Companies frequently place out-of-home advertisements in locations hoping their brand becomes associated with that environment’s favorable attributes. However, prior research using U.S. subjects suggested that these associative benefits do not actually transfer onto the advertised brand. We faithfully replicate this earlier research using a non-Western sample and find that culturally based communication and cognitive processing models may explain the lack of results in the earlier study and affirmative results in our study. Three experimental conditions are used: single exposure, multiple exposures, and high involvement. We find that a billboard’s external environment does influence brand evaluations but only in the single-exposure condition. A possible explanation for why results were not evident in the multiple exposure and high involvement conditions may be related to the amount of message elaboration across study conditions.
AliyevF.ÜrkmezT.WagnerR. (2018). Luxury brands do not glitter equally for everyone. Journal of Brand Management, 25, 337–350.
2.
AllenC. T.MaddenT. J. (1985). A closer look at classical conditioning. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 301–315.
3.
BaackD. W.WilsonR. T.TillB. D. (2008). Creativity and memory effects: Recall, recognition, and an exploration of non-traditional media. Journal of Advertising, 37(4), 85–94.
4.
BaackD. W.WilsonR. T.TillB. D. (2016). Culture, development, and advertising content: An exploratory replication and extension of past international advertising research to outdoor advertising. Marketing Management Journal, 26, 18–34.
5.
BakerW. E.HoneaH.RussellC. A. (2004). Do not wait to reveal the brand name. Journal of Advertising, 33(3), 77–85.
6.
CacioppoJ. T.Marshall-GoodellB. S.TassinaryL. G.PettyR. E. (1992). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: Classical conditioning is more effective when prior knowledge about the attitude stimulus is low than high. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 28, 207–233.
7.
CacioppoJ. T.PettyR. E. (1985). Central and peripheral routes to persuasion: The role of message repetition. In AlwittL.MitchellA. (Eds.), Psychological processes and advertising effects: Theory, research, and applications (pp. 91–112). Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
8.
ChenA. C.ChangR. Y.BesheratA.BaackD. W. (2013). Who benefits from multiple brand celebrity endorsements? An experimental investigation. Psychology & Marketing, 30, 850–860.
9.
ChuaH. F.BolandJ. E.NisbettR. E. (2005). Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 102, 12629–12633.
10.
de MooijM.HofstedeG. (2010). The Hofstede model: Applications to global branding and advertising strategy. International Journal of Advertising, 29, 85–110.
11.
FerraroG. P. (2001). The cultural dimension of international business (4th ed.). New York, NY: Prentice Hall.
12.
GornG. J. (1982). The effects of music in advertising on choice behavior: A classical conditioning approach. Journal of Marketing, 46, 94–101.
13.
GreshamL. G.ShimpT. A. (1985). Attitude toward the advertisement and brand attitudes: A classical conditioning perspective. Journal of Advertising, 14, 10–49.
14.
GrossmanR. P.TillB. D. (1998). The persistence of classically conditioned brand attitudes. Journal of Advertising, 27, 23–31.
15.
HallE. T. (1976). Beyond culture. Garden City, NJ: Anchor Press/Double Day.
16.
HermekingM. (2006). Culture and internet consumption: Contributions from cross-cultural marketing and advertising research. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 192–216.
17.
HerrP. M.FazioR. H. (1991). On the effectiveness of repeated positive expressions as an advertising strategy. Advances in Consumer Research, 18(1), 30–32.
18.
JaniszewskiC.WarlopL. (1993). The influence of classical conditioning procedures on subsequent attention to the conditioned brand. Journal of Consumer Research, 20, 171–189.
19.
JiL.PengK.NisbettR. E. (2000). Culture, control, and perception of relationships in the environment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 943–955.
20.
KerrG.SchultzD. E.LingsI. (2016). “Someone should do something”: Replication and an agenda for collective action. Journal of Advertising, 45, 4–12.
21.
KimJ.LimJ.BhargavaM. (1998). The role of affect in attitude formation: A classical conditioning approach. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26, 143–152.
22.
LindsayR. M.EhrenbergA. S. C. (1993). The design of replicated studies. The American Statistician, 47, 217–228.
23.
LutchynY. A.FaberR. J. (2016). A new look at associative learning in advertising: Can messages influence contextual associations?Journal of Current Issues & Research in Advertising, 37, 28–44.
24.
MasudaT.NisbettR. E. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 922–934.
25.
MillerF.AllenC. T. (2012). How does celebrity meaning transfer? Investigating the process of meaning transfer with celebrity affiliates and mature brands. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 22, 443–452.
26.
MitchellA. A. (1986). The effect of verbal and visual components of advertisements on brand attitudes and attitude toward the advertisement. Journal of Consumer Research, 13(1), 12–24.
27.
MitchellA. A.OlsonJ. C. (1981). Are product attribute beliefs the only mediator of advertising effects on brand attitude?Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 318–332.
28.
MitchellC. J.De HouwerJ.LovibondP. F. (2009). The propositional nature of human associative learning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 32, 183–198.
29.
NisbettR. E.PengK.ChoiI.NorenzayanA. (2001). Culture and systems of thought: Holistic versus analytic cognition. Psychological Review, 108, 291–310.
30.
NorenzayanA.NisbettR. E. (2000). Culture and causal cognition. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 9(4), 132–135.
31.
NorenzayanA.SmithE. E.KimB. J.NisbettR. E. (2002). Cultural preferences for formal versus intuitive reasoning. Cognitive Science, 26, 653–684.
32.
OkazakiS.MuellerB.DiehlS. (2013). A multi-country examination of hard-sell and soft-sell advertising: Comparing global consumer positioning in holistic- and analytic-thinking cultures. Journal of Advertising Research, 53, 258–272.
33.
PengK.NisbettR. E. (1999). Culture, dialectics, and reasoning about contradiction. American Psychologist, 54, 741–754.
34.
PettyR. E.CacioppoJ. T.SchumannD. (1983). Central and peripheral routes to advertising effectiveness: The moderating role of involvement. Journal of Consumer Research, 10, 135–146.
35.
PriluckR. L.TillB. D. (2004). The role of contingency awareness, involvement, and need for cognition in attitude formation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32, 329–344.
36.
RouxA. T.van der WaldtD. (2016). Toward a model to enhance synergy of out-of-home advertising media integration strategies. Journal of Promotion Management, 22, 386–402.
37.
SchemerC.MatthesJ.WirthW.TextorS. (2008). Does “passing the Courvoisier” always pay off? Positive and negative evaluative conditioning effects of brand placements in music videos. Psychology & Marketing, 25, 923–943.
38.
ShimpT. A. (1991) Neo-Pavlovian conditioning and its implications for consumer research. In RobertsonT. S.KassarjianH. H. (Eds.), Handbook of consumer behavior (pp. 162–187). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
39.
SobhR.SinghN.ChunW.BenmamounM. (2018). Localizing to Arabic consumers: Insights from print advertising. Journal of Marketing Communications, 24, 190–211.
40.
StuartE. W.ShimpT. A.EngleR. W. (1987). Classical conditioning of consumer attitudes: Four experiments in an advertising context. Journal of Consumer Research, 84, 334–349.
41.
TaylorC. R. (2005). Moving international advertising research forward. Journal of Advertising, 34(1), 7–16.
42.
TillB. D. (1998). Using celebrity endorsers effectively: Lessons from associative learning. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 7, 400–409.
43.
TillB. D.BuslerM. (2000). The match-up hypothesis: Physical attractiveness, expertise, and the role of fit on brand attitude, purchase intent, and brand beliefs. Journal of Advertising, 29(3), 1–13.
44.
TillB. D.PriluckR. L. (2000). Stimulus generalization in classical conditioning: An initial investigation and extension. Psychology & Marketing, 17, 55–72.
45.
TillB. D.StanleyS. M.PriluckR. L. (2008). Classical conditioning and celebrity endorsers: An examination of belongingness and resistance to extinction. Psychology & Marketing, 25, 179–196.
46.
VarnumM. E. W.GrossmannI.KitayamaS.NisbettR. E. (2010). The origin of cultural differences in cognition: Evidence for the social orientation hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19(1), 9–13.
47.
WilsonR. T.BaackD. W.TillB. D. (2015). Creativity, attention, and memory for brands: An outdoor advertising field study. International Journal of Advertising, 34, 232–261.
48.
WilsonR. T.CasperJ. (2016). The role of location and visual saliency in capturing attention to outdoor advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 34, 259–273.
49.
WilsonR. T.SuhT. (2018). Advertising to the masses: The effects of crowding on the attention to place-based advertising. International Journal of Advertising, 37, 402–420.
50.
WilsonR. T.TillB. D. (2011). Effects of outdoor advertising: Does location matter?Psychology & Marketing, 28, 909–993.
51.
WürtzE. (2005). A cross-cultural analysis of websites from high-context cultures and low-context cultures. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11, 274–299.
