Developing strategies to ensure the safe participation of people with dementia in research is critical to support their wider inclusion in research and to advance knowledge in the areas of dementia policy and practice.
Objectives
This literature review synthesizes and critically appraises different approaches to promote the safe participation of people with dementia in qualitative research.
Methods
Two databases were searched for articles that discuss the methodological or ethical aspects of qualitative research involving people with dementia. We did not focus on informed consent or ethical review processes as these have been reviewed elsewhere.
Findings
Key issues that impact participant safety include: language, gatekeepers, the research relationship, communication, dealing with distress, knowledge dissemination, and researcher skills.
Conclusion
By synthesizing different approaches to safety and highlighting areas of debate, we hope to advance discussion and to contribute to the development of inclusive research methods.
BartlettH.MartinW. (2002) Ethical issues in dementia care research. In: WilkinsonH. (eds) The perspectives of people with dementia: Research methods and motivations, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, pp. 47–61.
2.
BartlettR. (2012) Modifying the diary interview method to research the lives of people with dementia. Qualitative Health Research22(12): 1717–1726.
3.
BeattieA.Daker-WhiteG.GilliardJ.MeansR. (2004) ‘How can they tell?' A qualitative study of the views of younger people about their dementia and dementia care services. Health and Social Care in the Community12(4): 359–368.
4.
BeattieE. (2009) Research participation of individuals with dementia: Decisional capacity, informed consent, and considerations for nurse investigators. Research in Gerontological Nursing2(2): 94–102.
5.
BeresfordP. (2002) User involvement in research and evaluation: Liberation or regulation?Social Policy & Society1(02): 95–105.
6.
BeuscherL.GrandoV. T. (2009) Challenges in conducting qualitative research with individuals with dementia. Research in Gerontological Nursing2(1): 6–11.
7.
ClarkeC. L.KeadyJ. (2002) Getting down to brass tacks. In: WilkinsonH. (ed.) The perspectives of people with dementia: Research methods and motivations, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, pp. 25–46.
8.
CorbinJ.MorseJ. M. (2003) The unstructured interactive interview: Issues of reciprocity and risks when dealing with sensitive topics. Qualitative Inquiry9(3): 335–354.
9.
CotrellV.SchulzR. (1993) The perspective of the patient with Alzheimer's disease: A neglected dimension of dementia research. The Gerontologist33(2): 205–211.
10.
CubitK. (2010) Informed consent for research involving people with dementia: A grey area. Contemporary Nurse34(2): 230–236.
DewingJ. (2002) From ritual to relationship: A person-centred approach to consent in qualitative research with older people who have a dementia. Dementia1(2): 157–171.
13.
DewingJ. (2007) Participatory research: A method for process consent with persons who have dementia. Dementia6(1): 11–25.
14.
Dickson-SwiftV.JamesE. L.KippenS.LiamputtongP. (2007) Doing sensitive research: What challenges do qualitative researchers face?Qualitative Research7(3): 327–353.
15.
DigbyR.LeeS.WilliamsA. (2016) Interviewing people with dementia in hospital: Recommendations for researchers. Journal of Clinical Nursing25(7–8): 1156–1165.
16.
DownsM. (1997) The emergence of the person in dementia research. Ageing & Society17(5): 597–607.
17.
Ellsberg, M., & Heise, L. (2002). Bearing witness: Ethics in domestic violence research. The Lancet, 359(9317), 1599–1604.
18.
FlemmingK.BriggsM. (2007) Electronic searching to locate qualitative research: Evaluation of three strategies. Journal of Advanced Nursing57(1): 95–100.
19.
GarandL.LinglerJ. H.ConnerK. O.DewM. A. (2009) Diagnostic labels, stigma, and participation in research related to dementia and mild cognitive impairment. Research in Gerontological Nursing2(2): 112–121.
20.
HeggestadA. K. T.NortvedtP.SlettebøÅ. (2013) The importance of moral sensitivity when including persons with dementia in qualitative research. Nursing Ethics20(1): 30–40.
21.
HellstromI.NolanM.NordenfeltL.LundhU. (2007) Ethical and methodological issues in interviewing persons with dementia. Nursing Ethics14(5): 608–619.
22.
HewittJ. (2007) Ethical components of researcher-researched relationships in qualitative interviewing. Qualitative Health Research17(8): 1149–1159.
23.
HollandS.KyddA. (2015) Ethical issues when involving people newly diagnosed with dementia in research. Nurse Researcher22(4): 25–29.
24.
HubbardG.DownsM.TesterS. (2003) Including older people with dementia in research: Challenges and strategies. Aging & Mental Health7(5): 351–351.
25.
KendallM.MurrayS. A.CarduffE.WorthA.HarrisF.LloydA.SheikhA. (2010) Use of multiperspective qualitative interviews to understand patients’ and carers’ beliefs, experiences, and needs. British Medical Journal340: 196–199.
26.
KitchinR. (2000) The researched opinions on research: Disabled people and disability research. Disability & Society15(1): 25–47.
27.
MandersonL.BennettE.Andajani-SutjahjoS. (2006) The social dynamics of the interview: Age, class, and gender. Qualitative Health Research16(10): 1317–1334.
28.
McCosker, H., Barnard, A., & Gerber, R. (2001). Undertaking sensitive research: Issues and strategies for meeting the safety needs of all participants. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 2(1). Retrieved from: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/983.
29.
McGovernJ. (2014) The forgotten: Dementia and the aging LGBT community. Journal of Gerontological Social Work57(8): 845–857.
30.
McKeownJ.ClarkeA.IngletonC.RepperJ. (2010) Actively involving people with dementia in qualitative research. Journal of Clinical Nursing19(13–14): 1935–1943.
31.
McKillopJ. (2002) Did research alter anything. In: WilkinsonH. (ed.) The perspectives of people with dementia: Research methods and motivations, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, pp. 109–114.
32.
McKillopJ.WilkinsonH. (2004) Make it easy on yourself! Advice to researchers from someone with dementia on being interviewed. Dementia3(2): 117–125.
33.
MooreT. F.HollettJ. (2003) Giving voice to persons living with dementia: The researcher’s opportunities and challenges. Nursing Science Quarterly16(2): 163–167.
34.
MurphyK.JordanF.HunterA.CooneyA.CaseyD. (2015) Articulating the strategies for maximising the inclusion of people with dementia in qualitative research studies. Dementia14(6): 800–824.
35.
NygårdL. (2006) How can we get access to the experiences of people with dementia?Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy13(2): 101–112.
36.
O'ConnorD.PhinneyA.HulkoW. (2010) Dementia at the intersections: A unique case study exploring social location. Journal of Aging Studies24(1): 30–39.
37.
PesonenH.-M.RemesA. M.IsolaA. (2011) Ethical aspects of researching subjective experiences in early-stage dementia. Nursing Ethics18(5): 651–661.
38.
PrattR. (2002) ‘Nobody’s ever asked how I felt’. In: WilkinsonH. (ed.) The perspectives of people with dementia: Research methods and motivations, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, pp. 165–182.
39.
PrattR.WilkinsonH. (2001) ‘Tell me the truth'. The effect of being told the diagnosis of dementia from the perspective of the person with dementia, London: Mental Health Foundation.
40.
RichardsH. M.SchwartzL. J. (2002) Ethics of qualitative research: Are there special issues for health services research?Family Practice19(2): 135–139.
41.
RobinsonE. (2002) Should people with Alzheimer’s disease take part in research. In: WilkinsonH. (ed.) The perspectives of people with dementia: Research methods and motivations, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, pp. 101–108.
Scottish Dementia Working Group Research Sub-Group (2014) Core principles for involving people with dementia in research: Innovative practice. Dementia13(5): 680–685.
44.
SherrattC.SoteriouT.EvansS. (2007) Ethical issues in social research involving people with dementia. Dementia6(4): 463–479.
45.
SlaughterS.ColeD.JenningsE. (2007) Consent and assent to participate in research from people with dementia. Nursing Ethics14(1): 27–40.
46.
TannerD. (2012) Co-research with older people with dementia: Experience and reflections. Journal of Mental Health21(3): 296–306.
47.
TombaughT. N.McIntyreN. J. (1992) The mini-mental state examination: A comprehensive review. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society40(9): 922–935.
48.
WhitfieldK.WismerS. (2006) Inclusivity and dementia: Health services planning with individuals with dementia. Healthcare Policy1(2): 120–134.
49.
WiersmaE. C. (2011) Using photovoice with people with early-stage Alzheimer’s disease: A discussion of methodology. Dementia10(2): 203–216.
50.
WilkinsonH. (2002) Including people with dementia in research: Methods and motivations. In: WilkinsonH. (ed.) The perspectives of people with dementia: Research methods and motivations, London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers, pp. 9–24.
51.
WilkinsonH.MilneA. J. (2003) Sharing a diagnosis of dementia – Learning from the patient perspective. Aging & Mental Health7(4): 300–307.
52.
WilsonD.NevilleS. (2009) Culturally safe research with vulnerable populations. Contemporary Nurse: A Journal for the Australian Nursing Profession33(1): 69–79.
53.
World Health Organization (2012) Dementia: A public health priority, Geneva: World Health Organization Press.
54.
WrightK.GolderS.Lewis-LightK. (2015) What value is the CINAHL database when searching for systematic reviews of qualitative studies?Systematic Reviews4(104)
