How do planners engage with the diverse temporalities that shape deliberative processes? Crucially, how might they address the hidden conflicts that this diversity can lead to? This paper advances what we term ‘the Temporal Deliberation Approach’, a flexible lens through which deliberative practitioners can identify new avenues for working with the multiple temporalities that participants bring to deliberative processes. Developed from observations from two planning cases, the Approach is informed by critical temporal scholarship, alongside emerging temporal scholarship from within the planning literature. We introduce a set of key processes and three capacities – temporal multi-layeredness, temporal empathy and temporal flexibility – which we argue can enhance pluralistic integrative deliberations.
AdamB (1990) Time and Social Theory. Cambridge: Polity.
2.
AdamB (1998). Timescapes of Modernity: The Environment and Invisible Hazards. London: Routledge.
3.
BastianM (2014a) Time and community: A scoping study. Time & Society23(2): 137–166.
4.
BastianM (2014b) Interview with Ruth Ben-Tovim. Temporal Belongings Interview Series: Time and Community Development. No. 1: 1-9. Available from:https://www.temporalbelongings.org/interview-series.html (accessed 8 September 2023).
5.
BirthKK (2004) Finding time: Studying the concepts of time used in daily life. Field Methods16(1): 70-84.
6.
BramallR (2011) Dig for victory! Anti-consumerism, austerity and new historical subjectivities. Subjectivity4: 68-86.
7.
BuchananABastianM (2015) Activating the archive: rethinking the role of traditional archives for local activist projects. Archival Science15: 429–251.
8.
ConnellDJ (2009). Planning and its orientation to the future. International Planning Studies14(1): 85–98.
9.
ChristiansenLD (2015). The timing and aesthetics of public engagement: Insights from an urban street transformation initiative. Journal of Planning Education and Research35(4): 455–470.
10.
DobsonMParkerG (2024). The temporal governance of planning in England: Planning reform, Uchronia and ‘proper time.’ Planning Theory24(1): 21-42.
11.
DurrantDSaxeSSiemiatyckiMDeanM (2023) Planning, ethics and infrastructural time. Time & Society33(1): 25-47.
12.
FacerK (2023). Possibility and the temporal imagination. Possibility Studies & Society1(1–2): 60–66.
13.
FacerKSiebersJSmithB (2022) Working with Time in Qualitative Research: Case Studies, Theory and Practice. Abingdon: Routledge.
14.
FischerF (2006). Participatory governance as deliberative empowerment: The cultural politics of discursive space. The American Review of Public Administration36(1): 19-40.
15.
ForesterJ (1999) The Deliberative Practitioner: Encouraging Participatory Planning Processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
16.
ForesterJ (2006). Making participation work when interests conflict: Moving from facilitating dialogue and moderating debate to mediating negotiations. Journal of the American Planning Association72(4): 447–456.
17.
ForesterJ (2009). Dealing with Difference: Dramas of Mediating Public Disputes. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
18.
ForesterJKuitenbrouwerMLawsD (2019). Enacting reflective and deliberative practices in action research. Policy Studies40(5): 456–475.
HuebenerP (2015) Timing Canada: The Shifting Politics of Time in Canadian Literary Culture. Montreal and Kingston: McGill University Press.
21.
InchA (2015). Ordinary citizens and the political cultures of planning: In search of the subject of a new democratic ethos. Planning Theory14(4): 404–424.
22.
JensenMH (2026) Cultivating temporal attunement: Unfolding the seasonalities of an unsettled river landscape. Time & Society35(1): 73–96.
23.
JensenMHGallandDHarrisonJ (2025) The mistreatment of time in planning theory: Towards planning beyond the clock in a world increasingly out-of-sync. In: AllmendingerPTewdwr-JonesMWargentM (eds). Critical Planning Futures: New Directions in Planning Theory. London and New York: Routledge, 180–200. doi: 10.4324/9781003402855-11.
24.
JensenMHLawsD (2025) Engaging with the multiple temporalities inherent in participatory planning. Planning Theory and Practice26(5): 687–701.
25.
JordheimH (2014). Introduction: Multiple times and the work of synchronization. History and Theory, 53(4): 498-518.
26.
LaurianL (2007). Deliberative planning through citizen advisory boards: Five case studies from military and civilian environmental cleanups. Journal of Planning Education and Research, 26(4): 415–434.
27.
LaurianL (2009). Trust in planning: Theoretical and practical considerations for participatory and deliberative planning. Planning Theory & Practice10(3): 369-391.
28.
LaurianLInchA (2019) On time and planning: Opening futures by cultivating a ‘sense of now’. Journal of Planning Literature34(3): 267–285.
29.
LawsD (2020). What use is a critical moment?Negotiation Journal36(2): 107–126.
30.
LeverJSonninoRCheethamF (2019) Reconfiguring local food governance in an age of austerity: Towards a place-based approach?Journal of Rural Studies69: 97-105.
31.
LowndesVPratchettL (2012) Local governance under the Coalition Government: Austerity, localism and the ‘Big Society’. Local Government Studies38(1): 21-40.
32.
MahadeoR. (2024). Funk the Clock: Transgressing Time While Young, Perceptive, and Black. Ithaca and London: Cornell University Press.
33.
MansbridgeJHartz-KarpJAmengualMGastilJ (2006) Norms of deliberation: An inductive study. Journal of Public Deliberation2(1). doi: 10.16997/jdd.35.
34.
MarshallT. (2016). Learning from France: Using public deliberation to tackle infrastructure planning issues. International Planning Studies, 21(4): 329–347.
35.
MetzgerJTamm-HallströmK (2022) Doing planning differently: Affective politics and atmospheric engineering in experimental deliberative bubbles. Planning Theory & Practice23(4): 518-535.
36.
PschetzL (2015) Isn’t it time to change the way we think about time?Interactions22: 58-61.
37.
PschetzLBastianMSpeedC (2016) Temporal design: Looking at time as social coordination. DRS2016: Future-Focused Thinking5: 1-14.
38.
PschetzLBastianM (2018) Temporal Design: Rethinking time in design. Design Studies56: 169-184.
39.
PschetzLBastianMBowlerR (2022) Revealing social infrastructures of time. In: KnoxHJohnG (eds). Speaking for the Social: A Catalog of Methods. Goleta, CA: Punctum Books, pp. 255-294.
40.
RacoMDurrantDLivingstoneN (2018). Slow cities, urban politics and the temporalities of planning: Lessons from London. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space36(7): 1176–1194.
41.
ReychlerL (2015). Time, “temporament” and sustainable peace: The essential role of time in conflict and peace. Asian Journal of Peacebuilding3(1): 19-41.
42.
RyanD (2008) Emergent temporal effects in community initiatives. Sociological Perspectives51(1):139–162.
43.
RyfeDM (2005). Does deliberative democracy work?Annual Review of Political Science8(1): 49-71.
44.
SandercockL (2000). When strangers become neighbours: Managing cities of difference. Planning Theory and Practice1(1): 13–30.
45.
SetäläM (2025) Inclusive deliberation for future-regarding governance: Potentials and pitfalls. Policy StudiesEpub ahead of print 22 Jan 2025: 1–19. doi: 10.1080/01442872.2025.2454488.
46.
SharmaS (2014) In the Meantime, Temporality and Cultural Politics. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
47.
ThompsonJ (2012) Incredible Edible – social and environmental entrepreneurship in the era of the “Big Society”. Social Enterprise Journal8: 237-250.
48.
WolfEEAVan DoorenW (2018). ‘Time to move on’ or ‘taking more time’? How disregarding multiple perspectives on time can increase policy-making conflict. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space36(2): 340–356.
