The aim of this study was to evaluate the suitability and comprehensibility of the integrated palliative care outcome scale for the evaluation of palliative care needs in patients with heart failure.
Methods and results
This cross-sectional study investigated 100 heart failure patients (40 women, 60 men; median age 79 years) within the first few days of their hospitalisation by applying the integrated palliative care outcome scale (3-day recall period) and two additional self-developed questions about the suitability and comprehensibility of the integrated palliative care outcome scale. Clinically relevant somatic and psycho-emotional symptoms were reported very frequently (approximately 75% each), followed by communicational needs or practical issues. Ninety-five per cent of patients thought the integrated palliative care outcome scale very easy to understand, and 91% judged the integrated palliative care outcome scale suitable to assess palliative care needs.
Conclusion
The integrated palliative care outcome scale was well accepted by hospitalised patients with heart failure and identified a high burden of both physical and psycho-emotional symptoms. Screening for palliative care has to consider patients and their relatives alike, and should be part of a comprehensive care concept jointly integrated into clinical routine by primary and specialised palliative care teams.
StewartSMacIntyreKHoleDJ, et al.
More ‘malignant’ than cancer? Five-year survival following a first admission for heart failure. Eur J Heart Fail2001;
3: 315–322.
2.
AlpertCMSmithMAHummelSL, et al.
Symptom burden in heart failure: assessment, impact on outcomes, and management.Heart Fail Rev2017;
22: 25–39.
3.
DiopMSRudolphJLZimmermanKM, et al.
Palliative care interventions for patients with heart failure: a systematic review and meta-analysis.J Palliat Med2017;
20: 84–92.
4.
CagleJGBuntingMKelemenA, et al.
Psychosocial needs and interventions for heart failure patients and families receiving palliative care support: a systematic review.Heart Fail Rev2017;
22: 565–580.
5.
LuoNRogersJGDodsonGC, et al.
Usefulness of palliative care to complement the management of patients on left ventricular assist devices.Am J Cardiol2016;
118: 733–738.
6.
DatlaSVerberktCAHoyeA, et al.
Multi-disciplinary palliative care is effective in people with symptomatic heart failure: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Palliat Med2019; 33: 1003–1016.
KavalieratosDGelfmanLPTyconLE, et al.
Palliative care in heart failure: rationale, evidence, and future priorities.J Am Coll Cardiol2017;
70: 1919–1930.
9.
JaarsmaTBeattieJMRyderM, et al.
Palliative care in heart failure: a position statement from the palliative care workshop of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.Eur J Heart Fail2009;
11: 433–443.
PonikowskiPVoorsAAAnkerSD, et al.
2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: the Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur J Heart Fail2016;
18: 891–975.
12.
FendlerTJSwetzKMAllenLA.Team-based palliative and end-of-life care for heart failure.Heart Fail Clin2015;
11: 479–498.
13.
Crespo-LeiroMGMetraMLundLH, et al.
Advanced heart failure: a position statement of the Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology.Eur J Heart Fail2018;
20: 1505–1535.
14.
HardingRSelmanLBeynonT, et al.
Meeting the communication and information needs of chronic heart failure patients.J Pain Symptom Manage2008;
36: 149–156.
15.
CampbellRTPetrieMCJacksonCE, et al.
Which patients with heart failure should receive specialist palliative care?Eur J Heart Fail2018;
20: 1338–1347.
16.
FlintKMFaircloughDLSpertusJA, et al.
Does heart failure-specific health status identify patients with bothersome symptoms, depression, anxiety, and/or poorer spiritual well-being?Eur Heart J Quality Care Clin Outcomes2019;
5: 233–241.
17.
LiuLEisenHJ.Epidemiology of heart failure and scope of the problem.Cardiol Clin2014;
32: 1–8; vii.
18.
MadelaireCGustafssonFKristensenSL, et al.
Burden and causes of hospital admissions in heart failure during the last year of life. JACC Heart Fail2019;
7: 561–570.
19.
RogersJGPatelCBMentzRJ, et al.
Palliative care in heart failure: the PAL-HF Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial.J Am Coll Cardiol2017;
70: 331–341.
20.
GarinOHerdmanMVilagutG, et al.
Assessing health-related quality of life in patients with heart failure: a systematic, standardized comparison of available measures.Heart Fail Rev2014;
19: 359–367.
21.
KanePMEllis-SmithCIDavesonBA, et al.
Understanding how a palliative-specific patient-reported outcome intervention works to facilitate patient-centred care in advanced heart failure: a qualitative study.Palliat Med2018;
32: 143–155.
22.
CollinsESWittJBauseweinC, et al.
A systematic review of the use of the palliative care outcome scale and the support team assessment schedule in palliative care.J Pain Symptom Manage2015;
50: 842–853.e819.
23.
HigginsonIJSimonSTBenaliaH, et al.
Which questions of two commonly used multidimensional palliative care patient reported outcome measures are most useful? Results from the European and African PRISMA survey.BMJ Support Palliat Care2012;
2: 36–42.
24.
MurtaghFERamsenthalerCFirthA, et al.
A brief, patient- and proxy-reported outcome measure in advanced illness: validity, reliability and responsiveness of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale (IPOS). Heart Fail Clin 2015; 11: 479–498.
25.
BauseweinCSchildmannERosenbruchJ, et al.
Starting from scratch: implementing outcome measurement in clinical practice.Ann Palliat Med2018;
7: S253–S261.
26.
Leitlinienprogramm Onkologie (Deutsche Krebsgesellschaft, Deutsche Krebshilfe, AWMF). Palliativmedizin für Patienten mit einer nicht-heilbaren Krebserkrankung, Langversion 2.0, 2019, AWMF-Registernummer: 128/001OL, https://www.leitlinienprogramm-onkologie.de/leitlinien/palliativmedizin/ (accessed 20 September 2019).
27.
EtkindSNDavesonBAKwokW, et al.
Capture, transfer, and feedback of patient-centered outcomes data in palliative care populations: does it make a difference? A systematic review.J Pain Symptom Manage2015;
49: 611–624.
28.
MalikFAGyselsMHigginsonIJ.Living with breathlessness: a survey of caregivers of breathless patients with lung cancer or heart failure.Palliat Med2013;
27: 647–656.
29.
KanePMDavesonBARyanK, et al.
Feasibility and acceptability of a patient-reported outcome intervention in chronic heart failure.BMJ Support Palliat Care2017;
7: 470–479.
30.
BauseweinCFeggMRadbruchL, et al.
Validation and clinical application of the German version of the palliative care outcome scale.J Pain Symptom Manage2005;
30: 51–62.
31.
KavalieratosDKamalAHAbernethyAP, et al.
Comparing unmet needs between community-based palliative care patients with heart failure and patients with cancer. J Palliat Med2014;
17: 475–481.
32.
HuiDTitusACurtisT, et al.
Implementation of the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System for symptom distress screening at a community cancer center: a pilot program.The Oncologist2017;
22: 995–1001.
33.
MurtaghFEAddington-HallJMHigginsonIJ.The value of cognitive interviewing techniques in palliative care research.Palliat Med2007;
21: 87–93.
34.
SchildmannEKGroeneveldEIDenzelJ, et al.
Discovering the hidden benefits of cognitive interviewing in two languages: the first phase of a validation study of the Integrated Palliative care Outcome Scale.Palliat Med2016;
30: 599–610.
35.
LindSWallinLFurstCJ, et al.
The integrated palliative care outcome scale for patients with palliative care needs: factors related to and experiences of the use in acute care settings. Palliat Support Care2019; 17: 561–568.
36.
FallerHSteinbuchelTSchowalterM, et al.
[The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) – a new disease-specific quality of life measure for patients with chronic heart failure]. Psychotherapie, Psychosomatik, medizinische Psychologie2005;
55: 200–208.
37.
SchunkMSchulzeFBauseweinC.What constitutes good health care for patients with breathlessness? Perspectives of patients, caregivers, and health care professionals. J Palliat Med2018; 2019; 22: 656–662.
38.
BauseweinCSchunkMSchumacherP, et al.
Breathlessness services as a new model of support for patients with respiratory disease.Chronic Respirat Dis2018;
15: 48–59.
39.
LuttikMLJaarsmaTMoserD, et al.
The importance and impact of social support on outcomes in patients with heart failure: an overview of the literature.J Cardiovasc Nursing2005;
20: 162–169.
40.
StromAAndersenKLKorneliussenK, et al.
Being “on the alert” and “a forced volunteer”: a qualitative study of the invisible care provided by the next of kin of patients with chronic heart failure.J Multidiscipl Healthcare2015;
8: 271–277.
41.
HamidouZBaumstarckKChinotO, et al.
Domains of quality of life freely expressed by cancer patients and their caregivers: contribution of the SEIQoL.Health Qual Life Outcomes2017;
15: 99.
42.
MatlabiHAhmadzadehS.Evaluation of individual quality of life among hemodialysis patients: nominated themes using SEIQoL-adapted.Patient Prefer Adher2017;
11: 1–9.
43.
ChangPP.The last year in patients with heart failure: more than just heart.JACC Heart Fail2019;
7: 571–573.
44.
O’DonnellAESchaeferKGStevensonLW, et al.
Social Worker-Aided Palliative Care Intervention in High-risk Patients With Heart Failure (SWAP-HF): a pilot randomized clinical trial. JAMA Cardiol2018;
3: 516–519.
45.
CavanaghCE.Quality of life in heart failure: screening alone is insufficient.Eur Heart J Quality Care Clin Outcomes2019;
5: 191–192.
46.
ZiehmJFarinESchaferJ, et al.
Palliative care for patients with heart failure: facilitators and barriers – a cross sectional survey of German health care professionals.BMC Health Serv Res2016;
16: 361.
47.
KavalieratosDMitchellEMCareyTS, et al.
“Not the ‘grim reaper service’”: an assessment of provider knowledge, attitudes, and perceptions regarding palliative care referral barriers in heart failure.J Am Heart Assoc2014;
3: e000544.
