Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

Much of the upper echelons’ literature presumes that CEOs are unlikely and unwilling to participate in research regarding their roles and decision-making processes. In this opinion piece, we argue that the dearth of research utilizing primary data from the CEO population poses a challenge to the diversity and soundness of scholarship in this field, limiting our own capacity to truly know these crucial informants. Furthermore, we assert that the reluctance of organizational scholars to involve CEOs in their research is rooted in several assumptions that warrant re-evaluation. Drawing from a critical assessment of existing literature and our own experiences, we propose suggestions for effective strategies to engage with CEOs in our research endeavors.

Keywords

CEO leadership methods upper echelon theory elite research

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Adams

R. B.

Licht

A. N.

Sagiv

(2011). Shareholders and stakeholders: How do directors decide? Strategic Management Journal, 32(12), 1331–1355.

Aguiar

L. L.

Schneider

C. J.

(Eds.), (2016). Researching amongst elites: Challenges and opportunities in studying up. Routledge.

Anderson

Herriot

Hodgkinson

G. P.

(2001). The practitioner‐researcher divide in Industrial, Work and Organizational (IWO) psychology: Where are we now, and where do we go from here? Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 74(4), 391–411. https://doi.org/10.1348/096317901167451

Anseel

Lievens

Schollaert

Choragwicka

(2010). Response rates in organizational science, 1995–2008: A meta-analytic review and guidelines for survey researchers. Journal of Business and Psychology, 25(3), 335–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-010-9157-6

Bandiera

Prat

Hansen

Sadun

(2020). CEO behavior and firm performance. Journal of Political Economy, 128(4), 1325–1369. https://doi.org/10.1086/705331

Barling

Cloutier

(2017). Leaders’ mental health at work: Empirical, methodological, and policy directions. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 22(3), 394–406. https://doi.org/10.1037/ocp0000055

Bartholomew

Smith

A. D.

(2006). Improving survey response rates from chief executive officers in small firms: The importance of social networks. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(1), 83–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2006.00111.x

Bartunek

J. M.

(2011). What has happened to Mode 2? British Journal of Management, 22(3), 555–558. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00773.x

Bartunek

J. M.

Rynes

S. L.

Ireland

R. D.

(2006). What makes management research interesting, and why does it matter? Academy of Management Journal, 49(1), 9–15. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.20785494

10.

Baruch

(1999). Response rate in academic studies: A comparative analysis. Human Relations, 52(4), 421–438. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872679905200401

11.

Baruch

Holtom

B. C.

(2008). Survey response rate levels and trends in organizational research. Human Relations, 61(8), 1139–1160. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726708094863

12.

Baum

Bird

(2010). The successful intelligence of high-growth entrepreneurs: Links to new venture growth. Organization Science, 21(2), 397–412. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0445

13.

Baum

J. R.

Bird

B. J.

Singh

(2011). The practical intelligence of entrepreneurs: Antecedents and a link with new venture growth. Personnel Psychology, 64(2), 397–425. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2011.01214.x

14.

Benda

Kimball

(2017). The treason of the intellectuals. Routledge.

15.

Bennis

W. G.

O’Toole

(2005). How business schools have lost their way. Harvard Business Review, 83(5), 96–104.

16.

Berson

Oreg

Dvir

(2008). CEO values, organizational culture and firm outcomes. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 29(5), 615–633. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.499

17.

Boivie

Lange

McDonald

M. L.

Westphal

J. D.

(2011). Me or we: The effects of CEO organizational identification on agency costs. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2009(1), 551–556. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2009.44243388

18.

Borgholthaus

White

Harms

P. D.

(2023). CEO dark personality: A critical review, bibliometric analysis, and research agenda. Personality and Individual Differences, 201, 111951. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2022.111951

19.

Bourgoin

Harvey

J. F.

(2018). Professional image under threat: Dealing with learning–credibility tension. Human Relations, 71(12), 1611–1639. https://doi.org/10.1177/0018726718756168

20.

Bourgoin

Muniesa

(2016). Building a rock-solid slide: Management consulting, PowerPoint, and the craft of signification. Management Communication Quarterly, 30(3), 390–410. https://doi.org/10.1177/0893318916629562

21.

Brewis

D. N.

Bell

(2020). Provocation essays editorial: On the importance of moving and being moved. Management Learning, 51(5), 533–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/1350507620957111

22.

Bromiley

Rau

(2016). Social, behavioral, and cognitive influences on upper echelons during strategy process: A literature review. Journal of Management, 42(1), 174–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315617240

23.

Busenbark

J. R.

Krause

Boivie

Graffin

S. D.

(2016). Toward a configurational perspective on the CEO: A review and synthesis of the management literature. Journal of Management, 42(1), 234–268. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315618448

24.

Campbell

D. T.

Fiske

D. W.

(1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0046016

25.

Carpenter

M. A.

Geletkanycz

M. A.

Sanders

W. G.

(2004). Upper echelons research revisited: Antecedents, elements, and consequences of top management team composition. Journal of Management, 30(6), 749–778. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jm.2004.06.001

26.

Chatterjee

Hambrick

D. C.

(2007). It’s all about me: Narcissistic chief executive officers and their effects on company strategy and performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 52(3), 351–386. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.52.3.351

27.

Chatterjee

Hambrick

D. C.

(2011). Executive personality, capability cues, and risk taking: How narcissistic CEOs react to their successes and stumbles. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2), 202–237. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839211427534

28.

Chatterji

A. K.

Toffel

M. W.

(2019). Assessing the impact of CEO activism. Organization & Environment, 32(2), 159–185. https://doi.org/10.1177/1086026619848144

29.

Chen

J. X.

Sharma

Zhan

Liu

(2019). Demystifying the impact of CEO transformational leadership on firm performance: Interactive roles of exploratory innovation and environmental uncertainty. Journal of Business Research, 96, 85–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2018.10.061

30.

Chris

(1991). Teaching smart people how to learn. Harvard Business Review, 69(3), 99–109.

31.

Conti

J. A.

O’Neil

(2007). Studying power: Qualitative methods and the global elite. Qualitative Research, 7(1), 63–82. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794107071421

32.

Credé

(2010). Random responding as a threat to the validity of effect size estimates in correlational research. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70(4), 596–612. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164410366686

33.

Credé

Harms

P. D.

Niehorster

Gaye-Valentine

(2012). An evaluation of the consequences of using short measures of the Big Five personality traits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 874–888. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027403

34.

Crossland

Hambrick

(2011). Differences in managerial discretion across countries: How nation level institutions affect the degree to which CEOs matter. Strategic Management Journal, 32(8), 797–819. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.913

35.

Cunliffe

A. L.

Scaratti

(2017). Embedding impact in engaged research: Developing socially useful knowledge through dialogical sensemaking. British Journal of Management, 28(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8551.12204

36.

Cycyota

C. S.

Harrison

D. A.

(2002). Enhancing survey response rates at the executive level: Are employee-or consumer-level techniques effective? Journal of Management, 28(2), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063(01)00137-4

37.

Cycyota

C. S.

Harrison

D. A.

(2006). What (not) to expect when surveying executives: A meta-analysis of top manager response rates and techniques over time. Organizational Research Methods, 9(2), 133–160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105280770

38.

Davis

M. S.

(1971). That’s interesting! Towards a phenomenology of sociology and a sociology of phenomenology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 1(2), 309–344. https://doi.org/10.1177/004839317100100211

39.

Delgado‐García

J. B.

De La Fuente‐Sabaté

J. M.

(2010). How do CEO emotions matter? Impact of CEO affective traits on strategic and performance conformity in the Spanish banking industry. Strategic Management Journal, 31(5), 562–574.

40.

DeSimone

Harms

P. D.

Wood

(2018). The differential impacts of two forms of insufficient effort responding. Applied Psychology, 67(2), 309–338. https://doi.org/10.1111/apps.12117

41.

DeSimone

J. A.

Harms

P. D.

DeSimone

(2015). Best practice recommendations for data screening. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36(2), 171–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.1962

42.

Dillman

Smyth

Christian

(2014). Internet, phone, mail, and mixed-mode surveys: The tailored design method. John Wiley and Sons.

43.

Dinh

J. E.

Lord

R. G.

Gardner

W. L.

Meuser

J. D.

Liden

R. C.

(2014). Leadership theory and research in the new millennium: Current theoretical trends and changing perspectives. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(1), 36–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.005

44.

Doty

D. H.

Glick

W. H.

(1998). Common methods bias: Does common methods variance really bias results? Organizational Research Methods, 1(4), 374–406. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442819814002

45.

Empson

(2018). Elite interviewing in professional organizations. Journal of Professions and Organization, 5(1), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1093/jpo/jox010

46.

Erikson

E. H.

(1982). The life cycle completed. Norton.

47.

Falconer

D. J.

Hodgett

R. A.

(1999). Why executives don’t respond to your survey. Proceedings of the 10th Australasian conference on information systems (pp. 279–285): Association for Information Systems.

48.

Feghali

(2022). Executive peer advisory groups: Who they are? What are their benefits? Why do members join and stay? Digital USD. [Doctoral dissertation, University of San Diego]. https://digital.sandiego.edu/dissertations/930

49.

Fulton

B. R.

(2018). Organizations and survey research: Implementing response enhancing strategies and conducting nonresponse analyses. Sociological Methods & Research, 47(2), 240–276. https://doi.org/10.1177/0049124115626169

50.

Gabaix

Landier

(2008). Why has CEO pay increased so much? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 123(1), 49–100. https://doi.org/10.1162/qjec.2008.123.1.49

51.

Garcia-Blandon

Argilés-Bosch

J. M.

Ravenda

(2019). Exploring the relationship between CEO characteristics and performance. Journal of Business Economics and Management, 20(6), 1064–1082. https://doi.org/10.3846/jbem.2019.10447

52.

Gardner

W. L.

Lowe

K. B.

Meuser

J. D.

Noghani

Gullifor

D. P.

Cogliser

C. C.

(2020). The leadership trilogy: A review of the third decade of the leadership quarterly. The Leadership Quarterly, 31(1), 101379. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101379

53.

Garman

A. N.

(2011). Shooting for the moon: How academicians could make management research even less irrelevant. Journal of Business and Psychology, 26(2), 129–133. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10869-011-9224-7

54.

Gibbons

Limoges

Nowotny

Schwartzman

Scott

Trow

(1994). The new production of knowledge: The dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage Publications.

55.

Gulati

(2007). Tent poles, tribalism, and boundary spanning: The rigor-relevance debate in management research. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 775–782. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279170

56.

Hambrick

D. C.

(1995). Fragmentation and the other problems CEOs have with their top management teams. California Management Review, 37(3), 110–127. https://doi.org/10.2307/41165801

57.

Hambrick

D. C.

(2007). Upper echelons theory: An update. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 334–343. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.24345254

58.

Hambrick

D. C.

Fukutomi

G. D.

(1991). The seasons of a CEO’s tenure. Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 719–742. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1991.4279621

59.

Hambrick

D. C.

Mason

P. A.

(1984). Upper echelons: The organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9(2), 193–206. https://doi.org/10.2307/258434

60.

Harms

P. D.

(2022). Bad is stronger than good: A review of the models and measures of dark personality. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 230(4), 280–289. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000496

61.

Harrison

J. S.

Thurgood

G. R.

Boivie

Pfarrer

M. D.

(2019). Measuring CEO personality: Developing, validating, and testing a linguistic tool. Strategic Management Journal, 40(8), 1316–1330. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3023

62.

Hartnell

C. A.

Kinicki

A. J.

Lambert

L. S.

Fugate

Doyle Corner

(2016). Do similarities or differences between CEO leadership and organizational culture have a more positive effect on firm performance? A test of competing predictions. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101(6), 846–861. https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000083

63.

Harvey

W. S.

(2011). Strategies for conducting elite interviews. Qualitative Research, 11(4), 431–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/1468794111404329

64.

Harvey

W. S.

(2021). Interviewing global elites. Field guide to intercultural research (pp. 41–53). Edward Elgar Publishing.

65.

Herrmann

Nadkarni

(2014). Managing strategic change: The duality of CEO personality. Strategic Management Journal, 35(9), 1318–1342. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2156

66.

Hitt

M. A.

Tyler

B. B.

(1991). Strategic decision models: Integrating different perspectives. Strategic Management Journal, 12(5), 327–351. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.4250120502

67.

Hoffmann-Lange

(2007). Methods of elite research. In Dalton

R. J.

Klingemann

H.-D.

(Eds.), The oxford handbook of political behaviour (pp. 910–927). Oxford University Press.

68.

Hogan

(2009). Hogan development survey manual. Hogan Assessment Systems.

69.

Jaggia

Thosar

(2021). CEO management style: Does educational background play a role? Managerial Finance, 47(10), 1465–1485. https://doi.org/10.1108/mf-12-2020-0606

70.

Jones

Paulhus

(2013). Introducing the short dark triad (SD3): A brief measure of dark personality traits. Assessment, 21(1), 28–41. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073191113514105

71.

Joyce

W. F.

Nohria

Roberson

(2003). What really works. Harper Business.

72.

Kertzer

J. D.

Renshon

(2022). Experiments and surveys on political elites. Annual Review of Political Science, 25(1), 529–550. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-013649

73.

Kieser

Leiner

(2009). Why the rigour–relevance gap in management research is unbridgeable. Journal of Management Studies, 46(3), 516–533. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00831.x

74.

Kraus

Stokes

Moore

Ashta

Britzelmaier

B. J.

(2023). An elite perspective on interviewing entrepreneurs–methodological considerations for the entrepreneurship field. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 30(5), 857–879. https://doi.org/10.1108/jsbed-12-2022-0492

75.

Kvale

(2006). Dominance through interviews and dialogues. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(3), 480–500. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800406286235

76.

Lafley

A. G.

(2009). What only the CEO can do. Harvard Business Review, 87(5), 54–126.

77.

Lange

Boivie

Westphal

J. D.

(2015). Predicting organizational identification at the CEO level. Academy of Management Proceedings, 2011(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2011.65869484

78.

Latour

(2000). When things strike back: A possible contribution of ‘science studies’ to the social sciences. British Journal of Sociology, 51(1), 107–123. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-4446.2000.00107.x

79.

Laurila

(1997). Promoting research access and informant rapport in corporate settings: Notes from research on a crisis company. Scandinavian Journal of Management, 13(4), 407–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0956-5221(97)00026-2

80.

Ling

Simsek

Lubatkin

M. H.

Veiga

J. F.

(2008). The impact of transformational CEOs on the performance of small- to medium-sized firms: Does organizational context matter? Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(4), 923–934.

81.

Ling

Zhao

Baron

(2007). Influence of founder-CEOs’ personal values on firm performance: Moderating effects of firm age and size. Journal of Management, 33(5), 673–696. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307305564

82.

Liu

(2018). Interviewing elites: Methodological issues confronting a novice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 17(1), 1609406918770323.

83.

Liu

Jarrett

Maitlis

(2022). Top management team constellations and their implications for strategic decision making. The Leadership Quarterly, 33(3), 101510.

84.

Seidl

McNulty

(2021). Challenges and practices of interviewing business elites. Strategic Organization, 19(1), 81–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127020980969

85.

Manner

M. H.

(2010). The impact of CEO characteristics on corporate social performance. Journal of Business Ethics, 93(S1), 53–72. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-010-0626-7

86.

Mannor

M. J.

Wowak

A. J.

Bartkus

V. O.

Gomez‐Mejia

L. R.

(2016). Heavy lies the crown? How job anxiety affects top executive decision making in gain and loss contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 37(9), 1968–1989. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2425

87.

Mathieu

Babiak

(2016). Validating the B‐scan self: A self‐report measure of psychopathy in the workplace. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 24(3), 272–284. https://doi.org/10.1111/ijsa.12146

88.

McAdams

D. P.

St Aubin

E. D.

Logan

R. L.

(1993). Generativity among young, midlife, and older adults. Psychology and Aging, 8(2), 221–230. https://doi.org/10.1037//0882-7974.8.2.221

89.

McDonald

M. L.

Khanna

Westphal

J. D.

(2008). Getting them to think outside the circle: Corporate governance, CEOs’ external advice networks, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 51(3), 453–475. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2008.32625969

90.

McDonald

M. L.

Westphal

J. D.

(2010). A little help here? Board control, CEO identification with the corporate elite, and strategic help provided to CEOs at other firms. Academy of Management Journal, 53(2), 343–370. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.49389006

91.

McDonald

M. L.

Westphal

J. D.

(2011). My brother’s keeper? CEO identification with the corporate elite, social support among CEOs, and leader effectiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 54(4), 661–693. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.64869104

92.

McDonald

M. L.

Westphal

J. D.

(2013). Access denied: Low mentoring of women and minority first-time directors and its negative effects on appointments to additional boards. Academy of Management Journal, 56(4), 1169–1198. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0230

93.

McKelvey

(2006). Van de Ven and Johnson’s “engaged scholarship”: Nice try, but…. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 822–829. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527451

94.

McNulty

Pettigrew

(1999). Strategists on the board. Organization Studies, 20(1), 47–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840699201003

95.

Meuser

J. D.

Gardner

W. L.

Dinh

J. E.

Liden

R. C.

Lord

R. G.

(2016). A network analysis of leadership theory: The infancy of integration. Journal of Management, 42(5), 1374–1403.

96.

Michael Holmes Jr

Hitt

M. A.

Perrewe

P. L.

Palmer

J. C.

Molina-Sieiro

(2021). Building cross-disciplinary bridges in leadership: Integrating top executive personality and leadership theory and research. The Leadership Quarterly, 32(1), 101490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2020.101490

97.

Mikecz

(2012). Interviewing elites: Addressing methodological issues. Qualitative Inquiry, 18(6), 482–493. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800412442818

98.

Mintzberg

(1973). The nature of managerial work. Harper & Row.

99.

Mitchell

T. R.

(1985). An evaluation of the validity of correlational research conducted in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 10(2), 192–205. https://doi.org/10.2307/257962

100.

Mõttus

(2016). Towards more rigorous personality trait–outcome research. European Journal of Personality, 30(4), 292–303. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2041

101.

Nadkarni

Chen

(2014). Bridging yesterday, today, and tomorrow: CEO temporal focus, environmental dynamism, and rate of new product introduction. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1810–1833. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2011.0401

102.

Nadkarni

Herrmann

(2010). CEO personality, strategic flexibility, and firm performance: The case of the Indian business process outsourcing industry. Academy of Management Journal, 53(5), 1050–1073. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.54533196

103.

Neely

B. H.

Lovelace

J. B.

Cowen

A. P.

Hiller

N. J.

(2020). Metacritiques of upper echelons theory: Verdicts and recommendations for future research. Journal of Management, 46(6), 1029–1062. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206320908640

104.

E. S.

Sears

G. J.

(2017). The glass ceiling in context: The influence of CEO gender, recruitment practices and firm internationalisation on the representation of women in management. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1), 133–151. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12135

105.

Nisbett

R. E.

(1990). The anticreativity letters: Advice from a senior tempter to a junior tempter. American Psychologist, 45(9), 1078–1082. https://doi.org/10.1037//0003-066x.45.9.1078

106.

Ostrander

S. A.

(1993). “Surely you’re not in this just to be helpful” access, rapport, and interviews in three studies of elites. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22(1), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124193022001002

107.

A. Y.

Waldman

D. A.

Peterson

S. J.

(2018). Do humble CEOs matter? An examination of CEO humility and firm outcomes. Journal of Management, 44(3), 1147–1173. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206315604187

108.

Pangrazio

(2017). Exploring provocation as a research method in the social sciences. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 20(2), 225–236. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2016.1161346

109.

Park

Westphal

(2013). Social discrimination in the corporate elite: How status affects the propensity for minority CEOs to receive blame for low firm performance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 58(4), 542–586. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839213509364

110.

Park

Westphal

Stern

(2011). Set up for a fall: The insidious effects of flattery and opinion conformity toward corporate leaders. Administrative Science Quarterly, 56(2), 257–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839211429102

111.

Patel

P. C.

Cooper

(2014). Structural power equality between family and non-family TMT members and the performance of family firms. Academy of Management Journal, 57(6), 1624–1649. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0681

112.

Paterson

T. A.

Harms

P. D.

Tuggle

C. S.

(2018). Revisiting the rigor–relevance relationship: An institutional logics perspective. Human Resource Management, 57(6), 1371–1383. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21911

113.

Peterson

Smith

D. B.

Martorana

Owens

(2003). The impact of Chief Executive Officer personality on top management team dynamics: One mechanism by which leadership affects organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 795–808. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.795

114.

Peterson

S. J.

Galvin

B. M.

Lange

(2012). CEO servant leadership: Exploring executive characteristics and firm performance. Personnel Psychology, 65(3), 565–596. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.2012.01253.x

115.

Pfeffer

(1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organizations. Harvard Business Press.

116.

Plesner

(2011). Studying sideways: Displacing the problem of power in research interviews with sociologists and journalists. Qualitative Inquiry, 17(6), 471–482. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411409871

117.

Podsakoff

P. M.

MacKenzie

S. B.

Lee

J. Y.

Podsakoff

N. P.

(2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879

118.

Podsakoff

P. M.

Organ

D. W.

(1986). Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects. Journal of Management, 12(4), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638601200408

119.

Porter

M. E.

Nohria

(2018). How CEOs manage time. Harvard Business Review, 96(4), 42–51.

120.

Quigley

T. J.

Hambrick

D. C.

(2015). Has the “CEO effect” increased in recent decades? A new explanation for the great rise in America’s attention to corporate leaders. Strategic Management Journal, 36(6), 821–830. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2258

121.

Roberts

L. M.

(2005). Changing faces: Professional image construction in diverse organizational settings. Academy of Management Review, 30(4), 685–711. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2005.18378873

122.

Rogelberg

S. G.

Fisher

G. G.

Maynard

D. C.

Hakel

M. D.

Horvath

(2001). Attitudes toward surveys: Development of a measure and its relationship to respondent behavior. Organizational Research Methods, 4(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/109442810141001

123.

Rovelli

(2020). “I am stuck in meetings”: Understanding the relation of CEO time management with TMT size and gender diversity. European Management Journal, 38(5), 777–790. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.02.010

124.

Rynes

S. L.

Giluk

T. L.

Brown

K. G.

(2007). The very separate worlds of academic and practitioner periodicals in human resource management: Implications for evidence-based management. Academy of Management Journal, 50(5), 987–1008. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.27151939

125.

Saunders

Lewis

Thornhill

(2003). Research methods forbusiness students. Prentice Hall: Financial Times.

126.

Schwarz

(1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54(2), 93–105. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.54.2.93

127.

Shen

(2021). CEO characteristics: A review of influential publications and a research agenda. Accounting and Finance, 61(1), 361–385. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.12571

128.

Simsek

Heavey

Veiga

J. J. F.

(2010). The impact of CEO core self‐evaluation on the firm’s entrepreneurial orientation. Strategic Management Journal, 31(1), 110–119. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.800

129.

Smith

G. T.

McCarthy

D. M.

Anderson

K. G.

(2000). On the sins of short-form development. Psychological Assessment, 12(1), 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1037//1040-3590.12.1.102

130.

Smith

K. E.

(2006). Problematising power relations in ‘elite’ interviews. Geoforum, 37(4), 643–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2005.11.002

131.

Solarino

A. M.

Aguinis

(2021). Challenges and best‐practice recommendations for designing and conducting interviews with elite informants. Journal of Management Studies, 58(3), 649–672. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12620

132.

Spector

P. E.

(1994). Using self-report questionnaires in OB research: A comment on the use of a controversial method. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 15(5), 385–392. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.4030150503

133.

Starbuck

(2003). Turning lemons into lemonade: Where is the value in peer reviews? Journal of Management Inquiry, 12(4), 344–351. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492603258972

134.

Thomas

R. J.

(1993). Interviewing important people in big companies. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 22(1), 80–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124193022001006

135.

Van de Ven

A. H.

Johnson

P. E.

(2006). Knowledge for theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 802–821. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2006.22527385

136.

Van Scotter

J. R.

Roglio

K. D. D.

(2020). CEO bright and dark personality: Effects on ethical misconduct. Journal of Business Ethics, 164(3), 451–475. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-018-4061-5

137.

Wai

(2013). Investigating America’s elite: Cognitive ability, education, and sex differences. Intelligence, 41(4), 203–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2013.03.005

138.

Wai

Rindermann

(2015). The path and performance of a company leader: A historical examination of the education and cognitive ability of fortune 500 CEOs. Intelligence, 53, 102–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intell.2015.10.001

139.

Waldman

D. A.

Siegel

D. S.

Javidan

(2006). Components of CEO transformational leadership and corporate social responsibility. Journal of Management Studies, 43(8), 1703–1725. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2006.00642.x

140.

Wales

W. J.

Patel

P. C.

Lumpkin

G. T.

(2013). In pursuit of greatness: CEO narcissism, entrepreneurial orientation, and firm performance variance. Journal of Management Studies, 50(6), 1041–1069. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12034

141.

Welch

Marschan-Piekkari

Penttinen

Tahvanainen

(2002). Corporate elites as informants in qualitative international business research. International Business Review, 11(5), 611–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0969-5931(02)00039-2

142.

Westphal

J. D.

Bednar

M. K.

(2008). The pacification of institutional investors. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(1), 29–72. https://doi.org/10.2189/asqu.53.1.29

143.

Westphal

J. D.

Boivie

Ming Chng

D. H.

(2006). The strategic impetus for social network ties: Reconstituting broken CEO friendship ties. Strategic Management Journal, 27(5), 425–445. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.525

144.

Westphal

J. D.

Deephouse

D. L.

(2011). Avoiding bad press: Interpersonal influence in relations between CEOs and journalists and the consequences for press reporting about firms and their leadership. Organization Science, 22(4), 1061–1086. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1100.0563

145.

White

J. V.

Borgholthaus

C. J.

(2022). Who’s in charge here? A bibliometric analysis of upper echelons research. Journal of Business Research, 139, 1012–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.10.028

146.

Willmott

(2012). Reframing relevance as ‘social usefulness’: A comment on Hodgkinson and Starkey’s ‘not simply returning to the same answer over and over again. British Journal of Management, 23(4), 598–604. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2012.00839.x

147.

Wood

Harms

P. D.

(2016). On the TRAPs that make it dangerous to study personality with personality questionnaires. European Journal of Personality, 30(4), 327–328. https://doi.org/10.1002/per.2060

148.

Wright

Silard

Bourgoin

(2023). Publicly invulnerable, privately lonely: How the unique individual and structural characteristics of their organizational role contribute to CEO loneliness. Stress and well-being at the strategic level (21, pp. 65–79). Emerald Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/s1479-355520230000021004

149.

Wright

T. A.

Emich

Pearce

J. L.

Ramoglou

Ashkanasy

Bartunek

J. M.

Kunisch

Denyer

Foss

N. J.

Klein

P. G.

Town

Hollwitz

Barney

C. E.

Harms

Munyon

T. P.

Seijts

Tsang

E. W. K.

(2024). Advocacy and the search for truth in management scholarship: Can the twain ever meet? Journal of Management Inquiry, 33(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/10564926231203522

150.

Zhang

A. Y.

Tsui

A. S.

Wang

(2017). CEO humility, narcissism and firm innovation: A paradox perspective on CEO traits. The Leadership Quarterly, 28(5), 585–604. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.01.003

“It’s Not the CEOs,It’s Us”: On the Challenges of CEO Research and a Call for Deeper Engagement

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References