Sage Journals: Discover world-class research

Abstract

The visual design of consumer packaged products is crucial for brand success, as consumers learn to recognise pack styles and look for these in buying situations. Therefore, any pack redesign is risky, as the change could interfere with consumers’ ability to find and buy the brand. Market research is often undertaken to reduce the risk of poor pack redesign decisions. Many different approaches are available, meaning marketers must select an appropriate method to increase the chance of pack redesign success. As such, our paper investigates the role of market research in packaging redesign performance. We examine data collected via an online survey with 227 marketers who were asked questions about the last pack redesign they were involved with within the previous two years. The findings challenge the assumption that conducting pack redesign research will boost its success. Notably, commonly used methods and metrics, such as focus groups or brand attitudes, are associated with less successful outcomes. In contrast, testing that identifies and suggests elements to retain in an existing pack design, that consumers link with the brand proves promising, as it is linked to more successful pack redesigns.

Keywords

packaging pack redesigns brand identity market research distinctive assets

Get full access to this article

View all access options for this article.

References

Ambrose

Harris

(2011). Packaging the brand: The relationship between packaging design and brand identity. AVA Publishing.

Andrivet

(2022). What to learn from tropicana’s packaging redesign failure? In Available at: https://www.thebrandingjournal.com/2015/05/what-to-learn-from-tropicanas-packaging-redesign-failure/. The branding journal.

Armacost

R. L.

Hosseini

J. C.

Morris

S. A.

Rehbein

K. A.

(1991). An empirical comparison of direct questioning, scenario, and randomized response methods for obtaining sensitive business information. Decision Sciences, 22(5), 1073–1090. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.1991.tb01907.x

Bendle

Farris

Pfeifer

Reibstein

(2010). Metrics that matter – to marketing managers. Marketing: Journal of Research and Management, 32(1), 18–23. https://doi.org/10.15358/0344-1369-2010-jrm-1-18

Bennett

(2006). Design studies: Theory and research in graphic design. Princeton Architectural Press.

Dawes

Graham

Trinh

Sharp

(2022). The unbearable lightness of buying. Journal of Marketing Management, 38(7-8), 683–708. https://doi.org/10.1080/0267257x.2021.1963308

Deliza

MacFie

(2001). Product packaging and branding. In Food, people and society: A European perspective of consumers’ food choices (pp. 55–72). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-04601-2_5

Dickson

P. R.

Sawyer

A. G.

(1990). The price knowledge and search of supermarket shoppers. Journal of Marketing, 54(3), 42–53. https://doi.org/10.2307/1251815

Foley

(2023). Does this failed biscuit rebrand show designers sometimes get it wrong? In Available at: https://www.creativebloq.com/news/bahlsen-rebrand-fail. Creative Bloq.

10.

Fuller

Hogan

Pervan

(2024). How important is the in-store environment for new brands? International Journal of Market Research, 66(1), Article 14707853231219419. https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853231219419

11.

Gallop

(2020). Cadbury in first design overhaul for 50 years. Hannah Gallop Communications. Available at: https://www.barques.co.uk/insight/cadbury-reveals-its-first-major-design-overhaul-in-50-years

12.

Gebhardt

G. F.

Farrelly

F. J.

Conduit

(2019). Market intelligence dissemination practices. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 72–90. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022242919830958

13.

George

(2010). New Kotex brand: Discreetness makes a bold statement. Packaging World. Available at: https://www.packworld.com/article/package-design/graphic/new-kotex-brand-discreetness-makes-bold-statement

14.

Graham

Kennedy

(2022). Quantifying the target market for advertisers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 21(1), 33–48. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1986

15.

Grand View Research . (2023). Food packaging market size to reach $562.3 billion by 2030. Grand View Research.

16.

Green

P. E.

Tull

D. S.

(1974). Research for marketing decisions. Prentice Hall.

17.

Hagen

(2023). The quest for modern packaging design. Reach Brands. Available at: https://www.reachbrands.co.uk/blog/the-quest-for-modern-packaging-design/

18.

Hair

J. F.

Jr. Bush

R. P.

Ortinau

D. J.

(2006). Marketing research. McGraw Hill.

19.

Harald Baayen

Milin

(2010). Analyzing reaction times. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(2), 12–28. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.807

20.

Hartnett

Kennedy

Sharp

Greenacre

(2016). Marketers’intuitions about the sales effectiveness of advertisements. Journal of Marketing Behavior, 2(2-3), 177–194. https://doi.org/10.1561/107.00000034

21.

Herstatt

Von Hippel

(1992). From experience: Developing new product concepts via the lead user method: A case study in a “low-tech” field. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 9(3), 213–221. https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-5885.930213

22.

Hossain

Anesbury

Z. W.

Driesener

Trinh

(2023). Valuing the contribution of ultra-light buyers. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 23(2), 875–887. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.2251

23.

Kinchla

R. A.

(1992). Attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 43(1), 711–742. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.43.020192.003431

24.

Landwehr

J. R.

Wentzel

Herrmann

(2012). The tipping point of design: How product design and brands interact to affect consumers’ preferences. Psychology and Marketing, 29(6), 422–433. https://doi.org/10.1002/mar.20531

25.

Marshall

Cardon

Poddar

Fontenot

(2013). Does sample size matter in qualitative research? A review of qualitative interviews in is research. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 54(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/08874417.2013.11645667

26.

Meyers

H. M.

Lubliner

M. J.

the American Marketing Association . (1998). The marketer's guide to successful package design. NTC Business Books.

27.

Morwitz

V. G.

Steckel

J. H.

Gupta

(2007). When do purchase intentions predict sales? International Journal of Forecasting, 23(3), 347–364. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2007.05.015

28.

Nguyen

Romaniuk

Faulkner

Cohen

(2018). Does an expanded brand user base of Co-branded advertising help ad-memorability? International Journal of Market Research, 60(4), 366–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785318762682

29.

Nielsen (2020). Nielsen bases honors top packaging redesigns. In The shelby report. Gainesville, GA.

30.

Orth

Campana

Malkewitz

(2010). Formation of consumer price expectation based on package design: Attractive and quality routes. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 18(1), 23–40. https://doi.org/10.2753/mtp1069-6679180102

31.

Orth

U. R.

Malkewitz

(2006). Packaging design as resource for the construction of brand identity. 3rd academy of wine business research conference.

32.

Page

Sharp

Lockshin

Sorensen

(2018). Parents and children in supermarkets: Incidence and influence. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 40(1), 31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.08.023

33.

Phua

Page

Trinh

Hartnett

Kennedy

(2023). Does childhood exposure to a brand improve brand name recognition? Comparing age-of-acquisition effects with ongoing brand exposure and experience. Journal of Advertising Research. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-2023-025

34.

Qureshi

(2021). Bahlsen unveils ‘striking’ new branding. Packaging News. https://www.packagingnews.co.uk/design/new-packs/bahlsen-unveils-striking-new-branding-12-03-2021.

35.

Rettie

Brewer

(2000). The verbal and visual components of package design. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 9(1), 56–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/10610420010316339

36.

Ries

Trout

(1981). Positioning: The battle for your mind. McGrawHill.

37.

Romaniuk

(2018). Building distinctive brand assets. Oxford University Press.

38.

Romaniuk

(2018). Measuring distinctive asset value. In Romaniuk

(Ed.), Building distinctive brand assets (pp. 72–80). Oxford University Press.

39.

Romaniuk

Caruso

(2018). Building physical availability with distinctive assets. In Romaniuk

(Ed.), Building distinctive brand assets (pp. 43–55). Oxford University Press.

40.

Romaniuk

Jenni

Nenycz-Thiel

Magda

(2014). Measuring the strength of color brand-name links: The comparative efficacy of measurement approaches. Journal of Advertising Research, 54(3), 313–319. https://doi.org/10.2501/JAR-54-3-313-319

41.

Rossiter

J. R.

(2008). Qualitative research results. International Journal of Advertising, 27(5), 915–919.

42.

Roster

C. A.

(2021). Using memes in online surveys to engage and motivate respondents. International Journal of Market Research, 63(6), 754–771. https://doi.org/10.1177/1470785320981821

43.

Ryynänen

Rusko

(2015). Professionals’ view of consumers’ packaging interactions–a narrative analysis. Packaging Technology and Science, 28(4), 341–355. https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2107

44.

Sampson

P. M. J.

(1996). Commonsense in qualitative research. Market Research Society. Journal, 38(4), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078539603800404

45.

Seymour

Blair

(1998). Marketing research: A problem solving approach. McGraw-Hill.

46.

Sharp

(2017a). Market research. In Sharp

(Ed.), Marketing: Theory, evidence, practice (pp. 146–202). Oxford University.

47.

Sharp

(2017b). Marketing: Theory, evidence, practice. Oxford University Press.

48.

Shayon

(2011). Bad news, bears: Coke pulls back on white cans in holiday campaign to save polar bear . Available at: https://www.brandchannel.com/2011/12/01/bad-news-bears-coke-pulls-back-on-white-cans-in-holiday-campaign-to-save-polar-bear-updated/

49.

Sinkovics

R. R.

Penz

Ghauri

P. N.

(2008). Enhancing the trustworthiness of qualitative research in international business. Management International Review, 48(6), 689–714. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-008-0103-z

50.

Sorensen

Bogomolova

Anderson

Trinh

Sharp

Kennedy

Page

Wright

(2017). Fundamental patterns of in-store shopper behavior. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 37(1), 182–194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2017.02.003

51.

Stern

(1981). Handbook of package design research. John Wiley & Sons.

52.

Stewart

D. W.

Shamdasani

P. N.

Rook

D. W.

(2007). Focus groups: Theory and practice. Sage Publications, Ltd.

53.

Thomas

J. W.

(2012). The basics of packaging research (pp. 1–4). Decision Analyst.

54.

Twyman

W. A.

(1996). Designing advertising research for marketing decisions. Journal of the Market Research Society, 38(4), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1177/147078539603800413

55.

Veryzer

(1993). Aesthetic response and the influence of design principles on product preferences. Advances in Consumer Research, 20(1), 224.

56.

Veryzer

R. W.

Jr. Hutchinson

J. W.

(1998). The influence of unity and prototypicality on aesthetic responses to new product designs. Journal of Consumer Research, 24(4), 374–385. https://doi.org/10.1086/209516

57.

Ward

Romaniuk

Trinh

Dawes

Beal

(2023). How to signal product variety on pack: An investigation of color and image cues. International Journal of Market Research, 66(1), 46–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/14707853231201852

58.

Zikmund

D’Alessandro

Winzar

Lowe

Barry

(2013). Marketing research. Cengage Australia.

Supplementary Material

Please find the following supplemental material available below.

For Open Access articles published under a Creative Commons License, all supplemental material carries the same license as the article it is associated with.

For non-Open Access articles published, all supplemental material carries a non-exclusive license, and permission requests for re-use of supplemental material or any part of supplemental material shall be sent directly to the copyright owner as specified in the copyright notice associated with the article.

0.00 MB

0.22 MB

The role of market research in pack redesign performance

Abstract

Keywords

Get full access to this article

References

Supplementary Material