This article argues that high-rise residential projects—a dominant form of contemporary cities—are playing a pivotal role in generating new urban experience for city dwellers. Drawing on an affect-based research approach, we empirically examine high-rise residential projects built from 1998 to 2016 in two medium-size cities in central Israel. We address three moments of new affective experience of residents: (1) the view and the practice of viewing; (2) bodies and sound; and (3) bodies becoming a body. The article contributes a conceptual shift to urban planning for studying present-day urban experience. Accordingly, it derives insights to better understand contemporary socio-spatial relations in cities.
AndersonBHarrisonP (eds) (2010) Taking-Place: Non-Representational Theories and Geography. New York: Ashgate Publishing.
8.
ArrigoitiaMF (2014) Unmaking public housing towers: The role of lifts and stairs in the demolition of a Puerto Rican project. Home Cultures11(2): 167–196.
9.
AshJ (2012) Attention, videogames and the retentional economies of affective amplification. Theory, Culture and Society29(6): 3–26.
10.
AshJKitchinRLeszczynskiA (2018) Digital turn, digital geographies?Progress in Human Geography42(1): 25–43.
11.
BaxterR (2017) The high-rise home: Verticality as practice in London. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research41(2): 334–352.
12.
BoelensL (2010) Theorizing practice and practising theory: Outlines for an actor-relational- approach in planning. Planning Theory9(1): 28–62.
13.
BöhmeG (2014) Urban atmospheres: Charting new directions for architecture and urban planning. In: BorchC (ed.) Architectural Atmospheres: On the Experience and Politics of Architecture. Basel: Birkhäuser, 42–59.
14.
BuserM (2014) Thinking through nonrepresentational and affective atmospheres in planning theory and practice. Planning Theory13(3): 227–243.
15.
BusnelRGClasseA (2013) Whistled Languages, vol. 13. New York: Springer.
16.
CloughPT (2008) The affective turn: Political economy, biomedia and bodies. Theory, Culture and Society25(1): 1–22.
17.
CostelloL (2005) From prisons to penthouses: The changing images of high-rise living in Melbourne. Housing Studies20(1): 49–62.
18.
De SouzaSA (2006) From cyber to hybrid: Mobile technologies as interfaces of hybrid spaces. Space and Culture9(3): 261–278.
19.
DeleuzeGGuattariF (1987) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. London: University of Minnesota Press.
20.
DewsburyJD (2010) Performative, non-representational, and affect-based research: Seven injunctions. In: DeLyserDHerbertSAitkenS, et al. (eds) The SAGE handbook of qualitative geography. London: SAGE, 321–344.
21.
DrozdzMAppertMHarrisA (2017) High-rise urbanism in contemporary Europe. Built Environment43(4): 469–480.
22.
EizenbergE (2019) Large-scale urban developments and the future of cities: Possible checks and balances. Urban Planning4(4): 1–3.
23.
EizenbergESassonOShilonM (2019) Urban morphology and qualitative topology: Open green spaces in high-rise residential developments. Urban Planning4(4): 73–85.
24.
EvansJJonesP (2011) The walking interview: Methodology, mobility and place. Applied Geography31(2): 849–858.
25.
FrenkelA (2007) Spatial distribution of high-rise buildings within urban areas: The case of the Tel-Aviv metropolitan region. Urban Studies44(10): 1973–1996.
26.
GadCJensenCB (2010) On the consequences of post-ant. Science, Technology & Human Value35(1): 55–80.
27.
GarfunkelD (2017) High-rise residential condominiums and the transformation of private property governance. UBCL Review50(4): 891–934.
28.
GiffordR (2007) The consequences of living in high-rise buildings. Architectural Science Review50(1): 2–17.
29.
GrahamSHewittL (2013) Getting off the ground: On the politics of urban verticality. Progress in Human Geography37(1): 72–92.
30.
GrecoE (2018) Questioning the vertical urbanization of post-industrial cities: The cases of Turin and Lyon. Built Environment43(4): 555–570.
31.
HarkerC (2014) The only way is up? Ordinary topologies of Ramallah. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research38(1): 318–335.
32.
HarrisA (2015) Vertical urbanisms: Opening up geographies of the three-dimensional city. Progress in Human Geography39(5): 601–620.
33.
HuréMMontèsCAppertM (2018) The governance of office tower projects in a European second city: The case of Lyon. Built Environment43(4): 520–538.
34.
JacobsJM (2006) A geography of big things. Cultural Geographies13(1): 1–27.
35.
JacobsJMCairnsSStrebelI (2007) A tall storey . . . but, a fact just the same: The Red Road high-rise as a black box. Urban Studies44(3): 609–629.
36.
JenkinsL (2002) Geography and architecture: 11, rue du Conservatoire and the permeability of buildings. Space and Culture5(3): 222–236.
37.
KalchevaETakiAHHadiY (2017) Social and environmental sustainability for better quality of life in residential high-rises. Journal of Buildings and Sustainability1(1): 13–24.
38.
KearnsAWhitleyEMasonP, et al. (2012) Living the high life? Residential, social and psychosocial outcomes for high-rise occupants in a deprived context. Housing Studies27(1): 97–126.
39.
KraftlPAdeyP (2008) Architecture/affect/inhabitation: Geographies of being-in buildings. Annals of the Association of American Geographers98(1): 213–231.
40.
LeesLBaxterR (2011) A “building event” of fear: Thinking through the geography of architecture. Social and Cultural Geography12(2): 107–122.
41.
LlewellynM (2004) “Urban village” or “white house”: Envisioned spaces, experienced places, and everyday life at Kensal House, London in the 1930s. Environment and Planning D22(2): 229–249.
42.
LorimerH (2005) Cultural geography: The busyness of being “more-than representational.”Progress in Human Geography29(1): 83–94.
43.
LovellH (2005) Supply and demand for low energy housing in the UK: Insights from a science and technology studies approach. Housing Studies20(5): 815–829.
44.
McCormackD (2018) Atmospheric Things: On the Allure of Elemental Envelopment. London: Duke University Press.
45.
McFarlaneC (2011) Assemblage and critical urbanism. City15(2): 204–224.
46.
McNeillD (2002) The mayor and the world city skyline: London’s tall buildings debate. International Planning Studies7(4): 325–334.
47.
MarottaSCummingsA (2019) Planning affectively: Power, affect, and images of the future. Planning Theory18(2): 191–213.
48.
MarskampM (2018) Politics of zoning: Plans, procedures and publics in land-use change. In: KurathMMarskampMPaulosJ, et al (eds) Relational Planning: Tracing Artefacts, Agency and Practices. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 75–96.
49.
MassumiB (2002) Parables for the Virtual: Movement, Affect, Sensation. London: Duke University Press.
50.
MassumiB (2003) Navigating movements: An interview with Brian Massumi. In: ZournaziM (ed.) Hope: New Philosophies for Change. London: Laurence and Wishart, 210–242.
51.
MiddletonJ (2009) “Stepping in time”: Walking, time, and space in the city. Environment and Planning A41: 1943–1961.
52.
ModiS (2014) Improving the social sustainability of high-rises. CTBUH Journal1: 24–30.
NethercoteMHorneR (2016) Ordinary vertical urbanisms: City apartments and the everyday geographies of high-rise families. Environment and Planning A48(8): 1581–1598.
55.
PallasmaaJ (2014) Space, place and atmosphere: Emotion and peripherical perception in architectural experience. Lebenswelt: Aesthetics and Philosophy of Experience4: 230–245.
56.
PurcellM (2013) A new land: Deleuze and Guattari and planning. Planning Theory and Practice14(1): 20–38.
57.
RoseG (2017) Posthuman agency in the digitally mediated city: Exteriorization, individuation, reinvention. Annals of the American Association of Geographers107(4): 779–793.
58.
RoseGDegenMBasdasB (2010) More on “big things”: Building events and feelings. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers35(3): 334–349.
59.
RosenGCharneyI (2016) Divided we rise: Politics, architecture and vertical cityscapes at opposite ends of Jerusalem. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers41(2): 163–174.
60.
RydinY (2013) Using actor–network theory to understand planning practice: Exploring relationships between actants in regulating low-carbon commercial development. Planning Theory12(1): 23–45.
61.
ShihMChangHTBPopperFJ (2018) Development rights: Regulating vertical urbanism in Taiwan. Planning Theory and Practice19(5): 717–733.
62.
ShilonM (2019) Affective relations of bodies and sound: The constitution of the ‘Ben Gurion International Airport 2000’ planning project. In: DoughtyKDuffyMHaradaT (eds) Sounding Places. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
63.
ShilonMKallusR (2018) Noise, nuisance, nuances: Examining an airport expansion project with socio-relational tools. City22(5–6): 721–737.
64.
SimpsonP (2011) “So, as you can see. . .”: Some reflections on the utility of video methodologies in the study of embodied practices. Area43(3): 343–352.
65.
SpringgaySTrumanSE (2017) A transmaterial approach to walking methodologies: Embodiment, affect, and a sonic art performance. Body and Society23(4): 27–58.
66.
ThibaudJP (2011) A sonic paradigm of urban ambiances. Journal of Sonic Studies1(1): 1–14.
67.
ThibaudJP (2013) Commented city walks. Wi: Journal of Mobile Culture7(1): 1–32.
68.
VanniniP (ed.) (2015) Nonrepresentational Methodologies: Re-Envisioning Research. New York: Routledge.
69.
WeizmanE (2007) Hollow Land: Israel’s Architecture of Occupation. London: Verso Books.
70.
WongMSNicholJNgE (2011) A study of the “wall effect” caused by proliferation of high- rise buildings using GIS techniques. Landscape and Urban Planning102(4): 245–253.
71.
YipNMChangCOHungTY (2007) Modes of condominium management: A principal-agent perspective. Facilities25(5-6): 215–226.
