Inclusion of people living with Alzheimer’s disease or related dementias who lack a study partner in social research: Ethical considerations from a qualitative evidence synthesis

Abstract

Background

Because use of a study partner (proxy decision-maker) to give informed consent on behalf of someone living with Alzheimer’s disease or related dementias (ADRD) is common in nearly all clinical research, people living with ADRD who lack a study partner are regularly excluded from participation. Social research presents different opportunities and risks than clinical research. We argue that guidelines developed for the latter may be unduly restrictive for social research and, further, that the automatic exclusion of people living with ADRD presents separate ethical challenges by failing to support extant decision-making capacity and by contributing to underrepresentation in research.

Purpose

The study objective was to identify key components related to including cognitively vulnerable participants who lack a study partner in social research.

Research design/Study sample

We conducted an adaptive qualitative evidence synthesis (QES) and subsequent content analysis on 49 articles addressing capacity and research consent for potentially cognitively compromised individuals, to include people living with ADRD, who lack a study partner.

Results

We identified four major topic areas: defining competency, capacity, and consent; aspects of informed consent; strategies to assess comprehension of risks associated with social research; and risks versus benefits.

Conclusions

Based on findings, we suggest new and ethically appropriate ways to determine capacity to consent to social research, make consent processes accessible to a population experiencing cognitive challenges, and consider the risks of excluding a growing population from research that could benefit millions.

Keywords

research ethics consent social research dementia

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Abramovitch

Finstad

Silberfeld

(1993). Preliminary report on informed consent for mental capacity assessments. Canadian Journal on Aging, 12(3), 373–381. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0714980800013751

Adamis

Treloar

Martin

F. C.

MacDonald

A. J.

(2010). Ethical research in delirium: Arguments for including decisionally incapacitated subjects. Science and Engineering Ethics, 16(1), 169–174. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-009-9120-y

Appelbaum

P. S.

Grisso

(2001). MacArthur competence assessment tool for clinical research (MacCAT-CR). Professional Resource Press.

Artnak

K. E.

(1997). Informed consent in the elderly: Assessing decisional capacity. Seminars in Perioperative Nursing, 6(1), 59–64.

Association

A. S.

(2004). Research consent for cognitively impaired adults: Recommendations for institutional review boards and investigators. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 18(3), 171–175. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.wad.0000137520.23370.56

Astell

Lee

J.-H.

Sankaran

(2013). Review of capacity assessments and recommendations for examining capacity. The New Zealand Medical Journal, 126(1383), 38–48.

Baergen

(2002). Assessing the competence assessment tool. The Journal of Clinical Ethics, 13(2), 160–164.

Bartlett

O’Connor

(2007). From personhood to citizenship: Broadening the lens for dementia practice and research. Journal of Aging Studies, 21(2), 107–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaging.2006.09.002

Beattie

(2009). Research participation of individuals with dementia: Decisional capacity, informed consent, and considerations for nurse investigators. Research in Gerontological Nursing, 2(2), 94–102. https://doi.org/10.3928/19404921-20090401-01

10.

Berlinger

Jennings

Wolf

S. M.

(2013). The Hastings Center guidelines for treatment decision-making and care near the end of life, revised and (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199974566.001.0001

11.

Black

B. S.

Kass

N. E.

Fogarty

L. A.

Rabins

P. V.

(2007). Informed consent for dementia research: The study enrollment encounter. IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 29(4), 7–14.

12.

Black

B. S.

Brandt

Rabins

P. V.

Samus

Q. M.

Steele

C. D.

Lyketsos

C. G.

Rosenblatt

(2008). Predictors of providing informed consent or assent for research participation in assisted living residents. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 16(1), 83–91. https://doi.org/10.1097/JGP.0b013e318157cabd

13.

Black

B. S.

Wechsler

Fogarty

(2013). Decision making for participation in dementia research. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21(4), 355–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2012.11.009

14.

Bos

Tarnal

(1999). Content analysis in empirical social research. International Journal of Educational Research, 31(8), 659–671. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-0355(99)00032-4

15.

Buckles

Powlishta

Palmer

Coats

Hosto

Buckley

Morris

(2003). Understanding of informed consent by demented individuals. Neurology, 61(12), 1662–1666.

16.

Carroll

D. W.

(2012). Assessment of capacity for medical decision making. Journal of Gerontological Nursing, 36(5), 47–52. https://doi.org/10.3928/00989134-20100303-03

17.

Cherniack

E. P.

(2002). Informed consent for medical research by the elderly. Experimental Aging Research, 28(2), 183–198. https://doi.org/10.1080/03610730252800193

18.

Christensen

Haroun

Schneiderman

L. J.

Jeste

D. V.

(1995). Decision-making capacity for informed consent in the older population. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law Online, 23(3), 353–365.

19.

Cisar

N. S.

Bell

S. K.

(1995). Informed consent: An ethical dilemma. Nursing Forum, 3(3), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6198.1995.tb00475.x

20.

Clare

Martyr

Henderson

Gamble

Matthews

F. E.

Quinn

Nelis

S. M.

Rusted

Thom

Knapp

Hart

Victor

(2020). Living alone with mild-to-moderate dementia: Findings from the IDEAL cohort. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 78(3), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-200638

21.

de Medeiros

Girling

Berlinger

(2020). Ethical considerations and practices for the inclusion of people living alone with dementia in social research: Protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis review. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/343376245_Ethical_Considerations_and_Practices_for_the_Inclusion_of_People_Living_Alone_with_Dementia_in_Social_Research_Protocol_for_a_Qualitative_Evidence_Synthesis_Review. doi.org/10.1002/alz.044021

22.

Derenzo

E. G.

Conley

R. R.

Love

(1998). Assessment of capacity to give consent to research participation: State-of-the-art and beyond. Journal of Health Care Law and Policy, 1(1), 66.

23.

Dewing

(2007). Participatory research. Dementia, 6(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301207075625

24.

Dubois

J. M.

Banteabd Hadley

H. W. B.

(2011). Ethics in psychiatric research: A review of 25 years of NIH-funded empirical research projects. AJOB Primary Research, 2(4), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/21507716.2011.631514

25.

Dunn

L. B.

Lindamer

L. A.

Palmer

B. W.

Golshan

Schneiderman

L. J.

Jeste

D. V.

(2002). Improving understanding of research consent in middle-aged and elderly patients with psychotic disorders. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 10(2), 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1097/00019442-200203000-00005

26.

Dunn

L. B.

Palmer

B. W.

Applebaum

P. S.

Saks

E. R.

Aarons

G. A.

Jeste

D. V.

(2007). Prevalence and correlates of adequate performance on a measure of abilities related to decisional capacity: Differences among three standards for the MacCAT-CR in patients with schizophrenia. Schizophrenia Research, 89(1), 110–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.schres.2006.08.005

27.

R. A.

Sehiralti

(2014). Comparing assessments of the decision-making competencies of psychiatric inpatients as provided by physicians, nurses, relatives and an assessment tool. Journal of Medical Ethics, 40(7), 453–457. https://doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2012-100928

28.

Farrell

T. W.

Widera

Rosenberg

Rubin

C. D.

Naik

A. D.

Braun

Torke

Vitale

Shega

Ethics, Clinical Practice and Models of Care, & Public Policy Committees of the American Geriatrics Society (2017). AGS position statement: making medical treatment decisions for unbefriended older adults. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 65(1), 14–15. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.14586

29.

Flemming

Booth

Garside

Tunçalp

Ö.

Noyes

(2019). Qualitative evidence synthesis for complex interventions and guideline development: Clarification of the purpose, designs and relevant methods. BMJ Global Health, 4(Suppl 1), e000882. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000882

30.

Folstein

M. F.

Folstein

S. E.

McHugh

P. R.

(1975). “Mini-mental state”: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12(3), 189–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6

31.

Fry

S. T.

(1999). Ethical issues in Alzheimer disease research. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 13(Supp 1), S54–S58. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002093-199904001-00013

32.

Gilbert

Bosquet

Thomas-Antérion

Bonnefoy

Le Saux

(2017). Assessing capacity to consent for research in cognitively impaired older patients. Clinical Interventions in Aging, 2007(12), 1553–1563. https://doi.org/10.2147/CIA.S141905

33.

Goodman

Baron

N. L.

Machen

Stevenson

Evans

Davies

S. L.

Iliffe

(2011). Culture, consent, costs and care homes: enabling older people with dementia to participate in research. Aging & Mental Health, 15(4), 475–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/13607863.2010.543659

34.

Grebe

R. V.

(2007). Informed consent for patients with cognitive impairment. The Nurse Practitioner, 32(12), 39–44. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.NPR.0000300827.59217.c0

35.

Grimshaw

(2010). A guide to knowledge synthesis. A knowledge synthesis chapter. Canadian Institutes of Health Research. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/41382.html

36.

Guinn

D. E.

(2002). Mental competence, caregivers, and the process of consent: Research involving Alzheimer’s patients or others with decreasing mental capacity. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 11(13), 230–245. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180102113041

37.

Heggestad

A. K. T.

Nortvedt

Slettebo

Å.

(2013). The importance of moral sensitivity when including persons with dementia in qualitative research. Nursing Ethics, 20(1), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733012455564

38.

Higgins

(2013). Involving people with dementia in research. Nursing Times, 109(28), 20–23.

39.

High

D. M.

Post

S. G.

Whitehouse

P. J.

(1994a). Introduction (to 6 articles and a position paper on ethical and legal issues in Alzheimer disease research). Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 8(Suppl. 4), 1. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002093-199424003-00008

40.

High

D. M.

Whitehouse

P. J.

Post

S. G.

Berg

(1994b). Guidelines for addressing ethical and legal issues in Alzheimer disease research: A position paper. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 8(Suppl. 4), 66–74. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002093-199424003-00008

41.

Houghton

Murphy

Meehan

Thomas

Brooker

Casey

(2017). From screening to synthesis: Using Nvivo to enhance transparency in qualitative evidence synthesis. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 26(5–6), 873–881. https://doi.org/10.1111/jocn.13443

42.

Janofsky

J. S.

(1990). Assessing competency in the elderly. Geriatrics, 45(10), 45–78.

43.

Jefferson

A. L.

Lambe

Moser

D. J.

Byerly

L. K.

Ozonoff

Karlawish

J. H.

(2008). Decisional capacity for research participation in individuals with mild cognitive ompairment. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 56(7), 1236–1243. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.01752.x

44.

Jeste

D. V.

Palmer

B. W.

Appelbaum

P. S.

Golshan

Glorioso

Dunn

L. B.

Kim

Meeks

Kraemer

H. C.

(2007). A new brief instrument for assessing decisional capacity for clinical research. Archives of General Psychiatry, 64(8), 966966–966974. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpsyc.64.8.966

45.

Karlawish

Cary

Moelter

S. T.

Siderowf

Sullo

Xie

Weintraub

(2013). Cognitive impairment and PD patients’ capacity to consent to research. Neurology, 81(9), 801–807. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e3182a05ba5

46.

Keady

Hydén

Johnson

Swarbrick

(Eds.). (2017). Social research methods in dementia studies: Inclusion and innovation. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315517490

47.

Kim

S. Y.

Caine

E. D.

Currier

G. W.

Leibovici

Ryan

J. M.

(2001). Assessing the competence of persons with Alzheimer’s disease in providing informed consent for participation in research. American Journal of Psychiatry, 158(5), 712–717. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi10.1176/appi.ajp.158.5.712

48.

Lange

M. M.

Rogers

Dodds

(2013). Vulnerability in research ethics: A way forward. Bioethics, 27(6), 333–340. https://doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12032

49.

Largent

E. A.

Hey

S. P.

Harkins

Hoffman

A. K.

Joffe

Lima

J. C.

London

J. A

Karlawish

(2020). Ethical and regulatory issues for embedded pragmatic trials involving people living with dementia. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 68(Suppl 2), S37–S42. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.16620

50.

Lee

(2010). The capacity to consent to research among older adults. Educational Gerontology, 36(7), 592–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/03601270903324461

51.

Marson

D. C.

(2001). Loss of competency in Alzheimer's disease: Conceptual and psychometric approaches. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 24(2–3), 267–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0160-2527(01)00064-4

52.

Mayo

A. M.

Wallhagen

M. I.

(2009). Considerations of informed consent and decision-making competence in older adults with cognitive impairment. Research in Gerontological Nursing, 2(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.3928/19404921-20090401-08

53.

Meulenbroek

Vernooij-Dassen

Kessels

R. P. C.

Graff

M. J. L.

Sjögren

M. J. C.

Schalk

B. W. M.

Rikkert

M. O.

Hoogsteen-Ossewaarde

M. E.

Claassen

J. A. H. R.

Melis

R. J. F.

Olde Rikkert

M. G. M.

(2010). Informed consent in dementia research. Legislation, theoretical concepts and how to assess capacity to consent. European Geriatric Medicine, 1(1), 58–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurger.2010.01.009

54.

Moodie

Wright

(1997). Medical research and Alzheimer’s disease: A study of the hazards of conducting research on the incompetent patient. Medical Law International, 2(4), 291–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/096853329700200402

55.

Onyemelukwe

(2013). Neuroscience research involving older persons in Canada: Some legal and neuroethical concerns. Medicine and Law, 32(3), 389–422.

56.

Palmer

B. W.

Savla

G. N.

Roesch

S. C.

Jeste

D. V.

(2013). Changes in capacity to consent over time in patients involved in psychiatric research. British Journal of Psychiatry, 202(6), 454–458. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.bp.112.121160

57.

Pesonen

H.-M.

Remes

A. M.

Isola

(2011). Ethical aspects of researching subjective experiences in early-stage dementia. Nursing Ethics, 18(5), 651–661. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733011408046

58.

Pesonene

H.-M.

Remes

Isola

(2010). Ethical issues of the research interviews with people with dementia and their significant others fourth European nursing congress. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 14(5), 129.

59.

Rikkert

M. G. M.

van der Vorm

Burns

Dekkers

Robert

Sartorius

Selmes

Stoppe

Vernooij-Dassen

Waldemar

(2008). Consensus statement on genetic research in dementia. American Journal of Alzheimer's Disease and Other Dementias, 23(3), 262–266. https://doi.org/10.1177/1533317508317817

60.

Rubright

Casarett

D. J.

Gur

Xie

S. X.

Karlawish

Sankar

(2010). A memory and organizational aid improves Alzheimer disease research consent capacity: results of a randomized, controlled trial. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 18(12), 1124–1132.

61.

Ruof

M. C.

(2004). Vulnerability, vulnerable populations, and policy. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 14(4), 411–425. https://doi.org/10.1353/ken.2004.0044

62.

Schmand

Gouwenberg

Smit

J. H.

Jonker

(1999). Assessment of mental competency in community-dwelling elderly. Alzheimer Disease and Associated Disorders, 13(2), 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1097/00002093-199904000-00004

63.

Seaman

J. B.

Terhorst

Gentry

Hunsaker

Parker

L. S.

Lingler

J. H.

(2015). Psychometric properties of a decisional capacity screening tool for individuals contemplating participation in Alzheimer’s disease research. Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease, 46(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-142559

64.

Sherratt

Soteriou

Evans

(2007). Ethical issues in social research involving people with dementia. Dementia, 6(4), 463–479. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301207084365

65.

Silva

Cascio

M. A.

Racine

(2020). Person-oriented research ethics and dementia: The lack of consensus. The American Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 41(1), 21. https://doi.org/10.5195/aa.2020.211

66.

Slaughter

Cole

Jennings

Reimer

M. A.

(2007). Consent and assent to participate in research from people with dementia. Nursing Ethics, 14(7), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733007071355

67.

Sonne

S. C.

Andrews

J. O.

Gentilin

S. M.

Oppenheimer

Obeid

Brady

Wolf

Davis

Magruder

(2013). Development and pilot testing of a video-assisted informed consent process. Contemporary Clinical Trials, 36(1), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.2013.05.011

68.

Stanley

Guido

Stanley

Shortell

(1984). The elderly patient and informed consent: Empirical findings. Journal of the American Medical Association, 252(10), 1302–1306.

69.

Stanley

Guido

Garvin

(1988). The functional competency of elderly at risk. The Gerontologist, 28(Suppl), 53–58. https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/28.Suppl.53

70.

Sunderland

Dukoff

(1996). Informed consent with cognitively impaired patients: An NIMH perspective on the durable power of attorney. Accountability in Research, 4(3–4), 217–226. https://doi.org/10.1080/08989629608573882

71.

Sutton

L. B.

Erlen

J. A.

Glad

J. M.

Siminoff

L. A.

(2003). Recruiting vulnerable populations for research: Revisiting the ethical issues. Journal of Professional Nursing, 19(2), 106–112. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpnu.2003.16

72.

Vass

A. A.

Minardi

H. A.

Ward

Aggarwal

Garfield

Cybyk

(2003). Research into communication patterns and consequences for effective care of people with Alzheimer’s and their carers: Ethical considerations. Dementia, 2(1), 21–48. https://doi.org/10.1177/1471301203002001993

73.

Wark

MacPhail

McKay

Müller

(2017). Informed consent in a vulnerable population group: Supporting individuals aging with intellectual disability to participate in developing their own health and support programs. Australian Health Review, 41(4), 436–442. https://doi.org/10.1071/AH15235

74.

Wildridge

Bell

(2002). How CLIP became ECLIPSE: A mnemonic to assist in searching for health policy/management information. Health Information & Libraries Journal, 19(2), 113–115. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1471-1842.2002.00378.x

75.

Yang

Y. T.

Kels

C. G.

(2017). Ethical considerations in electronic monitoring of the cognitively impaired. The Journal of the American Board of Family Medicine, 30(2), 258–263. https://doi.org/10.3122/jabfm.2017.02.160219

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.03 MB

0.09 MB

0.14 MB