Adopting a place-based approach to categorization, we explore how and why institutional actors in the US and the UK have categorized e-cigarettes differently, namely as tobacco products in the US and as non-tobacco consumer products in the UK. Our inquiry identified the historical contingencies generating two different perspectives informing these differential categorizations—precautionary in the US and harm-reduction in the UK. Embedded in these two perspectives are different future imaginaries to address the harm from cigarettes and e-cigarettes to the different population groups at risk (i.e. smokers versus youth and non-smokers). Data also show institutional actors across the two countries offering justifications for or against e-cigarettes by deploying facts from different scientific research. We theorize these findings and conclude the article by discussing the importance of adopting a place-based approach to categorization.
ArjalièsD-LDurandR (2019) Product categories as judgment devices: The moral awakening of the investment industry. Organization Science30(5): 885–911.
2.
BeckU (1992a) From industrial society to the risk society: Questions of survival, social structure and ecological enlightenment. Theory, Culture & Society9: 97–123.
3.
BeckU (1992b) Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
4.
BothelloJNasonRSSchnyderG (2019) Institutional voids and organization studies: Towards an epistemological rupture. Organization Studies40(10): 1499–1512.
5.
BowkerGStarSL (1999) Sorting Things Out: Classification and Its Consequences. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6.
BrunerJ (1986) Actual Minds, Possible Worlds. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
7.
CallonM (1986) Some elements of a sociology of translation: Domestication of the scallops and the fisherman of St. Brieuc Bay. In: LawJ (ed.) Power, Action and Belief: A New Sociology of Knowledge?London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, pp. 196–223.
8.
ChakmaJKKumarHBhargavaS, et al. (2020) The e-cigarettes ban in India: An important public health decision. The Lancet5(8): e426.
9.
CresswellT (2004) Place: A Short Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
10.
CzarniawskaBSevónG (2005) Global Ideas: How Ideas, Objects and Practices Travel in the Global Economy. Copenhagen: Liber and Copenhagen Business School Press.
11.
DavidPA (1994) Why are institutions the “carriers of history”?: Path dependence and the evolution of conventions, organizations and institutions. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics5(2): 205–220.
12.
DelmestriGGreenwoodR (2016) How Cinderella became a queen: Theorizing radical status change. Administrative Science Quarterly61(4): 507–550.
13.
DelmestriGWezelFCGoodrickE, et al. (2020) The hidden paths of category research: Climbing new heights and slippery slopes. Organization Studies41(7): 909–920.
14.
DoreRLazonickWO’SullivanM (1999) Varieties of capitalism in the twentieth century. Oxford Review of Economic Policy15(4): 102–120.
15.
DouglasM (1966) Purity and Danger: An Analysis of the Concepts of Pollution and Taboo. London and New York: Routledge.
16.
DouglasM (1986) How Institutions Think. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.
17.
DouglasM (1991) Witchcraft and leprosy: Two strategies of exclusion. Man26(4): 723–736.
18.
DurandRKhaireM (2017) Where do market categories come from and how? Distinguishing category creation from category emergence. Journal of Management43(1): 87–110.
19.
DurandRPaolellaL (2013) Category stretching: Reorienting research on categories in strategy, entrepreneurship, and organization theory. Journal of Management Studies50(6): 1100–1123.
20.
DurandRGranqvistNTyllströmA (2017) From categories to categorization: A social perspective on market categorization. In: DurandRGranqvistNTyllströmA (eds) From Categories to Categorization: Studies in Sociology, Organizations and Strategy at the Crossroads (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 51). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 3–30.
FourcadeM (2012) The vile and the noble: On the relation between natural and social classifications in the French wine world. The Sociological Quarterly53: 524–545.
GalvinTLVentrescaMJHudsonBA (2004) Contested industry dynamics. International Studies of Management & Organization34(4): 56–82.
25.
GarudRAhlstromD (1997) Researchers’ roles in negotiating the institutional fabric of technologies. The American Behavioral Scientist40(4): 523–538.
26.
GarudRTharchenT (2016) The performative puzzle: How institutions matter in marginalizing and reconstituting identities. In:GehmanJLounsburyMGreenwoodR (eds) How Institutions Matter! (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 48B). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 235–260.
27.
GarudRGehmanJGiulianiAP (2014) Contextualizing entrepreneurial innovation: A narrative perspective. Research Policy43: 1177–1188.
28.
GarudRGehmanJKarnøeP (2010a) Categorization by association: Nuclear technology and emission-free electricity. In: SineWDDavidRJ (eds) Institutions and Entrepreneurship (Research in the Sociology of Work, Vol. 21). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 51–93.
29.
GarudRKumaraswamyAKarnøeP (2010b) Path dependence or path creation?Journal of Management Studies47(4): 760–774.
30.
GarudRKumaraswamyARobertsA, et al. (2022) Liminal movement by digital platform-based sharing economy ventures: The case of Uber Technologies. Strategic Management Journal43: 447–475.
31.
GierynTF (2000) A space for place in sociology. Annual Review of Sociology26(1): 463–496.
32.
GierynTF (2018) Truth-Spots: How Places Make People Believe. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
33.
GlaserВGStraussAL (1967) The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. Chicago, IL: Aldine de Gruyter.
34.
GlaserVLKrikorian AtkinsonMFissPC (2020) Goal-based categorization: Dynamic classification in the display advertising industry. Organization Studies41(7): 921–943.
35.
GranqvistNRitvalaT (2016) Beyond prototypes: Drivers of market categorization in functional foods and nanotechnology. Journal of Management Studies53(2): 210–237.
36.
GranqvistNSiltaojaM (2020) Constructions, claims, resonance, reflexivity: Language and market categorization. Organization Theory1(4): 1–32.
37.
HardyCMaguireS (2020) Organizations, risk translation, and the ecology of risks: The discursive construction of a novel risk. Academy of Management Journal63(3): 685–716.
38.
HargadonABWadhwaniRD (2022) Theorizing with microhistory. Academy of Management Review. Epub ahead of print 14June. DOI: 10.5465/amr.2019.0176.
39.
HsuGGrodalS (2021) The double-edged sword of oppositional category positioning: A study of the U.S. e-cigarette category, 2007–2017. Administrative Science Quarterly66(1): 86–132.
40.
JasanoffS (1995) Procedural choices in regulatory science. Technology in Society17(3): 279–293.
41.
JasanoffS (2015) Future imperfect: Science, technology, and the imaginations of modernity. In: JasanoffSKimS-H (eds) Dreamscapes of Modernity: Sociotechnical Imaginaries and the Fabrication of Power. Chicago, IL; London: The University of Chicago Press, pp. 1–33.
42.
JasanoffSKimS-H (2009) Containing the atom: Sociotechnical imaginaries and nuclear power in the United States and South Korea. Minerva47: 119–146.
43.
JonesCSvejenovaS (2017) The architecture of city identities: A multimodal study of Barcelona and Boston. In: HöllererMADaudigeosTJancsaryD (eds) Multimodality, Meaning, and Institutions (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 54B). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 203–234.
44.
JonesCMaoretMMassaFG, et al. (2012) Rebels with a cause: Formation, contestation, and expansion of the de novo category “modern architecture,” 1870–1975. Organization Science23(6): 1523–1545.
45.
KhaireMWadhwaniRD (2010) Changing landscapes: The construction of meaning and value in a new market category—Modern Indian art. Academy of Management Journal53(6): 1281–1304.
LawJ (2009) Actor network theory and material semiotics. In: TurnerBS (ed.) The New Blackwell Companion to Social Theory. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, pp. 141–158.
48.
LawrenceTBDoverG (2015) Place and institutional work: Creating housing for the hard-to-house. Administrative Science Quarterly60(3): 371–410.
MaguireSHardyC (2013) Organizing processes and the construction of risk: A discursive approach. Academy of Management Journal56(1): 231–255.
51.
MeyerREKornbergerMHöllererMA (2020) How cities think: Thought style, thought collective, and the impact of strategy. In: SteeleCWJHanniganTRGlaserVL, et al. (eds) Macrofoundations: Exploring the Institutionally Situated Nature of Activity (Research in the Sociology of Organizations, Vol. 68). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited, pp. 185–200.
52.
MolA (2002) The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.
53.
NicoliniDDelmestriGGoodrickE, et al. (2016) Look what’s back! Institutional complexity, reversibility and the knotting of logics. British Journal of Management27: 228–248.
OzcanPGursesK (2018) Playing cat and mouse: Contests over regulatory categorization of dietary supplements in the United States. Academy of Management Journal61(5): 1789–1820.
56.
PhillipsNLawrenceTBHardyC (2004) Discourse and institutions. Academy of Management Review29(4): 635–652.
57.
RittelHWWebberMM (1973) Dilemmas in a general theory of planning. Policy Sciences4: 155–169.
58.
RobertsRJ (2018) The Nobel Laureates’ campaign supporting GMOs. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge3(2): 61–65.
59.
RogersEM (1995) Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Free Press.
60.
SiltaojaMLähdesmakiMGranqvistN, et al. (2020) The dynamics of (de) stigmatization: Boundary construction in the nascent category of organic farming. Organization Studies41(7): 993–1018.
61.
SydowJSchreyöggGKochJ (2009) Organizational path dependence: Opening the black box. Academy of Management Review34(4): 689–709.
62.
ThelenKA (2018) Regulating Uber: The politics of the platform economy in Europe and the United States. Perspectives on Politics16(4): 938–953.
63.
TrancikJE (2014) Renewable energy: Back the renewables boom. Nature507: 300–302.
64.
TsoukasH (1998) The word and the world: A critique of representationalism in management research. International Journal of Public Administration21(5): 781–817.
65.
TsoukasHHatchMJ (2001) Complex thinking, complex practice: The case for a narrative approach to organizational complexity. Human Relations54(8): 979–1013.
66.
UzuncaBRigteringJPCOzcanP (2018) Sharing and shaping: A cross-country comparison of how sharing economy firms shape their institutional environment to gain legitimacy. Academy of Management Discoveries4(3): 248–272.
67.
VergneJPWryT (2014) Categorizing categorization research: Review, integration, and future directions. Journal of Management Studies51(1): 56–94.
68.
WeickKE (1979) The Social Psychology of Organizing. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
69.
WeickKE (2020) Sensemaking, organizing, and surpassing: A handoff. Journal of Management Studies57(7): 1420–1431.
70.
WrightALMeyerADReayT, et al. (2021) Maintaining places of social inclusion: Ebola and the emergency department. Administrative Science Quarterly66(1): 42–85.
71.
YinRK (2003) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
