I studied competing institutional logics in inter-institutional projects in aerospace to understand which logic would prevail when several logics compete in temporary organizing. While competing logic tensions between academia and the industry were expected, I additionally found competing logic tensions between multinationals and suppliers. I argue that the competing logic tensions originated from the informal roles that emerged from the interactions among the partners in the projects, which were predetermined by the complementary knowledge that initially justified the collaborations. These informal roles activated custodial work among the partners, which was bounded by logic plasticity. Contrary to what was expected, the more rigid logics prevailed over the most plastic logics in temporary organizing.
BangeS.Järventie-ThesleffR.TienariJ. (2022). Boundaries, roles and identities in an online organization. Journal of Management Inquiry, 31(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492620968913
2.
BarleyS. R. (2008). Coalface institutionalism. In Green woodR.OliverC.SahlinK.SuddabyR. (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of organizational institutionalism (pp. 491–518). Sage.
3.
BechkyB. A. (2006). Gaffers, gofers, and grips: Role-based coordination in temporary organizations. Organization Science, 17(1), 3–21. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0149
4.
BesharovM.SmithW. K. (2014). Multiple institutional logics in organizations: Explaining their varied nature and implications. Academy of Management Review, 39(3), 364–381. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2011.0431
5.
CorbinJ.StraussA. (2008). Basics of qualitative research (3rd ed). Sage.
6.
CouleT.PatmoreB. (2013). Institutional logics, institutional work, and public service innovation in non-profit organizations. Public Administration, 91(4), 980–997. https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12005
7.
DacinM. T.DacinP. A.KentD. (2019). Tradition in organizations: A custodianship framework. Academy of Management Annals, 13(1), 342–373. https://doi.org/10.5465/annals.2016.0122
8.
DacinM. T.MunirK.TraceyP. (2010). Formal dining at Cambridge colleges: Linking ritual performance and institutional maintenance. Academy of Management Journal, 53(6), 1393–1418. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.57318388
9.
DilleT.SöderlundJ. (2011). Managing inter-institutional projects: The significance of isochronism, timing norms and temporal misfits. International Journal of Project Management, 29(4), 480–490. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2011.02.007
10.
DilleT.SöderlundJ.CleggS. (2018). Temporal conditioning and the dynamics of inter-institutional projects. International Journal of Project Management, 36(5), 673–686. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.03.007
11.
EmersonD. (2012). Beyond the Horizon: Canada’s interests and future in aerospace. Industry Canada.
GawerA.PhillipsN. (2013). Institutional work as logics shift: The case of Intel’s transformation to platform leader. Organization Studies, 34(8), 1035–1071. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840613492071
14.
GoffmanE. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Anchor Books.
GreenwoodR.RaynardM.KodeihF.MicelottaE. R. (2011). Institutional complexity and organizational responses. Academy of Management Annals, 5(1), 317–371. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2011.590299
17.
GubaE. G.LincolnY. S. (1982). Epistemological and methodological bases of naturalistic inquiry. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 30(4), 233–252. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02765185
18.
GümüsayA. A.SmetsM.MorrisT. (2020). “God at work”: Engaging central and incompatible institutional logics through elastic hybridity. Academy of Management Journal, 63(1), 124–154. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2016.0481
19.
HataniF. (2016). Institutional plasticity in public-private interactions: Why Japan’s port reform failed. Journal of World Business, 51(6), 923–936. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.07.002
20.
HenselP. G. (2018). Organizational responses to proto-institutions: How the semi-edited and unedited accounts clash. Journal of Management Inquiry, 27(2), 224–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492616688086
21.
Hewitt-DundasN.GkypaliA.RoperS. (2019). Does learning from prior collaboration help firms to overcome the “two-worlds” paradox in university-business collaboration?Research Policy, 48, 1310–1322. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2019.01.016
22.
JarzabkowskiP.BednarekR.ChalkiasK.CacciatoriE. (2019). Exploring inter-organizational paradoxes: Methodological lessons from a study of a grand challenge. Strategic Organization, 17(1), 120–132. https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127018805345
23.
KašeR.SaksidaT.MiheličK. K. (2019). Skill development in reverse mentoring: Motivational processes of mentors and learners. Human Resource Management, 58(1), 57–69. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.21932
24.
KumarN.SternL.AndersonJ. C. (1993). Conducting interorganizational research using key informants. Academy of Management Journal, 36(6), 1633–1651. https://doi.org/10.2307/256824
25.
LangleyA. (1999). Strategies for theorizing from process data. Academy of Management Review, 24(4), 691–710. https://doi.org/10.2307/259349
26.
LawrenceT. B.HardyC.PhillipsN. (2002). Institutional effects of interorganizational collaboration: The emergence of proto-institutions. The Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 281–290. https://doi.org/10.5465/3069297
27.
LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR. (2006). Institutions and institutional work. In CleggS. R.HardyC.LawrenceT. B.NordW. R. (Eds.), Handbook of organization studies (pp. 215–254). Sage.
28.
LawrenceT. B.SuddabyR.LecaB. (2011). Institutional work: Refocusing institutional studies of organizations. Journal of Management Inquiry, 20(1), 52–58. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492610387222
29.
LokJ.de RondM. (2013). On the plasticity of institutions: Containing and restoring practice breakdowns at the Cambridge University Boat Club. Academy of Management Journal, 56(1), 185–207. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2010.0688
30.
MaS.KorY. Y.SeidlD. (2022). Top management team role structure: A vantage point for advancing upper echelons research. Strategic Management Journal, 43(8), 1–28. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3368
31.
MarquisC.LounsburyM. (2007). Vive La Résistance: Competing logics and the consolidation of U.S. community banking. Academy of Management Journal, 50(4), 799–820. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.26279172
32.
MatinheikkiJ.AaltonenK.WalkerD. (2019). Politics, public servants, and profits: Institutional complexity and temporary hybridization in a public infrastructure alliance project. International Journal of Project Management, 37(2), 298–317. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.07.004
33.
MontgomeryA. W.DacinM. T. (2020). Water wars in Detroit: Custodianship and the work of institutional renewal. Academy of Management Journal, 63(5), 1455–1484. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2017.1098
34.
MutchA. (2018). Practice, substance, and history: Reframing institutional logics. Academy of Management Review, 43(2), 242–258. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0303
35.
NotteboomT.de LangenP.JacobsW. (2013). Institutional plasticity and path dependence in seaports: Interactions between institutions, port governance reforms and port authority routines. Journal of Transport Geography, 27, 26–35. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.05.002
36.
O’NeillR. M.SankowskyD. (2001). The Caligula phenomenon: Mentoring relationships and theoretical abuse. Journal of Management Inquiry, 10(3), 206–216. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492601103002
37.
PattonM. Q. (2002). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (3rd ed). Sage.
38.
PutnamL. L.FairhurstG. T.BanghartS. (2016). Contradictions, dialectics, and paradoxes in organizations: A constitutive approach. Academy of Management Annals, 10(1), 65–171. https://doi.org/10.5465/19416520.2016.1162421
ScottW. R.RuefM.MendelP. J.CaronnaC. A. (2000). Institutional change and healthcare organizations: From professional dominance to managed care. University of Chicago Press.
41.
SmetsM.JarzabkowskiP.BurkeG. T.SpeeP. (2015). Reinsurance trading in Lloyd’s of London: Balancing conflicting-yet-complimentary logics in practice. Academy of Management Journal, 58(3), 932–970. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2012.0638
42.
SpicerA.SewellG. (2010). From national service to global player: Transforming the organizational logic of a public broadcaster. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 913–943. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2009.00915.x
43.
StåhleM.AholaT. (2022). Balancing on a tightrope: Coping with concurrent institutional logics in project business. International Journal of Project Management, 40(1), 52–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2021.09.005
44.
StrambachS. (2008). Path dependency and path plasticity: The co-evolution of institutions and innovation-the German customized business software industry (02.08; Working Papers on Innovation and Space).
45.
ThorntonP. H.OcasioW. (2008). Institutional logics. In GreenwoodR.OliverC.SuddabyR.Sahlin-AnderssonK. (Eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism (pp. 99–129). Sage.
46.
ThorntonP. H.OcasioW.LounsburyM. (2012). The institutional logics perspective: A new approach to culture, structure and process. Oxford University Press.
UriarteY. T.DeFillippiR.RiccaboniM.CatoniM. L. (2019). Projects, institutional logics and institutional work practices: The case of the Lucca Comics & Games Festival. International Journal of Project Management, 37(2), 318–330. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2018.09.001
49.
WeikE. (2019). Understanding institutional endurance: The role of dynamic form, harmony, and rhythm in institutions. Academy of Management Review, 44(2), 321–335. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2015.0050
50.
WeissH. R.HuaultI. (2016). Business as usual in financial markets? The creation of incommensurables as institutional maintenance work. Organization Studies, 37(7), 991–1015. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840615626463
WinchG. M.Maytorena-SanchezE. (2020). Institutional projects and contradictory logics: Responding to complexity in institutional field change. International Journal of Project Management, 38(6), 368–378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijproman.2020.08.004
53.
XiaoQ.KlarinA. (2021). Subordinate actors’ institutional maintenance in response to coercive reforms. Journal of Management Inquiry, 30(1), 24–39. https://doi.org/10.1177/1056492619868027
54.
YinJ.JamaliD. (2021). Collide or collaborate: The interplay of competing logics and institutional work in cross-sector social partnerships. Journal of Business Ethics, 169(4), 673–694. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-020-04548-8
55.
YinR. K. (2003). Case study research: Design and methods (3rd ed). Sage.
56.
ZietsmaC.RuebottomT.ShantzA. S. (2018). Unobtrusive maintenance: Temporal complexity, latent category control and the stalled emergence of the cleantech sector. Journal of Management Studies, 55(7), 1242–1277. https://doi.org/10.1111/joms.12350
Supplementary Material
Please find the following supplemental material available below.
For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.
For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.
