Social media is a rapidly expanding set of technology tools that people use to communicate, learn, interact, document, create, and participate in societies worldwide. It is also transforming how social work, among other professions, conducts qualitative research. This study outlines a field-tested method used to analyze data from Reddit, a major social media platform used by 6% of online adults in the United States. It provides a step-by-step account of a Reddit-based qualitative thematic analysis from a social work heuristic lens on the subject of poverty. To our knowledge, no such account of mining social media big data from Reddit for social work practice exists in the literature. Philosophical, ethical, and practical considerations of this method are discussed.
Back MD, Stopfer JM, Vazire S, et al. (2010) Facebook profiles reflect actual personality, not self-idealization. Psychological Science 21(3): 372–374.
4.
BakerSWarburtonJHodgkinSet al.(2014) Reimagining the relationship between social work and information communication technology in the network society. Australian Social Work67(4): 467–478.
5.
BazeleyPJacksonK (2013) Qualitative Data Analysis With NVivo, London, UK: Sage.
6.
BestPManktelowRTaylorBJ (2016) Social work and social media: Online help-seeking and the mental well- being of adolescent males. British Journal of Social Work46(1): 257–276.
7.
BranthwaiteAPattersonS (2011) The power of qualitative research in the era of social media. Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal14(4): 430–440.
8.
BraunVClarkeV (2006) Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology3(2): 77–101.
9.
BredlKHunnigerJJensenJ (2012) Methods for analyzing social media: Introduction to the special issue. Journal of Technology in Human Services30: 141–144.
10.
Brennan C, Swartout K, Cook S, et al. (2016) A qualitative analysis of offenders’ emotional responses to perpetrating sexual assault. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment. 30(4): 393–412.
11.
BreyetteSHillK (2015) The impact of electronic communication and social media on child welfare practice. Journal of Technology in Human Services33(4): 283–303.
12.
BroadhurstK (2016) Innovation in social work research. Qualitative Social Work15(1): 3–10.
13.
CalvinAJBellmoreAXuJMet al.(2015) #bully: Uses of hashtags in posts about bullying on Twitter. Journal of School Violence14(1): 133–153.
14.
ChanCHoloskoM (2016) The utilization of social media for youth outreach engagement. Qualitative Social Work. 16(5): 680–697.
15.
ChongESKZhangYMakWWSet al.(2015) Social media as social capital of LGB individuals in Hong Kong: Its relations with group membership, stigma, and mental well-being. American Journal of Community Psychology55: 228–238.
16.
ChouWYSHuntYFolkersAet al.(2011) Cancer survivorship in the age of YouTube and social media: A narrative analysis. Journal of Medical Internet Research13(1): e7.
17.
Coulton CJ, Goerge R, Putnam-Hornstein E, et al. (2015) Harnessing big data for social good: A grand challenge for social work. American Academy of Social Work and Social Welfare. Working Paper No. 11.
18.
Cukier K (2010) Data, data everywhere: A special report on managing information. Economist Newspaper.
19.
del Fresno GarcíaMLopez PeláezA (2014) Social work and netnography: The case of Spain and generic drugs. Qualitative Social Work13(1): 85–107.
20.
Denef S, Bayerl PS and Kaptein NA (2013) Social media and the police: tweeting practices of British police forces during the August 2011 riots. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on human factors in computing systems, Austin, TX, USA, pp. 3471–3480. ACM.
21.
DriskoJW (2013) Qualitative data analysis software. In: FortuneAEReidWJ (eds) Qualitative Research in Social Work, New York, NY: Columbia University Press, pp. 284–306.
EllisonNBSteinfieldCLampeC (2007) The benefits of Facebook “friends”: Social capital and college students’ use of online social network sites. Journal of Computer Mediated Communication12(4): 1143–1168.
FeredayJMuir-CochraneE (2006) Demonstrating rigor using thematic analysis: A hybrid approach of inductive and deductive coding and theme development. International Journal of Qualitative Methods5(1): 80–92.
26.
GigliettoFRossiLBennatoD (2012) The open laboratory: Limits and possibilities of using Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube as a research data source. Journal of Technology in Human Services30: 145–159.
27.
Greenwood S, Perrin A and Duggan M (2016) Social media update 2016: Facebook usage and engagement is on the rise, while adoption of other platforms holds steady. Pew Research Center. Available at: http://www.pewinternet.org/2016/11/11/social-media-update-2016/ (accessed 8 August 2017).
28.
GoldkindL (2015) Social media and social service: Are nonprofits plugged in to the digital age?Human Service Organizations: Management, Leadership, & Governance39(4): 380–396.
29.
GreenhowSHackettSJonesCet al.(2017) Adoptive family experiences of post-adoption contact in an Internet era. Child and Family Social Work22: 44–52.
30.
GuoCSaxtonGD (2014) Tweeting social change: How social media are changing nonprofit advocacy. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly43(1): 57–79.
31.
HaralabopoulosGAnagnostopoulosIZeadallyS (2015) Lifespan and propagation of information in on-line social networks: A case study based on Reddit. Journal of Network and Computer Applications56: 88–100.
32.
Eun-OkICheeW (2006) An online forum as a qualitative research method: Practical issues. Nursing Research55(4): 267–273.
33.
HoloskoM (2006) Primer for Critiquing Social Research: A Student Guide, Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole.
34.
Holosko M (2017) A Knowledge-Building Journey Assessing the Existence of a Culture of Research in Social Work Versus Psychology Using the h-Index: Secondary data challenges. Sage Research Methods Cases, Part 2. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4135/9781473993570
35.
HongJSLeeJEspelageDLet al.(2016) Understanding the correlates of face-to-face and cyberbullying victimization among US adolescents: a social-ecological analysis. Violence and victims31(4): 638–663.
HussainMLiJEllisLet al.(2015) Moderator assistant: A natural language generation-based intervention to support mental health via social media. Journal of Technology in Human Services33(4): 304–329.
38.
HutchinsonMJacksonD (2014) Troubling fragments and small stories: An analysis of public commentary on nursing through a web blog. Collegian21(2): 81–88.
39.
JanssensACJWKraftP (2012) Research conducted using data obtained through online communities: Ethical implications of methodological limitations. PLoS Medicine9(10): e1001328.
40.
JohnsenJKSteinsvikOOGammonD (2003) Health-care professionals’ participation in an online discussion forum: The impact on structure, content and interaction. Journal of Technology in Human Services22(2): 31–44.
41.
JürgensP (2012) Communities of communication: Making sense of the “social” in social media. Journal of Technology in Human Services30: 186–203.
42.
KitchinHA (2002) The Tri-Council on cyberspace: Insights, oversights, and extrapolations. In: Van den HoonaardWC (ed.) Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers, Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
43.
KramerADGuilloryJEHancockJT (2014) Experimental evidence of massive-scale emotional contagion through social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences111(24): 8788–8790.
44.
Lincoln YS and Guba EG (1985) Naturalistic Inquiry. Thousand Oaks, CA; Sage.
45.
MarzialiE (2006) Developing evidence for an Internet-based psychotherapeutic group intervention. Journal of Evidence-Based Social Work3(3/4): 149–165.
46.
MoylanCDerrALindhorstT (2015) Increasingly mobile: How new technologies can enhance qualitative research. Qualitative Social Work14(1): 36–47.
47.
NeigerBLThackerayRBurtonSH (2013) Use of Twitter among local health departments: An analysis of information sharing, engagement, and action. Journal of Medical Internet Research15(8): e177.
48.
Oh O, Kwon KH and Rao HR (2010) An exploration of social media in extreme events: Rumor theory and Twitter during the Haiti earthquake 2010. In: International conference on information systems, St. Louis, MO, p. 231.
49.
PattonDUEschmannRDButlerDA (2013) Internet banging: New trends in social media, gang violence, masculinity and hip hop. Computers in Human Behavior29(5): A54–A59.
50.
PattonDUEschmannRDElsaesserCet al.(2016) Sticks, stones and Facebook accounts: What violence outreach workers know about social media and urban-based gang violence in Chicago. Computers in Human Behavior65: 591–600.
51.
PattonDUHongJSRanneyMet al.(2014) Social media as a vector for youth violence: A review of the literature. Computers in Human Behavior35: 548–553.
52.
PaulusTLesterJDempsterP (2014) Digital Tools for Qualitative Research, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
53.
Paulus T (2016) Personal communication.
54.
Purser G and Caplan MA [names blinded for review] (2017) The experience of poverty: A thematic analysis of social media. Presented at the Society for Social Work Research. New Orleans, LA.
55.
QSR International Pty Ltd (2012) NVivo qualitative data analysis software, Version 10.
RosettaMWebberW (2012) The dance of disclosure: Online self-disclosure of sexual assault. Qualitative Social Work12(6): 799–815.
58.
RuckdeschelRShawI (2013) Reflections on editing a qualitative journal. Qualitative Social Work12(6): 750–764.
59.
RyanGRBernandHS (2003) Techniques to identify themes. Field Methods15(1): 85–109.
60.
SageMSageT (2016) Social media and e-professionalism in child welfare: Policy and practice. Journal of Public Child Welfare10(1): 79–95.
61.
Schrum L (1995) Framing the debate: Ethical research in the information age. Qualitative Inquiry 1(3): 311–326.
62.
SimpsonJ (2013) A divergence of opinion: How those involved in child and family social work are responding to the challenges of the Internet and social media. Child and Family Social Work21(1): 94–102.
63.
Sharf BF (1999) Beyond netiquette: The ethics of doing naturalistic discourse research on the Internet. In: Jones S (ed.) Doing Internet research: Critical Issues and Methods for Examining the Net. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 243–257.
64.
SmithBG (2010) Socially distributing public relations: Twitter, Haiti, and interactivity in social media. Public Relations Review36(4): 329–335.
StruikLLBaskervilleNB (2014) The role of Facebook in Crush the Crave, a mobile- and social media-based smoking cessation intervention: qualitative framework analysis of posts. Journal of Medical Internet Research16(7): e170.
67.
SunderlandNChenowethLMatthewsNet al.(2014) 1000 Voices: Reflective online multimodal narrative inquiry as a research methodology for disability research. Qualitative Social Work14(1): 48–64.
68.
SwirskyESHoopJGLabbottS (2014) Using social media in research: New ethics for a new meme?American Journal of Bioethics14(10): 60–61.
69.
ThomasDR (2006) A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. American Journal of Evaluation27(2): 237–246.
70.
TuckettAG (2005) Applying thematic analysis theory to practice: A researcher’s experience. Contemporary Nurse19(1–2): 75–87.
71.
Van DijckJ (2013) The culture of connectivity: A critical history of social media, New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
WaruszynskiBT (2002) Pace of technological change: Battling ethical issues in qualitative research. In: Van den HoonaardWC (ed.) Walking the Tightrope: Ethical Issues for Qualitative Researchers, Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
74.
WeisbuchMIvcevicZAmbadyN (2009) On being liked on the web and in the “real world”: Consistency in first impressions across personal webpages and spontaneous behavior. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology45: 573–576.
75.
WeningerT (2014) An exploration of submissions and discussions in social news: Mining the collective intelligence of Reddit. Social Network Analysis and Mining4(1): 1–19.
76.
World Bank (2015) Internet users (per 100 people): International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication/ICT Development report and database, and World Bank estimates. Available at: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/IT.NET.USER.P2?page=6&cid=GPD_44 (accessed 8 August 2017).
