The just city. Three background issues: Institutional justice and spatial justice,social justice and distributive justice,concept of justice and conceptions of justice
Restricted accessResearch articleFirst published online August, 2020
The just city. Three background issues: Institutional justice and spatial justice,social justice and distributive justice,concept of justice and conceptions of justice
In the fields of planning theory and human geography, there is a growing discussion of the just city. The impression is that in order to continue the discussion of the crucial issue of the just city, certain methodological considerations and precautions are necessary. The article is focused on three in particular: (a) (urban) institutions as the first subject of justice, (b) the incomplete overlap between social justice and distributive justice, (c) the distinction between the concept and the conceptions of social justice. The impression is that these three issues are not always recognised, or at least not always to the fullest extent, in the current debate in planning theory.
ActonHB (1972) Distributive justice, the invisible hand and the cunning of reason. Political Studies20(4): 421–431.
2.
AlfasiNFensterT (2014) Between socio-spatial and urban justice: Rawls’ principles of justice in the 2011 Israeli Protest Movement. Planning Theory13(4): 407–427.
3.
AndreottiAMingioneE (2013) The city as local welfare system. In: FainsteinNFainsteinSS (eds) Policy, Planning, and People. Promoting Justice in Urban Development. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press, 224–241.
4.
AngelSParentJCivcoDL, et al. (2011) The dimension of global urban expansion: Estimates and projections for all countries, 2000–2050. Progress in Planning75(2): 53–107.
5.
AnguelovskiIShiLChuE, et al. (2016) Equity impacts of urban land use planning for climate adaptation: Critical perspectives from the global north and south. Journal of Planning Education and Research36(3): 333–348.
6.
AnsaloniFTedeschiM (2016) Ethics and spatial justice: Unfolding non-linear possibilities for planning action. Planning Theory15(3): 316–332.
7.
Aristotle, Ethica Nicomachea. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University (1934 edition).
8.
BarbieriGABenassiFMantuanoM, et al. (2019) In search of spatial justice. Towards a conceptual and operative framework for the analysis of inter- and intra-urban inequalities using a geo-demographic approach. The case of Italy. Regional Science Policy & Practice11: 109–121.
9.
BarnettC (2011) Geography and ethics: Justice unbound. Progress in Human Geography35(2): 246–255.
10.
BarryB (1989) Theories of Justice. London: Harvester-Wheatsheaf.
11.
BastaC (2016) From justice in planning toward planning for justice: A capability approach. Planning Theory15(2): 190–212.
12.
BeauchampTL (1980) Distributive justice and the difference principle. In: BlockerHGSmithEH (eds) John Rawls’ Theory of Social Justice. Athens, OH: Ohio University Press, 132–161.
13.
BojerH (2003) Distributional Justice. Theory and Measurement. London: Routledge.
14.
BondP (2008) Decentralization, privatization and countervailing popular pressure: South African water commodification and decommodification. In: BeardVAMiraftabFSilverC (ed.) Planning and Decentralization. Contested Spaces for Public Action in the Global South. London: Routledge, 50–68.
15.
BurtonE (2003) Housing for an urban renaissance: Implications for social equity. Housing Studies18(4): 537–562.
16.
CampbellT (1988) Justice. London: Macmillan.
17.
CardosoRBreda-VázquezI (2007) Social justice as a guide to planning theory and practice: Analyzing the Portuguese planning system. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research31(2): 384–400.
18.
Castán BrotoVOballaBJuniorP (2013) Governing climate change for a just city: Challenges and lessons from Maputo, Mozambique. Local Environment18(6): 678–704.
19.
CertomàCMartellozzoF (2019) Cultivating urban justice? A spatial exploration of urban gardening crossing spatial and environmental injustice conditions. Applied Geography106: 60–70.
20.
ChiodelliFMoroniS (2014) Typology of spaces and topology of toleration: City, pluralism and ownership. Journal of Urban Affairs36(2): 167–181.
21.
ChiodelliFMoroniS (2017) Planning, pluralism and religious diversity: Critically reconsidering the spatial regulation of mosques in Italy starting from a much debated law in the Lombardy region. Cities62: 62–70.
22.
ChungH (2013) The spatial dimension of negotiated power relations and social justice in the redevelopment of villages-in-the-city in China. Environment and Planning A45: 2459–2476.
23.
CipletDRobertsJT (2017) Climate change and the transition to neoliberal environmental governance. Global Environmental Change46: 148–156.
24.
DavisonG (2017) The character of the Just City: The regulation of place distinctiveness and its unjust social effects. Town Planning Review88(3): 305–325.
25.
DavoudiSBrooksE (2014) When does unequal become unfair? Judging claims of environmental injustice. Environment and Planning A46(11): 2686–2702.
26.
DavyB (1997) Essential Injustice. When Legal Institutions Cannot Resolve Environmental and Land Use Dispute. Wien: Springer.
27.
DikeçM (2001) Justice and the spatial imagination. Environment and Planning A33(10): 1785–1805.
28.
DobsonA (1998) Justice and the Environment. Conceptions of Environmental Sustainability and Theories of Distributive Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
29.
DoolingS (2009) Ecological gentrification: A research agenda exploring justice in the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33(3): 621–639.
30.
DworkinR (1977) Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31.
EdwardsGA (2015) Justice, neoliberal natures, and Australia’s water reforms. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers40(4): 479–493.
32.
EllisC (2002) The new urbanism: Critiques and rebuttals. Journal of Urban Design7(3): 261–291.
33.
EricssonLO (1976) Justice in the Distribution of Economic Resources. Stockholm: Almqvist & Wiksell.
34.
FainsteinNFainsteinSS (2013) Restoring just outcomes to planning concerns. In: FainsteinNFainsteinSS (eds) Policy, Planning, and People. Promoting Justice in Urban Development. Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press32–53.
35.
FainsteinSS (2000) New directions in planning theory. Urban Affairs Review35(4): 451–478.
36.
FainsteinSS (2001) Competitiveness, cohesion, and governance: Their implications for social justice. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research25(4): 884–888.
37.
FainsteinSS (2005) Planning theory and the city. Journal of Planning Education and Research25(2): 121–130.
38.
FainsteinSS (2009) Planning and the just city. In: MarcusePConnollyJNovyJ, et al. (eds) Searching for the Just City. London: Routledge, 19–39.
39.
FainsteinSS (2010) The Just City. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
40.
FincherRIvesonK (2012) Justice and injustice in the city. Geographical Research50(3): 231–241.
41.
Finley-BrookMHollomanE (2016) Empowering energy justice. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health13: 1–19.
42.
FischerF (2009) Discursive planning. Social justice as discourse. In: MarcusePConnollyJNovyJ, et al. (eds) Searching for the Just City. London: Routledge, 52–71.
43.
FlewA (1985) The concept, and conceptions, of justice. Journal of Applied Philosophy2(2): 191–196.
44.
FloridaR (2008) Who’s Your City?. New York: Basic Books.
45.
ForstR (2012) The Right to Justification. New York: Columbia University Press.
46.
FrankenaWK (1962) The concept of social justice. In: BrandtRB (ed.) Social Justice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1–29.
47.
GarcíaM (2006) Citizenship practices and urban governance in European cities. Urban Studies43(4): 745–765.
48.
GinsbergM (1965) On Justice in Society. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
49.
GlaeserE (2011) Triumph of the City. London: Macmillan.
50.
GosepathS (2001) The global scope of justice. Metaphilosophy32(1–2): 135–159.
51.
GoughI (2013) Carbon mitigation policies, distributional dilemmas and social policies. Journal of Social Policy42(2): 191–213.
52.
GranqvistHGroverD (2016) Distributive fairness in paying for clean energy infrastructure. Ecological Economics126: 87–97.
53.
GroomsWFrimpong BoamahE (2018) Toward a political urban planning: Learning from growth machine and advocacy planning to ‘plannitize’ urban politics. Planning Theory17(2): 213–233.
54.
HareRM (1952) The Language of Morals. London: Oxford University Press.
55.
HartH (1961) The Concept of Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
56.
HarveyD (1973) Social Justice and the City. London: Edward Arnold.
57.
HarveyD (1992) Social justice, postmodernism and the city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research16(4): 588–601.
58.
HarveyD (1996) Justice, Nature and the Geography of Difference. Oxford: Blackwell.
HinschW (2010) Justice, legitimacy, and constitutional rights. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy13(1): 39–54.
61.
HöffeO (1987) Politische Gerechtigkeit. Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp.
62.
HyraDMouldenDWetedC, et al. (2019) A method for making the just city: Housing, gentrification, and health. Housing Policy Debate29: 421–431.
63.
InfrancaJI (2015) Housing resource bundles: Distributive justice and federal low-income housing policy. University of Richmond Law Review49: 1071–1137.
64.
InnesJEBooherDE (2015) A turning point for planning theory? Overcoming dividing discourses. Planning Theory14(2): 195–213.
65.
IrázabalC (2009) One size does not fit all: Land markets and property rights for the construction of the just city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research33(2): 558–563.
66.
IrazábalCPunjaA (2009) Cultivating just planning and legal institutions: A critical assessment of the South Central Farm struggle in Los Angeles. Journal of Urban Affairs31(1): 1–23.
67.
IsraelEFrenkelA (2018) Social justice and spatial inequality: Toward a conceptual framework. Progress in Human Geography42(5): 647–665.
68.
IvesonK (2011) Social or spatial justice? Marcuse and Soja on the right to the city. City15(2): 250–259.
69.
JamesA (2005) Power in social organization as the subject of justice. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly86(1): 25–49.
70.
JonkmanAJanssen-JansenL (2018) Identifying distributive injustice through housing (mis)match analysis: The case of social housing in Amsterdam. Housing, Theory and Society35(3): 353–377.
71.
JonkmanAJanssen-JansenLSchilderF (2018) Rent increase strategies and distributive justice: The socio-spatial effects of rent control policy in Amsterdam. Journal of Housing and the Built Environment33: 653–673.
72.
KauppinenA (2012) Meaningfulness and time. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research84(2): 345–377.
73.
KelsenH (1949) General Theory of Law and State. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
74.
KimHMarcouillerDWChoiY (2019) Urban redevelopment with justice implications: The role of social justice and social capital in residential relocation decisions. Urban Affairs Review55(1): 288–320.
75.
KingL (2011) Public reason and the just city. In: HaywardCRSwanstromT (eds) Justice and the American Metropolis. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press, 59–80.
76.
KorsgaardCM (1996) The Sources of Normativity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
77.
LandryC (2008) The Creative City. London: Earthscan.
78.
LarsonSM (2018) Imagining social justice and the false promise of urban park design. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space50(2): 391–406.
79.
Le GalèsP (2002) European Cities. Social Conflicts and Governance. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
LowSIvesonK (2016) Propositions for more just urban public spaces. City20(1): 10–31.
82.
LucasJR (1980) On Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
83.
McConnellS (1981) Theories for Planning. London: Heinemann.
84.
McConnellS (1995) Rawlsian planning theory. In: HendlerS (ed.) Planning Ethics. New Brunswick, NJ: The Center for Urban Policy Research, 30–48.
85.
MacLeodG (2002) From urban entrepreneurialism to a ‘revanchist city’? On the spatial injustices of Glasgow’s renaissance. Antipode34(3): 602–624.
86.
MarcuseP (2009) From justice planning to commons planning. In: MarcusePConnollyJNovyJ, et al. (eds) Searching for the Just City. London: Routledge, 91–102.
87.
MarcuseP (2010) Spatial justice: Derivative but causal of social injustice. In: BretBGervais-LambonyPHancockC, et al. (eds) Justices et injustices spatiales. Paris: PUF, 76–92.
88.
MarcusePConnollyJNovyJ, et al. (eds) (2009) Searching for the Just City. London: Routledge.
89.
MaricatoE (2009) Fighting for just cities in capitalism’s periphery. In: MarcusePConnollyJNovyJ, et al. (eds) Searching for the Just City. London: Routledge, 194–213.
90.
MartensK (2006) Basing transport planning on principles of social justice. Berkeley Planning Journal19: 1–17.
91.
MedvedP (2018) Exploring the ‘Just City principles’ within two European sustainable neighbourhoods. Journal of Urban Design23(3): 414–431.
92.
MierR (1993) Social Justice and Local Development Policy. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
93.
MillerD (1999) Principles of Social Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
94.
MoroniSChiodelliF (2016) Pluralism in private spaces: Homeowners associations, clubs, shopping malls. In: MoroniSWebermanD (eds) Space and Pluralism. Can Our Cities Today Be Places of Toleration?Budapest: Central European University Press, 77–96.
95.
NylundK (2014) Conceptions of justice in the planning of the new urban landscape. Recent changes in the comprehensive planning discourse in Malmö, Sweden. Planning Theory & Practice15(1): 41–61.
96.
OkerekeC (2007) Global Justice and Neoliberal Environmental Governance: Ethics, Sustainable Development and International Co-operation. London: Routledge.
97.
OkoyeA (2009) Theorising corporate social responsibility as an essentially contested concept: Is a definition necessary?Journal of Business Ethics89(4): 613–627.
98.
PavelMP (ed) (2009) Breakthrough Communities. Sustainability and Justice in the Next American Metropolis. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
99.
PerryBAthertonM (2017) Beyond critique: The value of co-production in realising just cities?Local Environment22(1): 36–51.
100.
PierceJMartinD (2017) The law is not enough: Seeking the theoretical ‘frontier of urban justice’ via legal tools. Urban Studies54(2): 456–465.
101.
PirieGH (1983) On spatial justice. Environment and Planning A15(4): 465–473.
102.
PorterT (2009) The division of moral labour and the basic structure restriction. Politics, Philosophy & Economics8(2): 173–199.
103.
PotterCNovyJ (2009) Conclusion. Just city on the horizon: Summing up, moving forward. In: MarcusePConnollyJNovyJ, et al. (eds) Searching for the Just City. London: Routledge, 229–239.
104.
RawlsJ (1971) A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
105.
RawlsJ (1993) Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.
106.
ReadeE (1985) An analysis of the use of the concept of rationality in the literature of planning. In: BrehenyMHooperA (eds) Rationality in Planning. London: Pion, 77–97.
107.
ReardonMDyménC (2015) Towards the just city. Local Economy30(7): 838–856.
108.
ReeceJW (2018) In pursuit of a twenty-first century just city: The evolution of equity planning theory and practice. Journal of Planning Literature33(3): 299–309.
109.
RyanA (1993) Introduction. In: RyanA (ed.) Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 1–17.
110.
SassenS (2000) Cities in a World Economy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Pine Forge Press.
111.
SchlosbergD (2004) Reconceiving environmental justice: Global movements and political theories. Environmental Politics13(3): 517–540.
112.
SchneiderKR (2003) On the Nature of Cities. New York: ACP.
113.
ShahA (ed.) (2006) Local Governance in Industrial Countries. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
114.
SimpsonGCliftonJ (2016) Subsidies for residential solar photovoltaic energy systems in Western Australia: Distributional, procedural and outcome justice. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews65: 262–273.
115.
SmithDM (1994) Geography and Social Justice. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
116.
SmithDM (2000) Social justice revisited. Environment and Planning A32(7): 1149–1162.
117.
SojaE (2010) Seeking Spatial Justice. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.
118.
SongLK (2015) Race, transformative planning, and the just city. Planning Theory14(2): 152–173.
119.
StanczykL (2012) Productive justice. Philosophy & Public Affairs40(2): 144–164.
120.
SteeleWMacCallumDByrneJ, et al. (2012) Planning the climate-just city. International Planning Studies17(1): 67–83.
121.
StorperM (2011) Justice, efficiency and economic geography: Should places help one another to develop?European Urban and Regional Studies18(1): 3–21.
122.
StumpfKHBeckerCUBaumgärtnerS (2016) A conceptual structure of justice. Providing a tool to analyse conceptions of justice. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice19(5): 1187–1202.
123.
TalenE (2013) Urban in/justice. In: BastaCMoroniS (eds) Ethics, Design and Planning of the Built Environment. Dordrecht: Springer, 125–132.
124.
ThomasJM (2008) The minority-race planner in the quest for a just city. Planning Theory7(3): 227–247.
125.
ThomasJM (2019) Socially responsible practice: The battle to reshape the American Institute of Planners. Journal of Planning History18: 258–281.
126.
ThompsonPBDeanW (1996) Competing conceptions of risk. Risk7: 361–384.
127.
TörnblomKVermuntR (eds) (2007) Distributive and Procedural Justice. Aldershot: Asghate.
128.
UitermarkJNichollsW (2017) Planning for social justice: Strategies, dilemmas, tradeoffs. Planning Theory16(1): 32–50.
129.
ValentineG (2003) Geography and ethics: In pursuit of social justice ethics and emotions in geographies of health and disability research. Progress in Human Geography27(3): 375–380.
130.
VasuML (1979) Politics and Planning. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.
131.
VisserG (2001) Social justice, integrated development planning and post-apartheid urban reconstruction. Urban Studies38(10): 1673–1699.
132.
Voget-KleschinLMeischS (2015) Concepts and conceptions of sustainable development: A comparative perspective. In: MeischSLundershausenJBossertL, et al. (eds) Ethics of Science in the Research for Sustainable Development. Baden-Baden: Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG, 45–72.
133.
WalkerG (2009) Beyond distribution and proximity: Exploring the multiple spatialities of environmental justice. Antipode41(4): 614–636.
134.
WalksRA (2009) The urban in fragile, uncertain, neoliberal times: Towards new geographies of social justice?The Canadian Geographer / Le Géographe Canadien53(3): 345–356.
135.
WalzerM (1983) Spheres of Justice. New York: Basic Books.
136.
WilliamsM (2017) Searching for actually existing justice in the city. Urban Studies54(10): 2217–2231.
137.
WinklerT (2012) Between economic efficacy and social justice: Exposing the ethico-politics of planning. Cities29(3): 166–173.
138.
WissenburgM (1999) Imperfection and Impartiality. London: UCL Press.
139.
WolmanHGoldsmithM (1992) Urban Politcs and Policy. A Comparative Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
140.
YoungIM (1990) Justice and the Politics of DifferencePrinceton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
141.
YoungIM (2003) Political Responsibility and Structural Injustice. Lawrence, KS: University of Kansas Press.
142.
ZhouSNoonanDS (2019) Justice implications of clean energy policies and programs in the United States: A theoretical and empirical exploration. Sustainability11(3): 807.
