This article examines the use of a conceptual framework informed by intersectionality in a study of women’s participation in the Welfare Rights Movement occurring in the United States from 1964–1972. The author explores how the participants’ and the researcher’s status as insiders and/or outsiders within the movement based on race, class, and gender interacted within the overall research process. The different ways that insider/outsider status was reflected in the cross-class, cross-race social movement work of the participants is explored. The usefulness of this framework and approach to exploring the sometimes shifting statuses of insider/outsider within the research process itself is also examined.
BestAL (2003) Doing race in the context of feminist interviewing: Constructing whiteness through talk. Qualitative Inquiry9(6): 895–914.
5.
BloomLB (1997) Locked in uneasy sisterhood: Reflections on feminist methodology and research relations. Anthropology & Education Quarterly28(1): 111–122.
6.
CollinsPH (1993) Toward a new vision: Race, class, and gender as categories of analysis and connection. Race, Sex, & Class1(1): 591–605.
7.
DeutschNL (2004) Positionality and the pen: Reflections on the process of becoming a feminist researcher and writer. Qualitative Inquiry10(6): 885–902.
8.
GluckSBPataiD (1991) Introduction. In: GluckSBPataiD (eds) Women’s Words: The Practice of Oral History. New York: Routledge, 1–7.
9.
HulkoW (2009) The time-and-context-contingent nature of intersectionality and interlocking oppressions. Affilia: Journal of Women in Social Work24(1): 44–55.
10.
KirschGE (1999) Ethical Dilemmas in Feminist Research: The Politics of Location, Interpretation, and Publication. New York: State University of New York Press.
11.
KotzNKotzML (1977) A Passion for Equality: George Wiley and the Movement. New York: W. W. Norton and Company.
12.
MilesMBHubermanAM (1994) Qualitative Data Analysis. Thousand Oaks, California: SAGE Publications.
13.
NaplesN (1996) The outsider phenomenon. In: SmithCDKornblumW (eds) In the Field: Readings on the Field Research Experience. Westport, CT: Praeger, 139–149.
14.
NaplesN (2003) The insider/outsider debate: A feminist revisiting. Feminism and Method: Ethnography, Discourse Analysis, and Activist Research. New York: Routledge, 49–66.
15.
OakleyA (1981) Interviewing women: A contradiction in terms. In: RobertsH (ed.) Doing Feminist Research. New York: Routledge, 30–61.
16.
PerksRThomsonA (1998) Critical developments: Introduction. The Oral History Reader. London: Routledge, 1–8.
17.
PhoenixA (1995) Practising feminist research: The intersection of gender and race in the research process. In: MaynardMPurvisJ (eds) Researching Women’s Lives From a Feminist Perspective. New York: Taylor & Francis, 49–71.
18.
ReayD (1996) Dealing with difficult differences: Reflexivity and social class in feminist research. Feminism & Psychology6(3): 443–456.
19.
SangsterJ (1998) Telling our stories: Feminist debates in the use of oral history. In: PerksRThomsonA (eds) The Oral History Reader. London: Routledge, 87–100.
20.
SilvermanD (2000) Doing Qualitative Research: A Practical Handbook. London: SAGE.
21.
WeberL (2001) Defining contested concepts. Understanding Race, Class, Gender, and Sexuality: A Conceptual Framework. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill.
22.
WestG (1981) The National Welfare Rights Movement: The Social Protest of Poor Women. New York: Praeger.
