The discussion and debates regarding researcher’s insider–outsider role in qualitative methodologies is not new in Western academia. But it remains to be ascertained and subjected to sustained analysis within Chinese sociological studies. This article addresses the influence of the relation-oriented nature of Chinese culture on researcher’s identity in qualitative methodologies that require reflexivity. Confucianism considers proper human relationships as the basis of society and assumes that man exists in relationship to others. Considering such cultural characteristics, I analyzed the interactions between my interpersonal relationships with the research participants and my professional status in the fieldwork. I also uncovered how I moved from seeing myself as an insider to reconceptualizing the researcher-researched relationship as a dynamic one. This article maintains that a researcher’s identity in Chinese context is subject to constant negotiation and re-negotiation through interaction between researcher and research participants as the research process proceeds.
Al-MakhamrehSSLewando-HundtG (2008) Researching “at home” as an insider/outsider: Gender and culture in an ethnographic study of social work practice in an Arab society. Qualitative Social Work7(1): 9–23.
2.
BanksJA (1998) The lives and values of researchers: Implications for educating citizens in a multicultural society. Educational Researcher27(7): 4–17.
3.
BarriballKLWhileA (1994) Collecting data using a semi-structured interview: A discussion paper. Journal of Advanced Nursing19(2): 328–335.
4.
BondMH (1991) Beyond the Chinese Face: Insights from Psychology, Hong Kong: Oxford University Press.
5.
BondMHHwangKK (1986) The Social Psychology of Chinese People, New York: Oxford University Press.
6.
BondMHWangS (1981) Aggressive behaviour in Chinese society: The problem of maintaining order and harmony. Acta Psychologica Taiwanica23(1): 57–73.
7.
BrayboyBMDeyhleD (2000) Insider-outsider: Researchers in American Indian communities. Theory Into Practice39(3): 163–169.
8.
BreenLJ (2007) The researcher “in the middle”: Negotiating the insider/outsider dichotomy. The Australian Community Psychologist19(1): 163–174.
9.
BridgesW (2001) The Way of Transition: Embracing Life's Most Difficult Moments, London: Da Capo Press.
10.
ChanKL (2006) The Chinese concept of face and violence against women. International Social Work49(1): 65–73.
11.
ChenXM (1997) “Insider” and “outsider” in qualitative research. Sociological Studies6: 80–89.
12.
DhunpathR (2000) Life history methodology: “Narradigm” regained. International Journal of Qualitative Studies in Education13(5): 543–551.
13.
DowlingM (2006) Approaches to reflexivity in qualitative research. Nurse Researcher13(3): 7–21.
14.
ErgunAErdemirA (2010) Negotiating insider and outsider identities in the field: “Insider” in a foreign land; “Outsider” in one’s own land. Field Methods22(1): 16–38.
15.
FinlayL (2002) “Outing” the researcher: The provenance, process, and practice of reflexivity. Qualitative Health Research12(4): 531–545.
16.
FoutsJTChanJC (1995) Confucius, Mao and modernization: Social studies education in the People’s Republic of China. Journal of curriculum studies27(5): 523–543.
17.
GaoG (1996) Self and other: A Chinese perspective on interpersonal relationships. In: GudykunstWBNishidaSTing-ToomeyS (eds) Communication in Personal Relationships Across Cultures, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp. 81–101.
18.
GriffithAI (1998) Insider/outsider: Epistemological privilege and mothering work. Human Studies21(4): 361–376.
19.
GuilleminMGillamL (2004) Ethics, reflexivity, and “ethically important moments” in research. Qualitative Inquiry10(2): 261–280.
20.
HammersleyMAtkinsonP (1995) Ethnography: Principles in Practice, London: Routledge.
21.
HellawellD (2006) Inside–out: Analysis of the insider–outsider concept as a heuristic device to develop reflexivity in students doing qualitative research. Teaching in Higher Education11(4): 483–494.
22.
HoDYF (1976) On the concept of face. American Journal of Sociology81(4): 867–884.
23.
HofstedeGH (1980) Culture’s Consequences: International Differences in Work-related Values, Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
24.
HwangKK (1987) Face and favour: The Chinese power game. American Journal of Sociology92(4): 944–974.
25.
HwangKK (1988) Power Games of the Chinese People, Taipei: Jiu Liu Tu Shu Co.
26.
HwangKK (2006) Moral face and social face: Contingent self-esteem in Confucian society. International Journal of Psychology41(4): 276–281.
27.
JacobsLGaoGPHerbigP (1995) Confucian roots in China: A force for today’s business. Management Decision33(10): 29–34.
28.
JenkinsR (2008) Social Identity, 3rd ed. London: Routledge.
29.
JosselsonRELieblichAE (1993) The Narrative Study of LivesVol. 1. London: Sage Publications.
30.
KanuhaVK (2000) “Being” native verse “going native”: Conducting social work research as an insider. Social Work45(5): 439–447.
31.
KatyalKRKingM (2011) “Outsiderness” and “insiderness” in a Confucian society: Complexity of contexts. Comparative Education47(3): 327–341.
32.
MertonRK (1972) Insiders and outsiders: A chapter in the sociology of knowledge. American Journal of Sociology78(1): 9–47.
33.
OriolaTHaggertyKD (2012) The ambivalent insider/outsider status of academic ‘homecomers’: Observations on identity and field research in the Nigerian Delta. Sociology46(3): 540–548.
34.
ReinharzS (1997) Who am I? The need for a variety of selves in the field. In: HertzR (ed.) Reflexivity and Voice, London: Sage, pp. 3–20.
ShenkarORonenS (1987) The cultural context of negotiations: The implications of Chinese interpersonal norms. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science23(2): 263–275.
37.
SherifB (2001) The ambiguity of boundaries in the fieldwork experience: Establishing rapport and negotiating insider/outsider status. Qualitative Inquiry7(4): 436–447.
38.
TakedaA (2012) Reflexivity: Unmarried Japanese male interviewing married Japanese women about international marriage. Qualitative Research13(3): 285–298.
39.
van HeugtenK (2004) Managing insider research: Learning from experience. Qualitative Social Work3(2): 203–219.
40.
WillotS (1998) An outsider within: A feminist doing research with men. In: HenwoodKGriffinCPhoenixA (eds) Standpoints and Differences, London: Sage, pp. 174–190.
41.
YangZF (1989) A discussion about the localization of Chinese experimental social psychology. Journal of Guangzhou Normal University2: 18–31.
42.
YumJO (1988) The impact of Confucianism on interpersonal relationships and communication patterns in East Asia. Communication Monographs55(4): 374–388.
43.
ZhaiXW (2011) Perspectives on Chinese “Face”: Psychological Motives and Social Representations, Peking, China: Peking University Press.
