Many school districts have recently revised, or tried to revise, their policies for assigning students to schools, because the legal and political status of racial and other kinds of diversity is uncertain, and the districts are facing fiscal austerity. This article presents case studies of politics and student assignment policy in three large school districts: Boston, Massachusetts; Wake County (Raleigh), North Carolina; and Jefferson County (Louisville), Kentucky. In all three districts, there has been pressure to change student-assignment policies in ways that respond to the priorities of White and middle-class populations, with the potential to worsen the options available to students of color. Our case studies reinforce the criticisms of race-neutral politics and policy that have been made by Eduardo Bonilla-Silva and others. Race-neutral politics during fiscal retrenchment tends to reframe privilege as common sense and to obscure some students’ structural disadvantages.
BoboL.KluegelJ. R.SmithR. A. (1997). Laissez-faire racism: The crystallization of a kinder, gentler antiblack ideology. In TuchS. A.MartinJ. K. (Eds.), Racial attitudes in the 1990s: Continuities and changes (pp. 15-41). Westport, CT: Praeger.
6.
BogerJ. C. (2000). Willful colorblindness: The new racial piety and the resegregation of public schools. North Carolina Law Review, 78, 1719-1796.
7.
Bonilla-SilvaE. (2010). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and racial inequality in contemporary America (3rd ed.). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Brief of Walt Sherlin as Amicus Curiae in Support of Respondents, Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, et al. and Crystal D. Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education et al., (Nos. 05-908 & 05-915) (Sp. Ct. 2006).
14.
Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, 347 U.S. 483 (1954).
Capacchione v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, 57. F. Supp. 2d 228, 292 (W.D.N.C. 1999).
19.
ClarkeS. E.HeroR. E.SidneyM. S.FragaL. R.ErlichsonB. A. (2006). Multiethnic moments: The politics of urban education reform. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
20.
ClotfelterC. T. (2004). After Brown: The rise and retreat of school desegregation. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
CummingsS.PriceM. (1997). Race relations and public policy in Louisville: Historical development of an urban underclass. Journal of Black Studies, 27, 615-649.
23.
CunninghamG. K.HuskW. L. (1979, June30). The impact of court-ordered desegregation on student enrollment and residential patterns in the Jefferson County Kentucky Public School District (Final Report). Louisville, KY: Jefferson County Education Consortium.
Eisenberg v Montgomery County Public Schools, 197 F.3d 123 (4th Cir. 1999).
27.
FlinspachS.BanksK. (2005). Moving beyond race: Socioeconomic diversity as a race-neutral approach to desegregation in the Wake County Schools. In BogerJ. C.OrfieldG. (Eds.), School resegregation: Must the South turn back? (pp. 261-280). Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
28.
FrankenbergE.McDermottK. A.DeBrayE.BlankenshipA. (2012, April). The Changing politics of diversity: Lessons from a federal technical assistance grant. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Vancouver, British Columbia.
29.
FrankenbergE.JacobsenR. (2011). Trends–School integration polls. Public Opinion Quarterly, 75, 788-811.
30.
GammG. (1999). Urban exodus: Why the Jews left Boston and the Catholics stayed. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
GrantG. (2009). Hope and despair in the American city: Why there are no bad schools in Raleigh. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
39.
Green v. County School Board of New Kent County, 391 U.S. 430 (1968).
40.
Grutter v. Bollinger, 539 U.S. 306 (2003).
41.
Hampton v. Jefferson County Board of Education, 102 F. Supp. 2d 358, 360 (W.D. Ky. 2000).
42.
Hampton v. Jefferson County Board of Education, 72 F. Supp. 2d 753, 762-765 (W.D. Ky. 1999).
43.
Haney LópezI. F. (1994). The social construction of race: Some observations on illusion, fabrication, and choice. Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review, 29, 1-62.
44.
Harvard University Center for Law and Education. (1972). A study of the Massachusetts Racial Imbalance Act (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Author.
45.
HenigJ. R.HulaR. C.OrrM.PedescleauxD. S. (1999). The color of school reform: Race, politics, and the challenge of urban education. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
HochschildJ. (1984). The new American dilemma: Liberal democracy and school desegregation. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
48.
HochschildJ.ScottB. (1998). Trends: Governance and reform of public education in the United States. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 79-120.
49.
Holley-WalkerD. (2010). After unitary status: Examining voluntary integration strategies for southern school districts. North Carolina Law Review, 88, 877-910.
HuiT. K.GoldsmithT.GarfieldM. (2011, November9). Democrats again control Wake school board. The News & Observer.
58.
Jefferson County Public Schools. (2008). Agenda Item III, May 28, 2008 Board of Education meeting. Louisville, KY: Author.
59.
Jefferson County Public Schools. (2011). 2011-2012 data books. Louisville, KY: Jefferson County Public Schools Department of Accountability, Research and Planning.
60.
KahlenbergR. D. (1996). The remedy: Class, race, and affirmative action. New York, NY: Basic Books.
61.
KahlenbergR. D. (2001). All together now: Creating middle-class schools through public school choice. Washington, DC: Brooking Institution Press.
Kentucky Commission on Human Rights. (1983, May). School and housing desegregation are working together in Louisville and Jefferson County (Staff Report 83-85). Louisville: Author.
69.
Kentucky Education Reform Act. (1990). General Assembly regular session, House Bill 940.
70.
KingD. S.SmithR. M. (2008). Strange bedfellows? Polarized politics? The quest for racial equity in contemporary America. Political Research Quarterly, 61, 686-703.
KurlaenderM.YunJ. (2001). Is diversity a compelling educational interest? Evidence from Louisville. In OrfieldG. (Ed.), Diversity challenged: Evidence on the impact of affirmative action (pp. 111-142). Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Publishing Group.
78.
LevinsonD. J. (1999). Rights essentialism and remedial equilibration. Columbia Law Review, 99, 857-940.
79.
LukasJ. A. (1985). Common ground: A turbulent decade in the lives of three American families. New York, NY: Vintage Books.
80.
MarxA. W. (1998). Making race and nation: A comparison of the United States, South Africa, and Brazil. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
McDermottK. A. (2001). Diversity or desegregation? Implications of arguments for diversity in K-12 and higher education. Educational Policy, 15, 452-473.
84.
McDermottK.A.DebrayE.FrankenbergE. (2012). How does Parents Involved in Community Schools Matter? Legal and Political Influence in Education Politics and Policy.Teachers College Record, 114, 1-39.
85.
McFarland v. Jefferson County Public Schools, 330 F.Supp.2d 834, 839 (W.D. Ky. 2004).
86.
McNealL. R. (2009). The re-segregation of public education now and after the end of Brown v. Board of Education. Education and Urban Society, 41, 562-574.
87.
Meredith v. Jefferson County Board of Education, 551 U.S. 05-915 (2007).
MosesM. S.ChangM. J. (2006). Toward a deeper understanding of the diversity rationale. Educational Researcher, 35, 6-11.
92.
National Association for the Advancement of Colored People. (2010). White paper on the Jefferson County Public Schools Student Assignment Plan. Louisville, KY: Author (Louisville Branch).
93.
National Center for Education Statistics. (2010). Common core of data, public school universe [Data file]. Washington, DC: Author.
Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 551 U.S. 05-908 (2007).
102.
PatashnikE. M. (2008). Reforms at risk: What happens after major policy changes are enacted. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
103.
PortzJ.SteinL.JonesR. R. (1999). City schools and city politics: Institutions and leadership in Pittsburgh, Boston, and St. Louis. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
104.
PrideR. A. (2002). The political use of racial narratives: School desegregation in Mobile, Alabama, 1954-97. Champaign: University of Illinois Press.
RodoskyR.DossettD. (2008). Rethinking diversity: The new vision for student assignment in Jefferson County, KY. Louisville, KY: Jefferson County Public Schools.
107.
Rose v. Council for Better Education, Inc., 790 S.W. 2d 186 (1989).
108.
RossellC. (1991). The carrot or the stick for school desegregation policy: Magnet schools or forced busing. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
109.
SchneiderA. L.IngramH. M. (Eds.). (2005). Deserving and entitled: Social constructions and public policy. Albany: State University of New York Press.
110.
SchneiderM.TeskeP.MarschallM. (2000). Choosing schools: Consumer choice and the quality of American schools. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
SilbermanT. (2002). Wake County schools: A question of balance. In KahlenbergR. (Ed.), Divided we fail (pp. 141-166). New York, NY: Century Foundation.
115.
SmithR. M. (1997). Civic ideals: Conflicting visions of citizenship in U.S. history. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
116.
SmithS. S. (2004). Boom for whom? Education, desegregation, and development in Charlotte. Albany: State University of New York Press.
StoneC. N.HenigJ. R.JonesB. D.PierannunziC. (2001). Building civic capacity: The politics of reforming urban schools. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas.
Tuttle v. Arlington County School Board, 195 F.3d 698 (4th Cir. 1999).
126.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (1975). School desegregation in Boston. Washington, DC: Author.
127.
U.S. Commission on Civil Rights. (1977). The unfinished business: Twenty years later . . . A report submitted to the U.S. Commission on Civil Rights by its fifty-one state advisors. Washington, DC: Author.
128.
U.S. Department of Justice, Civil Rights Division, and U.S. Department of Education, Office of Civil Rights. (2011). Guidance on the voluntary use of race to achieve diversity and avoid racial isolation in elementary and secondary schools. Retrieved from www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/ocr/docs/guidance-ese-201111.html
129.
VaishnavA.TalcottS. (2003, October9). Boston talks about ending school busing. Boston Globe, p. B1.
130.
ValenciaM. (2011, March1). Bias is alleged in school closings. Boston Globe, p. A1.
WellsA. S. (1996). African-American students’ views of choice. In FullerB.ElmoreR.OrfieldG. (Eds.), Who chooses? Who loses? Culture, institutions, and the unequal effects of school choice (pp. 25-49). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
143.
Wessmann v. Gittens, 103 F.3d. 790 (1st Cir. 1998).
144.
WinesM. (1980, May12). Busing: 5 years later. The Courier-Journal, pp. 1, 4.
