The effect of incoming turbulence intensity on the aerodynamic interaction noise of a rod-airfoil configuration is investigated by compressible large eddy simulation and Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings equation. The inlet position of the computational domain is determined by computing the turbulence intensity and mean velocity from the inlet to the rod leading edge. The mean velocity upstream of the airfoil is compared with experimental measurements to determine rod offset. The far-field sound predictions are consistent with the experimental measurements, demonstrating the validity of the computational model and applied methods. An increase in turbulence intensity increases the primary peak frequency of the power spectral density for the far-field sound. Moreover, the amplitude of the primary peak of the far-field acoustic pressure, overall sound pressure level of the far-field sound, stability of the large-scale vortex structures, and energy proportion of the first two proper orthogonal decomposition modes decreases with increasing incoming turbulence intensity.
PeakeNParryAB. Modern challenges facing turbomachinery aeroacoustics. Annu Rev Fluid Mech2012; 44: 227–248.
2.
CooperAJPeakeN. Upstream-radiated rotor–stator interaction noise in mean swirling flow. J Fluid Mech2005; 523: 219–250.
3.
JacobMCBoudetJCasalinoD, et al.A rod-airfoil experiment as a benchmark for broadband noise modeling. Theor Comput Fluid Dynam2005; 19: 171–196.
4.
WangMFreundJBLeleSK. Computational prediction of flow-generated sound. Annu Rev Fluid Mech2006; 38: 483–512.
5.
ReynoldsOIV. On the dynamical theory of incompressible viscous fluids and the determination of the criterion. Phil Trans Roy Soc Lond; 1895: 123–164.
6.
SmagorinskyJ. General circulation experiments with the primitive equations: I. The basic experiment. Mon Weather Rev1963; 91: 99–164.
7.
SpalartPR. Comments on the feasibility of LES for wings and on the hybrid RANS/LES approach. Proceedings of the First AFOSR International Conference on DNS/LES, 1997, pp. 137–147.
8.
SpalartPR. Detached-eddy simulation. Annu Rev Fluid Mech2009; 41: 181–202.
9.
CasalinoDJacobMRogerM. Prediction of rod-airfoil interaction noise using the Ffowcs-Williams-Hawkings analogy. AIAA J2003; 41: 182–191.
10.
JacobMCiardiMGametL, et al.Assessment of CFD broadband noise predictions on a rod-airfoil benchmark computation. 14th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (29th AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), 2008, p. 2899.
11.
GreschnerBThieleFJacobMC, et al.Prediction of sound generated by a rod–airfoil configuration using EASM DES and the generalised Lighthill/FW-H analogy. Computers & fluids2008; 37: 402–413.
12.
AgrawalBRSharmaA. Numerical analysis of aerodynamic noise mitigation via leading edge serrations for a rod–airfoil configuration. Int J Aeroacoustics2016; 15: 734–756.
13.
BoudetJCasalinoDJacobM, et al.Prediction of sound radiated by a rod using large eddy simulation. 9th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference and Exhibit, 2003, p. 3217.
14.
BoudetJGrosjeanNJacobMC. Wake-airfoil interaction as broadband noise source: a large-eddy simulation study. Int J Aeroacoustics2005; 4: 93–115.
15.
GiretJ-CSengissenAMoreauS, et al.Prediction of the sound generated by a rod-airfoil configuration using a compressible unstructured LES solver and a FW-H analogy. 18th AIAA/CEAS Aeroacoustics Conference (33rd AIAA Aeroacoustics Conference), 2012, p. 2058.
16.
JiangYMaoM-LDengX-G, et al.Numerical investigation on body-wake flow interaction over rod–airfoil configuration. J Fluid Mech2015; 779: 1–35.
17.
HanJZhangYLiS, et al.The noise-generating mechanism of rod-airfoil configuration and the effect of spanwise length on noise prediction. Aero Sci Technol2023; 134: 108166.
18.
EltaweelAWangM. Numerical simulation of broadband noise from airfoil-wake interaction. 17th AIAA/CEAS aeroacoustics conference (32nd AIAA aeroacoustics conference), 2011, p. 2802.
19.
ZhangYXiaoYLiuR, et al.Aeroacoustic prediction based on large-eddy simulation and the Ffowcs Williams–Hawkings equation. Adv Aerodyn2022; 4: 19.
20.
JinYLiaoFCaiJ, et al.Investigation on rod-airfoil noise with high-order cell-centered finite difference method and acoustic analogy. Aero Sci Technol2020; 102: 105851.
21.
ZamponiRSatcunanathanSMoreauS, et al.On the role of turbulence distortion on leading-edge noise reduction by means of porosity. J Sound Vib2020; 485: 115561.
22.
ChaitanyaPJosephPNarayananS, et al.Performance and mechanism of sinusoidal leading edge serrations for the reduction of turbulence–aerofoil interaction noise. J Fluid Mech2017; 818: 435–464.
23.
ChenWLeiHXingY, et al.On the airfoil leading-edge noise reduction using poro-wavy leading edges. Phys Fluids2024; 36.
24.
ChenWQiaoWTongF, et al.Numerical investigation of wavy leading edges on rod–airfoil interaction noise. AIAA J2018; 56: 2553–2567.
25.
TerunaCAvalloneFCasalinoD, et al.Numerical investigation of leading edge noise reduction on a rod-airfoil configuration using porous materials and serrations. J Sound Vib2021; 494: 115880.
26.
LiYNiuX. Rod–airfoil interaction noise at different rod cross sections and airfoil angles. AIAA J2022; 60: 3635–3650.
27.
LiYChenZWangX. Flow/noise control of a rod–airfoil configuration using “natural rod-base blowing”: numerical experiments. Eur J Mech B Fluid2020; 83: 99–113.
28.
Siozos-RousoulisLLacorCGhorbaniaslG. A flow control technique for noise reduction of a rod-airfoil configuration. J Fluid Struct2017; 69: 293–307.
29.
ChenWQiaoWWangL, et al.Investigation of rod-airfoil interaction noise using large eddy simulation and FW-H equation. J Aero Power2016; 31: 2146–2155.
30.
YangCFengHPengY, et al.Effects of porous media on rod-airfoil interaction noise. J Aero Power2022; 37: 1528–1538.
31.
KwokKC. Turbulence effect on flow around circular cylinder. J Eng Mech1986; 112: 1181–1197.
32.
Di FrancescantonioP. A new boundary integral formulation for the prediction of sound radiation. J Sound Vib1997; 202: 491–509.
33.
MaoYHuZ. Analysis of spurious sound due to vortical flow through permeable surfaces. Aero Sci Technol2020; 96: 105544.
34.
ZhongSZhangXHuangX. A comparison of acoustic far-field prediction methods for turbulent flows. Int J Aeroacoustics2019; 18: 579–595.
35.
KatoCIidaATakanoY, et al.Numerical prediction of aerodynamic noise radiated from low Mach number turbulent wake. 31st aerospace sciences meeting, 1993, p. 145.
36.
BerkoozGHolmesPLumleyJL. The proper orthogonal decomposition in the analysis of turbulent flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech1993; 25: 539–575.
37.
FarassatF. Derivation of formulations 1 and 1A of Farassat. 2007.
38.
YangCFengHPengY. Noise characteristic analysis and sound sources identification for rod–airfoil interaction using different subgrid-scale models. E3S Web of Conferences. EDP Sciences, 2021, p. 04036.
