The development of the Internet has increasingly led to advertisements presented on rich and interactive websites offering users a high level of control over the contents they are exposed to—sometimes to the extent of allowing them to skip “unwanted” ads preceding the desired content. While previous studies have shown that such interactivity and control can positively impact users’ subjective experience and attitude toward the advertisements, the present study examined their impact on users’ attention to the ad (using eye-tracking) and actual ad effectiveness (ad memory). It relied on an experimental design allowing for comparing the effectiveness of similar ads that were presented by realistic interfaces simulating common types of online media (in addition to “traditional television” as a form of passive baseline comparison condition). The interfaces consisted of a news website (including many stimuli surrounding the ads and an “ad countdown timer,” that might detract users’ attention from the ads) and YouTube (also including the “skip ad” option). Ad memory correlated positively (negatively) with gaze direction to the ad area (outside the ad area) and was particularly low when users had the opportunity to stop the ad after a few seconds. These results emphasize the scale of ad effectiveness decrease that may occur when the media interfaces offer users easy ways of avoiding video ads by gazing toward surrounding stimuli and by skipping the ads. The implications of these findings for advertisers are addressed, and it is suggested that future studies on the topic should include other measures of ad effectiveness and other distracting factors that might further detract users from online ad video content in real-life contexts.
AakerD. A.BruzzoneD. E. (1985). Causes of irritation in advertising. Journal of Marketing, 49, 47–57.
2.
AllportD. A. (1980). Attention and performance. Cognitive Psychology: New Directions, 1, 12–153.
3.
AlyM.Turk-BrowneN. B. (2016). Attention promotes episodic encoding by stabilizing hippocampal representations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113, E420–E429.
4.
AngellR.GortonM.SauerJ.BottomleyP.WhiteJ. (2016). Don’t distract me when I’m media multitasking: Toward a theory for raising advertising recall and recognition. Journal of Advertising, 45, 198–210.
5.
BaddeleyA. (1986). Working memory (Oxford psychology series, No. 11). New York, NY: Clarendon Press.
6.
BangH.KimJ.ChoiD. (2018). Exploring the effects of ad-task relevance and ad salience on ad avoidance: The moderating role of internet use motivation. Computers in Human Behavior, 89, 70–78.
7.
BelancheD.FlaviánC.Pérez-RuedaA. (2017). Understanding interactive online advertising: Congruence and product involvement in highly and lowly arousing, skippable video ads. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 37, 75–88.
8.
BreuerR.BrettelM. (2012). Short-and long-term effects of online advertising: Differences between new and existing customers. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 26, 155–166.
9.
CarrV. A.EngelS. A.KnowltonB. J. (2013). Top-down modulation of hippocampal encoding activity as measured by high-resolution functional MRI. Neuropsychologia, 51, 1829–1837.
10.
ChoC.-H.CheonH. J. (2004). Why do people avoid advertising on the internet?Journal of Advertising, 33, 89–97.
11.
ChunM. M.GolombJ. D.Turk-BrowneN. B. (2011). A taxonomy of external and internal attention. Annual Review of Psychology, 62, 73–101.
12.
ChunM. M.Turk-BrowneN. B. (2007). Interactions between attention and memory. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 17, 177–184.
13.
CohenJ. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behaviors science (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
14.
DeetlefsJ.ChylinskiM.OrtmannA. (2015). MTurk “unscrubbed”: Exploring the good, the “super,” and the unreliable on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Kensington, New South Wales, Australia: University of New South Wales.
15.
DehghaniM.NiakiM. K.RamezaniI.SaliR. (2016). Evaluating the influence of YouTube advertising for attraction of young customers. Computers in Human Behavior, 59, 165–172.
16.
DehghaniM.TumerM. (2015). A research on effectiveness of Facebook advertising on enhancing purchase intention of consumers. Computers in Human Behavior, 49, 597–600.
17.
De HouwerJ.ThomasS.BaeyensF. (2001). Association learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 853–869.
18.
DesimoneR.DuncanJ. (1995). Neural mechanisms of selective visual attention. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 18, 193–222.
19.
DraganskaM.HartmannW. R.StangleinG. (2014). Internet versus television advertising: A brand-building comparison. Journal of Marketing Research, 51, 578–590.
20.
DrèzeX.HussherrF. X. (2003). Internet advertising: Is anybody watching?Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17, 8–23.
21.
EdwardsS. M.LiH.LeeJ.-H. (2002). Forced exposure and psychological reactance: Antecedents and consequences of the perceived intrusiveness of pop-up ads. Journal of Advertising, 31, 83–95.
22.
ElliottM. T.SpeckP. S. (1998). Consumer perceptions of advertising clutter and its impact across various media. Journal of Advertising Research, 38, 29–30.
FortinD. R.DholakiaR. R. (2005). Interactivity and vividness effects on social presence and involvement with a web-based advertisement. Journal of Business Research, 58, 387–396.
25.
GallagherK.FosterK. D.ParsonsJ. (2001). The medium is not the message: Advertising effectiveness and content evaluation in print and on the web. Journal of Advertising Research, 41, 57–70.
26.
GeuensM.De PelsmackerP. (2017). Planning and conducting experimental advertising research and questionnaire design. Journal of Advertising, 46, 83–100.
27.
GoodrichK.SchillerS. Z.GallettaD. (2015). Consumer reactions to intrusiveness of online-video advertisements: Do length, informativeness, and humor help (or hinder) marketing outcomes?Journal of Advertising Research, 55, 37–50.
28.
HuangP.LurieN. H.MitraS. (2009). Searching for experience on the web: An empirical examination of consumer behavior for search and experience goods. Journal of Marketing, 73, 55–69.
29.
JinC. H.VillegasJ. (2006). Consumer responses to advertising on the internet: The effect of individual difference on ambivalence and avoidance. Cyberpsychology & Behavior, 10, 258–266.
30.
KaidL. L. (2002). Political advertising and information seeking: Comparing exposure via traditional and Internet channels. Journal of Advertising, 31, 27–35.
31.
KimE.ChoiS. M.KimS.YehY. H. (2013). Factors affecting advertising avoidance on online video sites. The Journal of Advertising and Promotion Research, 2, 87–121.
32.
KrishnanS. S.SitaramanR. K. (2013). Understanding the effectiveness of video ads: A measurement study. Proceedings of the 2013 Conference on Internet Measurement Conference. ACM, 149–162.
33.
LangA.BollsP.PotterR. F.KawaharaK. (1999). The effects of production pacing and arousing content on the information processing of television messages. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 43, 451–475.
34.
LeeD.HosanagarK.NairH. S. (2018). Advertising content and consumer engagement on social media: Evidence from Facebook. Management Science, 64, 5105–5131.
35.
LeeJ.AhnJ.-H. (2012). Attention to banner ads and their effectiveness: An eye-tracking approach. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 17, 119–137.
36.
LiH.EdwardsS. M.LeeJ.-H. (2002). Measuring the intrusiveness of advertisements: Scale development and validation. Journal of Advertising, 31, 37–47.
37.
LiH.LoH.-Y. (2015). Do you recognize its brand? The effectiveness of online in-stream video advertisements. Journal of Advertising44, 208–218.
38.
LoganK.BrightL. F.GangadharbatlaH. (2012). Facebook versus television: Advertising value perceptions among females. Journal of Research in Interactive Marketing, 6, 164–179.
39.
NatarajanT.BalakrishnanJ.BalasubramanianS. A.ManickavasagamJ. (2014). Perception of Indian consumers towards social media advertisements in Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube and Twitter. International Journal of Internet Marketing and Advertising, 8, 264–284.
40.
NysveenH.BreivikE. (2005). The influence of media on advertising effectiveness a comparison of internet, posters and radio. International Journal of Market Research47, 381–404.
41.
OrenN.Shapira-LichterI.LernerY.TarraschR.HendlerT.GiladiN.AshE. L. (2016). How attention modulates encoding of dynamic stimuli. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 507.
42.
PashkevichM.Dorai-RajS.KellarM.ZigmondD. (2012). Empowering online advertisements by empowering viewers with the right to choose: The relative effectiveness of skippable video advertisements on YouTube. Journal of Advertising Research, 52, 451–457.
43.
PercyL.RossiterJ. R. (1997). A theory-based approach to pretesting advertising. In WellsW. D. (Ed.), Measuring advertising effectiveness, pp. 267–281. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
44.
RaneyA. A.ArpanL. M.PashupatiK.BrillD. A. (2003). At the movies, on the web: An investigation of the effects of entertaining and interactive web content on site and brand evaluations. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 17, 38–53.
45.
SoniM. J. (2017). Effects of varying involvement level within a television program on recall of cognitive versus affective advertisement. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 34, 338–348.
46.
SpeckP. S.ElliottM. T. (1997). Predictors of advertising avoidance in print and broadcast media. Journal of Advertising, 26, 61–76.
47.
SterneJ. (2002). World Wide Web marketing: Integrating the Web into your marketing strategy. London, England: John Wiley & Sons.
48.
TaylorD. G.LewinJ. E.StruttonD. (2011). Friends, fans, and followers: Do ads work on social networks? How gender and age shape receptivity. Journal of Advertising Research, 51, 258–275.
49.
TaylorJ.KennedyR.McDonaldC.HaddadY.OuarzaziE.LarguinatL. (2013). Is the multi-platform whole more powerful than its separate parts? Measuring the sales effects of cross-media advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 53, 200–211.
50.
UncapherM. R.RuggM. D. (2009). Selecting for memory? The influence of selective attention on the mnemonic binding of contextual information. Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 8270–8279.
51.
WedelM.PietersR. (2000). Eye fixations on advertisements and memory for brands: A model and findings. Marketing Science, 19, 297–312.
52.
WedelM.PietersR. (2008). A review of eye-tracking research in marketing. In MalhotraN. K. (Ed.), Review of marketing research, pp. 123–147. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing.
