The aerodynamic noise of a NACA 0012 and NACA 0021 aerofoil is measured and compared in order to determine whether there are differences in their noise signatures with a focus on the onset of stall. Measurements of the self-noise of each aerofoil are measured in an open-jet Anechoic Wind Tunnel at Reynolds numbers of 64,000 and 96,000, at geometric angles of attack from −5° through 40° at a resolution of 1°. Further measurements are taken at Re = 96,000 at geometric angles of attack from −5 through 16° at a resolution of 0.5°. Results show that while the noise generated far into the stall regime is quite similar for both aerofoils the change in noise level at the onset of stall is significantly different between the two aerofoils with the NACA 0021 exhibiting a much sharper increase in noise levels below a chord-based Strouhal number of Stc = 1.1. This behaviour is consistent with the changes in lift of these aerofoils as well as the rate of collapse of the suction peak of a NACA 0012 aerofoil under these flow conditions.
ParchenRR. Progress report DRAW: a prediction scheme for trailing edge noise based on detailed boundary layer characteristics, TNO Rept. HAG-RPT-980023, TNO Institute of Applied Physics, The Netherlands, 1998, 1998.
5.
KamruzzamanMLutzTWurzW. Validations and improvements of airfoil trailing-edge noise prediction models using detailed experimental data. Wind Energy2012; 15: 45–61.
6.
Kamruzzaman M, Bekiropoulos D, Wolf A, et al. Rnoise: a RANS based airfoil trailing-edge noise prediction model. In: Twentieth AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, AIAA AVIATION forum, Atlanta, Georgia, USA, 16–20 June 2014, p.1. Reston, VA: American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIIA).
7.
PröbstingSScaranoFMorrisS. Regimes of tonal noise on an airfoil at moderate Reynolds number. J Fluid Mech2015; 780: 407–438.
8.
BrooksTFPopeDSMarcoliniMA. Airfoil self-noise and predictionWashington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Management, Scientific and Technical Information Division, 1989.
9.
LeeG-SCheongCShinS-H. A case study of localization and identification of noise sources from a pitch and a stall regulated wind turbine. Appl Acoust2012; 73: 817–827.
10.
OerlemansS. Effect of wind shear on amplitude modulation of wind turbine noise. Int J Aeroacoust2015; 14: 715–728.
11.
KamruzzamanMLutzTArnoldB. Prediction of flow-induced noise sources of wind turbines and application examples. Int J Aeroacoust2015; 14: 675–714.
12.
WasalaSHStoreyRCNorrisSE. Aeroacoustic noise prediction for wind turbines using large Eddy simulation. J Wind Eng Ind Aerodyn2015; 145: 17–29.
13.
Moreau S, Roger M and Christophe J. Flow features and self-noise of airfoils near stall or in stall. In: Fifteenth AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, Miami, Florida, 11–13 May 2009, p.1. Reston, VA: American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIIA).
14.
RodríguezILehmkuhlOBorrellR. Direct numerical simulation of a NACA 0012 in full stall. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2013; 43: 194–203.
15.
BergerRGAshtianiPOllsonCA. Health-based audible noise guidelines account for infrasound and low-frequency noise produced by wind turbines. Front Public Health2015; 3: 1–14.
16.
Lee J and Wang L. Assessment of noise-induced annoyance by tones in noise from building mechanical systems. In: Forty-third international congress on noise control engineering, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 16–19 November 2014. Brisbane, Queensland, Australia: The Australian Acoustical Society.
17.
LaratroAArjomandiMCazzolatoB. A comparison of NACA 0012 and NACA 0021 self-noise at low Reynolds number. In: Fluid-structure-sound interactions and control, Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2016, pp. 21–25.
18.
HuangRFLinCL. Vortex shedding and shear-layer instability of wing at low-Reynolds numbers. AIAA J1995; 33: 1398–1403.
19.
Arcondoulis E, Doolan C and Zander AC. Airfoil noise measurements at various angles of attack and low Reynolds number. In: Proceedings of acoustics 2009: research to consulting, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 23–25 November 2009, pp.23–25. Adelaide, Australia: The University of Adelaide School of Mechanical Engineering.
20.
HansenKKelsoRDoolanC. Reduction of flow induced tonal noise through leading edge tubercle modifications. In: Sixteenth AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference, Stockholm, Sweden, 7–9 June 2010, p.1. Reston, VA: American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIIA)2010.
21.
NakanoTFujisawaNLeeS. Measurement of tonal-noise characteristics and periodic flow structure around NACA 0018 airfoil. Exp Fluids2006; 40: 482–490.
ChoudhryAArjomandiMKelsoR. A study of long separation bubble on thick airfoils and its consequent effects. Int J Heat Fluid Flow2015; 52: 84–96.
24.
BraggMBHeinrichDCKhodadoustA. Low-frequency ow oscillation over airfoils near stall. AIAA J1993; 31: 1341–1343.
25.
GreenblattDWygnanskiI. Effect of leading-edge curvature and slot geometry on dynamic stall control. In: First flow control conference, fluid dynamics and co-located conferences, St. Louis, Missouri, 24–26 June 2002, p.1. Reston, VA: American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIIA)2002.
26.
MarchmanFGuntherCGundlachJ. Semi-span testing at low Reynolds number. In: Thirty-sixth AIAA aerospace sciences meeting and exhibit, Reno, Nevada, 12–15 January 1998, pp.1–9. Reston, VA: American Institute for Aeronautics and Astronautics (AIIA)1998.
27.
RostmzadehNKelsoRMDallyB. The effect of wavy leading edge modifications on NACA 0021 airfoil characteristics. In: Proceedings of the 18th Australasian fluid mechanics conference, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia, 3–7 December 2012. Melbourne, Victoria, Australia: Australasian Fluid Mechanics Society2012.
