The spatial, institutional and social configurations of school supply and demand are crucial aspects in understanding the various mechanisms of production and reproduction of socio-spatial inequalities in education. The same policy instruments may have different effects depending on the characteristics of local education markets and the dynamics of supply and demand in each of them. This article investigates how a policy designed to reduce school segregation in the city of Barcelona resulted in uneven effects in different catchment areas of the city, which are socially and educationally diverse. By comparing the effects of the same policy strategy in different territories, the article identifies four mechanisms that mediate and occasionally prevent the effectiveness of the policy instruments or their implementation procedures. Identifying these mechanisms is an important and necessary task when reviewing the existing policy design and adapting it to the particularities of local education markets.
ArbaciS (2019) Paradoxes of Segregation Housing Systems, Welfare Regimes and Ethnic Residential Change in Southern European Cities. Oxford: Wiley.
2.
AstburyBLeeuwFL (2010) Unpacking black boxes: Mechanisms and theory building in evaluation. American Journal of Evaluation31(3): 363–381.
3.
BarthonCMonfroyB (2010) Sociospatial schooling practices: A spatial capital approach. Educational Research and Evaluation16(2): 177–196.
4.
BenitoRAlegreMAGonzàlezI (2014) School educational project as a criterion of school choice: Discourses and practices in the city of Barcelona. Journal of Education Policy29(3): 397–420.
5.
BirckmayerJDWeissCH (2000) Theory-based evaluation in practice: What do we learn?Evaluation Review24(4): 407–431.
6.
BonalXBelleiC (eds) (2018) Understanding School Segregation: Patterns, Causes and Consequences of Spatial Inequalities in Education. London: Bloomsbury.
7.
BonalXVergerAZancajoA (2017) Making poor choices? Demand rationalities and school choice in a Chilean local education market. Journal of School Choice11(2): 258–281.
8.
BonalXZancajoA (2018) Demand rationalities in contexts of poverty: Do the Poor respond to market incentives in the same way?International Journal of Educational Development59: 20–27.
9.
BonalXZancajoAScandurraR (2019) Residential segregation and school segregation of foreign students in Barcelona. Urban Studies56(15): 3251–3273.
10.
BonalXZancajoAScandurraR (2021) Student mobility and school segregation in an (un)controlled choice system: A counterfactual approach. British Educational Research Journal47(1): 42–64.
11.
BotermanWR (2021) Socio-spatial Strategies of School Selection in a Free Parental Choice Context. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers. https://doi.org/10.1111/tran.12454
12.
BotermanWR (2018) School segregation in the free school choice context of Dutch cities. In: BonalXBelleiC (eds) Understanding School Segregation: Patterns, Causes and Consequences of Spatial Inequalities in Education. London: Bloomsbury, pp.155–178.
13.
BotermanWR (2020) School choice and school segregation in the context of gentrifying Amsterdam. Housing Studies37(5): 720–741.
14.
BotermanWMusterdSPacchiC, et al. (2019) School segregation in contemporary cities: Socio-spatial dynamics, institutional context and urban outcomes. Urban Studies, 56(15): 3055–3073.
15.
BroccolichiSVan ZantenA (2000) School competition and pupil flight in the urban periphery. Journal of Education Policy15(1): 51–60.
16.
BurgessSGreavesEVignolesA, et al. (2011) Parental choice of primary school in England: What types of school do different types of family really have available to them?Policy Studies32(5): 531–547.
17.
BurgessSGreavesEVignolesA, et al. (2015) What parents want: School preferences and school choice. Economic Journal125(587): 1262–1289.
18.
CantillonE (2017) Broadening the market design approach to school choice. Oxford Review of Economic Policy33(4): 613–634.
19.
CapanoGHowlettM (2021) Causal logics and mechanisms in policy design: How and why adopting a mechanistic perspective can improve policy design. Public Policy and Administration36(2): 141–162.
20.
Consorci d’Educació de Barcelona (2021) Alumnat curs 2020-21. Tots els ensenyaments. Barcelona: Consorci d’Educació de Barcelona.
FélouzisGMaroyCvan ZantenA (2013) Les marchés scolaires. Sociologie d’une politique publique d’éducation, Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.
23.
FjellmanAMYang HansenKBeachD (2019) School choice and implications for equity: The new political geography of the Swedish upper secondary school market. Educational Review71(4): 518–539.
LauderHHughesD (1999) The magic of the market? In: LauderLHughesD (eds) Trading in Future. Why Markets in Education Don’t Work. Buckingham and Philadelphia,PA: Open University Press, pp.4–20.
26.
LeeJLubienskiC (2021) A spatial analysis on charter school access in the New York metropolitan area. Teachers College Record123(2): 1–30.
27.
LubienskiC (2006a) Incentives for school diversification: Competition and promotional patterns in local education markets. Journal of School Choice1(2): 1–31.
28.
LubienskiC (2006b) School diversification in second-best education markets: International evidence and conflicting theories of change. Educational Policy20(2): 323–344.
29.
LubienskiCGulosinoCWeitzelP (2009) School choice and competitive incentives : Mapping the distribution of educational opportunities across local education markets. American Journal of Education115(4): 601–647.
30.
Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional (2019) Sistema estatal de indicadores de la educación. Madrid: Ministerio de Educación y Formación Profesional.
31.
MuellerB (2020) Why public policies fail: Policymaking under complexity. EconomiA, 21(2): 311–323.
32.
ObertiM (2007) Social and school differentiation in urban space: Inequalities and local configurations. Environment and Planning A39(1): 208–227.
33.
OECD (2019) Balancing School Choice and Equity: An International Perspective Based on Pisa. Paris: OECD Publishing.
ReayD (2001) Finding or losing yourself? Working-class relationships to education. Journal of Education Policy16(4): 333–346.
36.
ReayDLuceyH (2004) Stigmatised choices: Social class, social exclusion and secondary school markets in the inner city. Pedagogy, Culture & Society12(1): 35–51.
37.
SaporitoS (2017) Irregularly-shaped school attendance zones and racial integration. Social Science Research64: 299–318.
38.
ScandurraRZancajoABonalX (2021) Opting out of neighbourhood schools: The role of local education markets in student mobility. Population, Space and Place28(5): e2542.
39.
Síndic deGreuges (2016) La segregació escolar a Catalunya. Vol 2: Condicions d’escolarització. Barcelona: Síndic de Greuges.
40.
TammaruTMarcinczakSVan HamM, et al. (2015) Socio-Economic Segregation in European Capital Cities: East Meets West. London: Routledge.
41.
TaylorC (2001) The geography of choice and diversity in the ‘ new ‘ secondary education market in England. Area33(4): 368–381.
42.
TaylorC (2009) Towards a geography of education. Oxford Review of Education35(5): 651–669.
43.
ValenzuelaJPBelleiCRíosD (2014) Socioeconomic school segregation in a market-oriented educational system. The case of Chile. Journal of Education Policy29(2): 217–241.
44.
van ZantenA (2009) Competitive arenas and schools’ logics of action: A European comparison. Compare39(1): 85–98.
45.
VergerABonalXZancajoA (2016) What are the role and impact of public-private partnerships in education? A realist evaluation of the Chilean education Quasi-Market. Comparative Education Review60(2): 223–248.
46.
ViennetRPontB (2017) Education policy implementation: A literature review and proposed framework. OECD Education Working Papers, 162 (December), 63. OECD. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/edu/workingpapers (accessed 2 November 2022).
47.
YoonESLubienskiC (2017) How do marginalized families engage in school choice in inequitable urban landscapes? A critical geographic approach. Education Policy Analysis Archives25(42): 1–22.
48.
ZancajoA (2018) Educational providers in the marketplace: Schools’ marketing responses in Chile. International Journal of Educational Research88: 166–176.
49.
ZancajoABonalX (2022) Education markets and school segregation : A mechanism-based explanation. Compare: A Journal of Comparative and International Education52(8): 1241–1258.
50.
ZancajoAVergerAFontdevilaC (2022) La concertada a debat. Reformes contra les desigualtats educatives des d’una mirada internacional i comparada. Barcelona: Fundació Jaume Bofill.
