Thin spherical shell structures are wildly used as pressure vessels in the industry because of their property of having equal in-plane normal stresses in all directions. Since very large pressure difference between the inside and outside of the wall exists, any formation of defects in the pressure vessel wall has a huge safety risk. Therefore, it is necessary to quickly locate the area where the defect maybe located in the early stage of defect formation and make repair on time. The conventional acoustic source localization techniques for spherical shells require either direction-dependent velocity profile knowledge or a large number of sensors to form an array. In this study, we propose a fast approach for acoustic source localization on thin isotropic and anisotropic spherical shells. A solution technique based on the time difference of arrival on a thin spherical shell without the prior knowledge of direction-dependent velocity profile is provided. With the help of “L”-shaped sensor clusters, only 6 sensors are required to quickly predict the acoustic source location for anisotropic spherical shells. For isotropic spherical shells, only 4 sensors are required. Simulation and experimental results show that this technique works well for both isotropic and anisotropic spherical shells.
MalekiMFarrahiGHHaghpanah JahromiB, et al.Residual stress analysis of autofrettaged thick-walled spherical pressure vessel. The Int J Press Vessels Piping2010; 87: 396–401. DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2010.04.002.
3.
RizzoP. 17–Sensing solutions for assessing and monitoring underwater systems. In: WangMLLynchJPSohnH (eds) Sensor Technologies for Civil Infrastructures. Sawston, UK: Woodhead Publishing, 2014, pp. 525–549.
4.
McCroryJPPearsonMRPullinR, et al.Optimisation of acoustic emission wavestreaming for structural health monitoring. Struct Health Monit2020; 19: 2007–2022. DOI: 10.1177/1475921720912174.
BaronJYingS. Acoustic emission source location. In: MillerRMcIntireP (eds) Nondestructive testing handbook, volume 5: acoustic emission testing. Columbus, OH: American Society for Nondestructive Testing, 1987, pp. 136–154.
7.
CiampaFMeoM. Acoustic emission source localization and velocity determination of the fundamental mode A0 using wavelet analysis and a Newton-based optimization technique. Smart Mater Struct2010; 19: 045027. DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/19/4/045027.
8.
MeoMZumpanoGPiggottM, et al.Impact identification on a sandwich plate from wave propagation responses. Compos Struct2005; 71: 302–306. DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruct.2005.09.028.
9.
HeTPanQLiuY, et al.Near-field beamforming analysis for acoustic emission source localization. Ultrasonics2012; 52: 587–592. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2011.12.003.
10.
HeTXieYShanY, et al.Localizing two acoustic emission sources simultaneously using beamforming and singular value decomposition. Ultrasonics2018; 85: 3–22. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.10.019.
11.
McLaskeyGCGlaserSDGrosseCU. Beamforming array techniques for acoustic emission monitoring of large concrete structures. J Sound Vibration2010; 329: 2384–2394. DOI: 10.1016/j.jsv.2009.08.037.
12.
KunduTDasSJataKV. Point of impact prediction in isotropic and anisotropic plates from the acoustic emission data. The J Acoust Soc America2007; 122: 2057–2066. DOI: 10.1121/1.2775322.
13.
KunduTDasSMartinSA, et al.Locating point of impact in anisotropic fiber reinforced composite plates. Ultrasonics2008; 48: 193–201. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2007.12.001.
14.
HajzargerbashiTKunduTBlandS. An improved algorithm for detecting point of impact in anisotropic inhomogeneous plates. Ultrasonics2011; 51: 317–324. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2010.10.005.
15.
KoabazMHajzargarbashiTKunduT, et al.Locating the acoustic source in an anisotropic plate. Struct Health Monit2012; 11: 315–323. DOI: 10.1177/1475921711419991.
16.
EbrahimkhanlouADubucBSalamoneS. A generalizable deep learning framework for localizing and characterizing acoustic emission sources in riveted metallic panels. Mech Syst Signal Process2019; 130: 248–272. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2019.04.050.
17.
EbrahimkhanlouASalamoneS. Single-sensor acoustic emission source localization in plate-like structures using deep learning. Aerospace2018; 5: 50. DOI: 10.3390/aerospace5020050.
18.
AgrahariJKKapuriaS. A refined Lamb wave time-reversal method with enhanced sensitivity for damage detection in isotropic plates. J Intell Mater Syst structures2016; 27: 1283–1305. DOI: 10.1177/1045389X15590269.
19.
CiampaFMeoM. Impact detection in anisotropic materials using a time reversal approach. Struct Health Monit2012; 11: 43–49. DOI: 10.1177/1475921710395815.
20.
ParkBSohnHOlsonSE, et al.Impact localization in complex structures using laser-based time reversal. Struct Health Monit2012; 11: 577–588. DOI: 10.1177/1475921712449508.
21.
Al-JumailiSKPearsonMRHolfordKM, et al.Acoustic emission source location in complex structures using full automatic delta T mapping technique. Mech Syst Signal Process2016; 72-73: 513–524. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2015.11.026.
22.
BaxterMGPullinRHolfordKM, et al.Delta T source location for acoustic emission. Mech Syst Signal Process2007; 21: 1512–1520. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2006.05.003.
23.
HensmanJMillsRPierceSG, et al.Locating acoustic emission sources in complex structures using Gaussian processes. Mech Syst Signal Process2010; 24: 211–223. DOI: 10.1016/j.ymssp.2009.05.018.
24.
Hoseini SabzevariSAMoavenianM. Sound localization in an anisotropic plate using electret microphones. Ultrasonics2017; 73: 114–124. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2016.09.004.
25.
KunduT. A new technique for acoustic source localization in an anisotropic plate without knowing its material properties. In: Proceedings of the 6th European workshop on structural health monitoring, EWSHM) Dresden, 3-6 July 2012, 37–45.
YinSCuiZKunduT. Acoustic source localization in anisotropic plates with “Z” shaped sensor clusters. Ultrasonics2018; 84: 34–37. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.10.007.
28.
ParkWHPackoPKunduT. Acoustic source localization in an anisotropic plate without knowing its material properties – A new approach. Ultrasonics2017; 79: 9–17. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2017.02.021.
29.
SenNGawrońskiMPackoP, et al.Acoustic source localization in anisotropic plates without knowing their material properties: An experimental investigation. In: Proceedings of the health monitoring of structural and biological systems XIII, Denver, CO, 1 April 2019, paper no.1097224. Bellingham, WA: SPIE.
30.
SenNKunduT. Acoustic source localization in a highly anisotropic plate with unknown orientation of its axes of symmetry and material properties with numerical verification. Ultrasonics2020; 100: 105977. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2019.105977.
31.
YinSCuiZFuJ, et al.Acoustic source localization in heterogeneous media. Ultrasonics2019; 99: 105957. DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2019.105957.
32.
YinSXiaoHCuiZ, et al.Rapid localization of acoustic source using sensor clusters in 3D homogeneous and heterogeneous structures. Struct Health Monitoring-an Int J2020; 20(2): 147592172094519. DOI: 10.1177/1475921720945195.
33.
AstyM. Acoustic emission source location on a spherical or plane surface. NDT Int1978; 11: 223–226. DOI: 10.1016/0308-9126(78)90076-7.
34.
TobiasA. Acoustic-emission source location in two dimensions by an array of three sensors. Non-Destructive Test (Guildford)1976; 9: 9–12. DOI: 10.1016/0029-1021(76)90027-X.
35.
KappatosVLympertosEDermatasE. Estimation of the best sensors position for the minimum error location of acoustic emission sources on spherical surfaces. In: Proceeding of the 3rd International Conference on Non-Destructive Testing of the Hellenic Society for NDT, Canea, October 2003, 123–128.
36.
JinZLiuSGengR, et al.Location of acoustic emission source on curved surfaces and three-dimension structures. Nondestructive Test2002; 24: 205–222. DOI: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6656.2002.05.008.
37.
Skal’s’kyiVRPochaps’kyiEPKlymBP, et al.Location of the sources of acoustic emission in thin-wall objects of spherical shape. Mater Sci (New York, NY)2015; 51: 138–147. DOI: 10.1007/s11003-015-9820-1.
38.
SohaibMIslamMKimJ, et al.Leakage detection of a spherical water storage tank in a chemical industry using acoustic emissions. Appl Sci2019; 9: 196. DOI: 10.3390/app9010196.
39.
RoseJL. Ultrasonic waves in Solid Media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.
40.
LiMShangZCaiH, et al.Acoustic Emission Detection and Signal Processing. 1st ed.Beijing: Science Press, 2010.
41.
GB/T 18182–2012. Acoustic emission examination and evaluation of metallic Pressure Vessels. Beijing: Standards Press of China, 2012.
