Through the integration of advanced sensors, actuators, and micro-processors, aircraft smart skin technology can improve the structural performance of aircraft and make them self-perception, self-diagnosis, self-adaptation, self-learning, and self-repair. Aircraft smart skin for structural health monitoring (SHM) is an important type of aircraft smart skin and has received extensive attention in recent years. Large-scale, lightweight, and low-power consumption are three key problems hindering the realization and engineering applications of aircraft smart skin for SHM. In view of these problems and restrictions of practical aircraft onboard applications, this article reviews the current research progress on aircraft smart skin for SHM, introduces their design, materials, manufacturing process, and monitoring principles in detail, and discusses how they study above problems from these aspects. Finally, perspectives are proposed on the opportunities and future developments of aircraft smart skin for SHM.
McEvoyMACorrellN. Materials that couple sensing, actuation, computation, and communication. Science2015; 347(6228): 1261689.
2.
GibsonRF. A review of recent research on mechanics of multifunctional composite materials and structures. Compos Struct2010; 92(12): 2793–2810.
3.
FootePD. Integration of structural health monitoring sensors with aerospace, composite materials and structures. Materialwiss Werkst2015; 46(2): 197–203.
4.
QiuLDengXYuanS, et al.Impact monitoring for aircraft smart composite skins based on a lightweight sensor network and characteristic digital sequences. Sensors2018; 18(7): 2218.
5.
FangSMNiedzweckiJMOzbeyMC, et al.A brief review of structural health monitoring with special focus on damage detection and sensor optimization. In: Encyclopedia of Maritime and Offshore Engineering. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2017, pp. 1–8.
6.
SuZYeL. Identification of Damage Using Lamb Waves: From Fundamentals to Applications. Berlin: Springer Science & Business Media, 2009.
7.
WuJYuanSJiS, et al.Multi-agent system design and evaluation for collaborative wireless sensor network in large structure health monitoring. Expert Syst Appl2010; 37(3): 2028–2036.
8.
GiurgiutiuV. Structural Health Monitoring with Piezoelectric Wafer Active Wafer Sensor. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press, 2014.
9.
YuanSRenYQiuL, et al.A multi-response-based wireless impact monitoring network for aircraft composite structures. IEEE T Ind Electron2016; 63(12): 7712–7722.
10.
QingX PWangYGaoL, et al.Distributed multifunctional sensor network for composite structural state sensing. Sensors and Smart Structures Technologies for Civil, Mechanical, and Aerospace Systems2012; 8345: 83453O.
11.
SunHWangTLiuQ, et al.A two-dimensional eddy current array–based sensing film for estimating failure modes and tracking damage growth of bolted joints. Struct Health Monit2021; 20(3): 877–893.
12.
QingXLiWWangY, et al.Piezoelectric transducer-based structural health monitoring for aircraft applications. Sensors2019; 19(3): 545.
13.
MitraMGopalakrishnanS. Guided wave based structural health monitoring: A review. Smart Mater Struct2016; 25(5): 053001.
14.
BednarskaKSobotkaPWolińskiTR, et al.Hybrid fiber optic sensor systems in structural health monitoring in aircraft structures. Materials2020; 13(10): 2249.
15.
ZelenikaSHadasZBaderS, et al.Energy harvesting technologies for structural health monitoring of airplane components—a review. Sensors2020; 20(22): 6685.
16.
YinSXieNHuC. Development cost estimation of civil aircraft based on combination model of GM (1, N) and MLP neural network. In: 2015 IEEE International Conference on Grey Systems and Intelligent Services (GSIS), 2015. Leicester, UK: IEEE, pp. 312–317.
17.
YuanSLaiXZhaoX, et al.Distributed structural health monitoring system based on smart wireless sensor and multi-agent technology. Smart Mater Struct2006; 15(1): 1–8.
18.
QiuLYuanS. On development of a multi-channel PZT array scanning system and its evaluating application on UAV wing box. Sensor Actuat A-Phys2009; 151(2): 220–230.
19.
MengBTangWZhangX, et al.Self-powered flexible printed circuit board with integrated triboelectric generator. Nano Energy2013; 2(6): 1101–1106.
20.
GaoWEmaminejadSNyeinHYY, et al.Fully integrated wearable sensor arrays for multiplexed in situ perspiration analysis. Nature2016; 529(7587): 509–514.
21.
SuzukiYSuzukiTTodorokiA, et al.Smart lightning protection skin for real-time load monitoring of composite aircraft structures under multiple impacts. Compos Part A-Appl S2014; 67: 44–54.
22.
DudleyKSzatkowskiG. Open circuit resonant (SansEC) sensor for composite damage detection and diagnosis in aircraft lightning environments. In: 4th AIAA Atmospheric and Space Environments Conference. New Orleans: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2012: 2792.
23.
MenonARafiMSchirmerG, et al.Measurement of wing deflections in flexible aircraft using the SansEC smart sensor. IEEE Aero El Sys Mag2017; 32(10): 14–23.
24.
LanzaraGSalowitzNGuoZ, et al.A spider-web-like highly expandable sensor network for multifunctional materials. Adv Mater2010; 22(41): 4643–4648.
25.
WangYQiuLLuoY, et al.A stretchable and large-scale guided wave sensor network for aircraft smart skin of structural health monitoring. Struct Health Monit2021; 20(3): 861–876.
26.
KhanYThielensAMuinS, et al.A new frontier of printed electronics: flexible hybrid electronics. Adv Mater2020; 32(15): 1905279.
27.
MoridiAHassani-GangarajSMGuaglianoM, et al.Cold spray coating: review of material systems and future perspectives. Surf Eng2014; 30(6): 369–395.
28.
YeDDingYDuanY, et al.Large-scale direct-writing of aligned nanofibers for flexible electronics. Small2018; 14(21): 1703521.
29.
WallinTJPikulJShepherdRF. 3D printing of soft robotic systems. Nat Rev Mater2018; 3(6): 84–100.
30.
WilkinsonN JSmithMAAKayRW, et al.A review of aerosol jet printing—a non-traditional hybrid process for micro-manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Tech2019; 105(11): 4599–4619.
31.
NayakLMohantySNayakSK, et al.A review on inkjet printing of nanoparticle inks for flexible electronics. J Mater Chem2019; 7(29): 8771–8795.
32.
YanKLiJPanL, et al.Inkjet printing for flexible and wearable electronics. APL Mater2020; 8(12): 120705.
33.
YangPFanH J. Inkjet and extrusion printing for electrochemical energy storage: A minireview. Adv Mater Technol-US2020; 5(10): 2000217.
34.
KamyshnyAMagdassiS. Conductive nanomaterials for printed electronics. Small2014; 10(17): 3515–3535.
35.
PanZWangYHuangH, et al.Recent development on preparation of ceramic inks in ink-jet printing. Ceram Int2015; 41(10): 12515–12528.
36.
KhanSLorenzelliL. Recent advances of conductive nanocomposites in printed and flexible electronics. Smart Mater Struct2017; 26(8): 083001.
37.
WuW. Inorganic nanomaterials for printed electronics: A review. Nanoscale2017; 9(22): 7342–7372.
38.
EshkalakSKChinnappanAJayathilakaW, et al.A review on inkjet printing of CNT composites for smart applications. Appl Mater Today2017; 9: 372–386.
39.
ShakeelMKhanWARahmanK. Fabrication of cost effective and high sensitivity resistive strain gauge using DIW technique. Sensor Actuat A-Phys2017; 258: 123–130.
40.
LiYLiaoYSuZ. Graphene-functionalized polymer composites for self-sensing of ultrasonic waves: An initiative towards “sensor-free” structural health monitoring. Compos Sci Technol2018; 168: 203–213.
41.
QiuLLinXYuanS, et al.A lightweight system with ultralow-power consumption for on-line continuous impact monitoring of aerospace vehicle structures. IEEE T Ind Electron2020; 68(6): 5281–5292.
42.
QiuLLinXWangY, et al.A mechatronic smart skin of flight vehicle structures for impact monitoring of light weight and low-power consumption. Mech Syst Signal Pr2020; 144: 106829.
43.
KhatirSWahabMABoutchichaD, et al.Structural health monitoring using modal strain energy damage indicator coupled with teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm and isogoemetric analysis. J Sound Vib2019; 448: 230–246.
44.
CaiJShiLHYuanS, et al.High spatial resolution imaging for structural health monitoring based on virtual time reversal. Smart Mater Struct2011; 20(5): 055018.
45.
WangQYuanS. Baseline-free imaging method based on new PZT sensor arrangements. J Intel Mat Syst Str2009; 20(14): 1663–1673.
46.
LiuMBLiBBLiJT, et al.Smart coating sensor applied in crack detection for aircraft. Appl Mech Mater2013; 330: 383–388.
47.
NaWSBaekJ. A review of the piezoelectric electromechanical impedance based structural health monitoring technique for engineering structures. Sensors, 2018; 18(5): 1307.
48.
SunHWangYQingX, et al.High strain survivability of piezoceramics by optimal bonding adhesive design. Sensors2018; 18(8): 2554.
49.
LinMQingXKumarA, et al.Smart layer and smart suitcase for structural health monitoring applications. In: SPIE's 8th Annual International Symposium on Smart Structures and Materials, Newport Beach, CA, 2001.
50.
LinMChangF. The manufacture of composite structures with a built-in network of piezoceramics. Compos Sci Technol2002; 62(7–8): 919–939.
QingXBeardSJIkegamiR, et al.Aerospace applications of SMART layer technology. Encyclopedia of Struct Health Monit, 2009; 108: 1902–1906
53.
JanapatiVChungHLiF, et al.Evaluation of long-term flight data from on-board SMART layers. In: Proceeding of International Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring 2015. Stanford, CA, 1–3 September 2015.
54.
WölckenPCPapadopoulosM. Smart intelligent aircraft structures (SARISTU). Proceedings of the Final Project Conference, Germany, 2015. Springer.
55.
QiuLYuanSShiX, et al.Design of piezoelectric transducer layer with electromagnetic shielding and high connection reliability. Smart Mater Struct2012; 21(7): 075032.
56.
YamashitaTTakamatsuSOkadaH, et al.Ultra -thin piezoelectric strain sensor array integrated on a flexible printed circuit involving transfer printing methods. IEEE Sens J2016; 16(24): 8840–8846.
57.
SalmanpourMSSharif-KhodaeiZAliabadiMH. Impact damage localisation with piezoelectric sensors under operational and environmental conditions. Sensors2017; 17(5): 1178.
58.
WangQHongMSuZ. A sparse sensor network topologized for cylindrical wave-based identification of damage in pipeline structures. Smart Mater Struct2016; 25(7): 075015.
59.
SohnHKimSB. Development of dual PZT transducers for reference-free crack detection in thin plate structures. IEEE T Ultrason Ferr2010; 57(1): 229–240.
60.
KirikeraGR. An Artificial Neural System with Distributed Parallel Processing for Structural Health Monitoring. Cincinnati, OH: University of Cincinnati, 2003.
61.
KirikeraGRShindeVSchulzMJ, et al.Damage localisation in composite and metallic structures using a structural neural system and simulated acoustic emissions. Mech Syst Signal Pr2007; 21(1): 280–297.
62.
KirikeraGRShindeVSchulzMJ, et al.A structural neural system for real-time health monitoring of composite materials. Struct Health Monit2008; 7(1): 65–83.
63.
WangYQiuLLuoY, et al.A piezoelectric sensor network with shared signal transmission wires for structural health monitoring of aircraft smart skin. Mech Syst Signal Pr2020; 141: 106730.
64.
YaoYGlisicB. Sensing sheets: Optimal arrangement of dense array of sensors for an improved probability of damage detection. Struct Health Monit2015; 14(5): 513–531.
65.
GlišićBYaoYTungSTE, et al.Strain sensing sheets for structural health monitoring based on large-area electronics and integrated circuits. Proceedings of the IEEE2016; 104(8): 1513–1528.
66.
AygunLEKumarVWeaverC, et al.Large-area resistive strain sensing sheet for structural health monitoring. Sensors2020; 20(5): 1386.
67.
XiongWGuoDYangZ, et al.Conformable, programmable and step-linear sensor array for large-range wind pressure measurement on curved surface. Sci China Technol Sc2020; 63(10): 2073–2081.
68.
YangYChiesuraGPlovieB, et al.Design and integration of flexible sensor matrix for in situ monitoring of polymer composites. ACS Sens2018; 3(9): 1698–1705.
69.
RogersJASomeyaTHuangY. Materials and mechanics for stretchable electronics. Science2010; 327(5973): 1603–1607.
70.
KhanSLorenzelliLDahiyaRS. Technologies for printing sensors and electronics over large flexible substrates: a review. IEEE Sens J2014; 15(6): 3164–3185.
71.
ChoiSLeeHGhaffariR, et al.Recent advances in flexible and stretchable bio-electronic devices integrated with nanomaterials. Adv Mater2016; 28(22): 4203–4218.
72.
HuangSLiuYZhaoY, et al.Flexible electronics: Stretchable electrodes and their future. Adv Funct Mater2019; 29(6): 1805924.
73.
XiangLZengXXiaF, et al.Recent advances in flexible and stretchable sensing systems: From the perspective of system integration. ACS Nano2020; 14(6): 6449–6469.
74.
LimHRKimHSQaziR, et al.Advanced soft materials, sensor integrations, and applications of wearable flexible hybrid electronics in healthcare, energy, and environment. Adv Mater2020; 32(15): 1901924.
75.
WangSHuangYRogersJA. Mechanical designs for inorganic stretchable circuits in soft electronics. IEEE T Comp Pack Man2015; 5(9): 1201–1218.
76.
SongJJiangHHuangY, et al.Mechanics of stretchable inorganic electronic materials. J Vac Sci Technol A2009; 27(5): 1107–1125.
77.
ZhangYFuHSuY, et al.Mechanics of ultra-stretchable self-similar serpentine interconnects. Acta Mater2013; 61(20): 7816–7827.
78.
ZhangYYanZNanK, et al.A mechanically driven form of Kirigami as a route to 3D mesostructures in micro/nanomembranes. P Natl A Sci2015; 112(38): 11757–11764.
79.
WidlundTYangSHsuYY, et al.Stretchability and compliance of freestanding serpentine-shaped ribbons. Int J Solids Struct2014; 51(23–24): 4026–4037.
80.
LanzaraGFengJChangFK. Design of micro-scale highly expandable networks of polymer-based substrates for macro-scale applications. Smart Mater Struct2010; 19(4): 045013.
81.
GuoZKimKSalowitzN, et al.Functonalization of stretchable networks with sensors and switches for composite materials. Struct Health Monit2018; 17(3): 598–623.
82.
KopsaftopoulosFNardariRLiYH, et al.A stochastic global identification framework for aerospace structures operating under varying flight states. Mech Syst Signal Pr2018; 98: 425–447.
83.
ChenXTopacTSmithW, et al.Characterization of distributed microfabricated strain gauges on stretchable sensor networks for structural applications. Sensors2018; 18(10): 3260.
84.
ChenXMaxwellLLiF, et al.Design and integration of a wireless stretchable multimodal sensor network in a composite wing. Sensors2020; 20(9): 2528.
85.
WangYLuoYQiuL. Simulation method of an expandable lamb wave sensor network for aircraft smart skin. IEEE Sens J2019; 20(1): 102–112.
86.
CaoRPuXDuX, et al.Screen-printed washable electronic textiles as self-powered touch/gesture tribo-sensors for intelligent human–machine interaction. ACS Nano2018; 12(6): 5190–5196.
87.
MatsuhisaNInoueDZalarP, et al.Printable elastic conductors by in situ formation of silver nanoparticles from silver flakes. Nat Mater2017; 16(8): 834–840.
88.
ZymelkaDTogashiKOhigashiR, et al.Printed strain sensor array for application to structural health monitoring. Smart Mater Struct2017; 26(10): 105040.
89.
ZymelkaDTogashiKKobayashiT. Concentric array of printed strain sensors for structural health monitoring. Sensors2020; 20(7): 1997.
90.
YinFYeDZhuC, et al.Stretchable, highly durable ternary nanocomposite strain sensor for structural health monitoring of flexible aircraft. Sensors2017; 17(11): 2677.
91.
SalowitzNPGuoZKimSJ, et al.Microfabricated expandable sensor networks for intelligent sensing materials. IEEE Sens J2014; 14(7): 2138–2144.
92.
AminSPanchalH. A review on thermal spray coating processes. Transfer2016; 2(4): 556–563.
93.
BekasDSharif-KhodaeiZAliabadiMHF. An innovative diagnostic film for structural health monitoring of metallic and composite structures. Sensors2018; 18(7): 2084.
94.
SharpNKuntzABrubakerC, et al.A bio-inspired asynchronous skin system for crack detection applications. Smart Mater Struct2014; 23(5): 055020.
95.
ZengZLiuMXuH, et al.A coatable, light-weight, fast-response nanocomposite sensor for the in situ acquisition of dynamic elastic disturbance: from structural vibration to ultrasonic waves. Smart Mater Struct2016; 25(6): 065005.
96.
ZengZLiuMXuH, et al.Ultra-broadband frequency responsive sensor based on lightweight and flexible carbon nanostructured polymeric nanocomposites. Carbon2017; 121: 490–501.
97.
LiaoYDuanFZhangH, et al.Ultrafast response of spray-on nanocomposite piezoresistive sensors to broadband ultrasound. Carbon2019; 143: 743–751.
98.
ZhouPLiaoYLiY, et al.An Inkjet-printed, Flexible, Ultra-broadband nanocomposite film sensor for in-situ acquisition of high-frequency dynamic strains. Compos Part A-Appl S2019; 125: 105554.
99.
ZhouPCaoWLiaoY, et al.Temperature effect on all-inkjet-printed nanocomposite piezoresistive sensors for ultrasonics-based health monitoring. Compos Sci Technol2020; 19: 108273.
100.
ZhaoDLiuTZhangM, et al.Fabrication and characterization of aerosol-jet printed strain sensors for multifunctional composite structures. Smart Mater Struct2012; 21(11): 115008.
101.
BlumenthalTFratelloVNinoG, et al.Conformal printing of sensors on 3D and flexible surfaces using aerosol jet deposition. Nanosensors, Biosensors, and Info-Tech Sensors and Systems 2013. International Society for Optics and Photonics2013; 8691: 86910P.
102.
BorghettiMSerpelloniMSardiniE. Printed strain gauge on 3D and low-melting point plastic surface by aerosol jet printing and photonic curing. Sensors2019; 19(19): 4220.
103.
WeiLJOxleyCH. Carbon based resistive strain gauge sensor fabricated on titanium using micro-dispensing direct write technology. Sensor Actuat A-Phys2016; 247: 389–392.
104.
GuoZXuJChenY, et al.High-sensitive and stretchable resistive strain gauges: Parametric design and DIW fabrication. Compos Struct2019; 223: 110955.
105.
GuoZYuPLiuY, et al.High-precision resistance strain sensors of multilayer composite structure via direct ink writing: Optimized layer flatness and interfacial strength. Compos Sci Technol2021; 201: 108530.
106.
LiYFengWMengL, et al.Investigation on in-situ sprayed, annealed and corona poled PVDF-TrFE coatings for guided wave-based structural health monitoring: From crystallization to piezoelectricity. Mater Design2021; 199: 109415.
107.
SbarufattiCPatelBSánchez-RomateXF, et al.Self-sensing of CNT-Doped GFRP panels during impact and compression after impact tests. In: European Workshop on Structural Health Monitoring, Cham, 2020. Springer, pp. 527–536.
108.
GaoLThostensonETZhangZ, et al.Coupled carbon nanotube network and acoustic emission monitoring for sensing of damage development in composites. Carbon2009; 47(5): 1381–1388.
109.
GaoLThostensonETZhangZ, et al.Sensing of damage mechanisms in fiber-reinforced composites under cyclic loading using carbon nanotubes. Adv Funct Mater2009; 19(1): 123–130.
110.
GaoLChouTWThostensonET, et al.In situ sensing of impact damage in epoxy/glass fiber composites using percolating carbon nanotube networks. Carbon2011; 49(10): 3382–3385.
111.
WangGWangYZhangP, et al.Structure dependent properties of carbon nanomaterials enabled fiber sensors for in situ monitoring of composites. Compos Struct2018; 195: 36–44.
112.
Isaac-MedinaBKSAlonzo-GarcíaAAvilésF. Electrical self-sensing of impact damage in multiscale hierarchical composites with tailored location of carbon nanotube networks. Struct Health Monit2019; 18(3): 806–818.
113.
LiYWangKWangQ, et al.Acousto-ultrasonics-based health monitoring for nano-engineered composites using a dispersive graphene-networked sensing system. Struct Health Monit2021; 20(1): 240–254.
114.
DattaSNeerukattiRKChattopadhyayA. Buckypaper embedded self-sensing composite for real-time fatigue damage diagnosis and prognosis. Carbon2018; 139: 353–360.
115.
HuoQSJinJQLuSW, et al.Self-sensing properties of bending deformation of buckypaper composites. Mater Res Express2019, 6(10): 105004.
116.
WangMLiNWangGD, et al.High-sensitive flexural sensors for health monitoring of composite materials using embedded carbon nanotube (CNT) buckypaper. Compos Struct, 2020, 261: 113280.
117.
LinJPengZLiuY, et al.Laser-induced porous graphene films from commercial polymers. Nat Commun2014; 5(1): 1–8.
118.
YeRJamesDKTourJM. Laser-induced graphene: From discovery to translation. Adv Mater2019; 31(1): 1803621.
119.
YouRLiuYQHaoYL, et al.Laser fabrication of graphene‐based flexible electronics. Adv Mater2020; 32(15): 1901981.
120.
MaWZhuJWangZ, et al.Recent advances in preparation and application of laser induced graphene in energy storage devices. Materials Today Energy2020; 18: 100569.
121.
JeongSYMaYWLeeJU, et al.Flexible and highly sensitive strain sensor based on laser-induced graphene pattern fabricated by 355 nm pulsed laser. Sensors2019; 19(22): 4867.
122.
YangWZhaoWLiQ, et al.Fabrication of smart components by 3D printing and laser-scribing technologies. ACS Appl Mater Inter2019; 12(3): 3928–3935.
GrooLANasserJZhangL, et al.Laser induced graphene in fiberglass-reinforced composites for strain and damage sensing. Compos Sci Tech2020; 199: 108367.
128.
WangGWangYLuoY, et al.A self-converted strategy toward multifunctional composites with laser-induced graphitic structures. Compos Sci Tech2020; 199: 108334.
129.
FuHSharif-KhodaeiZAliabadiMHF. An event-triggered energy-efficient wireless structural health monitoring system for impact detection in composite airframes. IEEE Internet Things2018; 6(1): 1183–1192.
130.
SmithardJRajicNVeldenS, et al.An advanced multi-sensor acousto-ultrasonic structural health monitoring system: Development and aerospace demonstration. Materials2017; 10(7): 832.
131.
FuHSharif-KhodaeiZAliabadiMHF. An energy-efficient cyber-physical system for wireless on-board aircraft structural health monitoring. Mech Syst Signal Pr2019; 128: 352–368.
132.
AllmenLVBailleulGBeckerT, et al.Aircraft strain WSN powered by heat storage harvesting. IEEE T Ind Electron2017; 64(9): 7284–7292.
133.
LievenNEscamilla-AmbrosioPBunnissP, et al.Towards wireless sensor usage and health monitoring of helicopter rotor components. 6th DSTO International Conference on Health & Usage Monitoring, Melbourne, Austrialia, 2009.
134.
FanZZhouJHWangBC. On self-powered wireless sensor network node of near space airship. In: Proceeding of 2018 37th Chinese Control Conference (CCC). Wuhan China, 25–28 July, 2018.
135.
PengSWuSYuY, et al.Multimodal capacitive and piezoresistive sensor for simultaneous measurement of multiple forces. ACS Appl Mater Inter2020; 12(19): 22179–22190.
136.
YavasDZhangZLiuQ, et al.Interlaminar shear behavior of continuous and short carbon fiber reinforced polymer composites fabricated by additive manufacturing. Compos Part B-Eng2021; 204: 108460.
137.
EkoiEJDicksonANDowlingDP. Investigating the fatigue and mechanical behaviour of 3D printed woven and nonwoven continuous carbon fibre reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites. Compos Part B-Eng2021; 212: 108704.
138.
MontazerianHRashidiAMilaniAS, et al.Integrated sensors in advanced composites: A critical review. Crit Rev Solid State2020; 45(3): 187–238.
MahmudMABatesKWoodT, et al.A complete internet of things (IoT) platform for structural health monitoring (SHM). In: 2018 IEEE 4th World Forum on Internet of Things (WF-IoT), 2018. IEEE: 275–279.
142.
LamonacaFSciammarellaPFScuroC, et al.Internet of things for structural health monitoring. In: Proceedings of 2018 Workshop on Metrology for Industry 4.0 and IoT. Brescia, Italy, 2018. IEEE, pp. 95–100.
143.
XuLYuanSChenJ, et al.Guided wave-convolutional neural network based fatigue crack diagnosis of aircraft structures. Sensors2019; 19(16): 3567.
