This article explores the relationships among social work, feminist theory and ethnography in the context of social work research. The discussion reflects my research in the southeastern Caribbean. There are similarities between clinical social work and ethnographic research: both actively observing the actions of individuals and talking with them to gain an understanding of their lives from their own perspective. Two constructs generated from postmodern and post-colonial feminist scholarship served as cornerstones for this research, contextual diversity and reciprocity. These elements are also embedded in the ethnographic tradition and in the core mandates for social work practice. This writing provides a deconstruction of these concepts, discusses their grounding in the three disciplines, and illustrates their application in the research study through specific examples. The intersection of the traditions of social work, ethnography, and feminism were found to create a valuable research method that is especially compatible with social work research.
Abramovitz, M. (1996) Regulating the Lives of Women. Boston, MA: South End Press.
2.
Agar, M.H. (1980) The Professional Stranger: An Informal Introduction to Ethnography. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
3.
Archer, J. (2006) `Survival Strategies of African Caribbean Women Heads of Household', Dissertation Abstracts International67(02), 716A. (UMI No. 3207892)
4.
Atkinson, P. and Hammersley, M. (1994) `Ethnography and Participant Observation', in Norman K. Denzin and Yvonna S. Lincoln (eds) Handbook of Qualitative Research . Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
5.
Chowdry, G. (1995) `Engendering Development?: Women in Development (WID) in International Development Regimes', in M. H. Marchand and J. L. Parpart (eds) Feminism, Postmodernism, Development. London : Routledge.
6.
Creswell, J.W. (1998) Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
7.
Cronk, L. (2000) `Reciprocity and the Power of Giving', in J. Spradley and D. W. McCurdy (eds) Conformity and Conflict: Readings in Cultural Anthropology, 10th edn. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
8.
England, K.V.L. (1994) `Getting Personal: Reflexivity, Positionality, and Feminist Research', Professional Geographer46(1): 80-9.
9.
Heyzer, N. (ed.) (1995) A Commitment to the World's Women: Perspectives on Development for Beijing and Beyond. New York: UNIFEM.
10.
Higginbottom, G.M.A. and Serrant-Green, L. (2005) `Developing Culturally Sensitive Skills in Health and Social Care with a Focus on Conducting Research with African Caribbean Communities in England', The Qualitative Report10(4): 662-86, http://www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR10-4/higginbottom/pdf (consulted Nov. 2007).
11.
Hoffman, E.A. (2007) `Open-ended Interviews, Power, and Emotional Labor' , Journal of Contemporary Ethnography36(3): 318-46.
12.
Lawless, E.J. (1992) `Negotiating Interpretive Differences between Ethnographers and Subjects', Journal of American Folklore105: 302-14.
13.
Malinowski, B. (1950) Argonauts of the Western Pacific: An Account of Native Enterprise and Adventure in the Archipelagoes of Melanesian New Guinea . New York: E. P. Dutton.
14.
Massiah, J. (1983) Women as Heads of Household in the Caribbean: Family Structure and Feminine Status. Paris: UNESCO.
15.
Mishna, F. and Rasmussen, B. (2001) `The Learning Relationship: Working through in the Classroom', Clinical Social Work Journal29(4): 387-99.
16.
Mohanty, C.T. (1991) `Under Western Eyes: Feminist Scholarship and Colonial Discourses', in C. T. Mohanty, A. Russo and L. Torres (eds) Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
17.
Naples, N.A. (2000) `Standpoint Epistemology and the Uses of Self-Reflection in Feminist Ethnography: Lessons for Rural Sociology', Rural Sociology65(2): 194-214.
18.
Naples, N.A. (2003) Feminism and Method: Ethnography, Discourse Analysis, and Activist Research. New York: Routledge.
19.
Reinharz, S. (1992) Feminist Methods in Social Research. New York: Oxford University Press.
20.
Schwalbe, M.L. and Wolkomir, M. (2002) `Interviewing Men', in J. F. Gubrium and J. A. Holstein (eds) Handbook of Interview Research, pp. 203-19. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
21.
Sewpaul, V. (2006) `The Global-local Dialectic: Challenges for African Scholarship and Social Work in a Post-colonial World', British Journal of Social Work36: 419-34.
22.
Smale, G., Tuson, G. and Statham, D. (2000) Social Work and Social Problems: Working toward Social Inclusion and Social Change. Basingstoke: Macmillan.
23.
Spradley, J.P. (1979) The Ethnographic Interview. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
24.
Spradley, J.P. and McCurdy, D.W. (2000) `Culture and the Contemporary World', in J. P. Spradley and D. W. McCurdy (eds) Conformity and Conflict: Readings in Cultural Anthropology. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
25.
Stake, R.E. (1995) The Art of Case Study. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE.
26.
Terborg-Penn, R. (1995) `Through an African Feminist Theoretical Lens: Viewing Caribbean Women's History Cross-Culturally', in V. A. Shepherd, B. Brereton and B. Bailey (eds) Engendering History: Caribbean Women in Historical Perspective. New York: St. Martin's Press.
27.
Vigouroux, C.B. (2007) `Trans-scription as a Social Activity: An Ethnographic Approach', Ethnography8(1): 61-99.
28.
Wasserfall, R.R. (1997) `Reflexivity, Feminism, and Difference', in R. Hertz (ed.) Reflexivity and Voice. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE .
29.
World Bank (2000) World Development Report 2000/2001: Attacking Poverty. New York: Oxford University Press.
