of (non-definitive) environmental, social, and governance scoring methodology. Global Finance Journal56: 100780.
SchwartzSH (2016) Basic individual values: Sources and consequences. In: BroschTSanderD (eds) Handbook of Value: Perspectives From Economics, Neuroscience, Philosophy, Psychology, and Sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 63–84.
134.
ShortJCMcKennyAFReidSW (2018) More than words? Computer-aided text analysis in organizational behavior and psychology research. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior5: 415–435.
135.
SilverJRSilverE (2017) Why are conservatives more punitive than liberals? A moral foundations approach. Law and Human Behavior41(3): 258–272.
136.
SlaterDJDixon-FowlerHR (2009) CEO international assignment experience and corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics89(3): 473–489.
137.
SmithIHAquinoKKolevaS, et al. (2014) The moral ties that bind. . . even to out-groups: The interactive effect of moral identity and the binding moral foundations. Psychological Science25(8): 1554–1562.
138.
Strupp-LevitskyMNoorbaloochiSShipleyA, et al. (2020) Moral “foundations” as the product of motivated social cognition: Empathy and other psychological underpinnings of ideological divergence in “individualizing” and “binding” concerns. PLoS ONE15(11): e0241144.
139.
SurrocaJTribóJAZahraSA (2013) Stakeholder pressure on MNEs and the transfer of socially irresponsible practices to subsidiaries. Academy of Management Journal56(2): 549–572.
140.
SüssenbachPReesJGollwitzerM (2019) When the going gets tough, individualizers get going: On the relationship between moral foundations and prosociality. Personality and Individual Differences136: 122–131.
141.
TangYMackDZChenG (2018) The differential effects of CEO narcissism and hubris on corporate social responsibility. Strategic Management Journal39(5): 1370–1387.
142.
TangYQianCChenG, et al. (2015) How CEO hubris affects corporate social (ir)responsibility. Strategic Management Journal36(9): 1338–1357.
TsoukasH (2018) Strategy and virtue: Developing strategy-as-practice through virtue ethics. Strategic Organization16(3): 323–351.
145.
United Nations (2019) Only 11 years left to prevent irreversible damage from climate change, speakers warn during general assembly high-level meeting. Available at: https://www.un.org/press/en/2019/ga12131.doc.htm (accessed 22 March 2023).
146.
VainioAMäkiniemiJ-P (2016) How are moral foundations associated with climate-friendly consumption?Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics29(2): 265–283.
147.
van KnippenbergDHirstG (2020) A motivational lens model of person × situation interactions in employee creativity. Journal of Applied Psychology105(10): 1129–1144.
148.
VartanovaIErikssonKKirgilZM, et al. (2021) The advent of the COVID-19 epidemic did not affect Americans’ endorsement of moral foundations. Frontiers in Psychology12: 647858.
149.
VillaJRHowellJPDorfmanPW, et al. (2003) Problems with detecting moderators in leadership research using moderated multiple regression. The Leadership Quarterly14(1): 3–23.
150.
WallsJLSalaizAChiuS-C (2021) Wanted: Heroic leaders to drive the transition to “business beyond usual.”Strategic Organization19(3): 494–512.
151.
WangGHolmesRMJrOhIS, et al. (2016a) Do CEOs matter to firm strategic actions and firm performance? A meta-analytic investigation based on upper echelons theory. Personnel Psychology69(4): 775–862.
152.
WangHTongLTakeuchiR, et al. (2016b) Corporate social responsibility: An overview and new research directions. Academy of Management Journal59(2): 534–544.
153.
WangXLiFSunQ (2018) Confucian ethics, moral foundations, and shareholder value perspectives: An exploratory study. Business Ethics: A European Review27(3): 260–271.
154.
WatkinsLAitkenRMatherD (2016) Conscientious consumers: A relationship between moral foundations, political orientation and sustainable consumption. Journal of Cleaner Production134: 137–146.
155.
WelbourneTMNeckHMMeyerGD (1999) Human resource slack and venture growth: An exploratory analysis of growing employees at a faster rate than sales. Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research19: 480–490.
156.
WernickeGSajkoMBooneC (2022) How much influence do CEOs have on company actions and outcomes? The example of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Discoveries8(1): 36–55.
157.
WiersemaMKooH (2022) Corporate governance in today’s world: Looking back and an agenda for the future. Strategic Organization20(4): 786–796.
158.
WinterichKPZhangYMittalV (2012) How political identity and charity positioning increase donations: Insights from moral foundations theory. International Journal of Research in Marketing29(4): 346–354.
159.
WoehrDJLoignonACSchmidtPB, et al. (2015) Justifying aggregation with consensus-based constructs: A review and examination of cutoff values for common aggregation indices. Organizational Research Methods18(4): 704–737.
YilmazOSaribaySA (2017) Activating analytic thinking enhances the value given to individualizing moral foundations. Cognition165: 88–96.
162.
ZakharinMBatesTC (2021) Remapping the foundations of morality: Well-fitting structural model of the Moral Foundations Questionnaire. PLoS ONE16(10): e0258910.
163.
ZakharinMBatesTC (2023) Testing heritability of moral foundations: Common pathway models support strong heritability for the five moral foundations. European Journal of Personality37(4): 485–497.
164.
Zapko-WillmesASchwartzSHRichterJ, et al. (2021) Basic value orientations and moral foundations: Convergent or discriminant constructs?Journal of Research in Personality92: 104099.
165.
ZhangZWangXJiaM (2021) Echoes of CEO entrepreneurial orientation: How and when CEO entrepreneurial orientation influences dual CSR activities. Journal of Business Ethics169(4): 609–629.
