An experimental study of periodic surface waves acting against the turbulent currents under the influence of smooth and rough side wall is presented. Flow structure for current alone, and combined wave against current flows over smooth and rough side walls were measured with Acoustic Doppler Velocimeter to resolve the changes in the mean flow and turbulence characteristics resulting from the interaction of the flow and the wall roughness. Turbulent velocity fluctuations were analysed to characterise the turbulence and coherent structures and integral length and time scales were evaluated from the autocorrelation function estimates. Further the Kolmogorov length scales were determined using energy dissipation rate. Results show that the dissipation rate is greater for wave against current flow compared to the current alone flow for rough side walls. The streamwise integral length scale at the measured locations reduced with the increase in wave frequency acting against the current flow. Close to the wall surface, the effect of roughness attenuated the integral length scale and increased the turbulent dissipation rate. Continuous wavelet transform (CWT) was used as a tool to detect and establish the average time and length scales of largest horizontal coherent structures that existed in the wave against current combined flow.
OlabarrietaMMedinaRCastanedoS. Effects of wave–current interaction on the current profile. Coastal Eng2010; 57(7): 643–655.
7.
UmeyamaM. Changes in turbulent flow structure under combined wave-current motions. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng2009; 135(5): 213–227.
8.
RoySSamantaraySSDebnathK. Study of turbulent Eddies for wave against current. Ocean Eng2018; 150: 176–193.
9.
BarmanKDebnathKMazumderBS. Turbulence over chains of hemispherical ribs under waves in a current. Water Resour Res2019; 55(1): 55–75.
10.
MarshG. Wave and tidal power: an emerging new market for composites. Reinf Plast2009; 53: 20–24.
11.
UmeyamaM. Reynolds stresses and velocity distributions in a wave-current coexisting environment. J Waterw Port Coast Ocean Eng2005; 131(5): 203–212.
12.
KempPHSimonsRR. The interaction between waves and a turbulent current: waves propagating with the current. J Fluid Mech1982; 116: 227–250.
13.
KempPHSimonsRR. The interaction of waves and a turbulent current: waves propagating against the current. J Fluid Mech1983; 130: 73–89.
14.
HansdaSBarmanKRoyS, et al. Quantification of turbulent eddies in time-space and frequency domain for wave-current combined flow over side-wall roughness. Ocean Eng2019; 186: 106080.
AntoniaRALuxtonRE. The response of a turbulent boundary layer to a step change in surface roughness part 1: Smooth to rough. J Fluid Mech1971; 48(4): 721–761.
20.
AntoniouJBergelesG. Development of the reattached flow behind surface-mounted two-dimensional prisms. J Fluids Eng1988; 110(2): 127–133.
21.
AntoniaRAKimJBrowneLWB. Some characteristics of small-scale turbulence in a turbulent duct flow. J Fluid Mech1991; 233: 369–388.
22.
KrogstadPÅAntoniaRA. Structure of turbulent boundary layers on smooth and rough walls. J Fluid Mech1994; 277: 1–21.
23.
CastroIPChengHReynoldsR. Turbulence over urban-type roughness: deductions from wind-tunnel measurements. Boundary-Layer Meteorol2006; 118(1): 109–131.
24.
DingemansMWVan KesterJTMRadderAC, et al. The effect of the CL-vortex force in 3D wave-current interaction. Coastal Eng1997; 4821–4832.
25.
NepfHMMonismithSG. Experimental study of wave-induced longitudinal vortices. J Hydraul Eng1991; 117(12): 1639–1649.
26.
KlopmanG. Secondary circulation of the flow due to waves and current: Laser-Doppler flow measurements for waves following or opposing a current. Progress Report Z2249, Delft Hydraulics, Delft, Netherlands, 1997.
27.
GreenwoodCVoglerAVenugopalV. On the variation of turbulence in a high-velocity tidal channel. Energies2019; 12(4): 672.
28.
BarmanKDebnathKMazumderBS. Turbulence over a pair of submerged hemispheres in presence of surface waves and following current. J Offshore Mech Arct Eng2018; 140(3): 031104.
29.
FargeMSchneiderK. Coherent vortex simulation (CVS), a semi-deterministic turbulence model using wavelets. Flow Turbul Combust2001; 66(4): 393–426.
30.
LewisEV. Principles of naval architecture second revision. Jersey City, NJ: SNAME, 1988.
31.
RoySDebnathKMazumderBS. Distribution of eddy scales for wave current combined flow. Appl Ocean Res2017; 63: 170–183.
32.
MathisenPPMadsenOS. Waves and currents over a fixed rippled bed: 2. Bottom and apparent roughness experienced by currents in the presence of waves. J Geophys Res Oceans1996; 101(C7): 16543–16550.
33.
MichellJH. The highest waves in water. Lond Edinb Dublin Phil Mag J Sci1893; 36(222): 430–437.
34.
MicheM. Mouvements ondulatoires de la meren profondeur constant ou décroissante. Annales de Ponts et Chaussées1944; (1): 26–78, (2): 270–292, (3): 369–406.
35.
GodaY. Random seas and design of maritime structures. Advanced series on ocean engineering. Vol. 15. Washington, DC: World Scientific Publications, 2000.
36.
DeanRGDalrympleRA. Water wave mechanics for engineers and scientists. Vol. 2. Washington, DC: World Scientific Publishing Company, 1991.
37.
McLellandSJNicholasAP. A new method for evaluating errors in high-frequency ADV measurements. Hydrol Process2000; 14(2): 351–366.
38.
NikoraVIGoringDG. ADV measurements of turbulence: can we improve their interpretation?J Hydraul Eng1998; 124(6): 630–634.
39.
WahlTL. Analyzing ADV data using Win-ADV. In: HotchkissRHGladeM (eds) Building partnerships. Reston, VA: ASCE, 2000, pp.1–10.
40.
EfronB. Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann Stat1979; 7: 1–26.
41.
KunschH. The jackknife and the bootstrap for general stationary observations. Ann Stat1989; 17: 1217–1241.
42.
GarciaCMJacksonPRGarciaMH. Confidence intervals in the determination of turbulence parameters. Exp Fluids2006; 40(4): 514–522.
43.
TennekesHLumleyJL. A first course in turbulence. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1972.
44.
KimSCFriedrichsCTMaaJY, et al. Estimating bottom stress in tidal boundary layer from acoustic Doppler velocimeter data. J Hydraul Eng2000; 126(6): 399–406.
45.
ReidenbachMAKoseffJRMonismithSG. Laboratory experiments of fine-scale mixing and mass transport within a coral canopy. Phys Fluids2007; 19(7): 075107.
46.
KlopmanG. Vertical structure of the flow due to waves and currents. Prog Rep1994 H840.32, Delft Hydraulics, Delft, The Netherlands.
47.
FredsøeJAndersenKHSumerBM. Wave plus current over a ripple-covered bed. Coastal Eng1999; 38(4): 177–221.
48.
JiménezJ. Turbulent flows over rough walls. Annu Rev Fluid Mech2004; 36: 173–196.
49.
TownsendAA. The structure of turbulent Shear flows. 2nd ed.Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1976.
50.
LaceyRWJRoyAG. Fine-scale characterization of the turbulent shear layer of an instream pebble cluster. J Hydraul Eng2008; 134(7): 925–936.
51.
NovoPGKyozukaY. Field measurement and numerical study of tidal current turbulence intensity in the Kobe Strait of the Goto Islands, Nagasaki Prefecture. J Marine Sci Tech2017; 22(2): 335–350.
52.
ImamuraJTakagiKNagayaS. Engineering analysis of turbulent flow measurements near Kuchinoshima Island. J Marine Sci Tech2019; 24(2): 329–337.
53.
Longuet-HigginsMS. Vorticity and curvature at a free surface. J Fluid Mech1998; 356: 149–153.
54.
PettiMLongoS. Turbulence experiments in the swash zone. Coastal Eng2001; 43: 1–24.
55.
BebinaDTSharmaAKumarB. Turbulence characteristics of vegetated channel with downward seepage. J Fluids Eng2016; 138(12): 121102.
56.
LiuZWeiH. Estimation to the turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate and bottom shear stress in the tidal bottom boundary layer of the Yellow Sea. Progress Nat Sci2007; 17: 289–297.
57.
LozovatskyILiuZWeiH, et al. Tides and mixing in the northwestern East China Sea, Part II: near-bottom turbulence. Cont Shelf Res2008; 28(2): 338–350.
58.
BluteauCE.JonesNLIveyGN. Estimating turbulent kinetic energy dissipation using the inertial subrange method in environmental flows. Limno Oceanogr Methods2011; 9(7): 302–321.
59.
TaylorGI. Statistical theory of turbulence IV-diffusion in a turbulent air stream. Proc R Soc Lond Ser A Math Phys Sci1935; 151(873): 465–478.
60.
SreenivasanKR. On the universality of the Kolmogorov constant. Phys Fluids1995; 7(11): 2778–2784.
61.
LienRCD’AsaroEA. Measurement of turbulent kinetic energy dissipation rate with a Lagrangian float. J Atmos Ocean Tech2006; 23(7): 964–976.
62.
FargeM. Wavelet transforms and their applications to turbulence. Annu Rev Fluid Mech1992; 24(1): 395–458.
63.
WangHLeeSHassanYA, et al. Laser-Doppler measurements of the turbulent mixing of two rectangular water jets impinging on a stationary pool. Int J Heat Mass Tran2016; 92: 206–227.
64.
YalinMS. River mechanics. Oxford: Pergamon Press, 1992.
65.
FrancaMJLemminU. Detection and reconstruction of coherent structures based on wavelet multiresolution analysis. Proc River Flow2006; 1: 181–190.
66.
LiuPC. Wavelet spectrum analysis and ocean wind waves. In: LittleSAKumarP (eds) Wavelet analysis and its applications. Vol. 4. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 1994, pp.151–166.
67.
TorrenceCCompoGP. A practical guide to wavelet analysis. Bull Am Meteorol Soc1998; 79(1): 61–78.
68.
KananiADa SilvaAMF. Application of continuous wavelet transform to the study of large-scale coherent structures. Environ Fluid Mech2015; 15(6): 1293–1319.
69.
PopeSB. Turbulent flows. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
