Abstract
How can planning theory be simultaneously expansive and manageable? By adapting Mandelbaum’s Open Moral Communities, this article argues that myths like the armchair theorist help to enlarge the scope of planning by connecting diverse communities of scholars. The moral imperative ensures that myths remain myths.
Get full access to this article
View all access options for this article.
References
1.
Mandelbaum, S.
(2000 ) Open Moral Communities .
Cambridge, MA : MIT Press
.
2.
Toulmin, S.
(2001 ) Return to Reason .
Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press
.
3.
Verma, N.
(1995 )
‘What is Planning Practice? The Search for Suitable Categories’
, Journal of Planning Education and Research
14 :
178 -182
.
4.
Verma, N.
(2000 ) ‘Review of Seymour Mandelbaum’s
“Open Moral Communities”’ ,
H-Urban
, October, available at: [http://www.h-net.org/%7Eurban ].
