OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect on intubation success of different bent lengths of a lightwand (a malleable illuminating stylet used for intubation), based on the patient's thyroid prominence-to-mandibular angle distance (TMD), thyroid prominence-to-incisor distance (TID) and gender. METHODS: This prospective, randomized, blinded study included patients undergoing elective surgery. In group A, the bent length was determined based on the patient's gender. In groups B and C, the bent length was calculated according to the patient's TMD or TID, respectively. Intubation success rate, time required for intubation, haemodynamics and complications postintubation were documented. RESULTS: A total of 246 patients were recruited and randomly assigned to one of the study groups. There were no significant differences in number of intubation attempts and success rate among the three groups. The mean time required for intubation was significantly shorter in group A than in the other groups. There were no major complications in any group. CONCLUSIONS: Gender-determined bent length was more suitable for lightwand-guided intubation than TID or TMD. For most patients, the optimal bent length was in the range of 6.0 – 6.9 cm.
RagazziRFinessiLFarinelliI: LMA Supreme™ vs i-gel™—a comparison of insertion success in novices. Anaesthesia2012; 67: 384–388.
2.
DyerRAJamesMFButwickAJ: The Proseal laryngeal mask airway and elective caesarean section. Anaesth Intensive Care2011; 39: 760–761.
3.
CaldiroliDCortellazziP: A new difficult airway management algorithm based upon the EI Ganzouri risk index and GlideScope® videolaryngoscope. A new look for intubation?Minerva Anestesiol2011; 77: 1011–1017.
4.
ChandraDBSavoldelliGLJooHS: Fiberoptic oral intubation: the effect of model fidelity on training for transfer to patient care. Anaesthesiology2008; 109: 1007–1013.
5.
Van ZundertAAPietersBM: Combined technique using videolaryngoscopy and Bonfils for a difficult airway intubation. Br J Anaesth2012; 108: 327–328.
6.
SprungJWrightLCDilgerJ: Use of WuScope for exchange of endotracheal tube in a patient with difficult airway. Laryngoscope2003; 113: 1082–1084.
7.
RichJMMasonAMTillmannHA: Rescue ventilation: resolving a “cannot mask ventilate, cannot intubate” situation during exchange of a Combitube for a definitive airway. AANA J2009; 77: 339–342.
8.
HungORStewartRD: Lightwand intubation: I—a new lightwand device. Can J Anaesth1995; 42: 820–825.
9.
ChenWHSuHPChiuYH: A two-stage approach to positioning and identification of tracheal intubation using LED-based lightwand and acoustic models. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc2008; 2008: 4883–4886.
10.
JeonYTLimYJNaHS: A double bending lightwand can provide more successful endotracheal intubation in patients with a short thyromental distance: A prospective randomised study. Eur J Anaesthesiol2011; 28: 651–654.
11.
KuoYWYenMKChengKI: Lightwand-guided endotracheal intubation performed by the nondominant hand is feasible. Kaohsiung J Med Sci2007; 23: 504–510.
12.
YamamuraHYamamotoTKamiyamaM: Device for blind nasal intubation. Anesthesiology1959; 20: 221.
13.
Practice guidelines for management of the difficult airway. A report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. Anesthesiology1993; 78: 597–602.
14.
HungORPytkaSMorrisI: Clinical trial of a new lightwand device (Trachlight) to intubate the trachea. Anesthesiology1995; 83: 509–514.
EllisDGJakymecAKaplanRM: Guided orotracheal intubation in the operating room using a lighted stylet: A comparison with direct laryngoscopic technique. Anesthesiology1986; 64: 823–826.
17.
HirabayashiYHirutaMKawakamiT: Effects of lightwand (Trachlight) compared with direct laryngoscopy on circulatory responses to tracheal intubation. Br J Anaesth1998; 81: 253–255.
18.
BernsSDPatelRIChamberlainJM: Oral intubation using a lighted stylet vs direct laryngoscopy in older children with cervical immobilization. Acad Emerg Med1996; 3: 34–40.
19.
DjordjevicD: Trachlight™—learning tips. Can J Anaesth1999; 46: 615.
20.
XueFSYangQYLiaoX: Lightwand guided intubation in paediatric patients with a known difficult airway: A report of four cases. Anaesthesia2008; 63: 520–525.
21.
ChenTHTsaiSKLinCJ: Does the suggested lightwand bent length fit every patient? The relation between bent length and patient's thyroid prominence-to-mandibular angle distance. Anesthesiology2003; 98: 1070–1076.
AgròFHungORCataldoR: Lightwand intubation using the Trachlight™: A brief review of current knowledge. Can J Anaesth2001; 48: 592–599.
24.
Fitz-HenryJ: The ASA classification and perioperative risk. Ann R Coll Surg Engl2011; 93: 185–187.
25.
ZonatoALMartinhoFLBittencourtLR: Head and neck physical examination: comparison between nonapneic and obstructive sleep apnea patients. Laryngoscope2005; 115: 1030–1034.
StoutDMBishopMJDwerstegJF: Correlation of endotracheal tube size with sore throat and hoarseness following general anesthesia. Anesthesiology1987; 67: 419–421.
28.
XueFSLiuJHLiaoX: A modified technique for lightwand-guided nasotracheal intubation. J Clin Anesth2010; 22: 223–224.
29.
SalibaDL2ndMillerSAReynoldsJE: A novel technique for learning to intubate with the lightwand. Eur J Anaesthesiol2009; 26: 1093–1094.
30.
NishiyamaTMatsukawaTHanaokaK: Optimal length and angle of a new lightwand device (Trachlight™). J Clin Anesth1999; 11: 332–335.
31.
WongSYCoskunfiratNDHeeHI: Factors influencing time of intubation with a lightwand device in patients without known airway abnormality. J Clin Anesth2004; 16: 326–331.
32.
XueFSHeNLiaoX: Clinical assessment of awake endotracheal intubation using the lightwand technique alone in patients with difficult airways. Chin Med J (Engl)2009; 122: 408–415.
