Carbon nanotubes (CNTs) have been exploited in structural health monitoring applications as a novel inspection technique for fiber-reinforced plastic materials, thanks to their excellent electrical properties and piezoresistive behavior. However, investigations on the CNTs sensor network behavior during compression after impact tests and correlations between electric resistance variations and damage mechanisms are lacking. Therefore, in this study, the electromechanical behaviour of CNT percolation networks in glass fiber-reinforced plastics materials has been investigated during impact, indentation, and compression after impact tests aiming at relating electrical resistance variations with damage mechanisms, also proving the CNTs network sensitivity in presence of repeated damages. The electrical response of the CNTs networks was compared with conventional nondestructive measurements to improve the understanding of the electrical response. Good agreement between the electrical and mechanical response is demonstrated during impact tests, highlighting a shift in the electrical resistance correlated with permanent and irreversible damage. Sharp changes in electrical resistance are related to sudden variations in impact and indentation loads, which are correlated with damage mechanisms. Compliance between electrical and mechanical signals is also observed in compression after impact tests, resulting in a general decrease of the electrical resistance with increasing loading due to compressive and buckling strains. Finally, compression after impact and repeated impact tests proved the ability of the CNT-based sensor network to sense even after being damaged. These results push towards the future applicability of the CNTs-based monitoring approach for composite structures, exploiting the CNTs self-sensing capability for damage identification.
Sánchez-RomateXFArtigasJJiménez-SuárezA, et al. Critical parameters of carbon nanotube reinforced composites for structural health monitoring applications: empirical results versus theoretical predictions. Compos Sci Technol2019; 171: 44–53.
2.
Sánchez-RomateXFJiménez-SuárezASánchezM, et al. Novel approach to percolation threshold on electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube reinforced nanocomposites. RSC Adv2016; 6: 43418–43428.
3.
GrammatikosSAPaipetisAS. On the electrical properties of multi scale reinforced composites for damage accumulation monitoring. Compos Part B: Eng2012; 43(6): 2687–2696.
4.
Pratyush BeheraRRawatPSinghKK, et al. Fracture analysis and mechanical properties of three phased glass/epoxy laminates reinforced with multiwalled carbon nanotubes. J Sci Adv Mater Dev2019; 4(2): 299–309.
5.
Pratyush BeheraRPrashant RawatPKumar SinghK. Tensile behavior of three phased glass/epoxy laminate embedded with MWCNTs: an experimental approach. Mater Today2018; 5(2): 8176–8183.
6.
QuBZhuoDWangR, et al. Enhancement of mechanical properties of buckypapers/polyethylene composites by microwave irradiation. Compos Sci Technol2018; 164: 313–318.
7.
BaltopoulosAPolydoridesNPambaguianL, et al. Exploiting carbon nanotube networks for damage assessment of fiber reinforced composites. Compos Part B: Eng2015; 76: 149–158.
8.
GaoLChouT-WThostensonET, et al. In situ sensing of impact damage in epoxy/glass fiber composites using percolating carbon nanotube networks. Carbon2011; 49(10): 3382–3385.
9.
AlyKBradfordPD. Real-time impact damage sensing and localization in composites through embedded aligned carbon nanotube sheets. Compos Part B: Eng2019; 162: 522–531.
10.
ArroncheLLa SaponaraVYesilS, et al. Impact damage sensing of multiscale composites through epoxy matrix containing carbon nanotubes. J Appl Polym Sci2013; 128(5): 2797–2806.
11.
Uribe-RiestraGCOcampo-BelloJAGamboaF, et al. Influence of electrode configuration on impact damage evaluation of self-sensing hierarchical composites. J Intell Mater Syst Struct2020; 31(11): 1416–1429.
12.
Sánchez-RomateXFSbarufattiCScaccabarozziD, et al. Monitoring of impact dynamics on carbon nanotube multiscale glass fiber composites by means of electrical measurements. In: KunduT (ed) Health monitoring of structural and biological systems 2017, Portland, Oregon. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, 2017, vol. 10170, p. 101703A.
13.
SbaruffattiCSimónPCinquemaniS, et al. Impact analysis of fiber-reinforced composites by means of carbon nanotubes. In: ErturkA (ed) Active and passive smart structures and integrated systems XII, Denver, Colorado. International Society for Optics and Photonics, SPIE, 2018, vol 10595, p. 1059538.
14.
Al-BahraniMCreeA. A simple criterion to evaluate the degree of damage in composite materials after sudden impact loads by exploiting the MWCNTs piezoresistive property. Carbon2019; 150: 505–517.
15.
Isaac-MedinaBKSAlonzo-GarcíaAAvilésF. Electrical self-sensing of impact damage in multiscale hierarchical composites with tailored location of carbon nanotube networks. Struct Health Monit2019; 18(3): 806–818.
16.
Uribe-RiestraGAyuso-FaberPRivero-AyalaM, et al. Structural health monitoring of carbon nanotube-modified glass fiber-reinforced polymer composites by electrical resistance measurements and digital image correlation. Struct Health Monit2024; 23(1): 555–567.
17.
LuSDuKWangX, et al. Real-time monitoring of low-velocity impact damage for composite structures with the omnidirection carbon nanotubes’ buckypaper sensors. Struct Health Monit2019; 18(2): 454–465.
18.
NaghashpourAVan HoaS. A technique for real-time detecting, locating, and quantifying damage in large polymer composite structures made of carbon fibers and carbon nanotube networks. Struct Health Monit2015; 14(1): 35–45.
19.
SalvettiMSbarufattiCGilioliA, et al. On the mechanical response of CFRP composite with embedded optical fibre when subjected to low velocity impact and CAI tests. Compos Struct2017; 179: 21–34.
Denis CartiéDRIrvingPE. Effect of resin and fibre properties on impact and compression after impact performance of CFRP. Compos - Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2002; 33(4): 483–493.
22.
TuoHLuZXiaopingMa, et al. Damage and failure mechanism of thin composite laminates under low-velocity impact and compression-after-impact loading conditions. Compos Part B: Eng2019; 163: 642–654.
23.
GongSZhuZHHaddadEI. Modeling electrical conductivity of nanocomposites by considering carbon nanotube deformation at nanotube junctions. J Appl Phys2013; 114(7): 074303.
24.
LiHLuWLiJ, et al. Multichannel ballistic transport in multiwall carbon nanotubes. Phys Rev Lett2005; 95: 086601.
25.
HuNKarubeYYanC, et al. Tunneling effect in a polymer/carbon nanotube nanocomposite strain sensor. Acta Mater2008; 56(13): 2929–2936.
26.
De VivoBLambertiPSpinelliG, et al. Simulation and experimental characterization of polymer/carbon nanotubes composites for strain sensor applications. J Appl Phys2014; 116(5): 054307.
27.
LiCThostensonEChouT-W. Dominant role of tunneling resistance in the electrical conductivity of carbon nanotube–based composites. Appl Phys Lett2007; 91: 223114–223114.
SánchezMRamsJCampoM, et al. Characterization of carbon nanofiber/epoxy nanocomposites by the nanoindentation technique. Compos Part B: Eng2011; 42(4): 638–644.
31.
Astm d7136/d7136m-15 standard test method for measuring the damage resistance of a fiber-reinforced polymer matrix composite to a drop-weight impact event.
32.
Astm d7137/d7137m-12 standard test method for compressive residual strength properties of damaged polymer matrix composite.
33.
VescoviniACruzJAMaD, et al. Experimental investigation on low-velocity impact behavior of glass, kevlar, and hybrid composites with an elastomeric polyurethane matrix. Compos Part C: Open Access2024; 13: 100426.
34.
OuyangTSunWBaoR, et al. Effects of matrix cracks on delamination of composite laminates subjected to low-velocity impact. Compos Struct2021; 262: 113354.
35.
GhelliDMinakG. Low velocity impact and compression after impact tests on thin carbon/epoxy laminates. Compos Part B: Eng2011; 42(7): 2067–2079.
36.
SunXCHallettSR. Barely visible impact damage in scaled composite laminates: experiments and numerical simulations. Int J Impact Eng2017; 109: 178–195.
37.
WagihAMaimíPGonzálezEV, et al. Damage sequence in thin-ply composite laminates under out-of-plane loading. Compos Part A: Appl Sci Manuf2016; 87: 66–77.
38.
DongWLiWShenL, et al. Piezoresistivity of smart carbon nanotubes (CNTs) reinforced cementitious composite under integrated cyclic compression and impact. Compos Struct2020; 241: 112106.
39.
ZhuSChaiGB. Damage and failure mode maps of composite sandwich panel subjected to quasi-static indentation and low velocity impact. Compos Struct2013; 101: 204–214.
40.
SpronkSWFKersemansMDe BaerdemaekerJCA, et al. Comparing damage from low-velocity impact and quasi-static indentation in automotive carbon/epoxy and glass/polyamide-6 laminates. Polym Test2018; 65: 231–241.
41.
AbrateS. Impact on composite structures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998.
42.
TafreshiAOswaldT. Global buckling behaviour and local damage propagation in composite plates with embedded delaminations. Int J Press Vessels Pip2003; 80(1): 9–20.
